Keating, Michael J.

Abstract Background Patient age can impact the safety and efficacy of ulcerative colitis (UC) treatments. Etrasimod is an oral, once daily (QD), selective sphingosine 1-phosphate1,4,5 receptor modulator for the treatment of moderately to severely active UC. Here, we evaluate the impact of age on etrasimod safety and efficacy in patients with UC in the phase 3 ELEVATE UC clinical program. Methods Data were pooled from ELEVATE UC 52 and ELEVATE UC 12 in patients receiving etrasimod 2 mg QD or placebo. Proportions and incidence rates (IRs) per 100 patient-years of treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were stratified by age (<40, 40-59, and ≥60 years). With the same age stratifications, efficacy was evaluated in patients with baseline Modified Mayo scores of 5-9 and 4-9 for the primary efficacy endpoint (clinical remission) and secondary efficacy endpoints. Results Overall, 787 patients were enrolled (<40 years, n = 420 [53.4%]; 40-59 years, n = 276 [35.1%]; and ≥60 years, n = 91 [11.6%]). Arthralgia, fatigue, and hypertension IRs were higher in older patients, irrespective of treatment. Serious AEs and AEs leading to treatment discontinuation were low and consistent across age groups. Significantly more patients receiving etrasimod 2 mg QD vs placebo achieved efficacy endpoints, regardless of age. Conclusions The safety profile of etrasimod 2 mg QD in the ELEVATE UC population was consistent across age groups, with no change in the incidence of AEs. Patients receiving etrasimod vs placebo showed significant clinical benefit, regardless of age. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03945188; NCT03996369.

Background: Etrasimod is an oral, once-daily (QD), selective sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P)1,4,5 receptor modulator for the treatment of moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC). It is known that non-serious treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) may not lead to UC drug discontinuation but can affect treatment tolerability. Objectives: This post hoc analysis evaluated the incidence of specific, common, non-serious TEAEs reported in the etrasimod UC clinical programme and the characteristics of affected patients. Design: Data included patients from the Placebo-controlled UC cohort (phase II OASIS, and phase III ELEVATE UC 52 and ELEVATE UC 12 trials) receiving QD etrasimod (2 or 1 mg) or placebo. Methods: Proportions and incidence rates (IRs; the number of patients with a TEAE divided by the total exposure in patient-years (PYs), per 100 PY) of Headache, Pyrexia, Nausea and Dizziness TEAEs were reported. Changes in heart rate among patients with Dizziness TEAEs were also evaluated. Results: Among 943 patients (etrasimod 2 mg, N = 577 (276.7 PY); etrasimod 1 mg, N = 52 (11.4 PY); placebo, N = 314 (115.1 PY)), 48, 34, 27 and 21 patients experienced events of Headache, Pyrexia, Nausea and Dizziness, respectively. All events were non-serious; one patient treated with etrasimod was discontinued due to a Pyrexia TEAE. Numerically, IRs of Headache and Dizziness TEAEs were higher, and Nausea slightly higher, with etrasimod versus placebo (13.45 vs 8.63 per 100 PY, 6.52 vs 1.69 and 7.18 vs 5.13 per 100 PY, respectively); IRs were similar for Pyrexia. The duration of most TEAEs was 1–10 days. Conclusion: In the etrasimod UC clinical programme, all Headache, Pyrexia, Nausea and Dizziness events were non-serious. Headache and Dizziness were more frequent, and Nausea slightly more frequent, among patients receiving etrasimod versus placebo. The post hoc nature of this analysis is a limitation. These results reiterate the favourable safety profile and tolerability of etrasimod. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02447302; NCT03945188; NCT03996369.

Abstract Background Etrasimod is an oral, once-daily (QD), selective sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P)1,4,5 receptor modulator for the treatment of moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC). Previous work has shown age can impact treatment safety and efficacy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.1 This post hoc analysis investigated the impact of age on the safety and efficacy of etrasimod in patients with UC in the phase 3 ELEVATE UC clinical programme. Methods Data pooled from the ELEVATE UC 52 (NCT03945188) and ELEVATE UC 12 (NCT03996369) trials were analysed in patients receiving etrasimod 2 mg QD and placebo. ELEVATE UC 52 had a treat-through design comprising a 12-week induction period followed by a 40-week maintenance period. ELEVATE UC 12 was a 12-week induction trial. Proportions and incidence rates (IRs) per 100 patient-years from pooled data of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and events of interest were stratified by age (<40 years, 40–59 years, ≥60 years) and analysed in patients who received ≥1 dose of etrasimod or placebo. Efficacy analyses were evaluated in patients with baseline Modified Mayo score (MMS) 5–9 for the primary efficacy endpoint (clinical remission) and select secondary endpoints at Week 12 (both trials) and Week 52 (ELEVATE UC 52) stratified by age. Results There were 787 patients enrolled in the ELEVATE UC programme, of whom 420 (53.4%) were aged <40 years, 276 (35.1%) were aged 40–59 years and 91 (11.6%) were aged ≥60 years. The proportions and IRs of TEAEs and events of interest were mostly similar between age groups and treatment arms (Table). IRs of arthralgia, fatigue, hypertension and pyrexia were higher in older age groups, regardless of treatment arm. Serious AEs and AEs leading to treatment discontinuation were low and consistent across all age subgroups. Serious infections and infection events of interest were balanced across age groups and treatment arms. Regardless of age subgroup, significantly more patients treated with etrasimod 2 mg QD vs placebo achieved the primary and select secondary efficacy endpoints at Week 12 and Week 52 (Figure). Conclusion The safety profile of etrasimod 2 mg QD in the UC population was consistent across age groups, and with no new risks other than the estimated risks associated with increasing age.2 Patients receiving etrasimod in the ELEVATE UC programme showed significant clinical benefit as assessed by clinical remission, symptomatic remission and endoscopic improvement compared with placebo, regardless of age. References 1. Lichtenstein GR et al. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2023; 29: 27–41. 2. Luo J et al. JMIR Med Inform 2016; 4: e30.

Abstract Background Etrasimod is an oral, once-daily, selective sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P)1,4,5 receptor modulator for the treatment of moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC). Adverse events (AEs) pertaining to tolerability, laboratory and serious AEs are described elsewhere1,2; we present a post hoc analysis of the incidence, onset and duration of the most commonly occurring non-serious AEs in the etrasimod UC clinical programme. Methods Data from the pooled Placebo-controlled UC cohort, derived from the phase 2 OASIS (NCT02447302) and phase 3 ELEVATE UC 52 (NCT03945188) and ELEVATE UC 12 (NCT03996369) double-blind clinical trials, were included. Cohorts comprised OASIS and ELEVATE UC 12 12-week induction periods alongside the ELEVATE UC 52 12-week induction and 40-week maintenance periods utilising a "treat-through" design. Patients (pts) with moderately to severely active UC were eligible for the etrasimod UC clinical programme. Pts were randomised to etrasimod 1 mg once daily (QD; OASIS only), etrasimod 2 mg QD or placebo. Proportions and incidence rates (IRs) of non-serious AEs (MedDRA v24.1 Preferred Terms of headache, pyrexia, nausea, fatigue and dizziness) were analysed in the Placebo-controlled UC cohort. Results Among 943 pts (any dose of etrasimod, N=629 [288.1 pt years (PY)]; placebo, N=314 [115.1 PY]), there were 77, 36, 30, 15 and 23 headache, pyrexia, nausea, fatigue and dizziness AEs, respectively. All were non-serious and did not lead to treatment discontinuation, apart from one case of pyrexia in which early termination visits were incomplete. Proportions and IRs (per 100 PY) for headache and dizziness AEs were higher with etrasimod (any dose) vs placebo (IRs: 13.45 vs 8.63 and 6.52 vs 1.69, respectively); IRs for other non-serious AEs were similar in etrasimod (any dose) and placebo groups (Table). Onset of AEs varied over time and most AEs were short in duration (Figure shows onset and duration for headache and dizziness AEs). Most AEs were deemed not related to study treatment by the site investigator. Pts with dizziness on Days 1–3 had similar changes in heart rate vs those with dizziness after Day 3. No consistent trend in heart rate was observed in pts receiving etrasimod with early dizziness. Conclusion Among pts in the etrasimod UC clinical programme, all headache, pyrexia, nausea, fatigue and dizziness events were non-serious. IRs were similar for most non-serious AEs across treatment groups, excluding headache and dizziness. Most non-serious AEs were short in duration and judged as not related to study treatment, suggesting they may not impact on the overall tolerability of etrasimod. References 1. Sandborn WJ et al. Gastroenterology 2020; 158: 550–61. 2. Sandborn WJ et al. Lancet 2023; 401: 1159–71.

Abstract Figure Figure In order to characterize the clinical course of patients (pts) with deletion 17p13.1 (17p-) CLL, we identified 100 consecutive treatment-naïve pts with 17p- from the MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC, n=61) and Mayo Clinic (n=39) clinical databases. The diagnosis of 17p- was established by FISH with a median time from initial diagnosis to FISH documenting 17p- of 9 months. Median age was 64 yrs (60 for MDACC pts & 70 for Mayo pts) and Rai stage was 0, 1–2 and 3–4 in 34%, 49% and 17% pts respectively. 17p- was the sole FISH abnormality in 29%. Unmutated IgVH and ZAP-70 positivity were present in 30/62 and 54/84 patients respectively. <<<TIME TO FIRST THERAPY>>> 69 asymptomatic pts were followed until they developed progressive disease requiring therapy as defined by the NCIWG 96 criteria. The 2 year actuarial risk of progression to initiation of therapy was 43% (46% for MDACC pts & 36% for Mayo pts). Only 2 of 10 pts with stable disease >2 years progressed on prolonged follow-up of up to 54 months. Two pts with baseline 17p- in 10% and 13% of nuclei lost their 17p- clone after 23 and 41 months. Independent predictors of shorter time to treatment were Rai stage > 0 (hazard ratio 7.2) and unmutated IgVH (HR 5.3). Pts with 0, 1 or 2 of these factors had a 2 year progression rate of 0%, 48% and >75% respectively (p<0.01). Other prognostic parameters such as ZAP-70 and CD38 did not have independent prognostic utility. <<<RESPONSE TO THERAPY>>> 41 pts from MDACC were assessable for response to first therapy. Overall (OR) and complete response (CR) rates were: rituximab without chemotherapy (n=6), OR 67% CR 17%; purine analogue + rituximab combinations (n=20), OR 75% CR 30%; purine analogue, rituximab + alemtuzumab combinations (n=13), OR 85% CR 54%. The pt who achieved CR after rituximab was negative for minimal residual disease assessed by flow cytometry and consensus primer IgH PCR, and has remained in remission at 29 months. At 2 years, 75% of complete responders remained relapse free. <<<SURVIVAL FROM 17P- DIAGNOSIS>>> Two year survival was 78%. Independent predictors of inferior survival were age 60+ (HR 3.4), B-symptoms (HR 3.7) and 17p- in nuclei 70+% (HR 6.0). Considering age 60+ and 17p- in nuclei 70+% in a prognostic model, 2 year survival was 100%, 82% and 55% for pts with 0, 1 and 2 risk factors respectively. Other prognostic parameters such as ZAP-70, IgVH mutation status and CD38 did not have independent prognostic utility. <<<CONCLUSIONS>>> Pts with de novo 17p- CLL exhibit marked clinical heterogeneity, with some pts experiencing an indolent course with prolonged survival. Survival and time to treatment among patients with 17p- can be predicted using clinical and biological characteristics.

Abstract Approximately 10–15% of patients with CLL report a family history (FH) of CLL or a related lymphoproliferative disorder. Whether the biologic features of CLL that occurs within families differ from those that occur sporadically is unknown. A recent study addressing this question has reported that mutated IgVH is significantly more common among familial than sporadic CLL, 68% vs 47%, although the distribution of VH genes used was similar (Blood111:5691, 2008). Therefore we compared IgVH mutational status and gene usage, as well as other biologic features, between familial and sporadic CLL derived from patients enrolled on the CLL Research Consortium (CRC) Tissue Core. Of 4533 patients enrolled in the CRC database and tissue bank, 3328 had adequate family history information, and these were subdivided into 4 groups: FH of CLL (n=468), FH of other heme cancer but not CLL (n=421), FH of non-heme cancer (n=1444), and sporadic cases (no FH of any cancer) (n=995). Of those patients reporting a FH of CLL, 63% had at least one affected 1st degree relative, 20% at least one affected 2nd or greater degree relative, and 17% unknown. 68% of those reporting a FH of CLL also had other cancers in their family. Patients reporting a FH of CLL or non-CLL heme cancers were more frequently white (91%), compared to 87% of those with FH non-heme cancer and 84% of sporadic CLL patients (p=0.005). The proportion of CLL cases that were female was similar among groups, at 37.6% of patients with FH CLL, as compared to 32.5% of sporadic patients (p=0.12). The age at diagnosis of CLL also did not differ among the four groups, although a trend toward a difference was observed between the FH CLL patients, whose mean age at diagnosis was 54.9 (range 30, 93), and the sporadic patients, whose mean age at diagnosis was 56.1 (range 30, 84) (p=0.08). No significant difference was observed among groups in the frequency of IgVH mutation (defined as <98% homology to the most similar germline VH gene), which was present in 50.3% (95% CI 44.5–56.2) of patients with FH CLL, 56.3% (95% CI 49.7–62.7) of patients with FH other heme cancer, 51.9% (95% CI 48.5–55.3) of patients with FH non-heme cancer, and 51.3% (95% CI 47.0–55.5) of sporadic patients (p=0.53). The pattern of IgVH family gene usage also did not differ among the groups; the VH3 subgroup was most commonly used, at 45%, 52%, 46% and 47% of patients with FH CLL, FH other heme cancer, FH non-heme cancer and sporadic, respectively. The VH1 subgroup was next most common in all 4 groups, at 28%, 24%, 26% and 25%, respectively, followed by the VH4 subgroup, at 19%, 17%, 21% and 21%. In addition, no significant difference was observed in the distribution of ZAP-70 expression amongst the four family history subgroups (mean %ZAP-70 expression, 22.8% for FH CLL patients and 24.4% for sporadic patients, p=0.31), or in the fraction considered ZAP-70 positive (>20% expression), which was 40% for FH CLL patients and 45% for sporadic patients (p=0.16). The relative expression of CD23 and CD38 did not differ among groups, nor did levels of beta-2-microglobulin or IgG determined at time of CRC enrollment. Time from diagnosis to initial treatment for each of the subgroups is currently being analyzed. These data on patterns of biologic risk factors in this large group of familial CLLs compared to sporadic CLLs suggest that familial and sporadic CLL are biologically similar and therefore likely to have similar pathogenetic mechanisms, including perhaps an underlying genetic susceptibility.

Abstract We performed immunophenotypic and IgVH mutation analyses on the chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) cells of 307 patients for expression of CD38, ZAP-70, and IgVH mutation status to determine the relative strength of each in predicting the need for early treatment. For this we assessed the time from diagnosis to initial therapy for progressive and/or symptomatic disease. Patients confirmed to have remained untreated were censored for this endpoint. Expression of CD38 was defined as the proportion of CD38-stained CLL cells that had fluorescence intensity above a defined threshold. Similarly, cases were defined as ZAP-70+ when 20% or more of the ZAP-70-stained CLL cells had fluorescence intensity above a defined threshold, as described (NEJM351:893, 2004). CLL cells were classified as expressing mutated IgVH genes if they expressed IgVH with <98% homology with a known germline IgVH gene. The median percentage of cells expressing CD38 in our cohort was 11.5% (range 0.1% to 99.5%). In patients with multiple samples, the CD38 expression level appeared constant over time, with a median S.D. of 0.8%. We defined patient samples that had CD38 expression levels at or below the median as having low expression. There was a significant association between low expression of CD38 and lack of ZAP-70 or expression of a mutated IgVH (p < 0.0001 for each assessment by the Fisher exact test). Median level of CD38 among cases expressing mutated IgVH was 4.0%, compared to 27.4% among cases expressing unmutated IgVH (p < 0.0001 by the Wilcoxon rank sum test). Median level of CD38 among ZAP-70 negative cases was 5.3%, compared to 27.2% among ZAP-70+ cases (p < 0.0001 by the Wilcoxon rank sum test). Patients with low-level expression of CD38 had a median time to initiation of therapy of 8.2 years; whereas, patients with high-level expression of CD38 had a median time to initiation of therapy of 4.0 years (p<0.0001). Although high-level expression of CD38 was associated with a shorter time from diagnosis to initiation of therapy (p < 0.0001 in a Cox proportional hazards regression), the inclusion of IgVH mutation status (p < 0.0001) or expression of ZAP-70 (p < 0.0001) in these models reduced the contribution of CD38 status to a p-value of 0.051 (ZAP-70 model) or 0.052 (mutation status model). Although ZAP-70 expression and mutation status each contributed significantly to the hazard of initiating therapy in a Cox proportional hazards model, high-level expression of CD38 did not add significantly to the model that already addresses ZAP-70 and mutational status, p=0.425. As such, although knowledge of the CD38 expression level can be used as a predictor of the time from diagnosis to the initiation of therapy it provides only marginal value if either the IgVH mutational status or expression of ZAP-70 is known and no value if knowledge of both ZAP-70 expression and IgVH mutational status is available.

6122 Background: Clinicians and investigators commonly use ECOG PS and clinician-reported patient (pt) fatigue as surrogates for HRQOL, a multi-faceted construct that comprehensively looks at the pt perspective on disease and well-being. Because limited data exist on the relationships between PS, fatigue, and HRQOL for CLL pts, we examined the associations between these measures, and 3 validated HRQOL instruments: the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Leukemia (FACT-Leu), EQ-5D, and Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI). Methods: Data were collected in CONNECT CLL, a prospective US observational registry initiated in 2010. Patient demographics and clinical characteristics were provided by clinicians. Patient HRQOL was self-reported at enrollment using the FACT-Leu, EQ-5D, and BFI. Scores were analyzed by ECOG PS (0, 1, 2-4) and clinician-reported fatigue (yes, no). Differences in HRQOL scores were assessed by ANOVA. Results: HRQOL data were reported by 899 pts from 148 community, 10 academic, and 3 government centers. ECOG PS was available on 711 pts. Overall HRQOL, measured by mean FACT-Leu, FACT-G and EQ-5D Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), worsened with ECOG PS severity and was worse in pts with fatigue (all p<0.0001). All FACT-Leu domains except social/family were worse in pts with fatigue and those with higher ECOG PS. Mean EQ-5D pain/discomfort, mobility, self care and usual activities domain scores worsened in severity as ECOG worsened and for pts with fatigue (all p<0.011). BFI data indicated that global fatigue, fatigue severity and fatigue-related interference worsened by ECOG severity and were associated with clinician-reported fatigue (all p<0.0001). Conclusions: Initial CONNECT CLL results confirm that HRQOL worsens with worsening ECOG PS and was worse among pts with fatigue, especially in physical/functioning domains, pain/discomfort, and mobility. These results indicate that baseline ECOG PS and physician-rated fatigue are rapid assessments that predict robust measures of HRQOL. Future analyses are planned to examine how HRQOL, ECOG PS and fatigue change over time with changes in treatment and CLL disease status.

Abstract Abstract 2864 Introduction: Clinical trials have illuminated a number of unique treatment strategies for patients with CLL. The impact of these strategies on routine practice remains unknown as trial participants may not reflect the same population encountered outside of a clinical trial setting. Many questions remain regarding the sequencing of therapies based on age and performance status. By characterizing current patterns of care; patients, treating physicians, and regulatory agencies will be able to understand the current landscape of CLL treatment. The Connect® CLL registry was designed to report the natural history and real world management of patients receiving therapy for CLL. In this first report, we characterize the therapeutic approaches used for the treatment of patients with CLL of different age groups (i.e. < 65 years, 65–75 years, and ≥ 75 years) and with an ECOG PS status score of 0 compared to 1 or greater. Methods: Connect® CLL is a prospective, longitudinal, observational, multi-center registry conducted in community and academic research centers in the United States. At present, 237 sites are actively participating with a projected study enrollment of 1500 patients. Eligible patients are to be enrolled within 2 months of being initiated on any line of therapy; whether initial therapy or salvage therapy. Each patient will be followed for up to 60 months. Clinical data, physician choices, patient-reported health-related quality of life, response and survival are to be collected approximately every 3 months during participation. Results: A total of 607 patients have been enrolled (4% from academic sites) with a median age of 70 years. 198 were < 65 years old (age group 1), 187 were between 65–75 years old (age group 2), and 222 were ≥ 75 years old (age group 3). ECOG status varied across the three age groups, with an ECOG status score of ≥ 1 for 39%, 52%, and 70% of patients respectively. Treatment patterns varied across the age groups and by ECOG status in the 496 patients reporting therapies. The most commonly recorded first-line regimens independent of age included fludarabine (F) cyclophosphamide (C) and rituximab (R) (33%), bendamustine (B) +/− R (19%), F +/− R (15%), or investigational therapy (15%). For second-line regimens and beyond, the most frequently recorded regimen was B +/− R (30%), FCR (23%), other F-based regimens (13%), or investigational therapy (8%). The use of FCR for first-line treatment decreased significantly with increasing age group, (45%, 32%, 20%, for age group 1, 2, 3 respectively, p=0.04, spearman correlation) while use of F +/− R remained level across the age groups (14%, 15%, 15%, respectively). Compared to age group 1, first-line therapy with B +/− R in age groups 2 and 3 (15%, 22%, 21%, respectively) was higher but did not achieve statistical significance. B +/− R represented the most common treatment for all age groups (37%, 26%, 29%, respectively) as second line therapy but did not vary by age (P=0.35). The use of chlorambucil was infrequent in all age groups, but was more common in age group 3 patients compared to the others (P=0.01), in both first-line (2%, 4%, 12%, respectively) and subsequent lines of therapy (0%, 1%, 8%, respectively). Treatment assignments did not vary by ECOG PS score for patients in age group 1. First-line therapy for patients with an ECOG PS score of 0 in age groups 2 and 3 consisted of FCR (32% and 15%, respectively), F +/− R (19% and 15%, respectively), B +/− R (16% and 15%, respectively), and alkylating agents (3% and 23%, respectively). Patients in age groups 2 and 3 with ECOG PS score ≥ 1 received B +/− R regimen (33% and 22%, respectively), FCR (23% and 21%, respectively), F +/− R (14% and 10%, respectively) and alkylating agents (7% and 9%, respectively) as first-line therapy. Further description and clarification on the various treatment regimens based on the three age groups and by ECOG PS score will be presented at the meeting. Conclusion: The Connect® CLL Registry is the largest prospective, multicenter registry in the United States evaluating management for patients with CLL. With the currently available data, we characterize the extent to which age and performance status are associated with treatment selection in both first-line and subsequent lines of therapy in routine practice. As enrollment increases and additional follow-up is completed, the data will provide more extensive and real world overview of the current treatment strategies used in CLL patients. Disclosures: Sharman: Celgene - consulting: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria; Calistoga: Honoraria; Portola pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Flowers:Consultancy: Celgene, Prescription Solutions, Spectrum (future), Seattle Genetics, Millennium (future), Genentech (unpaid): Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Weiss:Celgene: Consultancy. Grinblatt:Celgene: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Kay:Genenetech, Celgene, Hospira,: Research Funding. Kipps:Igenica: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbot Industries: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Research Funding; GSK: Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding. Lamanna:Celgene Corporation: Advisory board. Pashos:United BioSource Corporation: Research Funding. Flinn:Celgene: Research Funding. Kozloff:Celgene: Consultancy. Lerner:Celgene Connect: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Swern:Celgene: Employment. Sullivan:Celgene: Employment. Street:Celgene: Employment. Keating:Celgene Connect: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.