Grogan, Martha

Abstract Background Wild type transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis (wtATTR-CA) is increasingly recognized as a cause of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) but prognosis is often limited due to late or misdiagnosis.Longitudinal left ventricular strain and biomarkers are established as markers of disease severity, but the role of RV free wall strain, reflecting RV contractility, is less well understood. Purpose We sought to determine whether RV free wall strain might add incremental prognostic value in wtATTR-CA. Methods Consecutive patients diagnosed with wtATTR-CA with tissue confirmation at Mayo clinic between 2013 and 2015 were included. Patients with TTR gene mutations were excluded. Baseline characteristics and transthoracic echocardiography measurements were obtained from the medical records. Speckle tracking RV free wall longitudinal 2D strain and peak LA longitudinal 2D strain were measured using Tom Tec Imaging System. Survival was determined using Kaplan Meier estimates and using the cox proportional hazard ratio, univariate and multivariable analysis were performed to identify predictors of mortality in patients with wtATTR. Results The study group comprised 139 patients (mean age 74.9±8.6, 92.8% male), of which 102 had adequate image quality for RV strain, and 99 for LA strain. Amongst these, 102 (73.3%) had AF and 118 patients (84.8%) had HF. During 3.23±2.0 years of follow up, 66 patients died. Both mean RV and LA strain were impaired at baseline: RV free wall strain was −14.7±4.9, and peak atrial longitudinal strain (PALS) was 13.2±8.8%. Using ROC analysis, RV strain of −16.8% was an independent predictor of all-cause mortality. In univariate modeling, higher levels of NT-proBNP (HR: 1.1 per 1000 pg.ml; 95%, CI 1.05–1.15, p<0.001) and Troponin T (HR: 2.0 per 0.1ng/ml; 95% CI 1.49–2.61, p<0.001) were associated with increased all-cause mortality. In addition, LV GLS (HR: 1.13 per 1%; 95% CI1.04–1.24, p=0.003), RV free wall LS (HR: 2.16 per 5%; 95%, CI 1.57–3.03, p<0.0001), and PALS (HR: 0.91 per1%; 95% CI 0.85–0.96, p<0.0001) were univariate predictors of all-cause mortality. In multivariate analysis using a stepwise regression model, RV free wall longitudinal strain (HR: 1.81; 95% CI 1.29–2.62, p<0.001) and Troponin T (HR: 1.7; 95% CI 1.25–2.26, p=0.001) remained independent predictors. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated a higher mortality rate above −16.8 RV strain cut-off (Wilcoxon <0.0001). All stages were divided into two groups by −16.8% RV strain, and survival in individual stages analyzed. Stage 1 and 2 with <−16.8 RV free wall strain value had higher mortality than ≤-16.8% RV strain (Stage 1: Wilcoxon = 0.0041 and Stage 2: Wilcoxon = 0.023). However, there was not a survival difference between two RV strain groups in stage3 (Wilcoxon = 0.34) Conclusion RV free wall strain is an independent predictor of survival in wtATTR patients and may add incremental prognostic value to NT-proBNP and Troponin. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None. Kaplan-Meier curve of all patientsKaplan-Meier curve of stages

Abstract Aims Transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) is a progressive, fatal disorder that remains underdiagnosed. The Tafamidis in Transthyretin Cardiomyopathy Clinical Trial (ATTR-ACT) was the first large clinical trial to include both wild-type (ATTRwt) and hereditary (ATTRv) patients. A description of the natural history of ATTR-CM, utilizing data from placebo-treated patients in ATTR-ACT, will provide a greater understanding of presentation and progression of ATTR-CM and may aid in disease awareness, earlier diagnosis and treatment monitoring. Methods and results Changes in clinical endpoints (mortality, cardiovascular [CV]-related hospitalizations, 6-min walk test [6MWT] distance and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall Summary [KCCQ-OS] score) from baseline to Month 30 in the 177 patients (134 ATTRwt, 43 ATTRv) who received placebo in ATTR-ACT were assessed. ATTRwt patients tended to have less severe disease at baseline. Over the duration of ATTR-ACT, there were 76 (42.9%) all-cause deaths, and 107 (60.5%) patients had a CV-related hospitalization. There was a lower proportion of all-cause deaths in ATTRwt (49, 36.6%) than ATTRv (27, 62.8%). There was a similar, steady decline in mean (SD) 6MWT distance from baseline to Month 30 in ATTRwt (93.9 [93.7] m) and ATTRv (89.1 [107.2] m) patients. The decline in mean (SD) KCCQ-OS score was less severe in ATTRwt (13.8 [20.7]) than ATTRv (21.0 [26.4]) patients. Conclusions Patients with ATTR-CM experience a severe, progressive disease. In ATTR-ACT, placebo-treated patients with ATTRv, compared with ATTRwt, had more severe disease at baseline, and their disease progressed more rapidly as shown by mortality, hospitalizations and quality of life over time.

Introduction: The T peak - T end interval (Tpe) is a measure of transmural dispersion of repolarisation with prolongation of this interval linked to an increased risk of ventricular arrhythmias and sudden death. Patients with cardiac amyloid experience a high rate of sudden cardiac death. Objective: To determine the prognostic utility of the Tpeak-Tend interval in patients with transthyretin (TTR) cardiac amyloidosis. Methods: Of the 240 patients who underwent evaluation for TTR amyloidosis at our tertiary referral center from 1966 to 2010, 39 met inclusion criteria (65 excluded for AF, 66 BBB/Paced Rhythm, 25 CAD, 21 other). Inclusion criteria were presence of histological diagnosis of TTR amyloid and confirmed cardiac involvement by echocardiogram or biopsy and absence of atrial fibrillation (AF) or bundle branch block/paced rhythm on the index surface ECG, or history of coronary heart disease (CAD). Tpe was measured in leads V3 and V5. Cox proportional hazards model were used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Kaplan-Meier curves were used to estimate overall survival and differences between curves were estimated using log rank. Primary endpoints were death or heart transplantation. Results: Of the 39 patients, 85% were male, and 69% were mTTR. Mean age 66.4 ± 13.9 years. Mean follow up period of 4.2 ± 3.2 years, 25 died and 5 received heart transplants. Median survival was 3.8 years, with 5 year survival 34%. On univariate analysis, Tpe in lead V3 was predictive of adverse outcome, HR per 10msec, 1.195 (1.051-1.370). Further multivariate analysis, in a model accounting for age, gender, Lead V3 Tpe was independently associated with survival, HR per 10msec, 1.207, (1.094-1.411, p=0.009). Conclusions: The Tpe interval in Lead V3 at diagnosis is a novel, noninvasive independent predictor of survival in transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis patients in sinus rhythm.

Objective: Recent MRI studies have demonstrated the common occurrence of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) in cardiac amyloidosis (CA). However, the association of LGE presence and pattern with other clinical, morphological, functional, and biochemical parameters has not yet been demonstrated. It is important to define this association, since many of these parameters (NYHA class, ventricular thickness, cardiac biomarkers) have prognostic implications. Methods: Of 151 patients with confirmed systemic amyloidosis who underwent LGE cardiac MRI between January 2006 and December 2007 to evaluate for possible CA, 120 (AL 100, senile 9, and familial 11) were included after meeting of inclusion and exclusion criteria. Cine MRI images were analyzed for morphologic and functional data. LGE images were analyzed for presence and pattern of LGE. Clinical data including ECG’s and cardiac biomarkers was obtained. Results: LGE evidence of CA was present in 95 patients and absent in 25 patients. Three main patterns of LGE were observed. These were global diffuse transmural (homogenous or heterogenous) or subendocardial, suboptimally nulled myocardium without clear hyperenhancement, and focal patchy LGE. Symptoms, morphologic/functional variables, ECG voltages, and cardiac biomarker levels were worst in patients with global diffuse LGE, followed by suboptimally nulled myocardium, focal patchy LGE, and absent LGE groups (Table 1 ). Conclusions: The presence of LGE in amyloidosis patients is associated with worse clinical, morphologic, functional, and biochemical parameters. Amongst patients with abnormal LGE, global diffuse (transmural or subendocardial) LGE is associated with the worst profile. This provides initial evidence that the presence and pattern of LGE in CA is associated with other markers of prognosis.

Objective: In AL amyloidosis, early detection of cardiac involvement is desirable because of prognostic and therapeutic implications. Recent pilot MRI studies have demonstrated that late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) is a common finding in cardiac amyloidosis (CA) and reflects interstitial expansion due to amyloid infiltration. However it is not known whether evaluation of the myocardial substrate via LGE MRI may allow for earlier detection of CA compared with morphological assessment on the basis of increased left ventricular thickness (LVT). Methods: Between January 2006 and December 2007, 100 patients with confirmed AL amyloidosis underwent LGE MRI at our institution to evaluate for CA. Morphological evidence of CA was considered to be present when LVT was increased (mean of septum and inferolateral wall > 12 mm). LGE images were analyzed for presence and pattern of LGE. Clinical data was also reviewed. Results: Increased LVT was present in 69 patients. Abnormal LGE images were present in 76 patients (global diffuse transmural or subendocardial LGE in 43, suboptimally nulled myocardium in 18, and focal patchy LGE in 15 patients). LGE was present in 21 of 22 patients with a diagnosis of CA on cardiac biopsy. Seven patients (10%) with increased LVT did not have LGE. Conversely of 31 pts with normal LVT, 14 (45%) had abnormal LGE on MRI (usually suboptimally nulled myocardium or focal patchy LGE) and also had significantly higher incidence of low voltage ECG (50% vs. 0%), lower absolute limb lead voltage (6.5±3 vs. 9.7±2.6 mm), increased RV thickness (4.9±1.1 vs. 4.1±1) and higher BNP (316±376 vs. 107±103) compared to 17 patients without LGE (Table 1 ). Conclusions: MRI LGE is common in patients with CA and evaluation of the myocardial substrate using this technique may allow for earlier detection of cardiac involvement in AL amyloidosis compared with morphological assessment on the basis of increased LVT.

Introduction: Intrinsic wave propagation is a novel approach to measure myocardial stiffness (MS) as validated in animal studies. Aims and Hypothesis: 1) To compare MS measured by the wave method with chamber stiffness (CS) derived from noninvasively estimated end-diastolic pressure-volume relationship (EDPVR) in patients; 2) To test the hypothesis that MS is superior to CS for predicting outcomes in patients with cardiac amyloidosis (CA). Methods: Prospective study in 56 patients with amyloidosis (CA: 38, noncardiac amyloidosis, NCA: 18; 90% AL-type; age 63 ± 10 yrs; ejection fraction 57 ± 11%) and 36 normal subjects (age 49 ± 13 years). Intrinsic velocity propagation of myocardial stretch (iVP), a measure of MS, was measured by ultra-high frame rate (250-465Hz) tissue Doppler imaging. Left ventricular (LV) EDPVR were reconstructed using the noninvasive single-beat method (Fig.A). Stiffness coefficients (α, β, load-independent) and CS (dP/dV) were calculated. End-diastolic pressure (EDP) was estimated from E/e’. Adverse events at follow-up (death, heart failure, stroke, significant arrhythmia) were recorded. Results: iVP was higher in CA compared to NCA and controls, indicating higher MS (Fig. B). This was confirmed by EDPVR, which were steeper and shifted leftward (Fig. A). The slope (β) of EDPVR and CS (dP/dV) were higher and LV capacitance (V 30 , volume at 30 mmHg) was lower in CA (Fig. A) and correlated with iVP (β: r = 0.59; CS dP/dV, r = 0.43; EDP, r = 0.61; all p<0.0001). Patients with higher LV thickness (r = 0.66), lower LV longitudinal strain (r = -0.57) and elevated NT-proBNP (r = 0.69) had higher iVP. At follow-up (median 2.5 years), after adjusting for relevant confounders, an iVP >2.7 m/s was strongly associated with excess events (p<0.0001; Fig. C) and was superior to measures of CS (dP/dV: p = 0.28; β >6.5: p = 0.03; Fig. D). Conclusions: Myocardial stiffness by intrinsic wave method shows similar findings to chamber stiffness by EDVPR, but is more strongly related to outcomes in patients with amyloidosis.

Abstract Cardiac amyloidosis is a serious and progressive infiltrative disease that is caused by the deposition of amyloid fibrils at the cardiac level. It can be due to rare genetic variants in the hereditary forms or as a consequence of acquired conditions. Thanks to advances in imaging techniques and the possibility of achieving a non-invasive diagnosis, we now know that cardiac amyloidosis is a more frequent disease than traditionally considered. In this position paper the Working Group on Myocardial and Pericardial Disease proposes an invasive and non-invasive definition of cardiac amyloidosis, addresses clinical scenarios and situations to suspect the condition and proposes a diagnostic algorithm to aid diagnosis. Furthermore, we also review how to monitor and treat cardiac amyloidosis, in an attempt to bridge the gap between the latest advances in the field and clinical practice.

Background: Newly diagnosed patients with AL Amyloidosis are a heterogeneous population, ranging from incidentally found nephrotic syndrome to delayed advanced cardiac disease. For the purposes of trials, patients with the highest-risk disease are often excluded from trial participation. An NT-proBNP of 8500 or higher is the criterion most often used for exclusion from clinical trials due to high rates of early death. It is well documented that overall survival is improving over time, in part due to earlier diagnosis and in part due to more effective therapies. It is our aim to describe outcomes of patients with very high (NT-proBNP &gt;=8500) and advanced stage amyloidosis excluding very high (VH) NT-proBNP. Methods: To address this need, we examined the outcomes of AL patients diagnosed between 1/2012 and 7/2020 and seen at our institution within 90 days of diagnosis. Of the 1290 patients, 291 were seen beyond the 90 day threshold and were thus excluded. Another 170 patients were excluded due to missing biomarkers to calculate stage, leaving 829 patients for our analysis. Thresholds for troponins and BNPs were used according to Muchtar Blood 133(7):2019 to correct for assay used. The vast majority of patients had troponin T measured, and for them the 0.025 mcg/L and the 0.035 mcg/L cut-points were used for the 2012 and 2004 staging systems. A minority of patients did not have troponin T, but rather high sensitivity troponin T (n=129) or troponin I (n=23). For patients with high sensitivity troponin T, cut-points of 41 and 50 ng/L were used, respectively, for the 2012 and 2004 systems, and for patients with troponin I only, a cut-point of 0.1 mcg/L was used for both systems. In the 3 patients with no NT-proBNP but with BNP, 400 and 81 ng/L were used respectively for the 2012 and 2004 systems; otherwise, the 1800 ng/L and 332 ng/L cut-offs were used. A BNP of &gt; 700 ng/L was considered equivalent to NT-proBNP greater than or equal to 8500 ng/L. For the 2012 system, the dFLC of 18 mg/dL was used as a cut-off. Survival estimates were done using the method of Kaplan-Meier, and differences in survival were by determined by Log-Rank. Results: The median age of patients was 65 (range 29, 89), and 65% were male. 148 (17%) of these newly diagnosed patients had a VH (&gt;=8500) NT-proBNP. Patients with VH NT-proBNP were older (67 versus 64 years, p=0.004). Only 4% of the VH NT-proBNP patients received an ASCT in contrast to 34% without VH NT-proBNP. With a median follow-up of 30 months for surviving patients, median OS for VH NT-proBNP patients was 3.3 months in contrast to patients without VH NT-proBNP at 68.4 months (Figure). Breakdown of early death for patients with VH NT-proBNP by stage is shown in Table. Of Mayo 2012 patients staged I, II, III, and IV, the percent of patients with VH NT-proBNP was 0, 3, 20, and 45%. In contrast, for the European modification of the Mayo 2004 system, the percent with VH NT-proBNP by stage was 0, 6, 0, 100 for stages I, II, IIIa, and IIIb, respectively. Among the VH NT-proBNP patients, there was stage discrimination using the Mayo 2012 system (6-month death rates were 17, 45, and 66% for patients with stages II, III, and IV, respectively, p=0.02). In contrast, using the Mayo 2004 system in the patients with VH NT-proBNP, 6-month death rates were 45 and 60% for stage II and IIIb patients, respectively (p= 0.12). Among patients without VH NT-proBNP, rates of death in the first year were 21% including stage I patients whose death rates were well under 10%. Patients without VH NT-proBNP but Mayo 2012 Stage III and IV had 1-year mortalities of 28 and 43% respectively. Using the modified Mayo 2004 system, excluding the VH NT-proBNP 1-year mortality was 19 and 37% for patients with stage II and IIIa, respectively. Discussion: Establishing expected outcomes for the sickest AL amyloidosis patients is a means by which trials can be designed for these patients with an unmet need. Patients with VH NT-proBNP should be considered for specially designed trials, and patients without VH NT-proBNP and advanced stage should be included in trials for newly diagnosed patients regardless of stage as long as there is appropriate stratification. Disclosures Dispenzieri: Janssen: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Intellia: Research Funding; Alnylam: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding. Kumar:AbbVie: Other: Research funding for clinical trials to the institution, Consulting/Advisory Board participation with no personal payments; Tenebio: Other, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; Carsgen: Other, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Other: Research funding for clinical trials to the institution, Consulting/Advisory Board participation with no personal payments, Research Funding; Oncopeptides: Consultancy, Other: Independent Review Committee; IRC member; Celgene/BMS: Other: Research funding for clinical trials to the institution, Consulting/Advisory Board participation with no personal payments; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Other: Research funding for clinical trials to the institution, Consulting/Advisory Board participation with no personal payments; Janssen Oncology: Other: Research funding for clinical trials to the institution, Consulting/Advisory Board participation with no personal payments; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy; Dr. Reddy's Laboratories: Honoraria; Novartis: Research Funding; MedImmune: Research Funding; Genecentrix: Consultancy; Kite Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Cellectar: Other; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Genentech/Roche: Other: Research funding for clinical trials to the institution, Consulting/Advisory Board participation with no personal payments. Dingli:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Millenium: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Alexion: Consultancy; Rigel: Consultancy; Apellis: Consultancy; Sanofi-Genzyme: Consultancy. Kapoor:Celgene: Honoraria; Cellectar: Consultancy; Janssen: Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding. Lin:Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bluebird Bio: Consultancy, Research Funding; Juno: Consultancy; Legend BioTech: Consultancy; Merck: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Gamida Cells: Consultancy; Sorrento: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Vineti: Consultancy. Gertz:Springer Publishing: Patents & Royalties; Amyloidosis Foundation: Research Funding; International Waldenstrom Foundation: Research Funding; NCI SPORE MM: Research Funding; Ionis/Akcea: Consultancy; Alnylam: Consultancy; Prothena: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Spectrum: Consultancy, Research Funding; Annexon: Consultancy; Appellis: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Medscape: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Physicians Education Resource: Consultancy; Data Safety Monitoring board from Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy; Johnson and Johnson: Speakers Bureau; DAVA oncology: Speakers Bureau; Advisory Board for Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Advisory Board for Proclara: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; i3Health: Consultancy.

Abstract Cardiac amyloidosis is a serious and progressive infiltrative disease that is caused by the deposition of amyloid fibrils at the cardiac level. It can be due to rare genetic variants in the hereditary forms or as a consequence of acquired conditions. Thanks to advances in imaging techniques and the possibility of achieving a non-invasive diagnosis, we now know that cardiac amyloidosis is a more frequent disease than traditionally considered. In this position paper the Working Group on Myocardial and Pericardial Disease proposes an invasive and non-invasive definition of cardiac amyloidosis, addresses clinical scenarios and situations to suspect the condition and proposes a diagnostic algorithm to aid diagnosis. Furthermore, we also review how to monitor and treat cardiac amyloidosis, in an attempt to bridge the gap between the latest advances in the field and clinical practice.