Tabori, Uri

Abstract INTRODUCTION While TERT promoter mutation (TPM) has been established as a marker of clinically aggressive meningiomas, this alteration is rare and found in less than 5% of all cases. However, a larger subset of meningiomas may exhibit aberrant TERT expression in the absence of TPMs. This study investigated the effect of TERT gene expression on clinical outcome in meningioma patients. METHODS Clinical and molecular data were retrospectively collected on 1241 meningiomas, split into a Toronto discovery cohort and a multi-institutional validation cohort. Sanger sequencing and bulk RNA sequencing were used to determine TPM status and TERT gene expression. The effect of TERT expression on progression-free survival (PFS) was assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis. RESULTS While meningiomas with TPM showed expectedly higher TERT gene expression compared to wildtype (TP-WT) cases (p<0.0001), TERT expression was still detected in 28.7% (157/547) of TP-WT meningiomas. Meningiomas with TERT expression showed significantly worse PFS compared to meningiomas without any TERT expression. In fact, WHO grade 1 meningiomas with TERT expression had PFS outcomes resembling WHO grade 2 meningiomas lacking TERT expression (p=0.59). In turn, WHO grade 2 meningiomas with TERT expression had clinical outcomes similar to WHO grade 3 meningiomas without TERT expression (p=0.42). Furthermore, the proportion of meningiomas expressing TERT as well as overall TERT expression levels increased with increasing WHO grade. Multivariable analysis showed that TERT expression was significantly associated with worse PFS even when controlling for other known predictors of clinical outcome including TPM, CDKN2A/B loss, 1p/22q status and WHO grade (HR 1.85 [95% CI 1.33-2.57], p=0.00024). CONCLUSION TERT expression is a novel independent biomarker of outcome for meningiomas identifiable in up to one-third of cases that may be utilized to reclassify tumours to a higher WHO grade.

PURPOSE Diagnosis of Mismatch Repair Deficiency (MMRD) is crucial for tumor management and early detection in patients with the cancer predisposition syndrome constitutional mismatch repair deficiency (CMMRD). Current diagnostic tools are cumbersome and inconsistent both in childhood cancers and in determining germline MMRD. PATIENTS AND METHODS We developed and analyzed a functional Low-pass Genomic Instability Characterization (LOGIC) assay to detect MMRD. The diagnostic performance of LOGIC was compared with that of current established assays including tumor mutational burden, immunohistochemistry, and the microsatellite instability panel. LOGIC was then applied to various normal tissues of patients with CMMRD with comprehensive clinical data including age of cancer presentation. RESULTS Overall, LOGIC was 100% sensitive and specific in detecting MMRD in childhood cancers (N = 376). It was more sensitive than the microsatellite instability panel (14%, P = 4.3 × 10 −12 ), immunohistochemistry (86%, P = 4.6 × 10 −3 ), or tumor mutational burden (80%, P = 9.1 × 10 −4 ). LOGIC was able to distinguish CMMRD from other cancer predisposition syndromes using blood and saliva DNA ( P < .0001, n = 277). In normal cells, MMRDness scores differed between tissues (GI > blood > brain), increased over time in the same individual, and revealed genotype-phenotype associations within the mismatch repair genes. Importantly, increased MMRDness score was associated with younger age of first cancer presentation in individuals with CMMRD ( P = 2.2 × 10 −5 ). CONCLUSION LOGIC was a robust tool for the diagnosis of MMRD in multiple cancer types and in normal tissues. LOGIC may inform therapeutic cancer decisions, provide rapid diagnosis of germline MMRD, and support tailored surveillance for individuals with CMMRD.

Abstract cIMPACT‐NOW (the Consortium to Inform Molecular and Practical Approaches to CNS Tumor Taxonomy) was established to evaluate and make practical recommendations on recent advances in the field of CNS tumor classification, particularly in light of the rapid progress in molecular insights into these neoplasms. For Round 2 of its deliberations, cIMPACT‐NOW Working Committee 3 was reconstituted and convened in Utrecht, The Netherlands, for a meeting designed to review putative new CNS tumor types in advance of any future World Health Organization meeting on CNS tumor classification. In preparatory activities for the meeting and at the actual meeting, a list of possible entities was assembled and each type and subtype debated. Working Committee 3 recommended that a substantial number of newly recognized types and subtypes should be considered for inclusion in future CNS tumor classifications. In addition, the group endorsed a number of principles—relating to classification categories, approaches to classification, nomenclature, and grading—that the group hopes will also inform the future classification of CNS neoplasms.