McDonnell, A

Abstract Background Etrasimod is an oral, once-daily (QD), selective sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P)1,4,5 receptor modulator for the treatment of moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC). Previous work has shown age can impact treatment safety and efficacy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.1 This post hoc analysis investigated the impact of age on the safety and efficacy of etrasimod in patients with UC in the phase 3 ELEVATE UC clinical programme. Methods Data pooled from the ELEVATE UC 52 (NCT03945188) and ELEVATE UC 12 (NCT03996369) trials were analysed in patients receiving etrasimod 2 mg QD and placebo. ELEVATE UC 52 had a treat-through design comprising a 12-week induction period followed by a 40-week maintenance period. ELEVATE UC 12 was a 12-week induction trial. Proportions and incidence rates (IRs) per 100 patient-years from pooled data of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and events of interest were stratified by age (<40 years, 40–59 years, ≥60 years) and analysed in patients who received ≥1 dose of etrasimod or placebo. Efficacy analyses were evaluated in patients with baseline Modified Mayo score (MMS) 5–9 for the primary efficacy endpoint (clinical remission) and select secondary endpoints at Week 12 (both trials) and Week 52 (ELEVATE UC 52) stratified by age. Results There were 787 patients enrolled in the ELEVATE UC programme, of whom 420 (53.4%) were aged <40 years, 276 (35.1%) were aged 40–59 years and 91 (11.6%) were aged ≥60 years. The proportions and IRs of TEAEs and events of interest were mostly similar between age groups and treatment arms (Table). IRs of arthralgia, fatigue, hypertension and pyrexia were higher in older age groups, regardless of treatment arm. Serious AEs and AEs leading to treatment discontinuation were low and consistent across all age subgroups. Serious infections and infection events of interest were balanced across age groups and treatment arms. Regardless of age subgroup, significantly more patients treated with etrasimod 2 mg QD vs placebo achieved the primary and select secondary efficacy endpoints at Week 12 and Week 52 (Figure). Conclusion The safety profile of etrasimod 2 mg QD in the UC population was consistent across age groups, and with no new risks other than the estimated risks associated with increasing age.2 Patients receiving etrasimod in the ELEVATE UC programme showed significant clinical benefit as assessed by clinical remission, symptomatic remission and endoscopic improvement compared with placebo, regardless of age. References 1. Lichtenstein GR et al. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2023; 29: 27–41. 2. Luo J et al. JMIR Med Inform 2016; 4: e30.

Abstract Background Etrasimod is an oral, once-daily, selective sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P)1,4,5 receptor modulator for the treatment of moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC). Adverse events (AEs) pertaining to tolerability, laboratory and serious AEs are described elsewhere1,2; we present a post hoc analysis of the incidence, onset and duration of the most commonly occurring non-serious AEs in the etrasimod UC clinical programme. Methods Data from the pooled Placebo-controlled UC cohort, derived from the phase 2 OASIS (NCT02447302) and phase 3 ELEVATE UC 52 (NCT03945188) and ELEVATE UC 12 (NCT03996369) double-blind clinical trials, were included. Cohorts comprised OASIS and ELEVATE UC 12 12-week induction periods alongside the ELEVATE UC 52 12-week induction and 40-week maintenance periods utilising a "treat-through" design. Patients (pts) with moderately to severely active UC were eligible for the etrasimod UC clinical programme. Pts were randomised to etrasimod 1 mg once daily (QD; OASIS only), etrasimod 2 mg QD or placebo. Proportions and incidence rates (IRs) of non-serious AEs (MedDRA v24.1 Preferred Terms of headache, pyrexia, nausea, fatigue and dizziness) were analysed in the Placebo-controlled UC cohort. Results Among 943 pts (any dose of etrasimod, N=629 [288.1 pt years (PY)]; placebo, N=314 [115.1 PY]), there were 77, 36, 30, 15 and 23 headache, pyrexia, nausea, fatigue and dizziness AEs, respectively. All were non-serious and did not lead to treatment discontinuation, apart from one case of pyrexia in which early termination visits were incomplete. Proportions and IRs (per 100 PY) for headache and dizziness AEs were higher with etrasimod (any dose) vs placebo (IRs: 13.45 vs 8.63 and 6.52 vs 1.69, respectively); IRs for other non-serious AEs were similar in etrasimod (any dose) and placebo groups (Table). Onset of AEs varied over time and most AEs were short in duration (Figure shows onset and duration for headache and dizziness AEs). Most AEs were deemed not related to study treatment by the site investigator. Pts with dizziness on Days 1–3 had similar changes in heart rate vs those with dizziness after Day 3. No consistent trend in heart rate was observed in pts receiving etrasimod with early dizziness. Conclusion Among pts in the etrasimod UC clinical programme, all headache, pyrexia, nausea, fatigue and dizziness events were non-serious. IRs were similar for most non-serious AEs across treatment groups, excluding headache and dizziness. Most non-serious AEs were short in duration and judged as not related to study treatment, suggesting they may not impact on the overall tolerability of etrasimod. References 1. Sandborn WJ et al. Gastroenterology 2020; 158: 550–61. 2. Sandborn WJ et al. Lancet 2023; 401: 1159–71.