Christensen, Jon M.

Introduction The safety of operating room extubation (ORE) immediately following cardiac surgery via median sternotomy remains unclear. However, reported outcomes in the setting of parasternal regional analgesia are limited. This study examined the safety of ORE for patients who received postoperative superficial parasternal intercostal plane (SPIP) blocks following median sternotomy for cardiac surgery. Methods Single-center retrospective cohort study from January 2020 to September 2023 compared the outcomes of adult cardiac surgical patients who were either extubated in the operating room immediately after surgery with SPIP blocks (ORE-B), received SPIP blocks and were extubated in the intensive care unit within 6 hours (FTE-B) or did not receive SPIP blocks and were extubated in the intensive care unit within 6 hours (FTE). Assessed outcomes were reintubation, use of non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV), intensive care unit (ICU) readmission, return to OR, postoperative transfusion, ICU and hospital length of stay. Results 2294 patients were studied, which included 256 ORE-B patients, 729 FTE-B patients and 1,309 FTE patients. Differences in reintubation rates (1.2% vs 0.7% vs 1.2%, all p≥0.26) and use of NIPPV (4.8% vs 4.8% vs 5.1%, all p≥0.743) did not differ between ORE-B, FTE-B, and FTE groups, respectively. Time to extubation differed between FTE-B and FTE groups (2.5 hours vs 3.8 hours, p=<0.001), respectively. Additionally, hospital length of stay was significantly shorter for groups ORE-B and FTE-B compared with group FTE (5 days vs 5 days vs 6 days), respectively. Conclusions Selective ORE after median sternotomy for cardiac surgery was not associated with an increased risk of reintubation and NIPPV use in the setting of parasternal regional analgesia.

Introduction Superficial parasternal intercostal plane blocks have grown in clinical use for cardiac surgery as a targeted fascial plane block for median sternotomy. Despite this, there remains no consensus on technique for optimal parasternal spread of injectate. The primary objective of this cadaveric study was to evaluate parasternal spread of injectate of single versus two-level superficial parasternal intercostal plane injections with the needle tip positioned on the anterior surface of the costal cartilage. Methods We performed 10 single-level injections at T4 and 10 two-level injections at T3 and T5 on alternating sides in 10 fresh frozen cadavers. All injections were ultrasound guided with a parasagittal ultrasound probe orientation and an in-plane needle orientation. Anatomic dissections were performed immediately following injections. Results Parasternal spread of injectate was greater with two-level injections at T3 and T5 costal cartilages than with single-level injections at the T4 costal cartilage, with two-level injections consistently spreading to the T2–T5 intercostal spaces. Median (Q1, Q3) intercostal space spread for single-level injections was 2.0 (2.0–2.5). Median (Q1, Q3) intercostal space spread for two-level injections was 4.0 (4.0–4.375). Conclusions Two-level injections with the needle tip located on the anterior surface of the costal cartilage resulted in improved parasternal spread compared with single-level injections.

BackgroundPlatelet (PLT) transfusions are an important component of hemostatic resuscitation. The AABB has published several guidelines recommending that PLT units should not be infused through blood warming devices.Study Design and MethodsThirty‐one units of hospital blood bank apheresis PLTs were obtained. PLT‐rich plasma (PRP) aggregometry and thromboelastography (TEG) were performed on the unit samples before and after the units were infused through a Ranger blood/fluid warming device.ResultsThere were no differences in any of the aggregometry results before and after infusion of the PLTs through the blood warmer (all P > .32). There was a significant reduction in the TEG maximum amplitude (MA) of 69.8 ± 7.9 mm before and 66.0 ± 8.8 mm after (P < .001) infusion of the PLTs through the blood warmer and α angle 61.8 ± 9.4° before and 59.3 ± 8.2° after (P = .044) infusion of the PLTs through the blood warmer, although both mean values were within normal range for the TEG and not clinically significant. There were very good correlations of aggregometry and TEG results before and after infusion of the PLTs through the blood warmer device.ConclusionThis study did not demonstrate significant deleterious effect on PLT function from infusing apheresis PLT units through a blood warming device by PRP aggregometry. We did detect a statistically significant—but not clinically significant—reduction in TEG MA and α angle. The prohibition of transfusing PLT units though the Ranger blood warming device is not indicated.