Martin, Mehwish

Background: According to past studies, recovery and survival following severe vascular events such as acute myocardial infarction and stroke are negatively impacted by vitamin D deficiency. However, the national estimate on disability-related burden is unclear. We intend to evaluate the prevalence and outcomes of vitamin D deficiency (VDD) among patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and cerebrovascular disorder (CeVD). Methods: We performed a cross-sectional study on the Nationwide Inpatient Sample data (2016–2017) of adult (≥18 years) hospitalizations. We identified patients with a secondary diagnosis of VDD and a primary diagnosis of CVD and CeVD using the 9th revision of the International Classification of Diseases, clinical modification code (ICD-10-CM) codes. A univariate and mixed-effect multivariable survey logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the prevalence, disability, and discharge disposition of patients with CVD and CeVD in the presence of VDD. Results: Among 58,259,589 USA hospitalizations, 3.44%, 2.15%, 0.06%, 1.28%, 11.49%, 1.71%, 0.38%, 0.23%, and 0.08% had primary admission of IHD, acute MI, angina, AFib, CHF, AIS, TIA, ICeH, and SAH, respectively and 1.82% had VDD. The prevalence of hospitalizations due to CHF (14.66% vs. 11.43%), AIS (1.87% vs. 1.71%), and TIA (0.4% vs. 0.38%) was higher among VDD patients as compared with non-VDD patients (p < 0.0001). In a regression analysis, as compare with non-VDD patients, the VDD patients were associated with higher odds of discharge to non-home facilities with an admission diagnosis of CHF (aOR 1.08, 95% CI 1.07–1.09), IHD (aOR 1.24, 95% CI 1.21–1.28), acute MI (aOR 1.23, 95% CI 1.19–1.28), AFib (aOR 1.21, 95% CI 1.16–1.27), and TIA (aOR 1.19, 95% CI 1.11–1.28). VDD was associated with higher odds of severe or extreme disability among patients hospitalized with AIS (aOR 1.1, 95% CI 1.06–1.14), ICeH (aOR 1.22, 95% CI 1.08–1.38), TIA (aOR 1.36, 95% CI 1.25–1.47), IHD (aOR 1.37, 95% CI 1.33–1.41), acute MI (aOR 1.44, 95% CI 1.38–1.49), AFib (aOR 1.10, 95% CI 1.06–1.15), and CHF (aOR 1.03, 95% CI 1.02–1.05) as compared with non-VDD. Conclusions: CVD and CeVD in the presence of VDD increase the disability and discharge to non-home facilities among USA hospitalizations. Future studies should be planned to evaluate the effect of VDD replacement for improving outcomes.

Introduction: Previous studies had provided evidence that vitamin D deficiency is a strong negative predictor for survival and recovery after severe vascular events but national estimate on disability related burden is not clear. Hypothesis: We evaluate the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency (VDD) amongst patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and cerebrovascular disorders (CeVD) and to find out whether or not CVD and CeVD in the presence of VDD increases the disability. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample data (years 2016-2017) in adults (≥18 years) hospitalizations. We identified patients with secondary diagnosis of VDD and primary diagnosis of CVD (AFib, CHF, IHD, acute MI, and angina) and CeVD (AIS, TIA, ICeH and SAH) using ICD-10-CM codes. We performed a chi-square test and multivariable survey logistic regression to analyze disability of patients with CVD and CeVD in presence of VDD. Disability/loss of function was investigated by APRDRGs severity using 3M Health Information Systems software. (Score 1-4 indicates minor to extreme loss of function) Results: Among 58,259,589 US hospitalizations, 3.44%, 2.15%, 0.06%, 1.28%, 11.49%, 1.71%, 0.38%, 0.23% and 0.08% had primary admission of IHD, acute MI, angina, AFib, CHF, AIS, TIA, ICeH and SAH, respectively and 1.82% had VDD. Prevalence of hospitalizations due to CHF (14.66% vs 11.43%), AIS (1.87% vs 1.71%) and TIA (0.4% vs 0.38%) was higher; and IHD (2.62% vs 3.45%), acute MI (1.58% vs 2.16), angina (0.05% vs 0.06%), AFib (1.14% vs 1.28%), ICeH (0.17% vs 0.23%) and SAH (0.05% vs 0.08%) was lower among VDD patients in compare to non-VDD. (p<0.0001) In regression analysis, VDD was associated with higher odds of severe or extreme disability amongst patients hospitalized with AIS (OR:1.1; 95%CI:1.06-1.14), ICeH (1.22; 1.08-1.39), TIA (1.36; 1.25-1.47), IHD (1.37; 1.33-1.41), acute MI (1.44; 1.38-1.49), Afib (1.10; 1.06-1.15), and CHF (1.03; 1.02-1.05) in comparison to without VDD. Conclusions: CVD and CeVD in presence of VDD increase the disability amongst US hospitalizations. Future studies should be planned to evaluate the discharge outcomes as well as the effect of identification and in-hospital management of VDD on improvement of the outcomes.

Introduction: COVID-19 has multiorgan involvement and it is believed that outcomes are poor amongst patients with hypertension (HTN) and pre-existing cardiovascular disorders (CVD). Hypothesis: The objective of this meta-analysis is to evaluate outcomes [mortality and invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) utilization] of COVID-19 in patients with pre-existing HTN and CVD. Methods: English full-text-observational studies having data on epidemiological characteristics of patients with COVID-19 were identified searching PubMed using MeSH-terms from December 1, 2019, to April 30, 2020. Studies having CVD or HTN as one of the pre-existing comorbidities and described outcomes including IMV and mortality were selected with a consensus of three reviewers. 29 studies met these criteria. Following MOOSE protocol, data on patients’ characteristics especially age and history of CVD, HTN, IMV, and mortality were pooled using a random-effects model. The pooled prevalence of CVD and HTN were calculated. Meta-regression was performed and correlation coefficient (r) and odds ratio (OR) were estimated to evaluate the effects of pre-existing CVD and HTN on outcomes of COVID-19 patients. Results: Out of 29 studies with COVID-19 epidemiology data, 21, 17, 18 and 19 studies have details on mortality, IMV, HTN, and pre-existing CVD, respectively. Pooled prevalence of HTN was 28.2% [95%CI:22.1%-35.1%; p<0.001; 4858/11626 patients; Heterogeneity (I 2 ):97.8%] and pre-existing CVD was 12.2% [8.9%-16.6%; p<0.001; 2044/11664 patients; I 2 :96.8%]. In age-adjusted meta-regression analysis, IMV was significantly higher among COVID-19 patients with pre-existing CVD [r:0.28; OR:1.3 (1.1-1.6); I 2 :89.7%; p=0.0028] without significant association with HTN [r:0.01; OR:1.0 (0.9-1.1); I 2 :95.9%; p=0.8161]. HTN [r:0.001; OR:1.0 (0.9-1.1); I 2 :96%; p=0.9685] and pre-existing CVD [r:-0.01; OR:0.9 (0.9-1.1); I 2 :96.3%; p=0.8772] had no significant association with mortality amongst COVID-19 patients. Conclusion: In the age-adjusted analysis, though we identified pre-existing CVD as a risk factor for higher utilization of IMV, pre-existing CVD and HTN had no independent role in increasing mortality.