Markovic, Svetomir N.

Abstract Abstract 464 Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) are important, albeit incompletely characterized, immune regulatory cells which suppress host anti-tumor immunity in malignancies like melanoma. We sought to address 3 outstanding questions in the present study: i) does tumor burden drive the expansion of MDSC; ii) do MDSC express immunosuppressive B7-H family members,;iii) are MDSC depleted following chemotherapy administration. As MDSC expand in response to tumor-derived factors, including those elevated in melanoma patients, we hypothesized that the frequency of MDSC present in the peripheral blood of melanoma patients may be dependent on tumor stage. Therefore, PBMC were obtained from both normal donors and melanoma patients with all stages of disease (stage I, n=10; stage II, n=10; stage III, n=10; stage IV, n=47). A discreet population of CD14+HLA-DR-/lo MDSC was appreciated in samples obtained from melanoma patients, but was largely absent in normal donors. Approximately 0.5% of PBMC were CD14+HLA-DR-/lo in normal donors. In contrast, the frequency of these cells progressively increased with tumor stage in melanoma. While a two-fold increase in CD14+HLA-DR-/lo MDSC was observed in stage I patients, this difference did not reach statistical significance. In contrast, a significant increase in CD14+HLA-DR-/lo MDSC was observed in patients with stage II-IV disease (2.2% Stage II, p<.01; 3.4% stage III, p<.001; 13.2% stage IV, p<.001). While the observed range (range: 0.8-66.3%) in frequency of CD14+HLA-DR-/lo MDSC was broad in stage IV melanoma, these cells comprised more than 10% of total PBMC in the majority of patients. Various B7 homologues (e.g. B7-H1, B7-H2, B7-H3 and B7-H4) may inhibit T-cell activation, proliferation and cytokine production or promote the induction of T-cell apoptosis and unresponsiveness. Due to their immunosuppressive affects, and expression by tumor cells or immune regulatory cells (e.g. Treg, MDSC), these B7-H members are associated with adverse outcomes in multiple human malignancies. As the expression of these important immunoregulatory molecules on MDSC is unknown, we sought to determine whether CD14+HLA-DR-/lo MDSC in melanoma may express B7-H family members. Therefore, PBMC from patients with metastatic melanoma were stained with either an isotype control or antibodies against B7-H1, B7-H2, B7-H3 or B7-H4. In all cases, B7-H family members were more highly expressed on CD14+HLA-DR-/lo MDSC when compared with the expression observed on CD14+ cells from normal donors. While B7-H1 (p<.01), B7-H2 (p<.001) and B7-H4 (p<.01) were preferentially expressed on HLA-DR-/lo cells in melanoma patients, B7-H3 was more highly expressed on both HLA-DR+ (p<.05) and HLA-DR-/lo (p<.001) CD14+ cells. Serial blood samples, both at baseline and at least 12 weeks after therapy, were availabel for 10 patients with metastatic melanoma undergoing therapy wither either carboplatin and nanoparticle albumin bound paclitaxel (nab paclitaxel; n=6) or carboplatin, paclitaxel and bevacizumab (n=4). The frequency of both CD14+HLA-DR-/lo MDSC and conventional CD14+HLA-DR+ monocytes was determined both before and after chemotherapy. An approximately 50% reduction in the frequency of CD14+HLA-DR-/lo MDSC was observed following chemotherapy (p=.004), with no significant reduction in the frequency of conventional HLA-DR+ monocytes (p=.08). Collectively, the data presented implicates multiple B7-H family members in MDSC-mediated immune suppression and demonstrates that the expansion of B7-H+CD14+HLA-DR-/lo MDSC in melanoma is directly associated with the tumor burden, but may be abrogated by the administration of taxane-based chemotherapy. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

138 Background: Clinical management of metastatic melanoma (MM) after PD-1 blockade failure remains challenging and lacks a standard of care. Chemo-immunotherapy (CIT) combinations have demonstrated favorable efficacy and safety profiles in lung cancer patients. In this study, we compared the clinical outcomes of CIT with immunotherapy or chemotherapy alone after PD-1 blockade failure. Methods: We reviewed MM patients seen at Mayo Clinic between Jan, 2012 and Jun, 2018 who failed anti-PD1 therapy and received subsequent CIT, or immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) or chemotherapy alone. A total of 60 patients were analyzed, the CIT cohort [n=33 (55%)] treatment consisted of carboplatin/paclitaxel (n=29), nab-paclitaxel (n=2), paclitaxel (n=1), and temozolomide (n=1). In the ICI (n=9) or chemotherapy alone cohort (n=18) [n=27 (45%)], treatment consisted of carboplatin/paclitaxel (n=11), temozolomide (n=4), nab-paclitaxel (n=3), ipilimumab/nivolumab (n=4), pembrolizumab (n=4), or nivolumab (n=1). Results: Patients in the CIT cohort had a median OS of 3.5 years (95% CI: 1.7-NR) compared to 1.8 years (95% CI: 0.9-2) in the ICI or chemotherapy alone cohort, p=0.02. The median EFS following CIT was 7.6 months (95% CI: 6-10) compared to 3.4 months (95% CI: 2.8-4.1) following either ICI or chemotherapy alone, p=0.0005. A trend towards longer median EFS with use of CIT was seen in patients with BRAF wild-type [median 9 months (95% CI: 6-12)] compared to those harboring a BRAF mutation [median 6.5 months (95% CI: 1.8-9.1), p=0.29]. Side effects were similar among both groups. Conclusions: In MM patients who have failed anti-PD-1 therapy, the CIT combination showed favorable clinical outcomes and acceptable safety profile. This regimen should be considered for MM pts in this setting who have limited treatment options. [Table: see text]

e21058 Background: Recent clinical advances in cancer immuno-therapeutics underscore the need for improved understanding of the complex relationship between cancer and the multiple, multi-functional, inter-dependent, cellular and humoral mediators/regulators of the human immune system. This will lead to improvements in the efficacy of existing immune therapies (patient selection; drug combinations) and insight into new therapeutic targets that may significantly reduce the time to new therapeutics discoveries capable of meaningful clinical impacts. Methods: A systems analysis approach (Cancer Immune Control Dynamics, CICD) attempts to identify the differences between systemic immune homeostasis of healthy volunteers versus patients with metastatic malignant melanoma based on serial measurements of a set of conventional peripheral blood biomarkers of immune function (15 cell subsets and 35 cytokines) assessed daily over 7-10 days. The modeling strategy takes aerospace engineering control theory and system identification algorithms to analyze the state of an individual’s immune system based on the biomarkers’ dynamic non-linear oscillatory behaviors. The analysis framework builds on the classical predator-prey equations commonly used to model biological system dynamics. Tens of thousands of biologically possible biomarker interactions are modeled by a set of matrix equations that creates a system interaction model. CICD quantifies the system equations with biomarker values and solves it to measure the interactions. Results: Quantification of thousands of unique biomarker relationships per participant enables classification based on their immune profile rather than their clinical diagnosis and a basis for a visualization of a person’s immunity state. Conclusions: Results provide initial evidence that a model-based analysis of serially collected biomarker data can lead to biological insights into human immunity, of potential benefit in clinical decisions. It is anticipated that CICD-based capabilities will provide tools to specifically address cancer and treatment modulated (immune checkpoint inhibitors) parameters of human immunity, revealing clinically relevant biological interactions.

e21039 Background: Tumor-infiltrating neutrophils (TINs) and their myeloid precursors play an important role in cancer biology. While activated neutrophils have been shown to kill tumor cells, there is growing evidence that neutrophils may also support tumor progression by impairing T cell-dependent anti-tumor immunity. We hypothesized that low TINs would be associated with better responses to immunotherapy (IO). Methods: Pretreatment biopsies from 15 metastatic melanoma (MM) pts treated with anti-CTL4 and anti-PD-1 therapy from 2012-17 were collected and stained with myeloperoxidase (MPO). Slides were scanned at 40x magnification on the Aperio ScanScope AT Turbo brightfield instrument (Leica Biosystems) at a resolution of 0.25 microns per pixel. To indicate the region of analysis, the digital pen tool was used to trace a minimum 85% of tumor. Ten fixed-sized boxes were placed on the hottest staining region in a second annotation layer on the image. The boxes equaled 1mm2 in total area. If the tumor tracing had an area of 1mm2, or less, boxes were not placed on the image. The selected tissue was analyzed using an Aperio imaging quatification algorithm . The number of 3+ cells were considered positive for neutrophils and used in subsequent calculations. Quality control review was performed on a subset of cases by Anatomic Pathologists. Response to therapy was assessed using the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST). Overall survival (OS) was calculated using the Kaplan Meier method. Results: The median number of treatment lines before the biopsy was 1 (range 0-2). The treatment immediately following the biopsy consisted of ipilimumab (n = 10, 66.6%), pembrolizumab (n = 4, 26.6%), ipilimumab/nivolumab (n = 1, 6.6%). The median number of neutrophils in the biopsy hotspot was 92/mm2 (range 6-219) for the entire cohort. For patients achieving PR and CR after 4 cycles of therapy, the median neutrophils were 36/mm2 (IQ 14-78) while the median was 106/mm2 (IQ 60-138) for patients who had progressive disease,( p = 0.04). There was no correlation between the numbers of neutrophils in the biopsy with the absolute neutrophil count in the peripheral blood (R value: 0.012). Conclusions: Decreased TINs are significantly associated with better responses to IO in MM pts. Measurements of TINs may help to select patients who are likely to benefit from anti-CTL4 and anti-PD-1 therapy. Additionally, exploration of whether combining therapies that decrease neutrophils intratumorally should be explored.

9535 Background: A broad understanding of baseline immunity is needed in order to predict responses to PD-1 blockade. We previously reported in a preclinical model that elevated Th1 signature cytokines are present after successful therapy with PD-1 blockade. In this study we evaluated serum cytokines as biomarkers of response in a cohort of patients with metastatic melanoma undergoing anti-PD1 therapy. Methods: 27 pts diagnosed with metastatic melanoma (MM) received anti-PD-1 therapy and had peripheral blood collected prior to anti-PD-1 therapy start and 12 weeks after; 55 proinflammatory-related serum cytokines were analyzed at both times using the Meso Scale Discovery (MSD) assay. At week 12, we identified 15 pts who had radiographic complete or partial response (TR) and 12 had progressive disease (PD) using RECIST criteria. Spearman rank correlation coefficients (rho) were used to assess association between pre-treatment serum cytokine levels. For each cytokine, differences in pretreatment serum levels and the ratio of the 12 week to pre-treatment serum levels between TR and PD groups were assessed using Wilcoxon rank sum tests. Results: Pretreatment serum IL-12p40 and MIP3a (CCL20) were moderately correlated (rho=0.3944). Pretreatment IL-12p40 and was found to be significantly higher (p=0.0025) in the TR group (median=48.5; 25th to 75th percentile [IQR]:25.3-63.8) relative to the PD group (median=17.3; IQR: 8.6-30.3). Pretreatment MIP3a was also found to be significantly higher (p=0.0359) in the TR group (median=1.72; IQR: 1.41-2.65) relative to the PD group (median=1.33; IQR: 1.09-1.98). The 12th week pretreatment IL-12p40 ratio (median=1.98; IQR: 1.4-11.3) in the TR group was greater than that (median=0.64; IQR: 0.23-1.61) in the PD group (p=0.0029); we identified that baseline serum levels >15pg/ml of IL12p40 prior to immunotherapy were associated with significantly prolonged event free survival (p=0.001). Conclusions: Measurements of IL-12p40 and MIP-3a levels before immunotherapy may help to select patients who are likely to benefit from anti-PD1 therapy. Additionally, exploration of combination therapies that increase IL-12P40 and MIP3 prior or during immunotherapy should be undertaken.

6592 Background: Sex, age and ECOG performance status (PS) may affect immune response and the efficacy of cancer immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). We did a meta-analysis to assess the potential sex, age and ECOG PS differences of immunotherapy efficacy in advanced cancer. Methods: PubMed was searched up to January 15, 2019 for randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced cancer treated with ICI immunotherapy vs control therapy (without ICI). For sex difference analysis, pooled hazard ratio (HR) of death for men and women was calculated separately, and the heterogeneity between the two estimates was assessed using an interaction test by pooling study-specific interaction HR. Age ( < 65 vs ≥65) and ECOG PS (0 vs ≥1) difference was analyzed similarly. Subgroup analysis by cancer type and line of therapy (frontline vs subsequent) was explored. All analyses were done in Comprehensive Meta Analysis (v2) with random effects models. Results: Thirty phase 2/3 RCTs involving 17,728 patients were included. An OS benefit of immunotherapy was found for both men (HR 0.75, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.69-0.81, P < 0.01) and women (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.69-0.90, P < 0.01); for both younger ( < 65; HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.68-0.83, P < 0.01) and older (≥65; HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.69-0.83, P < 0.01) patients; and for both ECOG PS 0 (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.69-0.89, P < 0.01) and PS ≥1 (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.71-0.84, P < 0.01) patients. No significant difference of relative benefit from immunotherapy over control therapy was found in patients with different sex ( P = 0.283), age ( P = 0.906) or ECOG PS ( P = 0.783). In melanoma RCTs, compared with women (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.64-0.94, P < 0.01), men (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.42-0.76, P < 0.01) had more OS benefit from immunotherapy ( P = 0.037). No significant difference was found in other subgroup analyses by cancer types or line of therapy. Conclusions: Overall we found no evidence of association of sex, age, or ECOG PS with cancer immunotherapy efficacy. However, in melanoma, men might benefit more from immunotherapy than women.