Batthula, Sreedhar

Abstract Introduction: Patients and their families and medical providers have assumed that psychologic stress impacts glucose control in T1D (Type 1 Diabetes) though studies providing confirmatory evidence in real world settings are, to our knowledge, lacking. We hypothesized that self-reported psychologic stress worsens glucose control in T1D. Method: We studied 20 adults with T1D on continuous glucose monitor (CGM), sensor augmented insulin pump (SAP) prospectively at 2 clinical research centers. Patients reported psychological stress through stress diaries for 5 weeks on a severity scale of 1-7 using hard copy logs including time of onset and offset of stress and severity. For analytic purpose, grades 1-4 are classified as mild and grades 5-7 as severe. Results: Baseline characteristics were age 44.9±15.0 years, F/M 12/8, HbA1c 6.8 ± 0.7%, and diabetes duration of 22.9±15.9 years. We analyzed glucose variability during days of stress versus days without stress. During a 24 hour period, patients experienced less hypoglycemia during days with stress versus days without stress (p value 0.03). During the 5 week period, patients reported 23 ± 19.5 events. We analyzed the impact of self-reported stress on CGM data streams after excluding stress events associated with missing CGM data, nocturnal events (from 12 MN to 6 AM, too few events) and events for which subjects did not provide duration of stress. Thus, we analyzed 19.5 ± 17 events per patient from 6AM to 12MN. From 6 AM to 12 MN, the episodes lasted 179 ± 255 minutes with 83 % episodes being mild/moderate and 17% moderate/ severe. Number of CGM readings during daytime stress episodes were 717± 1120 compared to 8768± 1238 during non-stress periods. Impact of stress from 6 AM to 12 MN (Mid-Night) on CGM glucose was analyzed using matched paired t test. Mean glucose (160.6±41.9 vs 148.3± 28.6) and SD (53.2 ±17.7 vs 56.1±14.6) did not show a difference; however % of time spent below 70 mg/dl was less (4 ± 5) in patients during stressful periods compared to times without stress (6.3± 5.5, P value 0.02). Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first study attempting to analyze the impact of self-reported stress using daily stress diaries on CGM data streams in T1D patients on SAP. The study revealed significant challenges experienced by patients in reporting adequate data. Self-reported stress was not associated with hyperglycemia. However, days of self-reported stress and periods during patients reported stress were characterized by less hypoglycemia on CGM data streams.

Abstract INTRODUCTION: Type 1 Diabetes (T1D) patients have an increased risk for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Pancreas Transplantation Alone (PTA) in patients with T1D achieves near normal glucose control for a prolonged period but limited data are available to date regarding MACE during a 10 year follow up period after the procedure. OBJECTIVE: We studied incidence of MACE after PTA in T1D patients over a 10 year follow-up period. METHODS: Retrospectively, we studied 113 T1D recipients of PTA at Mayo Clinic, Rochester with the procedure performed between January 1998 and August 2018 and follow up of at least 1 year. Data were collected before transplantation and up to 10 year follow up after the first PTA. MACE data were gathered until primary non function, re-transplantation, or complete loss of c-peptide (<0.01ng/ml). We report vascular risk factors including hypertension, hyperlipidemia, smoking and BMI along with MACE (defined as cardiac events as unstable angina, Myocardial Infarction (MI), need for re-vascularization, cardiac death, cerebral events as Transient ischemic attack (TIA), stroke, need for re-vascularization and peripheral arterial disease as need for re-vascularization, gangrene and amputation). RESULTS: Eighteen subjects had pre-transplant MACE. A total of 14 subjects had graft failure within 24 to 36 hours due to thrombosis, with 3 in pre-transplant MACE cohort and 11 in no MACE cohort. Thus, we followed 99 subjects for the development of post-transplant MACE for a period of 6.3 ± 3.6 years. T1D subjects with MACE (n=15) had baseline characteristics: Age 48± 7.8 years, gender F/M 9/6,, duration of diabetes 33 ± 12 years, BMI 26± 3.1(Kg/m2), HbA1c 9.3 ± 1.5% and C-peptide 0.09 ng/ml. 84 T1D patients without MACE were age 42 ± 10.6 years, gender F/M 55/29, duration of diabetes 26.5 ± 10.7 years, BMI 26 ± 5.2(Kg/m2), HbA1c 6.7 ± 2.5 and C-peptide 0.09 ng/ml. There are a total of 584 person-years of follow up to first MACE event and 632 person-years of graft failure, death or last follow-up. Nine patients developed 11 MACE events post-PTA. Therefore, the event rate is 1.5 MACE events per 100 person-years for first MACE event and the total event rate is 1.7 MACE events per 100 person-years of follow-up. Age, smoking (yes), gender, duration of diabetes, HTN and Hyperlipidemia presence did not show any significant impact on post-transplant MACE outcome based on univariate Cox regression but the pre-transplant BMI (HR = 1.14; CI = (1.04, 1.26); p = 0.008) and pre-transplant HbA1c (HR = 1.26; CI = (1.06, 1.51); p = 0.01) showed statistically significant impact. CONCLUSIONS: At our center, MACE is low in PTA recipients. There is no impact of presence of pre-transplant MACE on development of post-transplant MACE but pre-transplant BMI and HbA1c account for risk of MACE.