McKeon, Andrew

Objective The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic utility of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibodies (MOG‐IgG) testing. Methods We retrospectively identified patients for CSF MOG‐IgG testing from January 1, 1996, to May 1, 2023, at Mayo Clinic and other medical centers that sent CSF MOG‐IgG for testing including: controls, 282; serum MOG‐IgG positive MOG antibody‐associated disease (MOGAD), 74; serum MOG‐IgG negative high‐risk phenotypes, 73; serum false positive MOG‐IgG with alternative diagnoses, 18. A live cell‐based assay assessed CSF MOG‐IgG positivity (IgG‐binding‐index [IBI], ≥2.5) using multiple anti‐human secondary antibodies and end‐titers were calculated if sufficient sample volume. Correlation of CSF MOG‐IgG IBI and titer was assessed. Results The pan‐IgG Fc‐specific secondary was optimal, yielding CSF MOG‐IgG sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 98% (Youden's index 0.88). CSF MOG‐IgG was positive in: 4/282 (1.4%) controls; 66/74 (89%) serum MOG‐IgG positive MOGAD patients; and 9/73 (12%) serum MOG‐IgG negative patients with high‐risk phenotypes. Serum negative but CSF positive MOG‐IgG accounted for 9/83 (11%) MOGAD patients, and all fulfilled 2023 MOGAD diagnostic criteria. Subgroup analysis of serum MOG‐IgG low‐positives revealed CSF MOG‐IgG positivity more in MOGAD (13/16[81%]) than other diseases with false positive serum MOG‐IgG (3/15[20%]) ( p = 0.01). CSF MOG‐IgG IBI and CSF MOG‐IgG titer (both available in 29 samples) were correlated (Spearman's r = 0.64, p < 0.001). Interpretation CSF MOG‐IgG testing has diagnostic utility in patients with a suspicious phenotype but negative serum MOG‐IgG, and those with low positive serum MOG‐IgG results and diagnostic uncertainty. These findings support a role for CSF MOG‐IgG testing in the appropriate clinical setting. ANN NEUROL 2024;96:34–45