Back to Authors

Cindass, Jessica L.

Mayo Clinic

Brooke Army Medical Center

Citations 7

Tumor Lysate Particle Only Vaccine (TLPO) vs. Tumor Lysate Particle-Loaded, Dendritic Cell Vaccine (TLPLDC) to Prevent Recurrence in Resected Stage III/IV Melanoma Patients: Results of a Phase I/IIa Trial
Decar, Spencer G. Van, Carpenter, Elizabeth L. , Vreeland, Timothy J. , Valdera, Franklin A., Tiwari, Ankur, Hale, Diane F. , Hickerson, Annelies T. , Cindass, Jessica L., Hyngstrom, John , Berger, Adam C. , Shaheen, Montaser , Yu, Xianzhong, Wagner, Thomas E., Faries, Mark B. , Peoples, George E. , Decar, Spencer Van , Adams, Alexandra M. , Chick, Robert C. , Clifton, Guy T. , Stojadinovic, Alexander , O’Shea, Anne E. , McCarthy, Patrick M. , Bohan, Phillip M. Kemp , Jakub, James W. , Sussman, Jonathan

No container title available | March 19, 2024 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.21203/rs.3.rs-4088449/v1 Get It

Abstract Background: The autologous tumor lysate, particle-loaded, dendritic cell (TLPLDC) vaccine is produced from dendritic cells (DC) loaded ex vivo with autologous tumor lysate (TL). TLPLDC has been shown to decrease recurrence in resected Stage III/IV melanoma patients in a Phase IIb trial. The TL particle only (TLPO) vaccine is produced by loading of yeast cell wall particles with autologous TL and direct injection allowing for in vivo DC loading. We have compared the TLPO and TLPLDC vaccines in an embedded Phase I/IIa trial of a larger Phase IIb trial of the TLPLDC vaccine. Methods: Patients rendered clinically disease-free after surgery were randomized 2:1 to receive the TLPO or TLPLDC vaccine and followed for recurrence and death. Patients had scheduled intradermal inoculations at 0, 1, 2, 6, 12, and 18 months after enrollment. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank analysis were used to compare disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in an intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis. Results: Sixty-three patients were randomized, 43 TLPO and 20 TLPLDC. Patients randomized to the TLPO arm were more likely to be female (37.2% vs. 10.0%, p = 0.026), but otherwise no significant clinicopathological differences were identified. No differences in related adverse events (AE) were found between treatment arms. At a median follow-up of 20.5 months, the DFS (60.8% vs. 58.7%, p = 0.714) and OS (94.6% vs. 93.8%, p = 0.966) were equivalent between the TLPO and TLPLDC groups, respectively. No statistical differences were found in subgroup analyses between vaccine types, which accounted for receipt of immunotherapy and the use of G-CSF pre-blood draw. Conclusions: In a randomized, double-blind Phase I/IIa trial, there were no differences in DFS or OS in resected Stage III/IV melanoma patients receiving adjuvant TLPO versus TLPLDC vaccines. Given manufacturing advantages, further efficacy testing of TLPO is warranted in a Phase III trial. Trial Registration This is a clinical trial registered under NCT02301611.
Prospective, randomized, double-blind phase 2B trial of the TLPO and TLPLDC vaccines to prevent recurrence of resected stage III/IV melanoma: a prespecified 36-month analysis
Carpenter, Elizabeth Lee, Decar, Spencer Van , McCarthy, Patrick M. , Vreeland, Timothy J. , Valdera, Franklin, Tiwari, Ankur, Hale, Diane F. , Bohan, Phillip Kemp, Hickerson, Annelies T. , Smolinsky, Todd , Thomas, Katryna, Cindass, Jessica L., Hyngstrom, John , Berger, Adam C. , Shaheen, Montaser , Yu, Xianzhong, Wagner, Thomas E., Faries, Mark B. , Peoples, George E. , Van Decar, Spencer , McCarthy, Patrick , Vreeland, Timothy J , Jakub, James, Adams, Alexandra M. , O’Shea, Anne E. , Chick, Robert C. , Clifton, Guy T. , Bohan, Phillip M. Kemp , Jakub, James W. , Sussman, Jonathan

Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer | August 3, 2023 | Volume: 11 | Issue: 8 | Pages: e006665

10.1136/jitc-2023-006665 Get It

Background The tumor lysate, particle-loaded, dendritic cell (TLPLDC) vaccine is made by ex vivo priming matured autologous dendritic cells (DCs) with yeast cell wall particles (YCWPs) loaded with autologous tumor lysate (TL). The tumor lysate, particle only (TLPO) vaccine uses autologous TL-loaded YCWPs coated with silicate for in vivo DC loading. Here we report the 36-month prespecified analyses of this prospective, randomized, double-blind trial investigating the ability of the TLPO and TLPLDC (±granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF)) vaccines to prevent melanoma recurrence in high-risk patients. Methods Patients with clinically disease-free stage III/IV melanoma were randomized 2:1 initially to TLPLDC versus placebo (n=124) and subsequently TLPO versus TLPLDC (n=63). All patients were randomized and blinded; however, the placebo control arm was replaced in the second randomization scheme with another novel vaccine; some analyses in this paper therefore reflect a combination of the two randomization schemes. Patients receiving the TLPLDC vaccine were further divided by their method of DC harvest (with or without G-CSF pretreatment); this was not randomized. The use of standard of care checkpoint inhibitors was not stratified between groups. Safety was assessed and Kaplan-Meier and log-rank analyses compared disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Results After combining the two randomization processes, a total of 187 patients were allocated between treatment arms: placebo (n=41), TLPLDC (n=103), or TLPO (n=43). The allocation among arms created by the addition of patients from the two separate randomization schemes does not reflect concurrent randomization among all treatment arms. TLPLDC was further divided by use of G-CSF in DC harvest: no G-CSF (TLPLDC) (n=47) and with G-CSF (TLPLDC+G) (n=56). Median follow-up was 35.8 months. Only two patients experienced a related adverse event ≥grade 3, one each in the TLPLDC+G and placebo arms. DFS was 27.2% (placebo), 55.4% (TLPLDC), 22.9% (TLPLDC+G), and 60.9% (TLPO) (p<0.001). OS was 62.5% (placebo), 93.6% (TLPLDC), 57.7% (TLPLDC+G), and 94.6% (TLPO) (p=0.002). Conclusions The TLPO and TLPLDC (without G-CSF) vaccines were associated with improved DFS and OS in this clinical trial. Given production and manufacturing advantages, the efficacy of the TLPO vaccine will be confirmed in a phase 3 trial. Trial registration number NCT02301611 .
542 Randomized trial of tumor lysate particle only vaccine vs. tumor lysate particle-loaded, dendritic cell vaccine to prevent recurrence of resected stage III/IV melanoma: 36-month analysis
Carpenter, Elizabth, Adams, Lexy, Vreeland, Timothy J. , Valdera, Franklin, McCarthy, Patrick M. , Hale, Diane F. , Bohan, Phillip Kemp, Hickeron, Annelies, Myers, John , Cindass, Jessica L., Hyngstrom, John , Berger, Adam C. , Shaheen, Montaser , Yu, Xianzhong, Wagner, Thomas E., Faries, Mark B. , Peoples, George E. , McCarthy, Patrick , Chick, Robert C. , Clifton, Guy T. , O’Shea, Anne E. , Bohan, Phillip M. Kemp , Sussman, Jonathan , Jakub, James W.

Regular and Young Investigator Award Abstracts | November 9, 2021 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: A571-A571

10.1136/jitc-2021-sitc2021.542 Get It

Multi‐institutional, prospective, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled phase IIb trial of the tumor lysate, particle‐loaded, dendritic cell (TLPLDC) vaccine to prevent recurrence in high‐risk melanoma patients: A subgroup analysis
Chick, Robert C. , Faries, Mark B. , Hale, Diane F. , Hickerson, Annelies T. , Vreeland, Timothy J. , Myers, John W., Cindass, Jessica L., Brown, Tommy A., Hyngstrom, John , Berger, Adam C. , Jakub, James W. , Shaheen, Montaser , Park, Hyohyun, Sloan, Amanda JoEllen, Wagner, Thomas E., Peoples, George E. , Hickerson, Annelies T , Vreeland, Timothy J , Jakub, James W , Clifton, Guy T , Bohan, Phillip M. Kemp , Sussman, Jonathan , Clifton, Guy T.

Cancer Medicine | May 13, 2021 | Volume: 10 | Issue: 13 | Pages: 4302-4311

10.1002/cam4.3969 Get It

AbstractBackgroundCheckpoint inhibitors (CPI) in combination with cell‐based vaccines may produce synergistic antitumor immunity. The primary analysis of the randomized and blinded phase IIb trial in resected stage III/IV melanoma demonstrated TLPLDC is safe and improved 24‐month disease‐free survival (DFS) in the per treatment (PT) analysis. Here, we examine efficacy within pre‐specified and exploratory subgroups.MethodsStage III/IV patients rendered disease‐free by surgery were randomized 2:1 to TLPLDC vaccine versus placebo. The pre‐specified PT analysis included only patients completing the primary vaccine/placebo series at 6 months. Kaplan–Meier analysis was used to compare 24‐month DFS among subgroups.ResultsThere were no clinicopathologic differences between subgroups except stage IV patients were more likely to receive CPI. In stage IV patients, 24‐month DFS was 43% for vaccine versus 0% for placebo (p = 0.098) in the ITT analysis and 73% versus 0% (p = 0.002) in the PT analysis. There was no significant difference in 24‐month DFS when stratified by use of immunotherapy or CPI. For patients with resected recurrent disease, 24‐month DFS was 88.9% versus 33.3% (p = 0.013) in the PT analysis. All benefit from vaccination was in the PT analysis; no benefit was found in patients receiving up to three doses.ConclusionThe TLPLDC vaccine improved DFS in patients completing the primary vaccine series, particularly in the resected stage IV patients. The efficacy of the TLPLDC vaccine will be confirmed in a phase III study evaluating adjuvant TLPLDC + CPI versus Placebo + CPI in resected stage IV melanoma patients.
310 The effect of pretreatment with G-CSF prior to dendritic cell collection during the phase IIb trial of an autologous DC-based vaccine for advanced, resectable melanoma
Vreeland, Timothy J. , Adams, Lexy, McCarthy, Patrick M. , Bohan, Phillip Kemp, Hickeron, Annelies, Myers, John , Cindass, Jessica L., Brown, Tommy A., Hale, Diane F. , Faries, Mark B. , Hyngstrom, John , Berger, Adam C. , Shaheen, Montaser , Wagner, Thomas E., Peoples, George E. , McCarthy, Patrick , O’Shea, Anne E. , Chick, Robert C. , Clifton, Guy T. , Bohan, Phillip M. Kemp , Jakub, James W. , Sussman, Jonathan

Regular and young investigator award abstracts | November 9, 2020 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: A191.1-A191

10.1136/jitc-2020-sitc2020.0310 Get It

300 Final analysis of a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase IIb trial of tumor lysate, particle-loaded, dendritic cell vaccine in stage III/IV melanoma: 36-month analysis
Adams, Lexy, Chick, Robert C. , Vreeland, Timothy J. , McCarthy, Patrick M. , Bohan, P. Kemp, Hickeron, Annelies, Myers, John , Cindass, Jessica L., Hale, Diane F. , Faries, Mark B. , Hyngstrom, John , Berger, Adam C. , Shaheen, Montaser , Wagner, Thomas E., Peoples, George E. , McCarthy, Patrick , Clifton, Guy T. , O’Shea, Anne E. , Jakub, James W. , Sussman, Jonathan

Regular and young investigator award abstracts | November 9, 2020 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: A183.2-A184

10.1136/jitc-2020-sitc2020.0300 Get It

Multi-institutional, prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase IIb trial of the tumor lysate, particle-loaded, dendritic cell (TLPLDC) vaccine to prevent recurrence in high-risk melanoma patients: A subgroup analysis.
Chick, Robert C. , Hale, Diane F. , Hickerson, Annelies T. , Vreeland, Timothy J. , Myers, John W., Cindass, Jessica L., Brown, Tommy A., Hyngstrom, John , Berger, Adam C. , Shaheen, Montaser , Wagner, Thomas E., Peoples, George E. , Faries, Mark B. , Bohan, Phillip M. Kemp , Jakub, James W. , Sussman, Jonathan , Clifton, Guy T.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | February 4, 2020 | Volume: 38 | Issue: 5_suppl | Pages: 63-63

10.1200/jco.2020.38.5_suppl.63 Get It

63 Background: A novel vaccine strategy may prevent recurrence in high-risk melanoma patients (pts). The TLPLDC vaccine uses yeast cell wall particles (YCWP) to load tumor lysate into autologous dendritic cells (DC). In this phase IIb trial of TLPLDC vs. placebo in resected stage III/IV pts, TLPLDC increased 24 month (mo) disease free survival (DFS) in the per treatment (PT) population. Here, we present a 24mo DFS subgroup analysis and estimated overall 36mo DFS. Methods: Disease-free pts were randomized 2:1 to the TLPLDC vaccine vs. unloaded YCWP+DC at 0, 1, 2, 6, 12, and 18mo. The protocol was amended to allow concurrent adjuvant checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) therapy once approved. The pre-specified PT population included only pts completing the primary vaccine/placebo series (PVS) at 6 mo. Kaplan-Meier estimates of DFS were used to compare treatment arms by stage (III or IV) and CPI therapy (yes/no) in the ITT and PT populations. Results: 144 pts were randomized (103 TLPLDC, 41 placebo); 98 pts (66 TLPLDC, 32 placebo) completed the PVS. There were no clinicopathologic differences between treatment groups. There was no difference in 24mo DFS in stage III pts (n = 112), but in stage IV pts (n = 32), the 24mo DFS was 44% vs 0% (TLPLDC vs placebo) (p = 0.41) in ITT and 73.3% vs. 0% (HR 0.14, p = 0.002) in PT. Stage IV pts were more likely to receive CPI than stage III pts (50% vs. 30%, p = 0.003). There was no difference in 24mo DFS for pts who did not receive CPI (n = 102), but in pts who received CPI (n = 42), the 24mo DFS was 49.3% vs. 31.3% (p = 0.71) in ITT and 68.8% vs. 41.7% (HR 0.46, p = 0.28) in PT, showing a trend toward improved DFS in pts who completed the PVS and received CPI (n = 31). Overall, the 36mo estimated DFS was 34.2% vs. 21.6% (p = 0.89) for ITT and 56.9% vs. 27.9% (p = 0.021) for PT. Conclusions: The TLPLDC vaccine improved DFS in patients completing the PVS at 24 and 36 mos, particularly in the resected stage IV subset. The apparent synergistic effect with TLPLDC + CPI will be confirmed in a phase III study evaluating adjuvant TLPLDC + CPI vs. CPI alone in resected stage IV melanoma pts. Clinical trial information: NCT02301611.