Back to Authors

Ma, Jingfei

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2827-8891

Mayo Clinic

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

Citations 2

A Novel Positive-Contrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging Line Marker for High-Dose-Rate (HDR) MRI-Assisted Radiosurgery (MARS)
Bruno, Teresa L., Sanders, Jeremiah , Ning, Matthew S. , Ma, Jingfei , Klopp, Ann H. , Venkatesan, Aradhana M. , Martirosyan, Karen S. , Sanders, Jeremiah W , Ning, Matthew S , Ma, Jingfei , Klopp, Ann H , Martirosyan, Karen S , Venkatesan, Aradhana M , Wang, Li , Ding, Yao , Stafford, R. Jason , Lin, Eric, Bathala, Tharakeswara K , Wang, Jihong , Frank, Steven J.

Cancers | May 20, 2024 | Volume: 16 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 1922

10.3390/cancers16101922 Get It

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can facilitate accurate organ delineation and optimal dose distributions in high-dose-rate (HDR) MRI-Assisted Radiosurgery (MARS). Its use for this purpose has been limited by the lack of positive-contrast MRI markers that can clearly delineate the lumen of the HDR applicator and precisely show the path of the HDR source on T1- and T2-weighted MRI sequences. We investigated a novel MRI positive-contrast HDR brachytherapy or interventional radiotherapy line marker, C4:S, consisting of C4 (visible on T1-weighted images) complexed with saline. Longitudinal relaxation time (T1) and transverse relaxation time (T2) for C4:S were measured on a 1.5 T MRI scanner. High-density polyethylene (HDPE) tubing filled with C4:S as an HDR brachytherapy line marker was tested for visibility on T1- and T2-weighted MRI sequences in a tissue-equivalent female ultrasound training pelvis phantom. Relaxivity measurements indicated that C4:S solution had good T1-weighted contrast (relative to oil [fat] signal intensity) and good T2-weighted contrast (relative to water signal intensity) at both room temperature (relaxivity ratio > 1; r2/r1 = 1.43) and body temperature (relaxivity ratio > 1; r2/r1 = 1.38). These measurements were verified by the positive visualization of the C4:S (C4/saline 50:50) HDPE tube HDR brachytherapy line marker on both T1- and T2-weighted MRI sequences. Orientation did not affect the relaxivity of the C4:S contrast solution. C4:S encapsulated in HDPE tubing can be visualized as a positive line marker on both T1- and T2-weighted MRI sequences. MRI-guided HDR planning may be possible with these novel line markers for HDR MARS for several types of cancer.
Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) response evaluation with MRI/MR elastography (MRE) in surgical and nonsurgical patients with HCC.
Qayyum, Aliya , Avritscher, Rony , Aslam, Rizwan , Pagel, Mark D. , Sun, Jia , Abugabal, Yehia I., Hassan, Manal M. , Rashid, Asif , Lee, Sunyoung S. , Wolff, Robert A. , Ma, Jingfei , Amin, Hesham M. , Yao, James C. , Ehman, Richard L. , Duda, Dan G. , Kaseb, Ahmed O

Journal of Clinical Oncology | February 4, 2020 | Volume: 38 | Issue: 4_suppl | Pages: 480-480

10.1200/jco.2020.38.4_suppl.480 Get It

480 Background: Currently, there is a lack of imaging biomarkers of immunotherapy outcome in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The study aim was to determine if HCC enhancement on MRI and stiffness change measured by magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) can predict immunotherapy response. Methods: This was a prospective, Institutional Review Board approved study of 38 patients with HCC treated with immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy. All patients had liver MRI/MRE and HCC biopsy at baseline, and MRI/MRE with biopsy or resection after 6 weeks therapy. HCC stiffness (kPa) was measured on MRE elastograms (liver stiffness maps). HCC enhancement and change in stiffness were compared with treatment response to ICB in 1) non-surgical patients (pembrolizumab), and 2) surgical patients (nivolumab +/- ipilimumab). For non-surgical patients, treatment response was defined as overall survival >1 year. For surgical patients, treatment response was defined as <50% viable tumor at time of resection. Analysis was performed using descriptive statistics and Spearman correlation; p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Twenty-five patients were evaluable. Median age was 67 years (32, 78). Etiology of liver disease was NASH (n=8), HCV (n=8), HBV (n=2) and unknown (n=7). Treatment response occurred in 11/25 (44%) patients. Median HCC size and change in size were 4.7 cm (1.2, 14.0) and –0.32 cm, respectively. Median baseline HCC stiffness and change in stiffness were 5 kPa (2.2, 12.4) and –0.1 kPa (–2.2, 1.5), respectively. Median change in HCC size for responders and non-responders was –1.2 cm (–4.8, 0.4) and 0 cm (–1.5, 1.1), respectively (p = 0.02). Treatment response was associated with absence of portal venous phase capsular enhancement and increase in HCC stiffness, (p<0.001). Conclusions: Capsular enhancement and MRE stiffness change may be useful biomarkers of immune cell activated response to ICB therapy.