Kalos, Michael

Abstract Relapsing/refractory (r/r) B-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) is associated with a poor prognosis in both pediatric and adult patients. Novel therapies targeting CD19 on leukemic blasts, such as anti-CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptor T cells (CART19, CTL019) or bi-specific anti-CD19/CD3 antibodies (blinatumomab) induce significant responses in this population. However, CD19-negative relapses have been reported in 5-10% of patients following CART19 or blinatumomab therapies. This is likely due to selective pressure on leukemia sub-clones by these potent anti-CD19 agents. Hence, novel effective immunotherapies are needed in order to treat these patients. In order to identify potential additional B-ALL antigens, samples from 20 r/r patients (including two that relapsed with CD19-negative disease after treatment with CART19 therapy) were screened using a custom Quantigene RNA panel (Affymetrix) and expression on cell surface was confirmed by multiparametric flow cytometry. The IL-3 receptor α (CD123) was one of the most highly and homogeneously expressed antigens in the blasts of 16/20 r/r ALL patients, and 2/2 CD19-negative relapses. Therefore, we sought to investigate the role of CART targeting CD123 (CART123) against r/r B-ALL, focusing on treating patients with CD19-negative relapses after prior anti-CD19 directed therapy. CART123 was shown to be effective in eradicating acute myeloid leukemia in xenograft mouse models but its role in ALL has not been investigated (Gill et al, Blood, 2014). We used a 2nd generation CAR123 construct that comprised a 4-1BB (CD137) co-stimulatory domain. T cells were lentivirally transduced and expanded using anti-CD3/CD28 beads. Head-to-head in vitro comparisons between CART123 and CART19 revealed similar rates of proliferation, CD107a degranulation, cytokine production and cytotoxicity when CART were co-cultured with the CD19+CD123+ B-ALL cell line NALM-6 and with primary B-ALL blasts. For in vivo evaluation, we utilized the primary ALL model that was developed by our group (Barrett et al, Blood, 2011). In this model, primary blasts obtained from ALL patients were passaged in NOD-SCID-γ chain KO (NSG) mice, and transduced with GFP/luciferase. We injected NSG mice with 2 million primary ALL blasts i.v. (CD19+, CD123+) and after engraftment, mice were treated with CART19, CART123 or control untransduced T cells (1 million i.v.). Mice treated with control T cells succumbed quickly to disease, while mice treated with either CART19 or CART123 showed tumor eradication and long term survival (Figure 1). We then evaluated the role of CART123 in the treatment of leukemia obtained from an ALL patient that relapsed with CD19-negative disease after CART19 treatment. Both CART123 and CART19 were incubated with CD19-negative ALL blasts; CART123, but not CART19 resulted in significant degranulation, robust cytokine production, and potent cytotoxicity. To confirm these results in vivo, we established a unique model of CD19-negative B-ALL xenograft. We used primary CD19-negative blasts obtained from a pediatric patient that relapsed after CART19 therapy; CD19-negative blasts were passaged in vivo in NSG mice and stably transduced with GFP/luciferase. Importantly, the blasts retained their CD19-negative phenotype. After engraftment, mice were treated with CART19, CART123 or control T cells. CART19 and control T cells had no anti-tumor activity, while CART123 resulted in a complete eradication of the disease and long term survival in these mice (Figure 2). In conclusion, CART123 represents an important additional approach to treating B-ALL, in particular due to its activity against CD19-negative relapses. Since we have previously shown that treatment with CART123 can lead to myelosuppression, CART123 should be employed to eradicate disease prior to allogeneic transplantation. Future direction may include combining CART123 with CART19 preemptively in order to avoid CD19 antigen escapes. Figure 1 Figure 1. Figure 2 Figure 2. Disclosures Ruella: Novartis: Research Funding. Kenderian:Novartis: Research Funding. Shestova:Novartis: Research Funding. Scholler:Novartis: Research Funding. Lacey:Novartis: Research Funding. Melenhorst:Novartis: Research Funding. Nazimuddin:Novartis: Research Funding. Kalos:Novartis: CTL019 Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Porter:Novartis: Research Funding. June:Novartis: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Grupp:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Gill:Novartis: Research Funding.

Abstract Purpose: Responses to therapy with chimeric antigen receptor T cells recognizing CD19 (CART19, CTL019) may vary by histology. Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) represents a B-cell malignancy that remains incurable despite novel therapies such as the BTK inhibitor ibrutinib, and where data from CTL019 therapy are scant. Using MCL as a model, we sought to build upon the outcomes from CTL019 and from ibrutinib therapy by combining these in a rational manner. Experimental Design: MCL cell lines and primary MCL samples were combined with autologous or normal donor-derived anti-CD19 CAR T cells along with ibrutinib. The effect of the combination was studied in vitro and in mouse xenograft models. Results: MCL cells strongly activated multiple CTL019 effector functions, and MCL killing by CTL019 was further enhanced in the presence of ibrutinib. In a xenograft MCL model, we showed superior disease control in the CTL019- as compared with ibrutinib-treated mice (median survival not reached vs. 95 days, P < 0.005) but most mice receiving CTL019 monotherapy eventually relapsed. Therefore, we added ibrutinib to CTL019 and showed that 80% to 100% of mice in the CTL019 + ibrutinib arm and 0% to 20% of mice in the CTL019 arm, respectively, remained in long-term remission (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Combining CTL019 with ibrutinib represents a rational way to incorporate two of the most recent therapies in MCL. Our findings pave the way to a two-pronged therapeutic strategy in patients with MCL and other types of B-cell lymphoma. Clin Cancer Res; 22(11); 2684–96. ©2016 AACR.

Abstract Several decades of humoral immunotherapy using monoclonal antibodies and cellular immunotherapy using hematopoietic cell transplantation have recently culminated in a successful merger: the development and clinical application of genetically engineered antibody–T cell chimeras. Also known as chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR T cells), these entities combine the exquisite antigen specificity of antibodies with the polyfunctionality and potency of cellular immunity and are a prime example of the potential for synthetic biology to treat disease. CAR T cells overcome several of the biologic obstacles that have historically hampered immunotherapy while providing fundamental mechanistic insights into cellular immunology and revealing new challenges in genetic engineering and target selection. Results from early-phase CAR T-cell–based clinical trials demonstrate the significant potential for this approach to affect dramatic and complete clinical responses while revealing novel toxicities associated with activation of potent and specific antitumor immunity. Cancer Res; 74(22); 6383–9. ©2014 AACR.