Elrefaei, Amro

Introduction Background: The Woven Endo‐Bridge (WEB) device is an intrasaccular device being used to secure intracranial aneurysms through the endovascular approach. The WEB is commonly used for wide‐neck aneurysms. There are no comprehensive studies to assess the low‐profile device WEB 17 so far. Although, some single studies have reported their early experience using the device. We plan to provide a comprehensive assessment of the early center experience using the WEB 17 device to secure intracranial aneurysms. Objective: To provide an overview of the early‐center experience of the 0.017‐inch endovascular Woven EndoBridge device (WEB‐17) device. Methods A systematic review and meta‐analysis were conducted following the PRISMA recommendations. On April 15, 2023, we searched for eligible papers in Pubmed, Web of Science (ISI), Scopus, and Embase databases. The meta‐analysis was done using R software version 4.3.0. and the "meta" package. Pooled prevalence (%) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI), random‐effects model based and the generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) method. On the presence of multiple follow‐up points, we included the last available in the analysis. Complete occlusion was defined as Raymond–Roy occlusion classification (RROC) class I, and adequate occlusion was defined as RROC class I or II. Results Seven studies were finally included following the double‐reviewer screening of the retrieved literature. The patients' mean age ranged from 52.5±13.8 to 62.0±9.5 years, and 71.0% were females. The mean follow‐up duration ranged from 6±2.25 months to 11.6±4. Technical success was achieved in 98.34% (95% CI= 96.72‐99.17) of the cases, while adjunctive devices were used in 4.97% (95% CI= 1.60‐14.39) of them (Figure 1). The complete occlusion rate was 72.54% (95% CI= 63.44‐80.08) (Figure 2), while the adequate occlusion rate was 94.41 (95% CI= 88.17‐97.46) (Figure 3). There was no significant heterogeneity in all pooled outcomes. Conclusion The early experience of the device shows an efficacy profile comparable with the currently available devices in treating intracranial aneurysms.

Background The Woven Endo-Bridge (WEB) device revolutionized the treatment of wide-necked bifurcation aneurysms by intrasaccular flow diversion. The latest advancement is the WEB-17 system, offering greater flexibility with fewer wires, enabling treatment of smaller distal aneurysms using smaller microcatheters than the WEB-21 system. Methods We conducted a systematic review following preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines, analyzing data from seven retrospective cohort studies involving 483 aneurysms treated with the WEB-17 device. Statistical analysis computed pooled prevalence rates and 95% confidence intervals using appropriate models for each outcome and R software version 4.3.1 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). Results Technical success was achieved in 475 out of 483 aneurysms treated with the WEB-17 device, with a success rate of 98.34% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 96.72–99.17). Among the successful cases, 4.97% (95% CI = 1.60–14.39) required adjunctive devices. Adequate occlusion, defined as complete occlusion or neck remnants, was observed in 94.41% (95% CI = 88.17–97.46) of cases. Periprocedural complications were infrequent, with thromboembolic complications occurring in 4.93% (95% CI = 3.29–7.30) of cases, hemorrhagic complications in 1.28% (95% CI = 0.58–2.83), and postprocedural neurologic complications in 0.99% (95% CI = 0.31–3.14). Procedure-related morbidity was observed in 1.71% (95% CI = 0.86–3.39) of cases, and there was one procedure-related mortality reported at 0.21% (95% CI = .03–1.50). Mortality unrelated to the procedure occurred in 1% (95% CI = 0.23–4.15). Conclusion Our findings suggest that the WEB-17 device is associated with a high rate of technical success, favorable angiographic outcomes, and a low rate of periprocedural complications. Further research, including prospective trials, is needed to confirm these findings and establish its safety and efficacy definitively.

Mirror syndrome is a rare disease associated with a high fetal mortality of up to 67.2%. It is thought to be underdiagnosed and is often mistaken for preeclampsia. Mirror syndrome is characterized by ‘triple edema’: generalized maternal, placental, and fetal edema. A comprehensive search of several databaseswas conducted. Mirror syndrome is associated with high fetal morbidity and mortality; it is an important differential diagnosis with pre-eclampsia and thought to be currently underdiagnosed. Minimal is known about its pathogenesis. Maternal symptoms usually regress with resolution of pregnancy and management is dependent on the cause of fetal hydrops.

Since the declaration of the global pandemic of COVID-19 by the World Health Organization on 11 March 2020, we have continued to see a steady rise in the number of patients infected by SARS-CoV-2. However, there is still very limited data on the course and outcomes of this serious infection in a vulnerable population of pregnant patients and their fetuses. International perinatal societies and institutions including SMFM, ACOG, RCOG, ISUOG, CDC, CNGOF, ISS/SIEOG, and CatSalut have released guidelines for the care of these patients. We aim to summarize these current guidelines in a comprehensive review for patients, healthcare workers, and healthcare institutions. We included 15 papers from 10 societies through a literature search of direct review of society’s websites and their journal publications up till 20 April 2020. Recommendations specific to antepartum, intrapartum, and postpartum were abstracted from the publications and summarized into Tables. The summary of guidelines for the management of COVID-19 in pregnancy across different perinatal societies is fairly consistent, with some variation in the strength of recommendations. It is important to recognize that these guidelines are frequently updated, as we continue to learn more about the course and impact of COVID-19 in pregnancy.

Background: Since the declaration of the global pandemic of COVID-19 by the World Health Organization on March 11, 2020; we have continued to see a steady rise in the numbers of people infected by SARS-CoV-2. However, there is still very limited data on the course and outcomes of this serious infection in a vulnerable population of pregnant patients and their fetuses. International perinatal societies and institutions including SMFM, ACOG, RCOG, ISUOG, CDC, CNGOF, ISS/SIEOG and CatSalut have released guidelines for the care of these patients. Objectives: We aim to summarize these current guidelines in a comprehensive review for patients, healthcare workers and healthcare institutions. Search Strategy: A literature search was performed through PubMed, and direct review of professional society’s website and journal publications. A total of 15 papers were identified from 10 societies and reviewed by two authors who were in agreement. Selection Criteria: The most updated guideline including information on antepartum, intrapartum and postpartum care put forth by each society was included. Data Collection and Analysis: Data specific to antepartum, intrapartum, and postpartum were abstracted from the publications and summarized into tables 2, 3 and 4 respectively. Main Results: The summary of guidelines for management of COVID-19 in pregnancy across different perinatal societies is consistent, with some variation in the strength of recommendations. Conclusions: It is important to recognize that these guidelines are frequently updated, as we continue to learn more about the course and impact of COVID-19 in pregnancy. The references to access all these guidelines are provided.