Patnaik, Mrinal M.

Abstract Background Congenital/hereditary qualitative platelet disorders (CQPD) can be classified by platelet count (eg, normal or decreased) and platelet size as well as by functional defect. Based on mean platelet volume (MPV), congenital thrombocytopenias (CT) are classified as macro-thrombocytopenias (eg, Bernard-Soulier syndrome [BSS], MYH-9 [myosin heavy chain 9, non-muscle]-associated thrombocytopenias, gray platelet syndrome [GPS], etc.); microthrombocytopenias (eg, Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome and variants); and those with normal platelet size. CQPDs with normal platelet count include Glanzmann thrombasthenia (GT), dense granule storage pool disorders (DG-SPD) including Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome (HPS), platelet secretion disorders and many others. Diagnosis has relied on platelet counting and sizing, blood smear light microscopy, platelet aggregation (agg) and platelet function analyzer (PFA-100) studies. Platelet transmission electron microscopy (PTEM) and flow cytometry can provide supplementary information and molecular analysis is also evolving. The objective of this study was to determine the roles of platelet transmission electron microscopy (PTEM) and flow cytometry in the diagnosis of CQPD and CT. Methods In this retrospective cohort study, after IRB approval, the electronic medical record system was queried for patients (pt) with a confirmed CQPD or CT seen at Mayo Clinic between 2000 and 2015. A detailed chart review was undertaken. Results 54 pt (64% female) met our study criteria; median age was 32 years (range 1 day to 81 years). 18/54 (33%) pt had macrothrombocytopenia: BSS 4 (7%); MYH-9 10 (19%); gray platelet syndrome 4 (7%). 36/54 (66%) had normal MPV: Glanzmann thrombasthenia 6 (11%); storage pool disorders including DG-SPD 10 (19%) and HPS 2 (3%), mild alpha granule deficiency 3 (6%) and York platelet syndrome 4 (7%); platelet secretion disorders 4 (7%); ANKRD26 mutation 3 (6%); congenital amegakaryocytic thrombocytopenia 1 (2%); GATA-1 mutation 1 (2%); RUNX-1 mutation 1 (2%); and Jacobsen syndrome 1 (2%). 44 pt (81%) had a positive bleeding history: epistaxis 52%, cutaneous bleeding 57%, gastrointestinal bleeding 21% and menorrhagia 54%; 10 pt (19%) had a negative bleeding history. Results of standard and esoteric platelet testing are summarized in Table 1. Diagnosis in the 10 pt with glycoprotein deficiency (BSS or GT) was established by agg; flow cytometry was confirmatory but not necessary. Of the 23 pt with SPD, 5 had a negative bleeding history; 4 pt had normal agg and PFA-100 and were diagnosed exclusively by PTEM. In this group, the abnormalities on platelet aggregation and PFA were variable and PTEM allowed for a better definition of the specific abnormalities. For MYH-9 patients, PTEM confirmed leukocyte inclusions that had already been identified on light microscopy. PTEM was the only diagnostic modality able to identify the abnormality in York platelet syndrome. In 5/54 (9%) genetic testing was necessary for diagnosis (GATA-1, ANKRD26 and RUNX-1) Conclusion In this cohort, standard platelet assays established the diagnosis in the large majority of CQPD and CT. PTEM was essential for confirmation in DG-SPD, mild alpha granule deficiency and York platelet syndrome and useful in combination with molecular testing to establish a diagnosis in selected cases. Guidance on selection of patients for such specialized testing requires further study. Table 1. Results of standard and esoteric platelet testing for 54 patients with congenital qualitative platelet disorders and/or thrombocytopenia Disorder n (%) Platelet aggregation PFA PTEM Flow cytometry Confirmation by genetics Done Abnormal Done Abnormal Done Abnormal Done Abnormal Glanzmann thrombasthenia 6 (11) 6 6 5 5 1 0 3 3 0 Bernard-Soulier syndrome & variants 4 (7) 4 4 4 4 3 0 4 4 0 MYH-9 related disorders 10 (19) 7 2 8 3 5 5 4 2 5 Dense granule deficiency and HPS 12 (22) 12 8 12 8 12 12 4 0 0 Alpha granule deficiency* 7 (13) 7 4 7 6 7 7 4 4 1 York platelet syndrome 4 (7) 1 0 1 1 4 4 1 1 0 TXA2 or PG synthesis/receptor defect 4 (7) 4 4 4 3 3 0 3 0 0 CATM 1 (2) 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 1 ANKRD26 3 (6) 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 GATA-1 1 (2) 0 - 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 RUNX-1 1 (2) 1 0 1 1 0 - 0 - 1 Jacobsen syndrome 1 (2) 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 MYH-9: myosin heavy chain 9, non-muscle (MHY-9) associated thrombocytopenia, HPS: Hermansky-Pudlak Syndrome, TXA2: thromboxane A2, PG: prostaglandin CATM: congenital amegakaryocytic thrombocytopenia. * Includes gray platelet syndrome Disclosures Pardanani: Stemline: Research Funding.

Abstract Background: Severe myelosuppression (MS) and bone marrow failure (BMF) are rare but well characterized adverse effect of temozolomide (TMZ). The existing literature is limited to case reports and data reported to regulatory agencies, which usually describe very severe cases and lack long term and detailed follow-up. Methods: We identified cases of myelosuppression attributed to TMZ seen at the Mayo clinic, from 1998-2014. We also performed a literature (PubMed) search to identify published cases of TMZ induced MS and BMF. TMZ induced MS was defined as a decrease in at least 2 cell lines below normal that was clinically attributable to TMZ and persisted for > 28 days after the last TMZ dose. Severe MS was defined as bone marrow cellularity of <25% or at least 2 of: a) reticulocyte count <40,000/µL b) absolute neutrophil count (ANC)<500/ µL c) platelets <20,000/µL. Very severe MS was defined by an ANC <200/ µL. Results: A total of 15 Mayo patients and 10 published cases were identified. The baseline characteristics of patients are shown in table 1. The median interval between initiation of TMZ and diagnosis of MS was 48 days (range 26-121). The hematologic outcomes of the group are shown in table 2. Seventeen patients developed neutropenic fever, 4 had severe sepsis, and 6 experienced bleeding complications. Kaplan-Meier recovery curves for each cell line are shown in the figure. Myelosuppression was fatal in 3 cases. Most patients recovered their ANC (median-62 days, range 28-180). Persistent thrombocytopenia was seen in 19 patients, without evidence for clonal evolution or myelodysplasia. Four patients remain dependent on growth factor support (G-CSF and thrombopoietin agonists). Conclusion: MS is usually a non-fatal complication of TMZ. Most cell lines recover spontaneously and adequately with the exception of platelets, which can remain significantly suppressed for prolonged periods. Infectious complications are very common. Most patients respond to supportive care, including the use of growth factors. Figure 3 Figure 3. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Background: While Factor V Leiden is associated with an increased risk of thrombosis, the magnitude of that risk among homozygous carriers is uncertain. Methods: In a cross-sectional study of Mayo Clinic patients referred to the Special Coagulation Laboratory for a thrombophilia profile (n=379) over the 18-year period, 1996-2013, the prevalence of venous and arterial thrombosis was estimated for patients found to be Factor V Leiden carriers based on leukocyte genomic DNA genotyping. T tests and chi-square tests were used for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Results: Among homozygous (n=111) and heterozygous (n=268) carriers, the mean age at testing (50.3 and 50.5 years, respectively; p=0.9) and the proportion of females (50% and 54%, respectively; p=0.5) did not differ significantly. Of 29 asymptomatic carriers at the time of testing, 14 were homozygotes. Of the remaining 350 carriers, the mean age at first venous or arterial thrombosis (42 vs 43.8 years; p=0.5) among homozygous and heterozygous carriers, respectively, did not differ significantly. Thirty-five (33%) and 83 (31%) homozygous and heterozygous carriers, respectively, had at least one recurrent venous or arterial thrombosis (p=0.72). The prevalence of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) was 61% and 46% in homozygous and heterozygous carriers, respectively (p=0.008); the prevalence of pulmonary embolism was 18% and 20%, respectively (p=0.69). The prevalence of arterial thrombosis (mainly stroke and/or TIA) was higher in heterozygous (23%) compared to homozygous carriers (8%). Conclusion: In the largest sample of homozygous Factor V Leiden carriers reported to date, thrombosis penetrance and phenotype did not appear to differ among homozygous vs. heterozygous carriers with the exception of a higher prevalence of DVT among homozygous carriers. These data should be interpreted with caution due to the potential for referral bias. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Introduction T-cell prolymphocytic leukemia (T-PLL) is a rare mature T-Cell malignancy typically associated with aggressive clinical course. Leukemic T-cells demonstrate post-thymic T-cell phenotypes (Tdt-, CD1a-, CD5+, CD2+ and CD7+) and commonly are CD4+/CD8- T-cells, but co-expression of CD4+/CD8+ or CD8+/CD4- have also been observed. Rearrangement of chromosome 14 involving TCL1 locus is the cornerstone for T-PLL diagnosis which leads to overexpression of oncogene TCL1. As a binding partner for TCL1, AKT expression correlates with worse prognosis. Despite advances in identification of novel mutations, therapeutic option is limited with most patients having very short survival. Herein, we performed a detailed analysis of specific T-cell subsets affected in T-PLL and a comprehensive genomic analysis by whole exome sequencing (WES) and RNA sequencing. We also explored the preclinical efficacy of targeting AKT activation by AKT inhibitor MK2206 on leukemic T-cells isolated from T-PLL patients. Methods T-PLL leukemic cells were isolated from blood or marrow samples of T-PLL patients (n=9) and were tested for involved T-cell subsets by multicolor flow cytometric analysis. Leukemic T-cells were treated with escalating doses of MK2206 (0 to 10 µM) for about 80 hours and were assessed for their apoptosis levels using Annexin V flow cytometric analysis. Whole exome sequencing (WES) and RNA sequencing were conducted using genomic DNA and RNA isolated from purified leukemic T cells from T-PLL patients. Results Phenotypic analysis of T-cell subsets in T-PLL patients showed that leukemic T-cells in 4 untreated T-PLL patients are consistent with naïve T-cell phenotype (CD45RA+, CD45RO-, CCR7+). Leukemic T-cells in 3 of the untreated patients and in 2 of the treated patients have central memory T (CD45RA-, CD45RO+, CCR7+) and effector memory T phenotypes (CD45RA-, CD45RO+,CCR7-) respectively. MK2206 treatment was able to induce dose-dependent apoptosis on the isolated PBMC (containing > 90% leukemic T-cells) of T-PLL patients (n=4) (IC50: 5 µM). FISH analysis found a rearrangement of TCL1 locus on chromosome 14 in all T-PLL cases (n=9). Three cases have also been detected to have del (11q) involving ATM locus and one patient has both del(11q) and del(17p). Subsequent WES (n=7) and RNA sequencing (n=6) analysis revealed recently reported mutations in ATM (frame shift mutation and early stop mutation W579*) in 2 cases, JAK3 (M511I) in 2 cases and STAT5B (T628S and N642H) in 2 cases. Importantly, novel somatic mutations in gene IKZF1 (N159S), NTRK1 (R33W), AP2A2 (P514L), HDAC8 (I115R), RARB (G90W) and TNIP2 (K104Q) were detected by WES. Mutations in EML4 (L548W and F304S) and VAV3 (C282Y and splice site mutation) were also identified in 2 different T-PLL cases. RNA sequencing revealed several fusion transcripts resulting in early stop of several different genes including PTPRT, L3MBTL1, UCKL1 in one T-PLL case. Conclusion T-PLL leukemic T-cells are consistent with either naïve or central memory T-cell subsets in untreated patients. The AKT inhibitor MK-2206 was capable of inducing apoptosis and could be a potential therapeutic agent for T-PLL patients. In addition, we detected known mutations in ATM and JAK-STAT pathways. Novel mutations in genes involving DNA binding and chromatin remodeling (IKZF1, HDAC8) or kinase signal pathway (NTRK1, TNIP2, VAV3, EML4) were uncovered. These results suggest that further therapeutic approaches could be developed to target DNA binding factors or JAK-STAT or AKT-TCL1 signal pathway with an ultimate goal to improve survival of T-PLL patients. Disclosures Off Label Use: Off label use of MK2206: MK-2206 is an AKT inhibitor obtained from Selleck Chemicals and is used to treat leukemic cells in vitro to test the leukemic sensitivity to AKT inhibition. .

Abstract Abstract 600 Background: Both MM and AL are plasma cell neoplasms. The underlying clone in both diseases appears to be different not only in terms of “tumor burden” but also in terms of their underlying biology. The overall “fitness” of patients with these two diseases is also different, with AL patients having more major organ dysfunction. Therapy for both diseases is directed at killing the underlying clone. ASCT is one method of reducing the clone size and thereby improving overall survival. Post-ASCT outcomes between the two diseases have never been formally compared. Methods: We compiled all patients with a diagnosis of AL or MM who received ASCT at the Mayo Clinic Rochester between June 1996 and January 2011 to compare outcomes. Patients were retrieved from two prospectively maintained clinical transplant data bases (M.A.G.). Differences between groups were compared using Fisher's exact and Wilcoxon tests. Survival was calculated using the method of Kaplan-Meier, and differences between survival outcomes were calculated by log rank. Cox regression modeling was done to determine how non-disease specific variables—i.e. age, time period of ASCT, number of prior regimens, time to ASCT from diagnosis and acquisition of complete response (CR)—affected outcomes. All statistical analyses were performed using JMP (SAS, NC) software. This study was approved by the Mayo IRB. Results: The data set was comprised of 454 patients with AL and 1116 patients with MM. There were significant differences between the two respective groups of patients in terms of number of prior regimens (0 vs 1, p<0.0001), time to ASCT (3.95 months vs 7.20 months, p<0.0001), intensity of conditioning regimen (non-attenuated in 69.4% vs 89.1%, p<0.0001), serum creatinine (1.1mg/dl vs 1mg/dl p<0.0001), creatinine clearance (72.5 ml/minute vs 80 ml/minute p<0.0001), albumin (2.61g/dl vs 3.50g/dl, p<0.0001) CRP (0.40mg/dl vs 0.63mg/dl p<0.0001), LDH (196 U/l vs 182U/l, p<0.0001), and bone marrow plasmacytosis at transplant (6% vs 9%, p<0.0001). Hematologic response rates were also significantly different between the groups, with higher overall hematologic response in the MM group (90.9% vs 79.5%, p<0.0001) and higher complete response (CR) rates (40.1% vs 29.4%, p<0.0001) in the AL group. With a median follow-up of surviving patients of 68 months, the respective median overall survival (OS) for the AL and MM patients was 113 and 59.5 months, p<0.0001. Notably, the 5-year OS of AL and MM patients achieving CR were 91.4% and 57.7%, respectively, p<0.0001. If only those patients who were transplanted within 1 year of their diagnosis are included in the analysis, the respective 5-year OS of AL and MM patients achieving CR were 90.4% and 61.3%, p<0.0001 (Figure 1). To correct for imbalances in non-disease specific parameters, 3 multivariate analyses were performed using: 1) all patients; 2) only those achieving CR; and 3) only those who achieved a CR and were transplanted within 12 months of their diagnosis (Table 1). Among those patients achieving CR, MM patients had nearly a 4-fold risk of death as compared to patients with AL. Conclusion: Although ASCT is not available to all patients with either AL or MM, there is a significant difference in outcomes based on the diagnosis. Patients with AL who undergo ASCT enjoy a superior survival as compared MM patients undergoing the same procedure. This difference is most notable among those patients who achieve CR suggesting very different plasma cell biology between the two diseases. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Abstract 4931 Background: Autoimmunity, evidenced by positive serology or autoimmune diseases, has been noted to co-exist in pts with MDS. Autoimmune dysfunction has been found in some pts with a variant of MDS called hypocellular MDS, where immune suppressant medications have role in treatment. Clinical implications of AI on survival are not well described. Aim: To study clinical influence of autoimmunity on pts with LR-MDS. Methods: All adult pts diagnosed with LR (RCUD, RARS, and RCMD) MDS at the Mayo Clinic between 1996 to 2000 were studied. Retrospective data collection included pts' demographics, laboratory tests, bone marrow biopsies, treatment modalities and survival information. Autoimmunity (AI) was considered present if pts had evidence of positive serological testing (such as rheumatoid factor (RF), anti-nuclear antibodies (ANA), antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA)) and/or were diagnosed with autoimmune diseases (such as rheumatoid arthritis, vasculitis, autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA), immune thrombocytopenia (ITP)). IRB approval was obtained in accordance with Helsinki Declaration. Chi-Square, t-test and Anova were used for comparatives between groups, and Kaplan-Meier test was applied for survival estimates using JMP 9. 0 software. Results: A total of 134 adult pts were found to have LR-MDS at the time of their diagnosis. Sixty-six percent (89) were males, 13% (17) had antecedent hematological disease (AHD), and only 7% (9) had prior radio- or chemotherapy. Thirty-nine (29%) had evidence of AI. At the time of diagnosis, pts' median Hgb was 9. 3 g/dL, white blood cells (WBC) 4. 1×109/L, and platelets 151×109/L. On comparison, there was no difference between pts with AI (group 1) to the rest of the sample (group 2) (p = 0. 12, 0. 85 and 0. 23, respectively). Bone marrow cytogenetics were abnormal in 42% (56) pts, with 44 pts have one cytological anomaly, and only 2 have four anomalies. Twenty-four pts (18%) had RCUD, 60 (44%) RARS and 50 (37%) RCMD, as defined by World Health Organization (WHO) classification (Vardiman et al, 2008). Karyotype anomalies within the three WHO classes were found in 12/19 pts (63%), 15/52 pts (29%), and in 29/42 pts (70%), respectively. Of note, among those with karyotype anomalies, the mean number of cytogenetic abnormalities was significantly different across the three categories (F=6. 89, p=. 0014), with means of 0. 5, 0. 3, and 0. 9 respectively. Seven pts (5%) progressed into acute myeloid leukemia. Seventy percent of pts (94) remained as stable disease. Of the 134 pts studied, 39 (29%) were found to have evidence of AI, with 24/48 (50%) had abnormal serological tests, and 29/134 (21%) had an autoimmune disease. When tested, positive RF was found in 7/25 (28%), ANA in 14/42 (33%), anti dsDNA in 1/11 (9%), anti SS-A/-B in 2/3 (66%), ANCA in 1/12 (8%), anti-smooth muscle in 1/2 (50%), and anti-histone in 1 pt. As per autoimmune diseases, rheumatoid arthritis was identified in 6 pts (4%), vasculitides in 9 (7%), AIHA in 4 pts (3%), Sjögren syndrome in 3 (2%), myositis in 2 (1. 4%), ITP in 2 pts (1. 4%). There was no difference in AI frequency based on WHO classification (p 0. 17) or based on cytogenetic grouping (p 0. 37). Overall survival in pts with LR-MDS was found to be lower in group 1 as compared to group 2 but did not reach statistical significance (p=0. 109), with median survival of 40 months and 81 months, respectively. Conclusion: AI is a frequent finding in pts with LR-MDS, seen in up to 29% of pts. On comparison there was no difference in hematological parameters of both groups with or without AI (CBC, cytogenetics, and WHO classification). There was no survival difference in LR-MDS pts with AI compared to pts without AI. Larger size studies are needed to confirm our findings. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Abstract 4930 Background: Autoimmune disorders have been observed in pts with myeloid neoplasms but their frequency and impact on the natural history of the myeloid neoplasms remains to be defined. Aim: To describe the frequency and prognostic impact of autoimmunity in pts with CMML. Methods: After IRB approval, a retrospective chart review of all pts diagnosed with CMML at Mayo Clinic between 1994 – 2011. Autoimmunity (AI) was defined as positive serologic tests (Anti-nuclear antibodies (ANA), rheumatoid factor (RF), anti –cyclic citrullinate peptide (CCP), and antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA)), diagnosis of connective tissue disease (Rheumatoid arthritis, RA), vasculitis, or auto-immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). Survival estimates were calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox regression model for multivariate analysis for via JMP software v. 9. Results: During the study period, 288 pts with CMML were evaluated at Mayo Clinic, 35% (n=100) were female. Median age at diagnosis was 71yr (20–95). Median hemoglobin was 11 g/dL(6–16), median white blood cell (WBC) 12 x109/L (1–302), and median platelet count 86 x109/L (1–1110). Median peripheral blood (PB) and bone marrow (BM) blasts were 0 and 5 respectively, while median PB and BM monocytes were 20% and 8% respectively. Eight-nine percent of pts had CMML1, while 10% had CMML2 and only 2 pts had CMML transforming into acute myeloid leukemia (-t). Karyotype analysis performed in demonstrated normal (diploid) karyotype in 180 (63%) pts and complex karyotype in 31 pts (11%). JAK2 mutation analysis was performed in 76 pts, 13% (10/76) of which were positive for JAK2V617F mutation. Autoimmunity was found in 46 (16%) of 288 pts. When tested, positive ANA, RF, CCP, and ANCA were found in 28/89 (31%), 8/61 (13%), 1/20 (5%), and 7/25 (28%), respectively. However, RA was reported positive in 6/288 (2%), and vasculitis was reported in only 4 pts. Median overall survival of the 288 patients was 496 days. Pts with evidence of autoimmunity had a median survival of 400 days compared to 527 days to the rest of the group (p 0. 73). On multivariate analysis, autoimmunity was not an independent risk factor for survival (p 0. 15), but age, platelets, WBC and body mass index (BMI) were independent factors. Conclusion: Autoimmunity is a frequent finding in pts with CMML. When tested, autoimmune antibodies were very frequent up to 31% of pts with CMML, but this did not confer into higher frequency of autoimmune diseases. Presence of positive autoimmune antibodies did not affect overall survival adversely. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Abstract 423 Background: Cytogenetic abnormalities at diagnosis are seen in 20–70% of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). The International Prognostic Scoring System -revised (IPSS-R) classifies these cytogenetic abnormalities into five prognostic groups: very good (del(11q), ΠY with overall survival (OS) of 61 months); good (normal, del(20q), del(5q), del(12p) with OS 49 months); intermediate (+8,7q-, i(17q),+19,+21 with OS 26 months); poor (der(3)q21/q26, −7, complex with 3 abnormalities with OS 16 months); and very poor (complex with >3 abnormalities with OS of 6 months) (Schanz J, JCO 2012, Greenberg P, Blood 2012). Monosomal karyotype (MK) is defined as the presence of two or more autosomal monosomies or a single monosomy associated with a structural abnormality. We have previously shown that MK identifies a prognostically worse subgroup of MDS patients with a complex karyotype (Patnaik M, Leukemia 2010). Objectives: Methods: The Mayo Clinic database for MDS was used to identify patients in whom bone marrow histologic and cytogenetic information was obtained at the time of diagnosis. WHO criteria were used for MDS diagnosis and leukemic transformation. Results: i) Patient characteristics: A total of 1,014 patients met the above-stipulated criteria. Median age of the cohort was 71 years (range: 18–98 years) with 684 (67%) males. 819 patients (81%) had primary MDS with 195 cases (19%) of therapy-related MDS. 759 patients (75%) are dead at a median follow-up of 18 months (range: 0–223 months) with leukemic transformation documented in 125 cases (12%). IPSS-R risk distribution was as follows: very low (n=149, 15%), good (n=261, 26%), intermediate (n=221, 22%), high (n=131, 13%), and very high (n=252, 25%). ii) IPSS-R karyotype (Entire cohort; n=1,014): The five cytogenetic groups by IPSS-R were as follows: very good (n=43, 4%), good (n=577, 57%), intermediate (n=187, 18%), poor (n=83, 8%), and very poor (n=124, 12%). We evaluated the prognostic impact of the above groups by Kaplan Meier and Cox proportional hazards analysis. OS for the five cytogenetic groups was as follows: good (36 months), very good (28 months), intermediate (20 months), poor (13 months), and very poor (6 months) (Figure 1). OS of patients with very good karyotype was significantly better than patients with very poor and poor karyotype (p<0.0001, RR 3.2 and p=0.04, RR 1.6 respectively) but similar to patients with intermediate and good karyotype (p=0.22 and 0.28 respectively). iii) IPSS-R karyotype (Primary MDS; n=819): Cytogenetic risk groups by IPSS-R were as follows: very good (n=38, 5%), good (n=512, 63%), intermediate (n=153, 19%), poor (n=46, 6%), and very poor (n=70, 9%). OS of the five groups was as follows: good (39 months), very good (23 months), intermediate (21.5 months), poor (14.5 months), and very poor (6.5 months). OS of patients with very good karyotype was significantly better than patients with very poor karyotype (p=0.0002, RR 2.5) but similar to patients with poor, intermediate and good karyotype (p=0.23, 0.26 and 0.18 respectively). iv) Monosomal karyotype: MK was identified in 153 (15%) cases of which 4 cases were intermediate, 42 poor, and 107 very poor by IPSS-R. OS of patients with MK was similar to those with very poor karyotype (6 months). In addition, OS of patients with very poor without MK was akin to patients with poor without MK (p=0.21). Furthermore, among primary MDS we identified 83 (8%) cases of MK of which 4 were intermediate, 21 were poor, and 58 very poor by IPSS-R. We confirmed that OS of patients with MK was similar to patients with very poor karyotype (6.5 months). Moreover, survival of patients with very poor without MK was similar to patients with poor without MK (p=0.51). Conclusions: In this independent analysis of 1,014 patients with MDS, IPSS-R cytogenetic risk characterization failed to discriminate between very good, good and intermediate prognostic groups. In addition, patients with very poor without MK have a similar prognosis to patients with poor without MK and should be included in the poor category whereas the presence of MK should warrant inclusion into the very poor risk category. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Abstract 3790 Background: Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is a clonal stem cell disorder characterized by: persistent peripheral blood (PB) monocytosis (>1 × 10(9)/L), absence of BCR-ABL1 fusion, absence of rearrangement of the PDGFRA/B genes, <20% bone marrow (BM) & PB blasts, and dysplasia involving one or more myeloid cell lines. It is clinically considered to be an overlapping syndrome with myelodysplastic and myeloproliferative features. The natural history and prognostic features of CMML are not well defined with the MD Anderson prognostic score (MDAPS) and the Spanish risk stratification by cytogenetics being the two major prognostic tools currently being used in clinical practice. Methods: 227 patients with WHO defined CMML were seen at the Mayo Clinic from 1997 through 2007. All patients underwent bone marrow (BM) examination and cytogenetic evaluation at diagnosis. We evaluated the prognostic relevance of several clinical and laboratory parameters including those previously identified by the MDAPS (Blood 2002;99:840) and the Spanish cytogenetic risk stratification (Haematologica 2011;96:375). Results: Among the 227 study patients, 153 (67%) were males and median age was 71 years (range, 17–90 years). There were 192 (85%) patients with CMML-1 & the remainder had CMML-2. At a median follow-up of 15 months, 166 (73%) deaths and 33 (14.5%) leukemic transformations were documented. Median survivals were 22 months for CMML-1 and 14 months for CMML-2. In univariate analysis, significant risk factors for survival included decreased hemoglobin level, decreased platelet count and increased levels of white blood cells (WBC), absolute neutrophils (ANC), absolute monocytes (AMC), absolute lymphocytes (ALC), PB blasts, BM blasts and presence of circulating immature myeloid cells (IMC; inclusive of PB blasts). However, on multivariable analysis that included the aforementioned Spanish cytogenetic risk stratification, only increased AMC (>10 × 10(9)/L, RR 2.5, 95% CI 1.7–3.8), presence of circulating IMC (RR 2.0, 95% CI 1.4–2.7), decreased hemoglobin (<10 g/dL; RR 1.6, 99% CI 1.2–2.2), and decreased platelet count (<100 × 10(9)/L; RR 1.4, 99% CI 1.0–1.9) retained significance. Using these four independent risk factors, we prepared a new prognostic risk model that performed better than both the MDAPS and the Spanish cytogenetic risk models (Figure). The Mayo risk model was also predictive of leukemic transformation: high risk RR 4.9 (95% CI 1.9–12.8) and intermediate risk RR 2.6 (1.1–5.9). Individual parameters of independent significance for leukemic transformation included PB blast count and AMC >10 × 10(9)/L. Conclusions: Absolute monocyte count is the strongest predictor of survival in CMML. Other independent risk factors include circulating immature myeloid cells, anemia and thrombocytopenia. A risk model based on these four risk factors is effective in predicting both overall and leukemia-free survival and outperforms both the MDAPS and risk stratification by cytogenetics. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.