Grupp, Stephan A.

Abstract Late acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is defined as de novo acute GVHD presenting beyond 100 days after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) without manifestations of chronic GVHD. Data are limited regarding its characteristics, clinical course, and risk factors because of underrecognition and changes in classification. We evaluated 3542 consecutive adult recipients of first HCTs at 24 Mount Sinai Acute GVHD International Consortium (MAGIC) centers between January 2014 and August 2021 to better describe the clinical evolution and outcomes of late acute GVHD. The cumulative incidence of classic acute GVHD that required systemic treatment was 35.2%, and an additional 5.7% of patients required treatment for late acute GVHD. At the onset of symptoms, late acute GVHD was more severe than classic acute GVHD based on both clinical and MAGIC algorithm probability biomarker parameters and showed a lower overall response rate on day 28. Both clinical and biomarker grading at the time of treatment stratified the risk of nonrelapse mortality (NRM) in patients with classic and late acute GVHD, respectively, but long-term NRM and overall survival did not differ between patients with classic and late acute GVHD. Advanced age, female-to-male sex mismatch, and the use of reduced intensity conditioning were associated with the development of late acute GVHD, whereas the use of posttransplant cyclophosphamide–based GVHD prevention was protective mainly because of shifts in GVHD timing. Because overall outcomes were comparable, our findings, although not definitive, suggest that similar treatment strategies, including eligibility for clinical trials, based solely on clinical presentation at onset are appropriate.

Abstract Background: A major cause of mortality in patients receiving hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) is acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), a multiorgan disorder that includes the skin, liver and gastrointestinal tract. We have previously identified elafin, a protease inhibitor overexpressed in inflamed epidermis, as a diagnostic biomarker of GVHD in the skin, the most commonly involved GVHD organ. However, our initial study was limited to a subset of patients with isolated skin GVHD. The main driver of nonrelapse mortality (NRM) in HCT patients is GI GVHD. Two biomarkers, Regenerating islet-derived 3a (REG3α) and Suppressor of tumorigenesis 2 (ST2), have since been validated as biomarkers of GI GVHD that predict long-term outcomes in patients treated for GVHD. We undertook this study to determine the utility of elafin as a prognostic biomarker of acute GVHD in the general population of previously unstudied acute GVHD patients, and to compare it to ST2 and REG3α. Study Design: 526 patients who received systemic corticosteroid treatment for skin GVHD were analyzed from the Mount Sinai Acute GVHD International Consortium (MAGIC), which includes patients from 25 HCT centers. We used ELISA to measure serum concentrations of elafin, ST2 and REG3α. Patients were divided randomly into equal training and validation sets; and we developed a competing risk regression model for 6-month NRM using elafin concentration in the training set. We developed additional models for 6-month NRM using concentrations of ST2 and REG3α, or the combination of all three biomarkers as predictors. We then constructed ROC curves to evaluate the predictive accuracy of each model and to analyze the ability of each model to stratify patients into high- and low-risk groups. We analyzed the cumulative incidence of 6-month NRM and overall survival in each model and compared the accuracy of each model in the validation set. Results: The area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) for elafin alone was 0.55 whereas it was 0.75 and statistically superior (P = 0.02) for the combination of ST2 and REG3α. The combination of 3 biomarkers produced an AUROC of 0.76 that was not significantly better than the two biomarker model (P = 0.10). Elafin concentrations, either alone or in combination with ST2 and REG3α, did not produce higher hazard ratios of NRM (data not shown). Patients in the low-risk elafin group paradoxically demonstrated a higher incidence of 6-month NRM, although this difference was not statistically significant (17% vs. 11%, P=0.19), and both overall survival at 6 months (68% vs. 68%, P>0.99) and four-week response (78% vs. 78%, P=0.98) were similar in the low- and high-risk elafin groups (Figure 1). As demonstrated in previous data sets, the combination of ST2 and REG3α divided patients into two groups with a nearly five-fold difference in NRM (6.7% vs. 31%, P <0.001). Conclusion: We demonstrated that serum elafin concentrations measured at the initiation of systemic treatment for acute GVHD in a multicenter population of patients treated systemically for acute GVHD do not predict 6-month NRM, overall survival, or treatment response. As seen in previous studies, serum concentrations of the GI GVHD biomarkers ST2 and REG3α were significant predictors of NRM and the addition of elafin levels did not improve their accuracy. These results underscore the importance of GI disease in driving NRM in patients who develop acute GVHD. Figure 1. Cumulative incidence of nonrelapse mortality and overall survival in high and low risk groups Six-month cumulative incidences of nonrelapse mortality (NRM) in high (solid line) and low (dotted line) risk groups defined by optimized biomarker thresholds (upper panels) and six-month overall survival estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method (lower panels). (A) Cumulative incidence of NRM (14%) and overall survival (75%) in the total validation set (N=263). (B) Cumulative incidence of NRM in the low (N=150) and high (N=113) elafin group (17% vs. 11%, P=0.19). Overall survival in the low and high elafin group (68% vs. 68%, P > 0.99). (C) Cumulative incidence of NRM in the low (N=175) and high (N=88) ST2 + REG3a group (6.7 vs. 31%, P < 0.001). Overall survival in the low and high ST2 + REG3a group (77% vs. 51%, P < 0.001). (D) Cumulative incidence of NRM in the low (N=180) and high (N=83) elafin + ST2 + REG3a group (7.0 vs. 30%, P < 0.001). Overall survival in the low and high elafin + ST2 + REG3a group (79% vs. 64%, P < 0.001). Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Ozbek: Viracor: Patents & Royalties: GVHD biomarker patent with royalties from Viracor. DeFilipp: Omeros, Corp.: Consultancy; Incyte Corp.: Research Funding; Regimmune Corp.: Research Funding; Syndax Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Consultancy. Grupp: Novartis, Kite, Vertex, and Servier: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Other: Steering committee, Research Funding; Novartis, Roche, GSK, Humanigen, CBMG, Eureka, and Janssen/JnJ: Consultancy; Novartis, Adaptimmune, TCR2, Cellectis, Juno, Vertex, Allogene and Cabaletta: Other: Study steering committees or scientific advisory boards. Hexner: Blueprint medicines: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Tmunity Therapeutics: Research Funding; PharmaEssentia: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kitko: Co-investigator on two NIH grants as part of the cGVHD consortium: Research Funding; Vanderbilt University Medical Center: Current Employment; PER: Other: PER - CME educational talks about GVHD; Horizon: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Qayed: Novartis: Honoraria; Mesoblast: Honoraria; Medexus: Honoraria. Reshef: ilead, BMS, Precision, Immatics, Atara, Takeda, Shire, Pharmacyclics, Incyte: Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy; Gilead and Novartis: Honoraria; BMS, Regeneron, TScan, Synthekine, Atara, Jasper, Bayer: Consultancy. Levine: Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding; Viracor: Patents & Royalties: GVHD biomarker patent with royalties from Viracor; Mesoblast: Consultancy, Research Funding; Equillium Bio: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; X4 Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Talaris Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Omeros: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Symbio: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Biogen: Research Funding; Kamada: Research Funding. Ferrara: Eurofins Viracor: Consultancy, Other: Royalties. Chen: Incyte: Consultancy; Gamida: Consultancy.

Systemic glucocorticoids are the principal treatment for acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), which remains the major cause of non-relapse mortality (NRM) after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). However, there are no validated biomarkers that measure a patient's response to glucocorticoid therapy, and thus response is evaluated by the change in clinical symptom severity. A major weakness in the predictive power of clinical responses is that changes to all organs are weighted equally even though the major driver of NRM is irreversible damage to the crypts of the GI tract. Recent studies from the Mount Sinai Acute GVHD International Consortium (MAGIC) have validated an algorithm probability (MAP) that combines serum concentrations of two biomarkers of GVHD (REG3α and ST2) to generate an estimated probability of 6 month NRM for individual patients. The MAP has been considered a "liquid biopsy" that estimates the damage caused by GVHD to crypts throughout the lower GI tract (Hartwell et al., JCI Insight, 2017; Major-Monfried et al., Blood, 2018). We hypothesized that the change in MAP between start of treatment and 28 days later could serve as a response biomarker for GVHD and might compare favorably to the change in clinical symptoms that measures response to GVHD treatment, which is widely used as a surrogate for long term survival and is the primary endpoint in most GVHD treatment trials (Martin et al., BBMT, 2009; MacMillan et al., Blood, 2010). We prospectively collected serum samples and clinical staging from 368 sequential HCT patients who received systemic treatment for acute GVHD in one of 20 MAGIC centers between January 2016 and February 2018. We measured the serum concentrations of REG3α and ST2 before and after systemic therapy for acute GVHD and computed MAPs, the changes in MAPs, and clinical responses for each patient. MAPs of patients who experienced 6 month NRM showed significantly greater increases than MAPs of patients who survived (p=0.0004). In patients whose MAPs at the start of treatment were low (Ann Arbor 1, MAP < 0.141) or intermediate (Ann Arbor 2, 0.141 ≤ MAP ≤ 0.290), 6 month NRM clustered among those who had the greatest increases in MAP after 28 days (Fig 1A,B). In patients with high MAPs at the start of treatment (Ann Arbor 3, MAP > 0.290), those who survived tended to have the largest decreases in MAP (Fig 1C). These changes in MAP suggested crossing a single threshold could predict risk of mortality. We found that patients whose MAPs rose above a threshold MAP of 0.290 (5% of Ann Arbor 1, 27% of Ann Arbor 2) had significantly worse survival compared to those who remained below it, whereas the large number patients with initially high MAPs that remained above the threshold (66% of Ann Arbor 3) had a large increases in mortality (Fig 2). When measured at day 28, the MAP was significantly more accurate in predicting NRM than the gold standard of the clinical response, with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.86 and 0.70, respectively (p<0.0001). An algorithm that combined clinical response with biomarkers generated the same AUC as the MAP alone (0.83 v 0.86, p = NS). We next tested whether the same MAP threshold of 0.290 could predict risk within clinical response subsets. A significant minority (10%) of clinical responders had high MAPs and experienced three-fold greater NRM than those with low MAPs (40% v 12%, p<0.0001) whereas the majority (57%) of non-responders had low MAPs and experienced almost three-fold lower NRM than those with high MAPs (24% v 65%, p<0.0001) (Fig 3). Thus the MAP provides important prognostic information over and above the change in clinical symptoms, further stratifying both responders and non-responders at four weeks of treatment. The MAP threshold classified patients both with and without significant lower GI symptoms because the MAP is a more specific measure of irreversible cryptic damage in patients with copious diarrhea and more sensitive in patients with less than 0.5 liters of daily diarrhea (Fig 4). We conclude that the MAP is, to our knowledge, the first validated laboratory test to serve as response biomarker for the treatment for acute GVHD and a more accurate predictor of survival than clinical response after four weeks of treatment. The MAP may serve as a novel endpoint and an important complement to changes in clinical symptom severity in future trials of GVHD treatment. Disclosures Srinagesh: National Institutes of Health: Research Funding. Ozbek:Viracor: Patents & Royalties: Biomarker Patent. Ayuk:Novartis: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding. Aziz:Doris Duke Charitable Foundation: Research Funding. Defilipp:Incyte: Research Funding. Grupp:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy; GSK: Consultancy; CBMG: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding; Kite: Research Funding; Servier: Research Funding; Jazz: Other: study steering committees or scientific advisory boards; Adaptimmune: Other: study steering committees or scientific advisory boards; Cure Genetics: Consultancy; Humanigen: Consultancy. Hexner:novartis: Research Funding. Kitko:Mallinckrodt: Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria. Mielke:EBMT/EHA: Other: Travel support; ISCT: Other: Travel support; Miltenyi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel and speakers fee (via institution), Speakers Bureau; Jazz Pharma: Honoraria, Other: Travel support, Speakers Bureau; IACH: Other: Travel support; Kiadis Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel support (via institution), Speakers Bureau; DGHO: Other: Travel support; Bellicum: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel (via institution); GILEAD: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel (via institution), Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Other: Travel support (via institution), Speakers Bureau. Merli:Sobi: Consultancy; Amgen: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Bellicum: Consultancy. Pulsipher:Amgen: Other: Lecture; Miltenyi: Research Funding; Bellicum: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Jazz: Other: Education for employees; CSL Behring: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Medac: Honoraria. Qayed:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria. Reshef:Pfizer: Consultancy; Magenta: Consultancy; Kite: Consultancy, Research Funding; Atara: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Shire: Research Funding. Levine:Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding; Biogen: Other: non-financial support; Viracor: Patents & Royalties: biomarker patent; Ironwood: Honoraria; bluebird bio: Consultancy; National Cancer Institute: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Kamada: Research Funding. Ferrara:National Institutes of Health: Research Funding; ViraCor: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Kamada: Consultancy; Mallinckrodt: Consultancy; Enlivex: Consultancy; Xenikos: Consultancy; CSL Behring: Consultancy.

Key Points The MAGIC algorithm probability, computed from 2 serum biomarkers, predicts mortality in all GVHD grades after 4 weeks of treatment. Dynamic changes in the MAGIC algorithm probability occur within all biomarker risk groups and can guide therapy.

Abstract Abstract 906 Background: Single-arm Phase 2 trials of DF in the treatment of severe VOD/MOF post-SCT demonstrated a complete response (CR) in 36–46% of patients (pts). A subsequent Phase 3 trial enrolling pts with more severe VOD (28%/24% with ventilator/dialysis dependence at study entry vs 5%/7%) demonstrated a CR of 24% compared to 9% in a matched Historical Control (HC); p=0.0148; Richardson ASH 2009). Given the life-threatening nature of VOD/MOF, DF was made available in the United States through a Treatment IND protocol (T-IND) in December 2007 to gather additional safety and response data. Methods: Pts were required to have a diagnosis of VOD based upon Baltimore criteria (total bilirubin ≥ 2.0 mg/dL with ≥ 2 of the following: hepatomegaly, ascites or 5% weight gain) with MOF (either renal and/or pulmonary failure). Pts without a Baltimore diagnosis could enroll with biopsy-proven evidence of VOD. Eligibility criteria were expanded to permit patients with late onset VOD (VOD diagnosed after 21 days (d) or VOD/MOF after 28d post-SCT). Key exclusion criteria included clinically significant bleeding or need for >1 pressor to maintain BP. CR was defined as bilirubin < 2 mg/dL + resolution of MOF. Mortality was assessed at D+100. DF was given at 6.25 mg/kg IV q6h (25 mg/kg/d); treatment duration was recommended for at least 21d. Results: This interim analysis is based on 104 pts enrolled between14Dec2007-29Sep2009 and treated at 36 institutions. Most sites (n=23) enrolled only 1–2 pts. Nearly all pts (n=98) had undergone prior SCT; 6 had prior chemotherapy only; and 29 pts had late onset VOD post-SCT. Of the SCT pts, 69 pts enrolled in the T-IND met eligibility criteria for the original Phase 3 trial. Baseline demographics included median age 17 years (range 0.1 – 66); 59% male; and 16% with prior SCT. The most common diagnosis was leukemia (30% AML; 22% ALL; 7% other leukemia). The majority of pts had undergone allogeneic SCT (88%) with conditioning consisting of cyclophosphamide (76%), busulfan (42%) and/or TBI (41%). Mean onset of VOD post-SCT was 17 days. At entry, 20% of pts were dialysis dependent; 28% were ventilator dependent. Mean number of days of DF administration was 20 (range 2–88). Of the 104 pts, 36 (35%) achieved a CR by D+100. For the various sub-populations, the CR by D+100 rate was 24% for pts with late-onset VOD (n=29); 35% for those pts undergoing SCT (n=98); and 39% for the 69 pts who matched the entry criteria for the Phase 3 trial. Comparison of this group of 69 pts to the Phase 3 HC showed a statistically improved outcome (p=0.0007). Similar to the Phase 3 results, the CR rate was higher in pts who were not on dialysis/ventilator at study entry (41% vs 23%). Although children had previously been noted to have a higher CR rate in prior studies, the CR rate in the T-IND was similar in children compared to adults (35% and 34%, respectively). Overall D+100 mortality rate equaled 61% (n=104). Comparing the 69 pts who met Phase 3 entry criteria, D+100 mortality was 58% (p=0.0465 compared to the HC using Kaplan Meier estimates by log-rank analysis). Toxicity proved manageable: 11 pts experienced a total of 13 drug-related AEs including pulmonary hemorrhage (n=5), GI hemorrhage (n=3), hypotension (n=2), rectal hemorrhage, cerebral hemorrhage and pulmonary alveolar hemorrhage (1 pt each). Overall, 10% of pts experienced a drug-related toxicity that led to discontinuation. Similar to the observation of decreased GvHD in pediatric pts undergoing SCT who received prophylactic DF compared to best supportive care, the incidence of all grade GvHD was relatively low (8%). Conclusions: In 104 pts with severe VOD/MOF enrolled at 36 US institutions, use of DF demonstrated a 35% CR by D+100. Comparing those pts who met criteria for the Phase 3 trial to the HC used in that study, D+100 CR and survival were significantly improved in this study population. DF-associated toxicities are consistent with prior studies. Following an amendment in 30Sep2009, entry criteria for the T-IND study were expanded to permit enrollment of pts without SCT (VOD post chemotherapy) as well as pts without MOF to evaluate earlier intervention. Analysis of this group will be performed separately. Enrollment into the T-IND study continues. Disclosures: Richardson: Gentium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Massaro:Gentium: Consultancy. Hannah:Gentium: Consultancy. Iacobelli:Gentium: Employment.

Abstract Higher bone marrow cell dose has been associated with improved survival after allogeneic BMT. Although PBSC provides higher cell dose, it also provides a higher number of T cells which increases the risk of GVHD and may negatively impact the outcome in pediatric patients. A prospective multi-center trial was conducted to evaluate the safety and feasibility of G-CSF primed bone marrow in children receiving HLA-identical sibling bone marrow transplantation (BMT). Thirty eight children at 9 different centers, 17 female and 21 male with a median age of 9.8 years (range 0.8–17) were enrolled between May 2003 and May 2005. Fifteen patients had high risk diseases (ALL ≥CR2=4, AML≥ CR2/refractory=5, Advanced MDS=3, JMML=1, NHL=2) and 23 had standard risk disease (SAA=6, Red Cell Aplasia=1, Sickle cell disease=1, CML-CP=2, AML CR1=9, ALL CR1=2, MDS-RA=2). Five patients had undergone a prior allogeneic transplant. All patients received myeloablative preparative regimens (Cy/TBI±VP-16=12, BU/Cy±other=20 and Cy/ATG=6) and 32 (84%) received CSP/FK506 with MTX as GVHD prophylaxis. Donors were HLA identical siblings except for one who was syngeneic. Donors with median age of 9.2 y (range 1.1–22) received 5 mcg/kg/day of GCSF SQ for 5 consecutive days. Bone marrow was collected on the fifth day with a median volume of 14.5 cc/kg (range 5.2–25). No donor experienced any complications related to G-CSF administration or harvest, up to the time of last follow-up at one month after the harvest. The absolute CD34 cell count at the day of the harvest was measured in 28 patients and it was significantly higher in bone marrow compared to peripheral blood, median of 50/μl (8–247) vs 513/μl (116–156) respectively (p <0.0001). Median nucleated and CD 34 cells infused was 8.4x108/kg (range 2.4–60.9) and 8.7x106/kg (range 2–27.6) respectively. No G-CSF was administered post transplant. All patients had neutrophil engraftment at a median of 19 days (13–28), and all but one patient with early post-transplant relapse had platelet engraftment at a median of 20 days (9–44). Thirteen patients (35%) developed grade 2 GVHD and 4 of 34 evaluable patients (12%) developed chronic GVHD (3 limited and 1 extensive). There was no transplant related mortality. Among 30 patients with malignant disorders 9 (30%) relapsed (6 with high risk and 3 with standard risk disease). The EFS and OS of patients with standard disease at 1 year is 84% (95% CI 68–100%) and 95% (95% CI 87–100) respectively. With a median follow up of 1 year the estimated EFS and OS of all patients at one year is 76% (CI 62–93) and 92% (95% CI 83–100) respectively. We conclude that G-CSF primed bone marrow from pediatric donors is safe and can result in high NC and CD34 cell dose that facilitate engraftment after myeloablative BMT without a discernable increase in the risk of GVHD. A prospective randomized trial comparing G-CSF primed bone marrow to unstimulated marrow is planned.

Abstract Introduction: Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CART19) and bi-specific anti-CD19/CD3 antibodies (blinatumomab) generate unprecedented complete response rates of 45-90% in relapsing/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (r/r B-ALL). However, a subset of patients treated with these targeted approaches will relapse and a significant portion of these relapses are characterized by the loss of detectable CD19 (about 30% of relapses after blinatumomab and up to 50% after CART19), a clear manifestation of immunoediting. Hence, novel effective strategies are needed in order to be able to treat those patients and ideally prevent antigen-loss. CD123, the interleukin-3 receptor alpha, is involved in hematopoiesis and has been shown to be expressed in several hematologic neoplasms, including acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and more recently also B-ALL. Targeting CD123 with chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CART123) was shown to lead to deep and long-term responses in human primary AML xenografts. The goal of this study was to pre-clinically evaluate the impact of targeting CD123 and CD19 with chimeric antigen receptor T cells for the treatment and prevention of CD19-negative leukemia relapses occurring after CD19-directed therapies. Results: We analyzed the expression of CD123 in 42 r/r B-ALL samples and found that CD123 is highly and homogeneously expressed on the surface of most B-ALL blasts (81.75%, range: 5.1-99.6), making it a promising candidate for targeted therapy in B-ALL. Moreover, CD123 was also found to be expressed in the putative leukemia stem cells (LSC), identified as CD34-pos CD38-neg. Notably, in some Ph+ B-ALL samples we found CD19-ve CD123+ve cells with a BCR-ABL translocation by FISH, suggesting that these cells too are malignant. The expression of CD123 was detected in all (n=6) CD19-negative B-ALL blasts analyzed after relapse from CART19 treatment (Figure 1). These findings indicate that CD123 represents an ideal marker to target CD19-neg ALL blasts occurring after CART19 or blinatumomab. Therefore, we generated anti-CD123 chimeric antigen receptor T cells costimulated with 4-1-BB using a lentiviral vector (CART123). We then evaluated the CART123 anti-B-ALL efficacy both in vitro and in vivo against primary B-ALL and cell line (NALM-6). CART123 showed intense anti-B-ALL ex vivo activity, as defined by specific CD107a degranulation, cytokine production, cytotoxicity and proliferation, not statistically different from that of CART19. In order to test the role of CART123 to target CD19-negative relapses we developed a novel in vivo model, engrafting immunodeficient NSG mice with blasts obtained from a patient relapsing with CD19-ve disease after CART19 treatment. At day 14 mice were randomized to receive CART19, CART123 or control T cells (untransduced, UTD). CART19 and control T cell treated mice had no anti-tumor activity, while CART123 led to complete eradication of the disease and long-term survival. We next developed a murine model to test the hypothesis that a combined approach simultaneously targeting CD123 and CD19 could treat and prevent CD19-negative relapses. NSG mice were injected with a mixture of primary CD19-neg and CD19-pos blasts from the same patient that were labeled with different click beetle luciferases (red or green) in order to be able to track the respective clones in vivo. Mice were then randomized to receive UTD, CART19 or the combination of CART19 and CART123 (same total dose of T cells). As shown in Figure 2, mice treated with UTD had progression of both leukemic clones (CD19-pos and CD19-neg) while CART19 showed rapid progression mostly of the CD19-neg disease (red luciferase); on the contrary only mice treated with the combination of CART123 and CART19 showed rapid clearance of the disease, with improved overall survival (64 days for CART19, not reached for CART19+CART123). As a final strategy, we expressed both CAR19 and CAR123 in the same T cells and showed potent anti-leukemia activity (CD107a degranulation 81.7%). Conclusions: Here we demonstrate that CD123 is expressed in CD19-negative B-ALL relapses occurring after CD19-directed therapies, and that combining CART123 cells with CART19 cells is an effective therapy for the treatment and prevention of antigen-loss relapses in B-ALL murine xenografts. Disclosures Ruella: Novartis: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Kenderian:Novartis: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Scholler:Novartis: Patents & Royalties. Lacey:Novartis: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Melenhorst:Novartis: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Hunter:Surface Oncology - SAB: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Porter:Novartis: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. June:University of Pennsylvania: Patents & Royalties: financial interests due to intellectual property and patents in the field of cell and gene therapy. Conflicts of interest are managed in accordance with University of Pennsylvania policy and oversight; Novartis: Research Funding. Grupp:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Gill:Novartis: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding.

Abstract Background. Many children and adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) relapse or are incurable with current treatment modalities, highlighting a need for alternative therapies. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells targeting CD123 have demonstrated potent anti-leukemia activity in murine xenograft models of human AML. However, CD123-redirected T cell treatment of mice engrafted with normal human hematopoietic cells resulted in profound myeloablation, raising concerns for hematologic toxicity in patients with AML who may be treated with such therapies. We hypothesized that T cell deletion after CD123-redirected T cell-induced eradication of AML could minimize this bystander toxicity without impairing leukemia control, thereby increasing the therapeutic window of anti-AML CAR T cell immunotherapy. Methods. To test this hypothesis, we compared three termination strategies in human AML xenograft models: (1) T cell ablation with the anti-CD52 antibody alemtuzumab after treatment with T cells lentivirally-transduced with anti-CD123-41BB-CD3ζ (CART123), (2) T cell ablation with the anti-CD20 antibody rituximab after treatment with CART123 engineered to co-express CD20 (CART123/CD20), and (3) treatment with "biodegradable" anti-CD123 mRNA-electroporated CAR T cells (RNA-CART123). Mice engrafted with luciferase-expressing human AML cell lines (MOLM14, MOLM13, U937) or primary AML specimens (n=3) were treated with CD123-redirected CAR T cells as above. For T cell depletion studies, alemtuzumab 1 or 5 mg/kg was injected intraperitoneally (IP) at 1-4 weeks after 1x105-106 CART123 to determine optimal dosing and timing of T cell ablation. In subsequent studies, rituximab 10 mg/kg was injected IP 4 weeks after 1x105 -106 CART123/CD20, or 1x107 RNA-CART123 were injected intravenously at 5, 9, and 16 days after AML engraftment. Mice were followed by weekly bioluminescent imaging and/or quantitative flow cytometry analyses of blood, spleen, and/or bone marrow. Results. CART123 treatment of CD123+ AML xenografts induced marked T cell expansion and leukemia eradication in vivo, resulting in long-term animal survival (p<0.0001 vs untransduced T cell-treated controls). Minimal xenogeneic graft-versus-host effects were observed. One dose of alemtuzumab rapidly eliminated T cells in all tested models with best efficacy of 5 mg/kg dosing at 4 weeks post-CART123. CART123/CD20 inhibited AML proliferation with similar kinetics to those of CART123, and 1 dose of rituximab at 4 weeks post-CART123/CD20 infusion rapidly eliminated T cells while preserving leukemia remission. Alemtuzumab or rituximab alone did not inhibit AML proliferation in non-CART123-treated xenograft models vs AML-only controls (p=1.00). Mice with CART123- or CART123/CD20-induced AML remission at time of T cell ablation remained leukemia-free for ≥12 weeks, and animal survival did not differ from that of CD123-redirected CAR T cell-treated mice that did not undergo T cell depletion (p=1.00). In contrast, early depletion of T cells with alemtuzumab at 1, 2, or 3 weeks post-CART123 resulted in failure to eliminate AML with subsequent leukemia progression and animal death. Furthermore, AML rechallenge of animals with alemtuzumab- or rituximab-ablated T cells resulted in rapid leukemia proliferation without T cell re-expansion, confirming completeness of T cell depletion. Non-ablated mice demonstrated CAR T cell re-expansion with rejection of CD123+ leukemia rechallenge (p<0.0001). RNA-CART123 rapidly eliminated AML and facilitated long-term animal survival, although RNA-CART123 had expectedly shorter persistence in vivo than did CART123 or CART123/CD20. Conclusions. Alemtuzumab and rituximab completely eliminated CD123-redirected CAR T cells in human AML xenograft models. Sustained leukemia remission required CART123 or CART123/CD20 persistence for 4 weeks prior to T cell termination via alemtuzumab or rituximab post-CART123 or CART123/CD20, respectively. Ongoing studies are investigating efficacy of T cell elimination in additional xenograft models and against other anti-AML CAR T cell immunotherapies. Results from these studies may help to identify promising T cell termination strategies that will augment efficacy of CAR T cell therapy in patients with AML, particularly prior to stem cell transplantation. RNA-CART123 trials in patients with relapsed/refractory AML will open soon. Disclosures Off Label Use: depletion of CAR T cells with alemtuzumab or rituximab. Kenderian:Novartis: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Ruella:Novartis: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Aplenc:Sigma Tau: Consultancy. June:Novartis: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Grupp:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Gill:Novartis: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding.

Abstract Abstract 487FN2 Background: Given the life-threatening nature of severe VOD (sVOD) and multi-organ failure (MOF), DF was made available in the US through a prospective treatment IND protocol (T-IND) to gather additional safety and response data from SCT patients (pts) with sVOD who were not eligible for a pivotal Phase 3 trial. Following completion of this Phase 3 trial, the T-IND protocol has continued and been amended to include pts who would have met eligibility criteria for the completed phase 3 trial, as well as pts with non-severe VOD and non-SCT pts who develop VOD after chemotherapy (chemo). This is the largest prospective evaluation of DF for the treatment of sVOD/MOF post SCT and non-SCT pts to date. Methods: Pts were initially required to have a diagnosis of VOD by Baltimore criteria (total bilirubin > 2.0 mg/dL with > 2 of the following: hepatomegaly, ascites or 5% weight gain) with MOF (either renal and/or pulmonary failure) that followed SCT. Following treatment of 104 pts, an amendment expanded eligibility criteria to include pts with VOD after chemo and pts with non-severe VOD (defined as no MOF). Key exclusion criteria included clinically significant bleeding or >1 pressor to maintain BP. CR was defined as bilirubin < 2 mg/dL + resolution of MOF (if applicable). Mortality was assessed at Day +100 (D+100) in all pts. DF was given at 6.25 mg/kg IV q6h (25 mg/kg/d) with treatment duration recommended for at least 21d. Results: This interim analysis is based on 269 pts enrolled between December 2007 and March 2011 at 67 centers. Nearly all pts (n=251) had undergone SCT (with allogeneic SCT in 225, 90%); 18 developed VOD after chemo alone. Of the 269 cases of VOD, 200 were severe at study entry, with 25% (66/269) of all pts dialysis dependent and 31% (83/269) ventilator dependent. Median age was 16 years (range 0.1 – 70); 55% were male. In the SCT pts, the most common diagnosis was leukemia (29% AML; 22% ALL; CML 3%; 4% other), with conditioning of CY (71%), BU (46%) and TBI (38%) respectively; 18% had undergone multiple SCTs (>1 SCT). Median onset of VOD was 15 d post-SCT. When presenting after chemo alone (n=18), median onset of VOD was 16 d after the first dose, most frequently after CY (61%), cytarabine (44%) and vincristine (39%), and for treatment of leukemia (AML 33%, ALL 33%, other 6%). Overall mean number of days of DF administration in all pts was 22 (range 1–88).Of 269 pts, 32% (85/269) achieved a CR and 50% [ by Kaplan-Meier estimate] survived to D+100. In the subgroup of SCT pts, 31% (78/251) achieved CR and 50% survived to D+100; 134 pts met entry criteria for the original Phase 3 trial and comparison to the Phase 3 historical control showed a statistically improved outcome in CR (30% vs 9%, p=0.0006) and D+100 survival (46% vs 25%; p=0.006). Of 200 pts with sVOD, CR was 28% and D+100 survival was 44%. In the 18 chemo only pts, CR was 39% and D+100 survival was 50%. CR rate and D+100 survival for the 69 pts with non-severe VOD were 42% and 62%, respectively. Delay of >2 d (vs < 2 d) in the start of DF after VOD diagnosis resulted in reduced CR (23% vs 35%, p=0.0339) and survival (37% vs 56%, p=0.01). Children as compared to adults had higher rates in CR (35% vs 29%) and survival (55% vs 43%). Toxicity proved generally manageable: 22% of pts experienced a total of 81 related AEs, primarily consisting of hemorrhage (19%) and hypotension (4%). Hemorrhage included pulmonary bleeding (6%), GI hemorrhage (3%), epistaxis (3%) and hematuria (3%). Similar to the observation of decreased GvHD in other studies, the incidence of all grade GvHD in the allogeneic SCT pts was 8%. Conclusions: In 269 pts with mainly sVOD/MOF, DF therapy achieved significantly improved outcome compared to an untreated historical control. Importantly, CR and survival were improved in pts who were treated within 2d of VOD diagnosis (vs. later) and in pts who had not yet progressed to sVOD. As with prior studies, there was a low incidence of DF-associated toxicities. Interestingly, the incidence of GvHD in allo-SCT pts was low, consistent with the reduction of GvHD seen in the large randomized EBMT pediatric prevention study. These results confirm the findings of previous trials and strongly support early intervention with DF once the diagnosis of VOD is made after SCT, as well as its use in pts who have not progressed to advanced MOF. The use of DF for VOD following intensive chemotherapy without SCT also appears promising, but more research in this patient population is needed. Enrollment to the T-IND study continues. Disclosures: Richardson: Gentium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Arai:Gentium: Research Funding. Symons:Otsuka Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Martin:Gentium: Research Funding. Massaro:Gentium: Consultancy. D'Agostino:Gentium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hannah:Gentium: Consultancy. Tudone:Gentium: Employment. Hume:Gentium: Employment. Iacobelli:Gentium SpA: Employment. Soiffer:Gentium: Honoraria.

Abstract Relapsing/refractory (r/r) B-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) is associated with a poor prognosis in both pediatric and adult patients. Novel therapies targeting CD19 on leukemic blasts, such as anti-CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptor T cells (CART19, CTL019) or bi-specific anti-CD19/CD3 antibodies (blinatumomab) induce significant responses in this population. However, CD19-negative relapses have been reported in 5-10% of patients following CART19 or blinatumomab therapies. This is likely due to selective pressure on leukemia sub-clones by these potent anti-CD19 agents. Hence, novel effective immunotherapies are needed in order to treat these patients. In order to identify potential additional B-ALL antigens, samples from 20 r/r patients (including two that relapsed with CD19-negative disease after treatment with CART19 therapy) were screened using a custom Quantigene RNA panel (Affymetrix) and expression on cell surface was confirmed by multiparametric flow cytometry. The IL-3 receptor α (CD123) was one of the most highly and homogeneously expressed antigens in the blasts of 16/20 r/r ALL patients, and 2/2 CD19-negative relapses. Therefore, we sought to investigate the role of CART targeting CD123 (CART123) against r/r B-ALL, focusing on treating patients with CD19-negative relapses after prior anti-CD19 directed therapy. CART123 was shown to be effective in eradicating acute myeloid leukemia in xenograft mouse models but its role in ALL has not been investigated (Gill et al, Blood, 2014). We used a 2nd generation CAR123 construct that comprised a 4-1BB (CD137) co-stimulatory domain. T cells were lentivirally transduced and expanded using anti-CD3/CD28 beads. Head-to-head in vitro comparisons between CART123 and CART19 revealed similar rates of proliferation, CD107a degranulation, cytokine production and cytotoxicity when CART were co-cultured with the CD19+CD123+ B-ALL cell line NALM-6 and with primary B-ALL blasts. For in vivo evaluation, we utilized the primary ALL model that was developed by our group (Barrett et al, Blood, 2011). In this model, primary blasts obtained from ALL patients were passaged in NOD-SCID-γ chain KO (NSG) mice, and transduced with GFP/luciferase. We injected NSG mice with 2 million primary ALL blasts i.v. (CD19+, CD123+) and after engraftment, mice were treated with CART19, CART123 or control untransduced T cells (1 million i.v.). Mice treated with control T cells succumbed quickly to disease, while mice treated with either CART19 or CART123 showed tumor eradication and long term survival (Figure 1). We then evaluated the role of CART123 in the treatment of leukemia obtained from an ALL patient that relapsed with CD19-negative disease after CART19 treatment. Both CART123 and CART19 were incubated with CD19-negative ALL blasts; CART123, but not CART19 resulted in significant degranulation, robust cytokine production, and potent cytotoxicity. To confirm these results in vivo, we established a unique model of CD19-negative B-ALL xenograft. We used primary CD19-negative blasts obtained from a pediatric patient that relapsed after CART19 therapy; CD19-negative blasts were passaged in vivo in NSG mice and stably transduced with GFP/luciferase. Importantly, the blasts retained their CD19-negative phenotype. After engraftment, mice were treated with CART19, CART123 or control T cells. CART19 and control T cells had no anti-tumor activity, while CART123 resulted in a complete eradication of the disease and long term survival in these mice (Figure 2). In conclusion, CART123 represents an important additional approach to treating B-ALL, in particular due to its activity against CD19-negative relapses. Since we have previously shown that treatment with CART123 can lead to myelosuppression, CART123 should be employed to eradicate disease prior to allogeneic transplantation. Future direction may include combining CART123 with CART19 preemptively in order to avoid CD19 antigen escapes. Figure 1 Figure 1. Figure 2 Figure 2. Disclosures Ruella: Novartis: Research Funding. Kenderian:Novartis: Research Funding. Shestova:Novartis: Research Funding. Scholler:Novartis: Research Funding. Lacey:Novartis: Research Funding. Melenhorst:Novartis: Research Funding. Nazimuddin:Novartis: Research Funding. Kalos:Novartis: CTL019 Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Porter:Novartis: Research Funding. June:Novartis: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Grupp:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Gill:Novartis: Research Funding.