Lee, Yeonsoo Sara

Abstract STUDY QUESTION What is the fertility preservation (FP) utilization rate among transgender and gender diverse (TGD) patients at the Transgender and Intersex Specialty Care Clinic (TISCC) within the Mayo Clinic? SUMMARY ANSWER The rate of utilization of FP services by TGD patients at Mayo Clinic’s TISCC was determined to be 6.62%. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY TGD patients encounter several barriers when pursuing FP, which may contribute to a lower utilization rate of these services. These barriers include financial constraints and lack of insurance coverage, as well as societal and healthcare provider attitudes; TGD individuals face discrimination or lack of understanding, making it uncomfortable or difficult to discuss FP options. Additionally, there continues to be a lack of inclusive policies and support within healthcare systems that can further impede access to FP services for TGD individuals. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION The study was executed in two phases. In the first phase, a retrospective cohort study was completed with TGD patients who provided electronic health record (EHR) research authorization from Mayo Clinic’s TISCC in Rochester, MN between 1 January 2015 and 30 July 2021. Search terms related to FP were used to determine the FP utilization rate among this patient population. In the second phase of the study, two sets of patients, (i) patients who were included in the cohort study in Phase 1, and (ii) members of JASMYN, a community organization specializing in care and wellness coordination for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender (LGBT) teens and young adults in North Florida. Individuals were invited to participate in a qualitative interview exploring their cumulative healthcare experiences accessing gender-affirming care. Interviews were conducted from January 2023 to June 2023. Interviews examined participants’ perceptions of FP options, motivations for pursuing FP, and barriers to accessing both gender and fertility care. When applicable, participants also discussed their experiences pursuing FP and reflected on their satisfaction with their fertility and family planning decisions. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS In phase 1, a total of N = 1189 patients sought care from Mayo Clinic’s TISCC in Rochester, MN. Out of these patients, N = 589 patients provided research authorization and were included in the retrospective cohort study. The study team assessed whether FP terms were mentioned in each patient’s EHR, and whether patients scheduled and attended appointments with either the Department of Reproductive Endocrinology or the Department of Urology. FP search terms included sperm cryopreservation, sperm extraction, sperm aspiration, testicular tissue cryopreservation, oocyte cryopreservation, embryo cryopreservation, and ovarian tissue cryopreservation. In phase 2, N = 36 participants were interviewed, with N = 25 participants recruited from Mayo Clinic’s TISCC in Rochester, MN, and N = 11 participants recruited from JASMYN in Jacksonville, FL. Participants recruited from the Mayo Clinic participated in a video-call-based interview and those enrolled from JASMYN were interviewed in person. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE The study team observed a 6.62% utilization rate of FP services among N = 589 patients (median age: 28 years; age range: 8–78 years) included in the retrospective cohort study. N = 39 patients completed FP, with N = 14 receiving these services at other institutions before seeking care with the TISCC at Mayo Clinic. N = 25 patients pursued FP services within the Mayo Clinic. Patients with testes were more likely to complete FP via sperm cryopreservation when compared to the utilization of egg cryopreservation among patients with ovaries. Participants who completed an interview in Phase 2 (median age 27 years; age range: 22–80 years) reflected on their decision on whether to preserve their fertility and what factors influenced these decisions, and how their satisfaction with this decision has changed over their lifespan. The major themes reported here include the desire for biological children, planning gender care around fertility desires, conversations about FP options, physical and psychosocial barriers to pursuing FP, reflections on personal FP decisions, and reflections on having to make decisions about FP at a young age. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION All participants who completed an interview have done so voluntarily; as such, there is a possibility of selection and recall bias. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Findings suggest that there is a need for more structured conversations around FP when TGD patients seek medical and surgical gender-affirming care. Accessibility, including financial barriers and limited insurance coverage, continues to limit the utilization of FP services among TGD patients. Increased affordability through insurance coverage may additionally improve FP utilization. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) This project was funded by the Mayo Clinic Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and the Mayo Clinic Center for Clinical and Translational Science (CCaTS), grant number UL1TR002377. This project was also supported by Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) Grant Number TL1TR002380 from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS). Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH. Felicity Enders reports grants from the National Institutes of Health and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality paid to her institution; speakers’ fees for lectures or presentations from Mount Sinai, University of Washington, University of Minnesota, University of Rochester, Cincinnati University, the National Institutes of Health, Duke University, Wake Forest University, the Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute, Johns Hopkins University; travel support from the Association for Clinical and Translational Science and Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory; and an unpaid leadership role on the Board of Directors of the Association for Clinical and Translational Science. All other authors declare no conflicts of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A.

ABSTRACT Introduction and Objectives Female urethral strictures remain a challenging clinical entity with limited data on optimal reconstructive techniques. This study presents 12‐month clinical and patient‐reported outcomes following a novel transurethral approach to dorsal inlay buccal graft urethroplasty. Methods We evaluate the outcomes of consecutive female patients with urethral strictures treated via dorsal inlay buccal graft urethroplasty from October 2021 to November 2024. Preoperative evaluation included cystoscopy, uroflowmetry, and/or voiding cystourethrogram. Follow‐up at 4 and 12 months included cystoscopy, uroflowmetry, and patient‐reported outcomes measured via the Global Response Assessment. Success was defined as absence of recurrence on cystourethroscopy. Results Twenty‐one patients were included in the study, with 95% having undergone prior treatments (90% dilation/DVIU and 9% urethroplasty). Stricture locations varied across the distal (33%), mid (19%), proximal (19%), and multifocal/pan urethral (19%). The median operative duration was 60 min (IQR: 56–86) and all were discharged on the day of surgery. Nineteen patients (90%) underwent a dorsal inlay procedure, while two (10%) required combined dorsal and ventral inlay due to obliterative stricture. No complications were observed. The median follow‐up was 13.2 (IQR: 5.1–23.5) months, during which time 1 patient underwent retreatment for recurrent stricture. Clinical success was 95% at 4 months and 92% at 12 months. Median peak urinary flow rate preoperatively versus 4‐month postoperatively was 7.0 cc/s versus 13.0 cc/s ( p = 0.20) and at 12‐month postoperatively was 13.3 cc/s ( p = 0.50). 90% of patients reported improvement on the Global Response Assessment. There were no cases of de novo stress urinary incontinence. Conclusions This novel transurethral dorsal inlay buccal graft urethroplasty offers a safe and efficient treatment for female urethral strictures with durable clinical and patient‐reported outcomes at 12 months. The technique's minimal urethral mobilization translates into shorter operative times and a low risk of stress incontinence, making it a promising alternative to traditional approaches.

Introduction: Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) with extended pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) represents the gold standard surgical treatment for high-risk localized prostate cancer. PLND carries the risk of lymphocele formation, which can lead to complications such as deep vein thrombosis (DVT), infection, and voiding dysfunction. Many techniques have been described to minimize lymphocele formation, yet no method has seen widespread use or been described as sutureless. The objective of this study is to describe the novel, sutureless peritoneal window (PWIN) technique and assess its efficacy in lymphocele prophylaxis for extended PLND. Methods: This was a retrospective review of patients with high-risk prostate cancer undergoing RARP with extended PLND by a single surgeon from 2018 to 2024. PLND was carried out in the usual manner with bipolar cautery. PWIN technique is performed by excising a 3 × 5 cm PWIN over the lymphadenectomy bed to maintain lymphatic communication with the abdominal cavity. The primary outcome was a comparison between the incidence of symptomatic lymphoceles (SLs) with PWIN vs standard technique. SLs were defined as lymphoceles presenting with pain, DVT, voiding dysfunction, or infectious symptoms. Patients with asymptomatic lymphoceles were excluded. Results: Our study included 199 patients who underwent RARP with extended PLND. There were 46 patients (23.1%) in the standard approach group and 153 patients (76.9%) in the PWIN group. We identified 5/46 (10.9%) SLs in the standard technique, which were significantly higher than the 3/153 (2.0%) observed in the PWIN group (p = 0.017). There was no difference between the standard and PWIN cohorts regarding symptomology or treatment of their lymphocele. Conclusion: This study describes a novel, sutureless PWIN technique that significantly decreases SL after extended PLND. This technique offers a practical, time-efficient, and cost-effective alternative for lymphocele prevention. Future prospective studies are warranted to validate these findings.

Introduction: Endoscopic urethroplasty combines the minimally invasive benefit of endoscopic dilation or urethrotomy with the durability of open urethroplasty. Novel techniques in endoscopic urethroplasty have appeared through the years since the 1970s, including several techniques to hold free grafts against urethrotomy beds, such as grafts glued or sutured to a catheter, double-balloon catheter, and a novel balloon-graft carrying device along with transperineal sutures. 1 – 7 Ungerer et al. describe their endoscopic buccal graft urethroplasty using laparoscopic suturing instruments and a procedure-specific transurethral sheath. 8 In this video, we present our technique and early outcomes for transmeatal urethral surgery (TraMUS) for distal penile strictures. This technique applies to any stricture of the penile urethra where the distal aspect of a buccal mucosa graft (BMG) can be accessed transmeatally. Materials and Methods: The patient is prepped in the supine position. A 6 o’clock incision is made sharply using a nasal speculum with a scalpel, and an endoscopic cold knife set along the ventral plate of the urethra from the proximal end of the stricture to the meatus. Goal caliber is 26 French. The urethrotomy length is measured. A split-thickness BMG is deployed by passing a 26 French offset scope into the urethra. A Laborie needle is passed through the scope, through the mucosal edge of the urethrotomy, and out the penile skin. With each puncture, a 3-0 PDS free suture is passed through the needle, and the needle is removed to externalize the suture through the meatus. This is repeated until one pair of sutures exists on either side of the proximal urethrotomy. The equipment is removed and the transmeatal ends of each pair of sutures are passed through the proximal end of the graft from anti-mucosa to mucosa using a free needle and tied. The transcutaneous suture ends are pulled to parachute the graft into the urethra over the urethrotomy and then tied externally at the skin. The distal end of the graft is secured to the meatus with interrupted 4-0 Vicryl. Quilting sutures are placed along the graft using 3-0 Vicryl on skiied SH needles, similarly passing the needles through the urethra and out the skin with ends tied together, and then tying externally at the skin. Alternatively, quilting may be performed via the Laborie needle for more proximal placement. A Foley catheter is placed, and a compressive dressing is applied to the penis. The catheter remains for 2 weeks. Cystoscopy is performed at 4 months and 1 year to ensure patency. Results: Nineteen patients have been treated using TraMUS for distal penile strictures. Eighteen patients had at least 4 month of follow-up, with an average follow-up of 8 months (range 4–21 months). 2 failures are documented, in which we were unable to pass the 17 Fr flexible cystoscope. Median graft length was 5 cm (range 3–15 cm, IQR 4.9). Conclusions: TraMUS for distal penile strictures is a promising new technique for minimally invasive urethral reconstruction. The technique appears to be effective, and further data about outcomes are still needed. Patient Consent: Author(s) have received and archived patient consent for video recording/publication in advance of video recording of the procedure. Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no disclosures. Runtime of video: 8 mins 13 secs.

Introduction: Urethral strictures affect about 1% of men over 65 in the United States and significantly impact quality of life. 1 Most strictures (92.2%) occur anteriorly. 2 Urethroplasty, the gold standard treatment, is traditionally open but can be performed endoscopically with comparable results. This prospective study describes a technique for transmeatal urethral surgery with buccal graft urethroplasty for anterior urethral strictures. Methods: A 21 French direct vision internal urethrotomy (DVIU) cystoscope is used to inspect the stricture and make an incision along its ventral aspect. After the stricture is measured, a graft of buccal mucosa is harvested. For graft deployment, we utilize a 26 French Wolf Offset Nephroscope™ and a rigid injeTAK® cystoscopy needle. At the distal aspect of the urethrotomy, the needle is passed through the urethra and out the perineum. A pair of the sutures is placed on either side of the urethrotomy and held externally at the meatus. The graft is oriented with the lamina propria facing the spongiosum. The previously placed sutures are then passed from lamina propria to mucosa at the distal aspect of the graft. The sutures are tied, creating a knot on the mucosal side. The external sutures are then pulled, and the graft retracts into the urethra. The JNW Urtract™ and Securestrap® are then used for graft fixation. Graft Deployment: At the distal aspect of the urethrotomy, the injeTAK® needle is passed through the urethra and out of the perineum. A pair of the sutures is then placed on either side of the urethrotomy. These are held in place at the meatus to maintain proper laterality and avoid twisting. The graft is oriented into position, with the anti-mucosa facing the exposed spongiosum and the mucosa facing the lumen. The previously placed sutures are then passed from anti-mucosa to mucosa using a free Mayo needle at the distal aspect of the graft. The suture pairs are tied, creating a knot on the mucosal side. The external sutures are then pulled, and the graft retracts into the urethra. Cystoscopy is performed to ensure the graft is covering the urethrotomy. Graft Fixation: The JNW Urtract was then introduced with the Securestrap® (a Vicryl tacking suture). While a finger externally compresses the perineum toward the tip of the Securestrap®, the ventral midline portion of the graft is secured. A 22 French Foley catheter is then placed over a wire. Results: Out of 20 total patients, 13 are eligible for their 4-month follow-up. Of those who have completed follow-up, 86% had urethral patency on cystoscopy. The average duration of foley catheterization was 2.4 weeks. The average operative time was 100.8 minutes, and the average estimated blood loss was 37.5 cc. Conclusion: Transmeatal urethral surgery is a safe and effective repair option for management of anterior urethral stricture disease. The authors have no disclosures or commercial associations that might create a conflict of interest. Authors have received and archived patient consent for video recording/publication in advance of video recording of the procedure. Data and video obtained during the treatment of patients at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota. Authors have received and archived patient consent for video recording/publication in advance of video recording of the procedure. No conflicts of interest or obligations resulted from data collection. Runtime of video: 8 mins 52 secs.

Introduction and Objectives: Urethral stricture disease is a challenging urologic problem with a high recurrence rate. Initial management is typically completed endoscopically (e.g., urethral dilation, direct visual internal urethrotomy); however, guidelines recommend against repeated endoscopic management. Currently, surgical urethroplasty or intermittent catheterization remains the only other option. We have demonstrated a minimally invasive approach to urethroplasty. In this video, we aim to demonstrate the techniques and early outcomes of transmeatal urethral surgery for short urethral strictures. Materials and Methods: We demonstrate the procedure in two different individuals with idiopathic bulbar urethral strictures less than 2 cm. The patient is prepped in dorsal lithotomy position. Under direct visualization via cystoscopy, the ventral place of the urethral stricture is first incised to a goal of 26 Fr lumen. Next, mucosal realignment is completed via LSI Solutions’ URTRAC sheath and the RD 180 endoscopic suturing device. Two sutures are placed on either side of the urethrotomy incision site, allowing the proximal and distal ends of the mucosa to be pulled perpendicular to the urethrotomy. After reapproximation, a titanium knot is introduced endoscopically to anchor each suture into place. An indwelling catheter is then left in place. Patients are then seen at four months postoperatively. Results: Out of four total patients, there is a 100% success rate cystoscopically at 4 months postoperatively. There have been no recorded intraoperative or postoperative complications. The average operating room time was 54 minutes, and the average estimated blood loss was 9 mL. Conclusions: Transmeatal urethral surgery for short strictures via incision and urethral reapproximation appears to be a safe and effective repair option for the management of short urethral strictures. All research procedures were carried out in accordance with ethical guidelines and institutional policies, reviewed by the IRB. Authors have received and archived patient consent for video recording/publication in advance of video recording of procedure. The authors declare that there are no commercial associations or financial interests in any product or service discussed in this article that might create a conflict of interest. The authors have not engaged in any activities or relationships with commercial entities that would bias or influence the content of this study. Runtime of video: 5 mins 40 secs.

Objective: To describe a step-by-step guide for successful implementation of transmeatal urethral surgery for obliterated membranous urethral strictures. Patient and Methods: The patient is placed in the dorsal lithotomy position. Cystoscopy will be performed through both the suprapubic tube above and transmeatally from below. A Libri rigid endoscopic needle will be passed under guidance, with placement of a 0.38 wire through the inner lumen. Subsequently, over the wire, a tiger tail catheter will be placed and the wire exchanged for a rigid sensor wire, over which a charger balloon will be passed and used for dilation. The Olympus resectoscope will be used to resect the area of the stricture. The RD180 from LSI solutions will be used to situate the graft over the area of the stricture. Results: Our number of cases is five, of which 4 have had no recurrence. The median follow-up is 6 months. We have three from radiation and two from pelvic fractures. In the radiation population, one patient did recur. However, he was not obliterated and has been voiding even though he has a 14 French urethra. Conclusion: This technique appears to be a safe and effective repair option for management of obliterated membranous urethra strictures. Author disclosure statement: J.N.W. is a consultant for Olympus. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose. Authors have received and archived patient consent for video recording/publication in advance of video recording of procedure . Runtime of video: 7 min 38 sec.