Hanson, Curtis A.

Abstract Introduction: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved ibrutinib in February 2014 based on results from a pivotal phase 2 clinical trial that enrolled 85 patients with relapsed/refractory CLL. A subsequent phase 3 trial confirmed the superior progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of ibrutinib compared to ofatumumab in 391 CLL patients. However, there is no information on the efficacy and safety of ibrutinib in CLL patients treated outside the context of clinical trials. Additionally, it is unclear if the reasons for discontinuation of ibrutinib differ in routine clinical practice from those described in patients treated on clinical trials. We conducted a retrospective study to evaluate these aspects in a large cohort of CLL patients treated with ibrutinib off-protocol. Methods: After IRB approval, CLL patients seen at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, and treated with commercial ibrutinib from November 2013 through July 2015 were evaluated. The baseline characteristics, time to therapy discontinuation, reasons for discontinuation and survival following discontinuation were abstracted. Results: One hundred thirty-five patients with CLL were treated during the study interval; 124 received ibrutinib for relapsed/refractory CLL and 11 received ibrutinib for treatment-naïve CLL with TP53 disruption (either del17p on FISH or TP53 mutation). Patients with relapsed/refractory CLL (n=124) Patients were high-risk, with a median of 3 prior therapies (range, 1-15), 81% had unmutated IGHV, and 38% had either del11q or del17p on FISH testing. After a median follow-up of 6.4 months, 101 remain on ibrutinib therapy. The estimated proportion of patients continuing ibrutinib at 6 months was 84% (95% CI: 77-92%) and at 12 months was 70% (95% CI: 59-83%). Of the 23 who discontinued ibrutinib therapy, 8 discontinued for progressive disease (2 progressive CLL; 6 Richter's transformation). The remaining 15 discontinued therapy for reasons other than progression, including: infection (n=3), bleeding (n=3), diarrhea (n=1), atrial fibrillation (n=1), rash (n=1), immune thrombocytopenia (n=1), renal dysfunction (n=1), severe edema (n=1), MDS (n=1) and physician preference (n=2). Table 1 shows the reasons for discontinuation of ibrutinib in patients treated on clinical trials (Maddocks, JAMA Oncology, 2015) compared to the current cohort of patients. The estimated cumulative incidence of discontinuation of ibrutinib therapy due to CLL progression/Richter's transformation at 6 and 12 months was 9% (95% CI: 4-17%) and 12% (95% CI: 5-23%), respectively. The estimated cumulative incidence of ibrutinib discontinuation due to reasons other than progression at 6 and 12 months was 10% (95% CI: 5-17%) and 22% (12-34%), respectively (Figure). The median survival after discontinuation of ibrutinib for patients who had CLL progression was 3.5 months, not reached in patients who developed Richter's transformation and not reached in those patients who discontinued ibrutinib due to reasons other than progression. Patients with treatment-naïve CLL (n=11) All patients had evidence of TP53 disruption (9 had del17p, 3 had TP53 mutation, and 1 had both). After a median follow-up of 2.8 months, no patient has had progression of CLL, and 2 patients have discontinued ibrutinib therapy for reasons other than CLL progression (atrial fibrillation, n=2). The estimated proportion of patients continuing ibrutinib at 6-months was 71% (95% CI: 45-100%). All 11 are still alive, and no patient has undergone allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Conclusion: This is the first study that describes the outcomes of a large cohort of CLL patients treated with ibrutinib outside the context of clinical trials. Patients treated in routine practice appear more likely to discontinue ibrutinib for reasons other than progression of disease, compared to those participating in clinical trials. Our results confirm the poor survival of CLL patients who progress on ibrutinib. Table 1. Comparative analysis of reasons for discontinuation of ibrutinib in patients with relapsed/refractory CLL: Characteristic Current Study (%) Maddocks (JAMA Oncology 2015) (%) No. of patients 124 308 Median follow-up (months) 6.4 20 Reasons for Discontinuation Progression of disease CLL 2 (2) 13 (4) Richter's transformation 6 (5) 15 (5) Non-progression of disease Infection 3 (2) 28 (9) Other 12 (10) 17 (5) Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures Ding: Merek: Research Funding. Kay:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Hospira: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Tolero Pharm: Research Funding. Shanafelt:Cephalon: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Glaxo-Smith_Kline: Research Funding; Polyphenon E Int'l: Research Funding; Hospira: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Pharmactckucs: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding.

Abstract Background : In primary myelofibrosis (PMF), ̴ 88% of patients harbor JAK2, CALR or MPL, with respective mutational frequencies of approximately 60%, 22% and 6%; ̴ 12% are wild type for all three driver mutations and are labelled as being "triple negative" (Blood. 2014;124:2507). It is now well-established that CALR-mutated patients with PMF display significantly better survival, compared to all the other mutational categories; in addition, preliminary data have suggested inferior survival for "triple-negative" cases (Leukemia. 2014;28:1472; Blood. 2014;124:1062) and the possibility that the favorable impact of CALR mutations might be restricted to CALR type 1 or type 1-like variants (Blood. 2014;124:2465). In the current study, we sought to clarify the prognostic impact of driver mutations, and CALR variants, on overall (OS) and leukemia-free (LFS) survival, in a two-center study involving 1118 patients. Methods: A total of 1118 patients with PMF from the Mayo Clinic (n =722) and University of Florence, Italy (n =396) were included in the current study. Study patients were selected based on availability of mutation information. PMF diagnosis was according to World Health Organization criteria (Blood. 2009;114:937). Previously published methods were used for CALR, JAK2 and MPL mutation analyses and determination of CALR variants (Blood. 2014;124:2465). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was considered from the date of first referral for the Mayo cohort and date of diagnosis for the Florence cohort. Leukemic transformation events replaced death as the uncensored variable during LFS analysis and Cox proportional hazard regression model was used for multivariable analysis. Results : Analysis was first conducted on the Mayo cohort of 722 patients (median age 64 years; 64% males). DIPSS-plus risk distributions were 14% low, 17% intermediate-1, 37% intermediate-2 and 33% high. All patients were annotated for JAK2/CALR/MPL mutations as well as CALR variants; 477 harbored JAK2, 139 CALR and 41 MPL mutations; 65 patients were triple-negative. The 139 CALR -mutated patients included type 1/type 1-like (n =115) and type 2/type 2-like (n =24). At a median follow-up time of 3.1 years, 439 (61%) deaths and 63 (8.7%) blast transformations were documented. In univariate analysis, survival in patients with CALR type 1/type 1-like mutations was significantly longer than every other mutational category: HR (95% CI) were for triple-negative 2.7 (1.8-4.0), JAK2 2.7 (2.0-3.7), CALR type 2/type 2-like 2.3 (1.3-4.2) and MPL 1.9 (1.1-3.1) (Figure 1); these differences were sustained during multivariable analysis that included ASXL1 mutations (n =480) and DIPSS-plus, and were also apparent in the Florence cohort of 396 cases that included 251 JAK2, 53 CALR type 1/type 1-like, 21 CALR type 2/type 2-like, 50 triple-negative and 21 MPL mutated cases (Figure 2). There was no difference in survival among the Mayo cohort across mutational categories not including CALR type 1/type 1-like variants (p=0.33). Because specific driver mutations in PMF differentially cluster with age and sex, multivariable analysis including these two parameters was also performed and confirmed the significant survival advantage of CALR type 1/type 1-like over triple-negative, JAK2 and CALR type 2/type 2-like mutated cases. Based on the above information, we divided driver mutational categories into "type 1/type 1-like" (median survival 10.3 years) and "all other mutational categories" (median survival 3.9 years; p<0.01). The difference in survival between these two groups remained significant (HR 2.1, 95% CI 1.5-2.9) during multivariable analysis that included both DIPSS-plus (P<0.01) and ASXL1 mutation (HR 1.8, 95% CI 1.4-2.2). LFS was similar between these two groups (p=0.4) but it was inferior in triple-negative cases compared to CALR type 1/type 1-like variants (HR 2.8, 95% CI 1.3-6.2), MPL (HR 4.6; 95% CI 1.04-20.4) and JAK2 (HR 2.5, 95% CI 1.3-4.8) but not CALR type 2/type 2-like variants (p=0.56). There was no difference in LFS among mutational categories not including triple-negative cases (p=0.33). Conclusions : In PMF, driver mutations might be classified into two prognostically distinct categories: "favorable" (type 1/type 1-like) and "unfavorable" (all other mutational categories). In addition, triple-negative cases might be at a higher risk of leukemic transformation. Disclosures Pardanani: Stemline: Research Funding. Vannucchi:Novartis: Other: Research Funding paid to institution (University of Florence), Research Funding; Shire: Speakers Bureau; Baxalta: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.

Abstract Background: Addition of sex combs-like 1 (ASXL1) is frequently mutated (mutational frequency 14-29%) and is prognostically relevant in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) (Bejar, NEJM 2011, Thol, JCO 2011). The prevalence and prognostic impact of ASXL1 mutation in MDS with ring sideroblasts (MDS-RS) is not known. MDS-RS is defined by the presence of ≥15% RS in bone marrow (BM), with refractory anemia with ring sideroblasts (RARS) being the prototype but may also be seen in other categories. Methods : Our institutional database was reviewed to identify patients with WHO-defined primary MDS with ≥1% BM RS. Pathology slides, including iron stains, were reviewed to accurately quantify BM RS percentage and confirm WHO morphologic categories. All patients were annotated for their mutational status including ASXL1, JAK2, MPL and IDH with a subset for SF3B1 by PCR sequencing performed on BM specimens obtained at diagnosis. Results : i) Patient characteristics: A total of 76 MDS patients displayed ≥1% BM RS (median age 72 years; 76% males); 51 (67%) patients had ≥15% BM RS. IPSS-R risk categories for the entire 76 study patients were 30% very low, 37% low, 14% intermediate, 11% high and 8% very high; IPSS-R karyotype was normal in 63%, very good/good risk 17%, intermediate risk 12%, and poor/very poor in 8%; 3% had monosomal karyotype. ii) Prevalence of ASXL1 mutations: Twenty-one (28%) of the 76 study patients were ASXL1 mutated; ASXL1 mutational frequencies were 25% (16/63 patients) in the absence and 38% (5/13 patients) in the presence of excess blasts (P =0.34). When considering only those patients with ≥15% BM RS (n =51), ASXL1 mutations were detected in 12 (24%) patients with mutational frequencies of 24% (11/46 patients) in the absence and 20% (1/5 patients) in the presence of excess blasts (P =0.84); ASXL1 mutational frequencies were 13% (3/23 patients) in RARS and 37% (7/19 patients) in RCMD-RS (P=0.07). In terms of other mutations, all 76 study patients were wild-type for JAK2 and MPL, whereas IDH2 R140Q mutations were present in 4 (5%) patients, including 3 with concomitant ASXL1 and IDH2 mutations. IDH1 mutation was seen in only 1 patient. 25 of 43 (58%) patients screened were mutated for SF3B1, including 4 (9%) who were mutated for both ASXL1 and SF3B1. Significant associations were evident between ASXL1 and IDH2 mutations (P =0.02) but not between ASXL1 and SF3B1 mutations (P =0.61). iii) Clinical correlates of ASXL1 mutations: Among all 76 study patients, presence of ASXL1 mutation did not correlate with age (P =0.30), hemoglobin level (P =0.17), platelet count (P =0.53), BM blast percentage (P =0.17), WHO morphologic category (P =0.34), transfusion dependence (P =0.84), IPSS-R cytogenetic categories (P =0.93), or IPSS-R risk group (P =0.33). The results were unchanged when analyzing the 51 patients with MDS-RS (i.e. ≥15% BM RS). Amongst the ASXL1 mutated patients (n =21) IPSS-R cytogenetic categories were as follows: 13 patients with normal karyotype (62%), 2 patients with trisomy 8 (10%), 1 patient each with -Y, del(11q), del(5q), del(20q), isochromosome 17 and monosomy 7 (5% each). iv) Prognostic impact of ASXL1 mutations: Median follow-up was 42.5 months, during which time 69 (91%) deaths and 8 (11%) leukemic transformations were documented. ASXL1 mutated patients had a median survival of 29 months, compared to 45 months in ASXL1 wild-type patients (P =0.04). However, the difference in median survival was no longer significant during multivariable analysis, which instead identified only IPSS-R and transfusion need as being independent predictors of inferior survival. Amongst those patients without excess blasts (n =63), presence of ASXL1 mutation predicted inferior survival in univariate analysis (P =.04) and significance was sustained during multivariable analysis that included IPSS-R cytogenetic categories (P =.04) but became borderline when WHO morphologic category was included (P =0.06); ASXL1 mutated patients had a shortened median survival of 43 months compared to 66 months in ASXL1 wild-type patients (P =.04). In the presence of ≥15% BM RS, ASXL1 mutations did not affect survival (P =0.48); the results were the same for RARS (P =0.9) and RCMD-RS (P =0.64). Conclusions : ASXL1 mutations might not affect survival in MDS patients with ≥15% BM RS, including those with RARS or RCMD-RS. Furthermore, an apparent survival disadvantage seen in ASXL1 -mutated MDS patients with ≥1% BM RS was accounted for by IPSS-R. Disclosures Pardanani: Stemline: Research Funding.

Abstract Background: CD123 is the α-subunit of the high-affinity receptor for interleukin-3; its expression in normal bone marrow (BM) is highly restricted, however CD123 is highly expressed in certain hematolymphoid malignancies. In a pilot study of 11 systemic mastocytosis (SM) patients (Lasho et al., Leukemia, 2015), we made the following novel observations (i) CD123 was aberrantly expressed on neoplastic mast cells (MC); and (ii) there was focal proliferation of plasmacytoid dendritic cells (PDC) around MC aggregates, suggesting a tumor promoting role for PDC. Objectives: To study MC CD123 expression by IHC in a larger cohort of SM patients to ascertain: (i) whether there is a significant difference in CD123 expression between SM subtypes; (ii) whether focal PDC proliferation around MC aggregates is correlated with CD123 expression; and (iii) whether CD123 expression has prognostic value for overall survival (OS). Methods: The current study was approved by the Mayo Clinic institutional review board. SM was classified as per standard criteria. Archived BM slides were stained for tryptase and CD123 as previously described (Lasho et al., Leukemia, 2015). Slides were reviewed independently by 2 hematopathologists who were blinded with regards to SM subgroups and scored on the following pre-defined parameters: (i) CD123 expression yes/no; (ii) CD123 expression strong/weak; (iii) focal PDC proliferation yes/no; and (iv) BM MC%. Results: We studied 58 SM patients and 3 controls. Of the former, 23 had indolent SM (ISM), 10 aggressive SM (ASM), 23 SM with associated hematological disease (SM-AHD), and 2 had mast cell leukemia (MCL). Of the SM-AHD patients, 10 (43%) had CMML, 5 (22%) myeloproliferative neoplasm-unclassified (MPN-u), 3 (13%) PV, 2 (9%) acute myeloid leukemia, and 1 each had lymphoma, myeloma and myelodysplastic syndrome. The median follow up from diagnosis was 32 months (range 0.1 to 162). Over this period, 3 patients (5%) had leukemic transformation and 30 patients (52%) died. Concordance rates between hematopathologists for CD123 positive/negative, CD123 strong/weak, focal PDC proliferation yes/no and MC% were 97%, 94%, 98% and 100%, respectively. MC CD123 expression was absent in control cases but demonstrable in 37 (64%) SM patients; expression rates were 100%, 61%, 57%, and 0% in ASM, ISM, SM-AHD and MCL, respectively (p=0.02). Similar to MCL, both cases with SM-AML showed absent MC CD123 expression. Strong MC CD123 expression (comparable to background interstitial PDC) was observed in 23 patients (62%), including 85% with SM-AHD, 60% with ASM, and 43% with ISM (p=0.08). Focal PDC proliferation around MC aggregates, regardless of CD123 expression status, was noted in 44 patients (76%), including 90% with ASM, 87% with ISM, 65% with SM-AHD and 0% with MCL (p=0.02). Focal PDC proliferation was significantly higher in CD123-positive versus -negative patients (87% versus 50%, p=0.005). OS was predicted by SM subtype; the median OS for ISM, ASM, SM-AHD and MCL patients was not reached, 30 months, 25 months and 3 months, respectively (p=0.005). CD123 expression status did not have prognostic value for OS overall, however, in SM-AHD patients, CD123 expression was associated with significantly inferior survival (p=0.04), independent of the associated disease (ie, CMML vs AML vs MPN vs other). Survival outcome of SM-CMML patients expressing MC CD123 (n=3, median OS=11 months) was significantly inferior as compared to patients who did not (n=7, median OS=44 months), independent of age and absolute monocyte count (p=0.01). CD123 staining intensity had borderline significance for OS in the overall cohort (p=0.08). When restricted to non-indolent SM cases, strong CD123 expression was associated with significantly worse overall survival (15 versus 88 months, p=0.04). Conclusions: In this cohort, aberrant MC CD123 expression was observed in the majority of SM patients with highest prevalence in ASM patients and uniformly absent expression in leukemic phase SM (MCL or SM-AML). Focal PDC proliferation around MC aggregates was significantly higher in CD123-positive cases, indicating a potential functional interaction. CD123 expression identified SM-AHD patients with inferior OS, especially those with SM-CMML. Strong CD123 staining intensity may be associated with inferior OS in non-indolent SM patients. CD123 expression on MC and PDC constitutes a novel therapeutic target in non-leukemic SM. Disclosures Pardanani: Stemline: Research Funding. Brooks:Stemline Therapeutics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties.

Abstract Abstract 3069 Background: Monosomal karyotype (MK) is defined as the presence of two or more distinct autosomal chromosome monosomies or a single autosomal monosomy associated with at least one structural abnormality (Breems DA et al. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26: 4791). In acute myeloid leukemia (AML), MK has been shown to be prognostically worse than complex or other unfavorable karyotype (Breems DA et al. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26: 4791). In primary myelofibrosis (PMF), complex karyotype or isolated trisomy 8 predicts inferior survival (Hussein K et al. Blood 2010; 115: 496). Objective: To determine if MK in PMF is prognostically distinct from previously defined poor cytogenetic risk categories including complex karyotype and isolated trisomy 8. Methods: The Mayo Clinic database for PMF was used to identify consecutive patients with unfavorable karyotype including complex karyotype and sole trisomy 8. WHO criteria were used for PMF diagnosis and leukemic transformation (Vardiman JW et al. Blood 2009; 114: 937). Results: Among 793 PMF patients with cytogenetic information at the time of their first time referral to the Mayo Clinic, 452 displayed a normal karyotype and 341 (43%) an abnormal karyotype. Of the latter, 41 (12%) displayed complex karyotype and 21 (6%) sole trisomy 8. Among the 41 patients with complex karyotype, 17 (42%) met the criteria for MK and 24 (58%) displayed complex karyotype without monosomies. Overall survival was significantly inferior in patients with MK compared to those with either complex karyotype without monosomies (p=0.02; HR 2.3, 95% CI 1.1–4.8) or trisomy 8 (p=0.02; HR 2.4, 95% CI 1.2–5.1) (Fig. 1). Prognosis among all three groups was significantly worse than patients with normal karyotype (Fig. 1). Leukemia-free survival was also significantly inferior in patients with MK compared to those with either complex karyotype without monosomies (p=0.02; HR 6.9, 95% CI 1.3–37.3) or trisomy 8 (p=0.02; HR 14.8, 95% CI 1.7–130.8) (Fig. 2). LFS in patients with normal karyotype was similar to those with either complex karyotype without monosomies (p=0.31) or trisomy 8 (p=0.86) (Figure 2). Conclusions: Monosomal karyotype in PMF is distinctly associated with extremely poor overall and leukemia-free survivals that are significantly worse than those seen in PMF patients with other unfavorable karyotype including complex karyotype without monosomies and sole trisomy 8 abnormalities. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Abstract 2918 Background: Monosomal karyotype (MK) is defined as the presence of two or more distinct autosomal chromosome monosomies or a single autosomal monosomy associated with at least one structural abnormality (Breems DA et al. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26: 4791). In acute myeloid leukemia (AML), MK has been associated with a worse prognosis than otherwise complex karyotype, regardless of the specific type of autosomal chromosome involved (Breems DA et al. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26: 4791). Whether or not these observations also hold true for myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) is currently unknown. Objective: To determine if MDS with complex karyotype can be prognostically sub-stratified further based on the presence or absence of MK and if prognosis in MDS with MK is in addition affected by the presence or absence of monosomy 7 or monosomy 5. Methods: The Mayo Clinic database for MDS was used to identify consecutive patients with complex karyotype, defined as the presence of three or more numerical or structural cytogenetic abnormalities. World Health Organization (WHO) criteria were used for MDS diagnosis and leukemic transformation (Vardiman JW et al. Blood 2009; 114: 937). Overall and leukemia-free survivals were calculated from the time of initial cytogenetic studies documenting complex karyotype. Results: A total of 127 MDS patients (median age 70 years; 79 males) with complex karyotype were identified. Amongst them, 106 (83%) met the above-stipulated criteria for MK and 21 (17%) had complex karyotype without monosomies. The MK in the 106 patients included monosomy 7 and/or monosomy 5 in 73 cases. The three complex karyotype subsets (i.e. complex without monosomies vs. MK that included monosomy 7 and/or 5 vs. MK excluding monosomy 7 or 5) were not significantly different in terms of age and sex distribution, hemoglobin level, leukocyte or platelet count, bone marrow blast percentage or International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) risk score. However, survival was significantly inferior in patients with MK compared to those with complex karyotype without monosomies (p=0.01; HR 1.9, 95% CI 1.1–3.3). Multivariable analysis identified MK (p=0.002), advanced age (p=0.0004), increased bone marrow blast percentage (0.04), but not IPSS risk category (p=0.34), as independent risk factors for survival. Interestingly, there was no difference in survival among MK patients further sub-stratified by the presence or absence of monosomy 7 and/or monosomy 5 (Figure 1). Although not statistically significant, leukemia-free survival was also worse in patients with MK compared to those with complex karyotype (p=0.11; HR 2.7, 95% CI 0.8–9.0); none of the aforementioned variables significantly affected leukemia-free survival. Conclusions: Monosomal karyotype in MDS identifies a prognostically worse subgroup of patients with complex karyotype. Furthermore, in the context of MK, autosomal monosomies other than monosomy 7 or monosomy 5 are prognostically as detrimental. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Abstract 2408 Purpose: Vitamin D insufficiency is common globally and in the United States. Approximately 25–50% of patients seen in routine clinical practice have vitamin D levels below the optimal range with low levels linked to higher cancer incidence. Although vitamin D insufficiency is also related to inferior prognosis in some cancers, no data exists for chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL). Patients and Methods: To test the hypothesis that vitamin D levels predict outcome in patients with CLL, we evaluated the relationship of 25 (OH)D serum levels with time-to-treatment (TTT) and overall survival (OS) in 390 newly diagnosed CLL patients participating in a prospective cohort study (discovery cohort) and separate cohort of 153 previously untreated patients participating in an observational study (confirmation cohort). 25 (OH)D levels were measured by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation were all <7% (data not shown). All vitamin D assays were performed on stored research samples; results were not included in the clinical record and were not known to the treating physicians in either study. Vitamin D insufficiency was defined as a serum 25 (OH)D level <25 ng/mL (62.5 nmol/L), an accepted level3 for the establishment of hypovitaminosis D and the threshold used in routine clinical practice to identify individuals with 25 (OH)D insufficiency by our laboratory in routine clinical practice (http://www.mayomedicallaboratories.com). Results: We evaluated the relationship of 25 (OH)D serum levels with time-to-treatment (TTT) and overall survival (OS) in newly diagnosed CLL patients participating in a prospective cohort study (discovery cohort) and a separate cohort of previously untreated patients participating in an observational study (confirmation cohort). Of 390 CLL patients in the discovery cohort, 119 (30.5%) were 25 (OH)D insufficient. 25 (OH)D insufficiency had no relationship with CD38, ZAP-70, CD49d or IGHV mutation status and had no relationship with FISH risk category as classified using the Dohner system. After median follow-up of 3 years, TTT (hazard ratio [HR]=1.66; p=0.005) and OS (HR=2.39; p=0.01) were shorter for 25 (OH)D insufficient patients (figure). We next attempted to validate these findings in an independent group of previously untreated CLL patients. In the validation cohort, 61 of 153 patients (39.9%) were 25 (OH)D insufficient. After median follow-up of 9.9 years, TTT (HR=1.59; p=0.05) and OS (HR 1.63; p=0.06) were again shorter for 25 (OH)D insufficient patients. On pooled multivariable analysis of patients in both cohorts adjusting for age, sex, stage, CD38, ZAP-70, IGHV, CD49d, and FISH, 25 (OH)D insufficiency remained an independent predictor of TTT (HR=1.47; p=0.008). On multivariable analysis for OS, the HR for death associated with 25 (OH)D insufficiency was similar to univariate findings although the p value did not reach the threshold of statistical significance (HR=1.47; 95% CI=0.97–2.23; p=0.07). Conclusion: 25 (OH)D insufficiency is associated with inferior TTT and OS in CLL patients. Whether normalizing vitamin D levels in deficient CLL patients would improve outcome merits clinical testing. Disclosures: Zent: Genzyme: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; G.S.K.: Research Funding.

Abstract Background : Gene mutations are common (~90%) in patients with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) and involve epigenetic regulators (TET2 ~ 60%, ASXL1 ~40%), spliceosome components (SRSF2 ~40%) and signal pathways (RAS ~30%). Of these, thus far, only ASXL1 mutations have been shown to adversely impact overall survival (OS). In the current study, we used a 27-gene panel assay to identify additional prognostically-relevant mutations in CMML and to also determine if number of mutations carries prognostic relevance. Methods : 175 patients with WHO-defined CMML were included in the study. All patients had bone marrow (BM) biopsies and cytogenetics performed at diagnosis. Targeted capture assays were carried out on BM DNA specimens obtained at diagnosis for the following genes; TET2, DNMT3A, IDH1, IDH2, ASXL1, EZH2, SUZ12, SRSF2, SF3B1, ZRSR2, U2AF1, PTPN11, Tp53, SH2B3, RUNX1, CBL, NRAS, JAK2, CSF3R, FLT3, KIT, CALR, MPL, NPM1, CEBPA, IKZF, and SETBP1. Paired-end indexed libraries were prepared from individual patient DNA using the NEBNext Ultra Library prep protocol on the Agilent Bravo liquid handler. Capture libraries were assembled according to Nimblegen standard library protocol. Base-calling was performed using Illumina's RTA version 1.17.21.3. Genesifter software was utilized to analyze targeted sequence data. Specific variants were deemed as mutations if they were associated with a hematological malignancy (as identified by COSMIC database), or if they were not associated with a dbSNP Results: Among the 175 study patients, 66% were males and median age was 70 years. 146 (83%) patients were subclassified as CMML-1. At a median follow-up of 23 months, 146 (83%) deaths and 25 (14%) leukemic transformations were documented. Median survivals were 24 months for CMML-1 and 16 months for CMML-2 (p=0.38). Mutational frequencies were; TET2 46%, ASXL1 45%, SRSF2 45%, SETBP1 19%, CBL 14%, RUNX1 14%, NRAS 12%, U2AF1 8%, SF3B1 6%, ZRSR2 6%, Tp53 5%, DNMT3A 5%, IDH2 5%, PTPN11 5%, SH2B3 5%, JAK2 4%, NPM1 3%, CSF3R 2%, IDH1 2%, EZH2 1%, SUZ12 1%, KIT 1%, FLT3 1%, CALR 1%. 172 patients (98%) had at least one mutation, 21 (12%) had 2, 24 (14%) had 3, 20 (11%) had 4, 9 (5%) had 5, while one (1%) patient had 6 concurrent mutations. Risk stratification was based on Mayo prognostic model: 25% high, 32% intermediate and 43 % low risk. In univariate analysis, presence of ASXL1 mutations (p=0.01), absence of TET2 mutations (p=0.005) and presence of DNMT3A mutations (p=0.02) were associated with inferior survival; in multivariable analysis, ASXL1 (p=0.01) and TET2 (p=0.03) mutations remained significant. In order to determine prognostic interaction between these two mutations, patients were stratified into four mutational categories: ASXL1wt/TET2wt (n =56), ASXL1mut/TET2wt (n =31), ASXL1mut/TET2mut (n =50) and ASXL1wt/TET2mut (n =38). Survival data in these four groups showed significant difference in favor of ASXL1wt/TET2mut (median survival 38 months; p=0.016), compared to those with ASXL1wt/TET2wt (19 months), ASXL1mut/TET2wt (31 months)and ASXL1mut/TET2mut (16 months); there was no significant difference in survival among the latter three groups (p=0.3) (Figure). The number of mutations per patient did not affect outcome (p=0.3). In multivariable analysis, presence of ASXL1 mutations (P=0.01) and absence of TET2 mutations (p=0.003) remained significant when risk factors used in the Mayo prognostic model (HB <10 gm/dl, AMC >10 x 10(9)/L, platelets <100 x 10(9)/L, circulating IMC) were added to the model; the same was true for ASXL1wt/TET2mut (p=0.036). In a separate multivariable analysis that included the Mayo prognostic model as a single variable along with presence of ASXL1 and absence of TET2 mutations; or absence of ASXL1wt/TET2mut mutational status, the respective hazard ratios were 1.4 (95% CI 1.07-2.1; p=0.012), 1.5 (95% CI 1.07-2.1; p=0.03) and 1.8 (95% CI 1.2-2.7; p=0.001). Leukemia-free survival was worse in ZRSR2 -mutated cases (p=0.03). Conclusions: Almost 100% of patients with CMML express one or more myeloid neoplasm-relevant mutations. The current study suggests a favorable prognostic impact from TET2 mutations, unless accompanied by ASXL1 mutations. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Abstract 1887 Poster Board I-910 Background: Chromosomal translocations involving 8p11.2 give rise to diverse oncogenic fusion genes including FGFR1 and MYST3. FGFR1 rearrangements have been associated with the stem cell leukemia/lymphoma (SCLL) syndrome, which is a mixed myeloid-lymphoid malignancy characterized by eosinophilia, monocytosis and rapid disease progression into acute myeloid leukemia or lymphoblastic lymphoma. MYST3 is a histone acetyltransferase whose rearrangement has been associated with acute myeloid leukemia (AML; usually monocytic). Methods: The Mayo Clinic cytogenetic database spanning the years 1988–2009 was screened for 8p11.2 translocations. Bone marrow (BM) pathology and cytogenetic results were re-reviewed and relevant clinical information was retrospectively obtained. Archived BM specimens were analyzed by FISH to identify FGFR1 and/or MYST3 rearrangements. BAC clones used for direct-labeled break-apart FISH probes for FGFR1 were CTC-497A2, RP11-90P5 and RP11-513D5 for the 5' portion and RP11-675F6 and RP11-495O10 for the 3' portion; those used for direct-labeled dual color, dual fusion FISH probes for MYST3 were RP11-589C21, CTD-2532C15, RP11-45I11 and RP11-411A18 and for CREBBP (16p13.3) were RP11-737F1, RP11-136I22, Rp11-962J17 and CTD-2514E9. Results: Out of 24,262 unique patient cytogenetic studies, 8p11.2 translocations were identified in 14 (∼0.06%) patients; 6 constituted sole abnormalities. BM specimens for FISH analysis were available in 13 patients (age range 52–75 years; 8 males). Twelve of these 13 patients had myeloid neoplasms and one had lymphoma; the latter patient had a t(8;10)(p11.2;p13) translocation as a subclone of a 14q32 abnormality and neither FGFR1 nor MYST3 were involved. Among the 12 patients with myeloid neoplasms, FISH analysis revealed abnormalities of MYST3 in 4 patients, FGFR1 in 4 patients, and neither in 4 patients. The MYST3 abnormalities included MYST3-CREBBP in 2 patients, MYST3-EP300 in one patient and MYST3 amplification in one patient; specific diagnoses included AML with or without antecedent chronic myeloid malignancy. Only one of the 4 patients with FGFR1 rearrangements displayed peripheral blood eosinophilia; specific diagnoses included chronic myeloid malignancy and AML. Three of the remaining 4 patients with neither FGFR1 nor MYST3 abnormalities had highly complex cytogenetic abnormalities except one who had sole t(8;13)(p11.2,q12) and presented with lymphadenopathy (precursor-T cell lymphoblastic lymphoma), marked leukocytosis, eosinophilia, monocytosis, and a BM morphology consistent with MPN (marked myeloproliferation with granulocytosis and eosinophilia). Survival was uniformly poor in all 8p11.2 translocations. Conclusions: 8p11.2 translocations are rarely encountered in routine clinical practice and are usually associated with aggressive myeloid malignancies. In the current unselected series of patients, peripheral blood eosinophilia was not a typical feature of the myeloid neoplasm phenotype associated with FGFR1 translocation. Conversely, at least by FISH, FGFR1 was not involved in an 8p11.2-associated myeloid neoplasm that exhibited SCLL-like features. Additional molecular studies are planned to validate the current findings. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Abstract 1241 Poster Board I-263 Background and Significance Monoclonal B lymphocytosis (MBL) is a hematologic syndrome characterized by accumulations of clonal B lymphocytes in the peripheral blood. Most MBL have a CLL-like immunophenotype, though other, less common phenotypes are observed. Although some MBL, particularly those with MBL cell counts >1.9 × 109 / L, progress to CLL, “low count” MBL (<0.2 × 109 MBL / μL) have little potential to progress to MBL and may have different biologic characteristics from MBL with lymphocytosis or Rai Stage 0 CLL. Our hypothesis was that detailed characterization of family-associated MBL may also provide biologic insights into the pathogenesis of CLL. Methods Individuals with MBL were identified by flow cytometry screening of fresh and cyropreserved peripheral blood from unaffected members of CLL kindreds ascertained by Genetic Epidemiology of CLL Consortium (GEC) sites. We defined MBL as populations of CD5+, CD19+, CD20lo, CD23+ B cells that comprised at least 0.02% of the PBMC and did not exceed 5.0 × 109 MBL cells / L. Flow cytometry was used to determine the surface immunophenotype including prognostic parameters of CD38, intracellular ZAP-70, immunoglobulin isotype, CD49d, and the ratio of CD69:71. mRNA and genomic DNA from single MBL cells isolated by flow cytometric sorting were analyzed using PCR to determine immunoglobulin heavy and light chain sequences (IGVH status). MBL cells were sorted in bulk for FISH determination of genetic loci associated with clinical CLL. Results Fifty-four unaffected family members were found to have MBL, of these 48 (89%) showed a typical CLL immunophenotype (CLL-like MBL). We observed significant variability in the size of the MBL clone as a percentage of the CD19+ B cell compartment (mean 30%, median 16%; range 2% - 97%). CD38 positive (defined as CD38 surface expression in ≥ 30% of MBL cells) was observed in 6 of 38 (16%) subjects tested. ZAP-70 positive (defined as intracellular expression in ≥ 20% of MBL cells) was expressed in 5 of 28 (18%) participants. CD49d positive (defined as surface expression in ≥ 45% of MBL cells) was observed in 4 of 17 (24%) subjects. The ratio of surface expression of CD69:CD71, a measure of cellular activation that also correlates with an unmutated IGVH, was ≥2.0 in 3 of 34 (9%) subjects tested. Among 36 subjects tested, 9 (25%) MBL expressed both surface IgD and IgM (defined as surface expression ≥ 40% for both IgM and IgD), 12 (33%) expressed IgD only, 2 (6%) expressed IgM only, and 13 did not express IgD or IgM (36%). Analysis of IGVH status has been completed in 10 individuals. Both immunoglobulin heavy chain variable (IGVH) region mutated (n = 14) and unmutated (n = 5) sequences were observed. Six of 10 individuals had 2 or more unrelated MBL clones (range 2 - 4), including two individuals with both unmutated and mutated clones. Among the 19 MBL clones identified in these 8 subjects, VH3 or VH4 rearrangements were observed in all MBL clones. The most commonly rearranged IGVH genes were 3-07 (3 MBL clones), 3-15 (3), and 4-34 (3). No VH1 family gene rearrangements were observed. MBL cells were bulk sorted for FISH from 14 subjects. Mono or biallelic deletion of 13q14.3 was observed in 9 subjects, 4 were normal, and one showed trisomy 12. Conclusions Our data affirms that CLL-like MBL are commonly observed among the unaffected family members from CLL kindreds. We found that family associated MBL clones (most of which were small clones) express ZAP-70, CD38, and CD49d at an apparently lower frequency than observed in CLL. Unlike in CLL, the surface immunoglobulin isotype showed co-expression of IgM and IgD in only one third of cases. Moreover, small MBL clones are commonly oligoclonal and predominantly express mutated IGVH genes with an IGVH usage that also appears different from CLL. Taken together, these findings suggest that small MBL clones, though phenotypically similar to CLL, have important biologic differences from CLL that may explain the limited potential of these clones to progress to CLL. The clinical outcome of these MBL clones in relation to our baseline prognostic characterization will be of interest. In addition the further investigation of family associated MBL is being conducted and may clarify the genetics and immunobiology of familial CLL. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.