Kay, Neil E.

Abstract Abstract 3928 Background: Accumulating data support the critical role of PI3K/Akt in CLL B cell receptor (BCR) mediated signal transduction, cell proliferation and survival. In addition recent preclinical and clinical studies indicate that specific PI3K blockade results in robust preclinical and clinical efficacy in CLL. In our model system of CLL B cell-stromal cultures which feature their interaction, platelet derived growth factor (PDGF) present in CLL culture medium drives VEGF production through PI3K/Akt activation in stromal cells (Blood. 2010. 116:2984). Indeed Akt was found to be activated in leukemic cells during the CLL-stroma interaction (Leuk Res. 2008. 32:1565). Therefore, we hypothesized that Akt inhibition should promote CLL B cell apoptosis and abrogate BCR mediated cytokine production. MK2206 is an orally bioavailable highly specific allosteric Akt inhibitor. It has been tested in patients with refractory solid tumors and was demonstrated to be safely administered in a phase I trial. Therefore the goal of this study was to test the preclinical efficacy of MK2206 on both the survival and the BCR mediated cytokine production of CLL leukemic B cells. Methods: Peripheral blood mononuclear cells isolated from CLL patients (n=37) were treated with escalating concentrations of MK2206 (1–16 μM) for 24 hours, 48 hours or 72 hours. The levels of leukemic B cell viability were tested using an (3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) (MTT) assay. The potential impact (antagonistic/additive/synergistic) of Bendamustine in combination with MK2206 was also tested by using the MTT assay. We used the Calcusyn system to calculate the effect of drug interactions. The combination index (CI) as calculated by the program usually indicates synergy when ≤ 0.8 and indicates additive outcomes when between 0.8–1.2. A CI >1.2 indicates antagonism. Downstream signals of Akt activation in CLL B cells were evaluated by testing their expression of Mcl-1, 4EBP1 and p70S6K using immunoblot. The impact of Akt inhibition by MK2206 on cytokine production in response to B-cell receptor ligation with anti-IgM was also tested using a multiplex cytokine analysis (Invitrogen) in a time-course experiment. Results: MK2206 treatment induced concentration- and time-dependent apoptosis in CLL leukemic cells. At 72 hours, the IC50 of MK2206 in the experiments using CLL leukemic cells in vitro is ∼8 mM. MK2206 incubation at 1 or 5 mM cultured with CLL B cells over a 48-hour period abolished of Akt and p70S6K phosphorylation while native PARP was cleaved into the 85 kD polypeptide fragment. However, the expression level of the upstream signal molecule, PI3K, was not changed. Among the CLL patients tested (n = 37), we did not find any difference in sensitivity to MK2206 induced apoptosis based on critical prognostic factors of CD38, ZAP-70, IGHV and del(17p) status. Importantly, we detected synergistic or additive activity between MK2206 and Bendamustine in 11 tested CLL samples when these combinations were used to treat CLL cells in vitro for 72hrs. Thus the median CI value for this group of patients was 0.8 (0.1 – 1.1). Six were found to have CI ≤ 0.8 and five fell within the additive CI values (0.8 – 1.2). Production of immune or chemotactic cytokines (e.g. CCL3, CCL4, MCP-1, IL-1Ra, IL-8 and IL-2R) at 24 hour incubation increased significantly above baseline when CLL cells were stimulated anti-IgM. Akt inhibition with MK2206 selectively abrogated upregulation of CCL3, CCL4, MCP-1 and IL-2R production, but not for IL-8 or IL-1Ra secretion. MK2206 also abolished BCR mediated Akt activation and decreased Erk activation. Conclusion: MK2206, a robust and selective Akt inhibitor, induced significant in vitro apoptosis of CLL B-cells in vitro. Preclinical evidence of a synergistic effect between MK2206 and Bendamustine was also observed independent of prognostic risk. MK2206 abolished BCR mediated Akt activation and selectively abrogates BCR mediated production of cytokines that may promote apoptotic resistance. These findings support the use of MK2206 in treating CLL and indeed we have initiated a phase I/II trial of MK2206 in combination with Bendamustine and Rituximab for relapsed CLL patients(N1087, October 2011). Acknowledgments: This study was funded by the NCI-K23, NCCTG and CLL Global Foundation. Disclosures: Shanafelt: Cephalon: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding. Kumar:Genzyme: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria. Kay:Celgene: Research Funding.

Abstract Abstract 1614 Poster Board I-640 Background Cytogenetic abnormalities in B-cell CLL are important prognostic indicators for predicting disease progression and treatment response. Until recently, only interphase cytogenetics has been readily applicable to clinical use in CLL due to the inability of traditional mitogens to promote effective metaphase cytogenetic identification. Recently, cytokine or CpG oligonucleotide stimulation has been utilized to promote efficient metaphase analysis. One concern with this approach is the actual clonality and reproducibility of such clones when examined by different cytogenetic laboratories. The CLL Research Consortium (CRC) conducted a prospective trial to test (1) whether CpG would enhance detection of abnormal clones and (2) whether the CRC cytogenetic laboratories would achieve similar results when testing the same patient samples. Methods Initially, one laboratory compared stimulation of CLL cells using CpG versus pokeweed mitogen (PWM) + 12-O-tetradecanoyl-phorbol-13-acetate (TPA) in the same samples. To test the reproducibility of CpG stimulation, fresh blood samples from 1 normal control and 12 CLL patients were collected at one site and distributed (blinded to phenotype and prior cytogenetic results) to 5 CRC cytogenetic laboratories where they were cultured for 3 days using CpG stimulation, harvested, banded and analyzed utilizing standard laboratory procedures. When possible, each laboratory analyzed 20 metaphases per case. Interphase FISH analysis for CLL (including probes for chromosomes 6q, 11q, 12, 13q, 17p, and IGH/CCND1) was also done on each sample. Results In the PWM+TPA versus CpG comparison, more cases were found to have clonal abnormalities with CpG stimulation (147 of 229, 64%) than with PWM+TPA (110 of 229, 48%; P=0.0005). All clonal abnormalities detected in the PWM+TPA cultures were also observed in the CpG cultures. In the 5-laboratory CpG comparison, the results were compiled and compared to the concurrent FISH results. The CpG karyotypes were concordant with the FISH results. The control case had a normal CpG-stimulated karyotype in all 5 laboratories. Three cases exhibited a complex karyotype; one of these also exhibited 11q-, one had 17p-, and one had neither. The cytogenetic descriptions varied modestly among labs, but all identified the complex clones. Every case including the control exhibited some nonclonal abnormal cells, but no pattern was detected among the 5 labs. When an abnormal clone was found by only 1 or 2 labs, it was present in only a very small number of cells. A small 13q- clone was observed in 2 cases in 1 and 2 labs (3 of 20 and 5 of 50 cells, respectively), and was confirmed by interphase FISH. A single lab found 2 of 30 cells with a t(12;15) in one case. Conclusions Abnormal clones in CLL are more readily detected with CpG stimulation than with traditional B-cell mitogens. The clonal abnormalities revealed by CpG stimulation are consistent with the “gold standard” interphase FISH results, and are reproducible among different cytogenetic laboratories. We have no evidence that CpG oligonucleotides create new clonal B-cell populations in vitro during 3 days of cell culture. CpG stimulation in vitro reveals clonal cytogenetic abnormalities and complexity in CLL that should be evaluated as potential independent prognostic parameters. Disclosures Kay: Biogenc-Idec, Celgene, Genentech, genmab: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech, Celgene, Hospira, Polyphenon Pharma, Sanofi-Aventis: Research Funding.

Abstract Abstract 1379 Background: Although chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) has substantially improved response rates, treatment free survival, and overall survival in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), only 40–50% of patients achieve a complete remission and the majority have residual disease when evaluated using sensitive assays for minimal residual disease (MRD). While this observation created interest in consolidation therapy, previous alemtuzumab based consolidation trials have demonstrated excess morbidity/mortality. We conducted a lenalidomide based consolidation trial for patients with previously untreated CLL who received 6 cycles of induction with pentostatin, cyclophosphamide and rituximab (PCR). Methods: Eligible patients were previously untreated and had CLL in need of treatment according to the NCI-WG criteria (Blood 111:5446). Treatment schema consisted of 6 cycles of pentostatin (2 mg/m2), cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2) and rituximab (375 mg/m2) given every 21 days (Blood 109:405). All patients completing 6 cycles of PCR, underwent complete restaging and evaluation for MRD using sensitive flow cytometry (Leukemia 21:956). Following restaging and adequate recovery of blood counts, patients received 6 mos of lenalidomide consolidation by continuous daily administration. The starting lenalidomide dose was 5 mg/day with escalation to 10 mg/day after the first cycle as tolerated. Patients again underwent complete restaging and MRD evaluation after 6 mos of lenalidomide. At the time of this restaging, MRD negative patients entered observation. Those with residual disease continued on lenalidomide and underwent repeat MRD assessment every 3 mos with cessation of lenalidomide when an MRD negative state achieved. Results: 45 patients were enrolled at Mayo Clinic between 3/2008 and 11/2009. 44 patients were eligible for treatment: 71% male, median age 65 (range: 44–78); intermediate Rai risk 61%; high Rai risk 39%. On prognostic testing 32% were CD38+, 52% Zap-70 +, 52% IGHV unmutated, and 16% had high risk FISH (del 17p13; del 11q22). 38 of 44 eligible patients (86%) completed 6 cycles of PCR induction. Adverse events deemed at least possibly related to PCR induction included 19 (43%) patients with grade 3+ hematologic toxicity and 9 (20%) with grade 3+ non-hematologic toxicity. The Overall response rate to induction was 98% with 15 CR/CRi, 3 CCR, 9 nPR, and 16 PR. Four patients with CR were also MRD negative at the completion of induction. Of 38 patients who completed induction, 34 initiated lenalidomide consolidation. Thus, by protocol intent to treat analysis, 34/44 (77%) patients starting CIT with PCR were able to receive consolidation therapy. The remaining patients were unable to initiate consolidation due to: failure to complete induction (6 patients), disease progression (1), adverse event (1) and patient refusal (2). Among the 34 patients who initiated consolidation, the median number of cycles of lenalidomide received was 5.5 (range: 1–19). Adverse events deemed at least possibly related to lenalidomide consolidation included 22 (65%) patients with grade 3+ hematologic toxicity and 4 (12%) with grade 3+ non-hematologic toxicity. Among the 34 patients who received at least 1 cycle of lenalidomide, 4 patients have improved the quality of their response to date with 11 patients still on lenalidomide at the time of this report. After median follow-up of 16 mos, 42/44 patients are alive and median duration of response has not been reached. To date 3/44 (7%) of patients have progressed to require additional treatment. Finally, since eligibility was nearly identical to our historic trial of PCR without lenalidomide consolidation, we compared the 44 patients in the present trial to the 64 patients previously treated on our PCR trial (Blood 109:405). Demographic and prognostic characteristics of the patients in the two studies were similar. With the caveat it represents comparison across phase II trials, the proportion of patients free of retreatment at 12 mos was 97% (95%CI: 91–100) for PCR-L vs. 78% (95%CI: 68–89) for PCR (Figure 1). Conclusion: We report here the first results of lenalidomide based consolidation for CLL patients receiving first-line CIT induction. Although lenalidomide consolidation appears to improve the quality of response and prolong time to retreatment, longer follow-up is necessary to determine the clinical benefit of this strategy. Disclosures: Shanafelt: Celgene: Research Funding; Hospira: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Lenalidomide. Kay:Celgene: Research Funding; Hospira: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding.

Abstract Abstract 804 Background: We have demonstrated that crosstalk between CLL B-cells and marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) can modulate the activation of both. Soluble factors in the CLL-condition media (CM) regulate the migration and proliferation of MSC. We previously found that platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) receptors were selectively activated in MSC by CLL-CM and are necessary for the downstream Akt activation in MSC. PDGF is capable of promoting vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) production in MSC; however, several questions remain unanswered. Can CLL B-cells produce PDGF; is PDGF the specific mediator in CLL-CM responsible for PDGFR activation in MSC; what is the mechanism of PDGF mediated VEGF production in MSC; and is there any clinical significance of PDGF mediated VEGF production by MSC for CLL patients? Methods: MSC were generated from CLL patients and controls as previously described. To determine the specific ligand responsible for PDGFR activation mediated by CLL-CM blocking antibody to PDGF or VEGF or both was used to neutralize the binding activity of PDGF or VEGF in the CLL-CM. Subsequently, the pattern of membrane receptor activation was evaluated using a commercially available receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) array assay. ELISA was performed to measure PDGF and VEGF levels from plasma and CM of CLL patients and normals. The protein expression of PDGF isoforms in CLL and normal B-cells was assessed using Western blot. To assess the mechanism of PDGF mediated VEGF production by MSC, we used either a PI3K inhibitor, LY294002 (20 mM), or a p38 MAPK inhibitor, SB202190 (100 nM), to block these pathways in MSC. Results: The known ligands for PDGF receptors, PDGF and VEGF, were detected in the CLL-CM (PDGF, 113.7 ± 23.6 pg/ml, VEGF, 186.94 ± 54.57 ng/ml; n = 12). We also found that PDGF is present in CLL cells by Western blot analysis and expression of PDGF in CLL cells was up regulated by hypoxia. By using PDGF- or VEGF-blocking antibody or both to neutralize the binding activity of PDGF or VEGF in CLL-CM, we found only PDGF-blocking antibody was able to neutralize the majority of PDGFRa activation, indicating that PDGF in the CM is the predominant ligand for PDGFR activation in MSC. CLL MSC was exposed to either pooled CLL (n = 5) or pooled normal plasma (n = 5). Interestingly, PDGFR was more potently activated by CLL plasma than the normal plasma, suggesting PDGF levels were elevated in the CLL plasma. Indeed, PDGF in the normal plasma appeared to be much lower compared to the CLL plasma [normal (n = 11): 554.43 ± 88.55 pg/ml; CLL (n=43): 3115.36 ± 428.79 pg/ml. p < 0.0001]. In addition, the plasma PDGF level was found to be weakly correlated with VEGF level in 43 CLL patients assessed using Spearman correlation analysis (r = 0.3, p = 0.001). However, when CLL patients were grouped by clinical prognostic factors, the plasma PDGF level was found to be strongly correlated with plasma VEGF level in CLL patients with high-risk features including more advanced Rai stage 2-4 (r = 0.87, p < 0.0001), ZAP-70 positive (r = 0.8, p =0.04) and CLL patients who had required treatment (r = 0.8, p = 0.0008). To examine the mechanism for PDGF augmentation of VEGF by MSC, we found that PI3K pathway interruption using LY294002 (n = 6, p = 0.04), but not p38 MAPK inhibition (n = 6, p = 0.5), was able to abrogate the PDGF mediated VEGF production in MSC. Importantly, we also found that the secreted VEGF level in the CM of unstimulated CLL MSC appeared to be significantly higher compared to the level from culture media of unstimulated normal MSC [CLL (n = 14) vs. normal (n = 5), 298.1± 61.2 vs. 109.9 ± 52.3, p = 0.03]. Conclusions: These results indicate that PDGF secreted by CLL B-cells is necessary for PDGFR activation in MSC and can lead to increased VEGF production by MSC via a PI3K-Akt dependent mechanism. These findings have clinical implications as plasma PDGF levels are strongly correlated with plasma VEGF levels in high risk CLL. The finding that CLL MSC are more prone to secrete VEGF than normal MSC suggests the stromal microenvironment may function to facilitate CLL disease progression. Finally, as VEGF is known to enhance CLL B-cell survival and drug resistance, interrogation of the PDGF-VEGF regulation in the microenvironment of CLL patients should yield important information that can be used for therapeutic strategies in CLL. Disclosures: Kay: Biogenc-Idec, Celgene, Genentech, genmab: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech, Celgene, Hospira, Polyphenon Pharma, Sanofi-Aventis: Research Funding.

Abstract BACKGROUND: Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is one of the most common lymphoid malignancies, accounting for ~11% of all hematologic neoplasms. Over the last 15 years, a series of phase 3 trials have established that chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) with fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (FCR) improves both progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with chemotherapy alone. FCR is the gold standard for young fit patients with treatment naïve CLL. In parallel with the advances in CIT, a profound increase in the understanding of CLL B-cell biology led to new therapeutic approaches.1 Among these, ibrutinib (an irreversible inhibitor of Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase [BTK]) has had the largest impact on clinical practice to date. Initial trials of ibrutinib demonstrated robust and durable efficacy in patients with relapsed/refractory disease. Subsequent phase 3 trials showed improved PFS and OS with ibrutinib relative to chlorambucil in previously untreated, older CLL patients. Despite these advances, the efficacy of ibrutinib as a first-line treatment for younger CLL patients (i.e. <70) relative to the most efficacious CIT regimens, such as FCR, is unknown. METHODS: Eligible patients were treatment-naive individuals with CLL who were age <70 and required therapy. Patients with deletion 17p- were excluded from participating given the poor response of these patients to FCR therapy. Participants were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive ibrutinib (420 mg/day until disease progression) and rituximab (50 mg/m2 on day 1 of cycle 2; 325 mg/m2 on day 2 of cycle 2; 500 mg/m2 on day 1 of cycles 3-7) or six courses of intravenous fludarabine (25 mg/m2 ) and cyclophosphamide (250 mg/m2) days 1-3 with rituximab (50 mg/m2 on day 1 of cycle 1; 325 mg/m2 on day 2 of cycle 1; 500 mg/m2 on day 1 of cycles 2-6) every 28-days. The planned accrual was 519 patients. Hematologic toxicity was graded according to the 2008 IWCLL Working Group scale. All other adverse events were graded according to the NCI Common Toxicity Criteria (version 4). The primary endpoint was PFS with a secondary endpoint of overall survival (OS). Analysis was by intention to treat. The first planed interim analysis for PFS was scheduled to occur 24-27 months after full accrual with the first interim analysis for OS scheduled to occur if the boundary for PFS was crossed. The primary analysis was a stratified logrank test applied to all patients as randomized. Treatment effect p-values are one-sided. The study was approved by the Central Institutional Review Board for the National Cancer Institute, conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki, and registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02048813). RESULTS: A total of 529 patients were accrued between January 31, 2014 and June 9, 2016. 354 patients were assigned to ibrutinib and rituximab (IR) and 175 to FCR. Nineteen patients did not start protocol therapy. The first interim analysis was performed September 2018. With median follow-up of 33.4 months, we observed 77 PFS events and 14 deaths. The hazard ratio (HR) for PFS favored IR over FCR (HR=0.352; 95% CI 0.223-0.558; p<0.0001) which crossed the pre specified boundary. The HR for OS also favored the IR arm (HR=0.168, 95% CI 0.053-0.538; p=0.0003, pre-specified boundary for superiority p=0.0005). Kaplan-Meier estimates for PFS and OS are shown in Figure 1A and 1B. In subgroup analysis for PFS, IR was superior to FCR independent of age, sex, performance status, disease stage or the presence/absence of del11q23. With current follow-up, IR was also superior to FCR for IGHV unmutated patients (HR=0.262; 95% CI 0.137-0.498; p<0.0001) but not IGHV mutated patients (HR=0.435; 95% CI 0.140-0.1350; p=0.07). Grade 3 and 4 treatment-related adverse events were observed in 58% of IR and 72% of FCR treated patients (p=0.0042). Specifically, FCR was more frequently associated with grade 3 and 4 neutropenia (FCR: 69 [44%] of 158 vs. IR: 80 [23%] of 352; p<0·0001) and infectious complications (FCR: 28/158 [17.7%] vs. IR: 25/352 [7.1%]; p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of ibrutinib and rituximab provides superior PFS and OS relative to FCR for patients with previously untreated CLL age <70. These findings have immediate practice changing implications and establish ibrutinib-based therapy as the most efficacious first-line therapy for patients with CLL. Disclosures Shanafelt: Mayo Clinic: Patents & Royalties: Physician Well-being Index, Medical Student Well-being Index, Well-being index; Celgene: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding. Kay:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Morpho-sys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cytomx Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Tolero Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios Pharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Infinity Pharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. O'Brien:Amgen: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Aptose Biosciences Inc.: Consultancy; Vaniam Group LLC: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Alexion: Consultancy; Kite Pharma: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sunesis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Barrientos:Pharmacyclics/AbbVie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; astra Zeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Erba:Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Other: grant; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Other: grant; Pfizer: Consultancy, Other: grant; Incyte: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Agios: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Agios: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Astellas: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Astellas: Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Astellas: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Other: grant; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Juno: Research Funding; Juno: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; MacroGenics: Consultancy; MacroGenics: Consultancy; Amgen: Research Funding; Takeda/Millenium: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Takeda/Millenium: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Immunogen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Takeda/Millenium: Research Funding; Immunogen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda/Millenium: Research Funding; Glycomimetics: Consultancy, Other: Chair, Data and Safety Monitoring Committee; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; MacroGenics: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Research Funding; MacroGenics: Consultancy; Glycomimetics: Consultancy, Other: Chair, Data and Safety Monitoring Committee; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Research Funding; Juno: Research Funding; Juno: Research Funding; Agios: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Agios: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Jazz: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Immunogen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Immunogen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Glycomimetics: Consultancy, Other: Chair, Data and Safety Monitoring Committee; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Research Funding; Glycomimetics: Consultancy, Other: Chair, Data and Safety Monitoring Committee; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Research Funding. Stone:Juno: Consultancy; Macrogenics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; FujiFilm: Consultancy; Sumitomo: Consultancy; Ono/Theradex: Consultancy; Otzuka/Astex: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy, Research Funding; Actinium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Argenx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Arog: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Celator / Jazz: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cornerstone: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Tallman:ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Other: Advisory board; BioSight: Other: Advisory board; AbbVie: Research Funding; Cellerant: Research Funding; AROG: Research Funding; Orsenix: Other: Advisory board.

Abstract CLL is a clinically heterogeneous disease with wide ranging disease course. A novel CLL-IPI based on Rai/Binet stage, IGHV-mutation status, TP53 mutation/deletion, B2M level, and age was developed to stratify patients into 4 risk groups, with a c-statistic of 0.75. Next-generation sequencing has identified ~60 genes recurrently mutated in CLL, some of which are associated with poor overall survival, whereas the clinical effect of most genes is still unknown. Herein, we examine whether somatic mutations in these putative driver genes are associated with time to first treatment (TTT), and whether they add prognostic value beyond CLL-IPI. Based on the 2008 International Workshop CLL criteria, we identified 100 CLL and 96 high-count monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis (MBL) newly diagnosed from the Mayo Clinic CLL biobank. Pre-treatment peripheral blood mononuclear cells were collected &lt;2 years of diagnosis and tumor DNA was extracted from sorted CD5+/CD19+. We sequenced the coding regions of 61 recurrently mutated CLL driver genes using a custom SureSelect panel, with 24 samples per flow cell in Illumina HiSeq 4000. The average coverage depth was &gt;1000X. Somatic mutations were called using MuTect2 in tumor-only mode. To remove germline variants, variants were eliminated based on minor allele frequencies &gt;0.01%, identified in 1000 Genomes Project, ExAC and/or ESP6500 databases, unless present in known mutation hotspots or COSMIC. After filtering, high/moderate impact mutations were analyzed using Cox regression, to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) to test for associations with TTT. Among 196 patients the most commonly mutated genes were TP53 (11%), ATM (10%), SF3B1 (10%), NOTCH1 (9%), CHD2 (8%), and BIRC3 (7%). The median follow-up was 8.7 years, and 73 patients were subsequently treated. ATM (HR=3.27, CI:1.8-6.1, P=0.0002) and NOTCH1 (HR=2.41, CI:1.3-4.6, P=0.008) were associated with TTT. When evaluating the total number of mutated genes, we found 32%, 29%, and 39% patients had ≥2, 1, or 0 genes mutated, respectively, and this was associated with shorter TTT (HR=1.74, CI:1.3-2.4, P=0.0005) adjusting for sex and CLL-IPI with a c-statistic=0.8 (CI: 0.75-0.84). When stratified by CLL-IPI, the association held for low (N=99, HR=1.88, CI:1.1-3.4, P=0.03) and intermediate risk (N=54, HR=1.87, CI:1.1-3.2, P=0.03) but not high/very high risk (N=35, HR=1.07, CI:0.6-1.9, P=0.83). We demonstrated that the total number of CLL putative driver genes with high or moderate impact mutations provided prognostic information in newly diagnosed CLL/MBL beyond CLL-IPI. Moreover, even among those with low or intermediate CLL-IPI risk, the total number of somatic mutations separated those patients who progressed. Sequencing the CLL driver genes at time of diagnosis could be a potential biomarker for outcome prediction. Citation Format: Geffen Kleinstern, Daniel R. O’Brien, Brian F. Kabat, Kari G. Chaffee, Aaron D. Norman, Timothy G. Call, Sameer A. Parikh, Jose F. Leis, Wei Ding, James R. Cerhan, Neil E. Kay, Susan L. Slager, Esteban Braggio. Somatic mutations within chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) putative driver genes are associated with outcomes beyond the CLL international prognostic index (CLL-IPI) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 4466.

AbstractAlterations in global DNA methylation patterns are a major hallmark of cancer and represent attractive biomarkers for personalized risk stratification. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) risk stratification studies typically focus on time to first treatment (TTFT), time to progression (TTP) after treatment, and overall survival (OS). Whereas TTFT risk stratification remains similar over time, TTP and OS have changed dramatically with the introduction of targeted therapies, such as the Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor ibrutinib. We have shown that genome-wide DNA methylation patterns in CLL are strongly associated with phenotypic differentiation and patient outcomes. Here, we developed a novel assay, termed methylation-iPLEX (Me-iPLEX), for high-throughput quantification of targeted panels of single cytosine guanine dinucleotides from multiple independent loci. Me-iPLEX was used to classify CLL samples into 1 of 3 known epigenetic subtypes (epitypes). We examined the impact of epitype in 1286 CLL patients from 4 independent cohorts representing a comprehensive view of CLL disease course and therapies. We found that epitype significantly predicted TTFT and OS among newly diagnosed CLL patients. Additionally, epitype predicted TTP and OS with 2 common CLL therapies: chemoimmunotherapy and ibrutinib. Epitype retained significance after stratifying by biologically related biomarkers, immunoglobulin heavy chain mutational status, and ZAP70 expression, as well as other common prognostic markers. Furthermore, among several biological traits enriched between epitypes, we found highly biased immunogenetic features, including IGLV3-21 usage in the poorly characterized intermediate-programmed CLL epitype. In summary, Me-iPLEX is an elegant method to assess epigenetic signatures, including robust classification of CLL epitypes that independently stratify patient risk at diagnosis and time of treatment.

Background:We have previously reported that ∼50% of CLL patients (pts) experience rapid flare of disease when they discontinue ibrutinib therapy due to progression of disease (CLL or Richter's transformation [RT]) (Hampel et al, JCO suppl, 2018). This lead to the clinical practice of overlapping venetoclax with ibrutinib for combination therapy in this setting to prevent ibrutinib withdrawal.Aims:To evaluate the role of continuing ibrutinib beyond the start of salvage venetoclax in pts who have progression of disease on ibrutinib monotherapy, both in preventing ibrutinib withdrawal associated with ibrutinib discontinuation and in disease response.Methods:We identified all CLL pts at Mayo Clinic (3/2017–11/2018) who had disease progression on ibrutinib therapy, where venetoclax was added as subsequent treatment while ibrutinib was continued. CLL‐specific characteristics, treatment timeline and toxicities, and disease course following combination therapy were ascertained. All pts started venetoclax according to the weekly ramp‐up per the package instructions.Results:Eighteen pts treated with the addition of venetoclax to ibrutinib therapy were identified; indications were CLL progression (n = 13) and RT (n = 5). BTK or PLCG2 mutations were present in 8/13 pts. Median duration of follow‐up was 9.6 months after the start of combination therapy.The target venetoclax dose was reached by 5 weeks in 13 pts; reasons for delaying or stopping dose escalation included diarrhea (n = 2), sepsis (n = 2), and neutropenia (n = 1). No patient experienced a disease flare during venetoclax ramp‐up.The median duration of combination ibrutinib and venetoclax therapy was 3 months (range, 0–14 months). Of 18 pts who started combination therapy with ibrutinib and venetoclax, ibrutinib was discontinued in 10 pts. Reasons included hematopoietic stem cell transplant (n = 2), planned stop after adequate disease control (n = 4), financial reasons (n = 1), toxicity (neutropenia n = 1, immune thrombocytopenia/bleeding risk n = 1), and death (n = 1). Only 1 patient experienced ibrutinib withdrawal, which occurred following planned discontinuation after clinical complete response (CR) with a 41 day overlap and toleration of venetoclax 400 mg daily; management with re‐initiation of ibrutinib was effective in regaining disease control. Of 9 pts who stopped ibrutinib, 4 pts had a slow taper over 2–8 weeks, and 2 pts also received corticosteroids at the time of ibrutinib discontinuation.Among the other 8 pts who did not discontinue ibrutinib, 6 pts remain on the combination with venetoclax (median duration 6.5 months, range 3–14 months), and 2 pts continued on ibrutinib following venetoclax discontinuation due to disease progression (both pts received further combination of ibrutinib with multi‐agent chemotherapy).The overall response rate (ORR) to combination therapy with ibrutinib and venetoclax was 81% (CR/clinical CR n = 9, partial response n = 4, stable disease n = 1, and primary refractory disease n = 2). The duration of combination therapy was <4 weeks in 2 pts, precluding response assessment. The estimated 12‐month event‐free survival was 54% (95% CI 33–87%), and the estimated 12‐month overall survival from start of combination therapy was 79% (95% CI 60–100%); see Figure 1.Summary/Conclusion:Among CLL pts who develop progression of disease on ibrutinib monotherapy, continued ibrutinib therapy with addition of venetoclax was feasible, ameliorated ibrutinib withdrawal, and was associated with high ORR.image

Background:The expression of the receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) Axl on cancer cells has been associated with poor prognosis and implicated in disease progression. Inhibition of Axl‐RTK with TP‐0903, a high affinity Axl‐RTK inhibitor induces robust apoptosis of several tumors, including chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Axl‐RTK inhibition has also been found to induce nonspecific immunomodulatory effects in syngeneic tumor models.Aims:We aimed to investigate the impact and downstream effects of Axl‐RTK inhibition on naïve T cells and chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CART), using CD19 directed CART cells (CART19) as a model.Methods:We utilized either PMA/Ionomycin or the CD19+ mantle cell lymphoma cell line, JeKo as a stimulant for naïve T cells and CART19, respectively. Cells were analyzed for cytokine profile, T cell phenotype, and kinetics after the stimulation in the presence or the absence of the Axl‐RTK inhibitor TP‐0903. Regarding in vivo experiment, a relapse JeKo xenograft model was used. Mice were treated with vehicle alone, TP‐0903 alone, CART19 alone, or TP‐0903 + CART19. Three weeks after the treatment, mice were re‐challenged with JeKo as a CART19 relapse model.Results:Stimulation of naïve T cells in the presence of the Axl‐RTK inhibitor TP‐0903 resulted in a significant reduction of Th2 cytokines and downregulation of inhibitory receptors. The differential expansion of either effector T cells or Tregs in the presence of TP‐0903 resulted in a preferential reduction of Tregs (Fig 1A). Axl‐RTK inhibition of CART19 led to Th1 polarization upon stimulation with the JeKo, as evident by the selective reduction of Th2 cytokine. Additionally, this resulted in a reduction of myeloid attracting cytokines, such as CXCL1, IL‐8, IL‐6, and IL‐10, cytokines implicated in the development cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity after CART cell therapy and in adaptive resistance to immunotherapy (Fig 1B). TP‐0903 also significantly downregulated inhibitory receptors on activated CARTs (Fig 1C). In our relapsed in vivo model, mice treated with CART19 + TP‐0903 rejected the JeKo challenge while mice received CART19 alone redeveloped disease, suggesting that Axl‐RTK inhibition enhanced CART cell persistence. Peripheral blood analysis of mice after the rechallenge showed a higher number of circulating T cells and lower level of MCP‐1. Western blotting was performed to investigate the downstream effect of Axl‐RTK inhibition on CART19 and it revealed a relatively selective inhibition of LCK on stimulated CART19. Transcriptome analysis of activated CARTs treated with TP‐0903 revealed >100 genes that were differentially expressed compared to untreated cells. Among these, Th cell and Treg polarization genes were significantly altered in activated CARTs treated with TP‐0903.imageFinally, we validated our findings in phase I clinical trial of TP‐0903 (NCT02729298). T cells isolated from 3 cancer patients showed a significant reduction of Tregs and Th1 polarization. This will be further investigated in a planned phase I clinical trial of TP‐0903 in relapsed/refractory CLL (NCT03572634).Summary/Conclusion:We showed for the first time that Axl‐RTK inhibition polarizes T cells into a Th1 functional phenotype, downregulates inhibitory receptors, and reduces myeloid associated cytokine production by CART19. The combination therapy yielded synergistic cytotoxicity against JeKo in vitro and in a CART19 relapse model. These findings encourage further study of Axl‐RTK inhibition with TP‐0903 as an enhancer of T cell immunotherapies.