Singh, Harmandeep

Background: According to past studies, recovery and survival following severe vascular events such as acute myocardial infarction and stroke are negatively impacted by vitamin D deficiency. However, the national estimate on disability-related burden is unclear. We intend to evaluate the prevalence and outcomes of vitamin D deficiency (VDD) among patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and cerebrovascular disorder (CeVD). Methods: We performed a cross-sectional study on the Nationwide Inpatient Sample data (2016–2017) of adult (≥18 years) hospitalizations. We identified patients with a secondary diagnosis of VDD and a primary diagnosis of CVD and CeVD using the 9th revision of the International Classification of Diseases, clinical modification code (ICD-10-CM) codes. A univariate and mixed-effect multivariable survey logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the prevalence, disability, and discharge disposition of patients with CVD and CeVD in the presence of VDD. Results: Among 58,259,589 USA hospitalizations, 3.44%, 2.15%, 0.06%, 1.28%, 11.49%, 1.71%, 0.38%, 0.23%, and 0.08% had primary admission of IHD, acute MI, angina, AFib, CHF, AIS, TIA, ICeH, and SAH, respectively and 1.82% had VDD. The prevalence of hospitalizations due to CHF (14.66% vs. 11.43%), AIS (1.87% vs. 1.71%), and TIA (0.4% vs. 0.38%) was higher among VDD patients as compared with non-VDD patients (p < 0.0001). In a regression analysis, as compare with non-VDD patients, the VDD patients were associated with higher odds of discharge to non-home facilities with an admission diagnosis of CHF (aOR 1.08, 95% CI 1.07–1.09), IHD (aOR 1.24, 95% CI 1.21–1.28), acute MI (aOR 1.23, 95% CI 1.19–1.28), AFib (aOR 1.21, 95% CI 1.16–1.27), and TIA (aOR 1.19, 95% CI 1.11–1.28). VDD was associated with higher odds of severe or extreme disability among patients hospitalized with AIS (aOR 1.1, 95% CI 1.06–1.14), ICeH (aOR 1.22, 95% CI 1.08–1.38), TIA (aOR 1.36, 95% CI 1.25–1.47), IHD (aOR 1.37, 95% CI 1.33–1.41), acute MI (aOR 1.44, 95% CI 1.38–1.49), AFib (aOR 1.10, 95% CI 1.06–1.15), and CHF (aOR 1.03, 95% CI 1.02–1.05) as compared with non-VDD. Conclusions: CVD and CeVD in the presence of VDD increase the disability and discharge to non-home facilities among USA hospitalizations. Future studies should be planned to evaluate the effect of VDD replacement for improving outcomes.

Introduction: COVID-19 has multiorgan involvement and it is believed that outcomes are poor amongst patients with hypertension (HTN) and pre-existing cardiovascular disorders (CVD). Hypothesis: The objective of this meta-analysis is to evaluate outcomes [mortality and invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) utilization] of COVID-19 in patients with pre-existing HTN and CVD. Methods: English full-text-observational studies having data on epidemiological characteristics of patients with COVID-19 were identified searching PubMed using MeSH-terms from December 1, 2019, to April 30, 2020. Studies having CVD or HTN as one of the pre-existing comorbidities and described outcomes including IMV and mortality were selected with a consensus of three reviewers. 29 studies met these criteria. Following MOOSE protocol, data on patients’ characteristics especially age and history of CVD, HTN, IMV, and mortality were pooled using a random-effects model. The pooled prevalence of CVD and HTN were calculated. Meta-regression was performed and correlation coefficient (r) and odds ratio (OR) were estimated to evaluate the effects of pre-existing CVD and HTN on outcomes of COVID-19 patients. Results: Out of 29 studies with COVID-19 epidemiology data, 21, 17, 18 and 19 studies have details on mortality, IMV, HTN, and pre-existing CVD, respectively. Pooled prevalence of HTN was 28.2% [95%CI:22.1%-35.1%; p<0.001; 4858/11626 patients; Heterogeneity (I 2 ):97.8%] and pre-existing CVD was 12.2% [8.9%-16.6%; p<0.001; 2044/11664 patients; I 2 :96.8%]. In age-adjusted meta-regression analysis, IMV was significantly higher among COVID-19 patients with pre-existing CVD [r:0.28; OR:1.3 (1.1-1.6); I 2 :89.7%; p=0.0028] without significant association with HTN [r:0.01; OR:1.0 (0.9-1.1); I 2 :95.9%; p=0.8161]. HTN [r:0.001; OR:1.0 (0.9-1.1); I 2 :96%; p=0.9685] and pre-existing CVD [r:-0.01; OR:0.9 (0.9-1.1); I 2 :96.3%; p=0.8772] had no significant association with mortality amongst COVID-19 patients. Conclusion: In the age-adjusted analysis, though we identified pre-existing CVD as a risk factor for higher utilization of IMV, pre-existing CVD and HTN had no independent role in increasing mortality.