Brem, Rachel F.

Abstract Objective The purpose of this study is to summarize the results of a survey distributed by the Society of Breast Imaging (SBI) to assess applicants’ experience with the 2018 and 2019 Breast Imaging Fellowship Match process. Methods In this institutional review board–exempt study, the SBI issued an anonymous survey to all matched applicants in an attempt to gauge their experience with the 2018 and 2019 Match process. Results The survey was sent to all 2018 and 2019 matched applicants and 105/236 (45%) responses were received. The majority (75%, 79/105) of respondents reported a positive experience with the Match, with at least a 4/5 rating, and only 3% (5/105) reported a rating below 3/5. There was some improvement in 2019, with 86% (24/28) of respondents reporting at least a 4/5 rating compared to 71% (55/77) in 2018. No respondent reported a score below a 3/5 rating in 2019. The most commonly cited issues with the Match were the timing of the Match process, the need for a universal application, and the burden of travel. Location and program reputation were the two most important factors contributing to the final rank order of programs. Conclusion The great majority of applicants felt that the Match created a positive experience. Planned areas of improvement include the implementation of a universal application, the transition to virtual interviews, and a condensed timeline. These measures are likely to increase applicant satisfaction and provide a fair and efficient experience for future breast radiologists.

Abstract PURPOSE. Increased mammographic percent density (MPD) is a strong independent risk factor for developing breast cancer. Previous studies have shown that tissue sound speed, derived from ultrasound tomography, is a surrogate biomarker of MPD. We examined associations of sound speed and MPD with breast cancer risk in a case-control study. METHOD AND MATERIALS. We evaluated breast cancer risk associated with sound speed and MPD in a case-control study involving 59 participants with recent breast cancer diagnoses (cases, aged 30-70 years) and 150 participants with no history of breast cancer (controls), who were matched to cases on age, race, and menopausal status. The cases and controls were imaged with both ultrasound tomography (UST) and mammography. In cases, breast density was measured pre-treatment in the contralateral breast to avoid potential influences of tumor-related changes on MPD or sound speed. In controls, a randomly selected breast was imaged. The ultrasound tomography images were used to estimate the volume averaged sound speed of the breast, and the Cumulus software package was applied to mammograms to determine MPD. Odds Ratios (ORs) and 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs), adjusted for matching factors, were calculated for the relation of quartiles of MPD and sound speed with breast cancer risk. OR differences were tested using a bootstrap approach. RESULTS. MPD was associated with elevated breast cancer risk compared to controls, consistent with previous studies, although the trend did not reach statistical significance (OR per quartile=1.28, 95%CI: 0.95, 1.73; ptrend=0.10). In contrast, elevated sound speed was significantly associated with increased breast cancer risk in a dose-response fashion (OR per quartile=1.79, 95%CI: 1.30, 2.48; ptrend=0.0004). The OR-trend for sound speed was statistically significantly different from that observed for MPD (p=0.01). DISCUSSION. Our case-control study showed that increasing quartiles of whole breast sound speed were consistently and more strongly associated with increasing breast cancer risk than quartiles of MPD. These results show promise for UST’s role in breast cancer risk stratification. CONCLUSION. Elevated breast density strongly increases breast cancer risk. UST has the potential to provide a more accurate, non-ionizing method for assessing breast density and its associated breast cancer risk. Citation Format: Mark Sak, Neb Duric, Ruth Pfeiffer, Mark Sherman, Peter Littrup, Michael Simon, David Gorski, Teri Albrecht, Haythem Ali, Rachel Brem, Rachel Brem, Sharon Fan, Gretchen Gierach. Tissue sound speed is more strongly associated with breast cancer risk than mammographic percent density: A comparative case-control study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-08-28.

Abstract PURPOSE. Studies have shown that a decrease in mammographic density (MD) or lowering of background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) on MRI after initiation of tamoxifen therapy predicts a favorable response in the preventive or adjuvant settings. However, performing serial mammograms poses radiation concerns, while serial MRIs carry high cost as well as risk of multiple Gadolinium doses. Previous studies have shown that tissue sound speed, derived from whole breast ultrasound tomography measurements, is a surrogate biomarker of MD. Ultrasound is ideal for performing serial measurements because it is fast and poses almost no risks. The purpose of this study was to evaluate repeated measures of the sound speed biomarker at 3, 6 and 12-months following tamoxifen initiation. METHOD AND MATERIALS. We performed a case-control comparison involving 74 participants referred by a health professional to undergo tamoxifen therapy (cases) and 150 matched participants with no history of breast cancer (controls). The cases were scanned with ultrasound tomography at baseline (i.e. before start of tamoxifen therapy), and then at 3, 6 and 12 months after tamoxifen initiation. Controls were scanned at baseline and 12 months. In the case group, sound speed was measured pre-treatment in the contralateral breast to avoid potential influences of tumor-related changes on density. In the control group, a single randomized breast was scanned. A pairwise t-test was used to assess differences in sound speed over time and between cases and controls. RESULTS. There was a steady decline in sound speed over the 12-month period for women undergoing tamoxifen therapy (mean(SD): -3.0(8.2) m/s; P=0.001). Furthermore, significant sound speed reductions were observed as early as 4-6 months after tamoxifen initiation (mean(SD): -2.1(6.8) m/s; P=0.008). In contrast, the controls demonstrated no significant change in sound speed over a 12-month period, and the difference between case-control groups was statistically significant (P=0.0009). DISCUSSION. Breast sound speed decreases rapidly after tamoxifen initiation while it remains steady for the control group. These results suggest that sound speed may be a biomarker of response to tamoxifen. Further studies are needed to assess whether this observation can predict clinical response. CONCLUSION. Ultrasound tomography may have utility in monitoring breast sound speed change as a potential biomarker of clinical tamoxifen response. Citation Format: Neb Duric, Mark Sak, Mark Sherman, Ruth Pfeiffer, Sharon Fan, Michael Simon, David Gorski, Teri Albrecht, Haythem Ali, Peter Littrup, Rachel Brem, Gretchen Gierach. Tissue sound speed: A novel imaging biomarker for measuring tamoxifen response [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-11-11.

Mammographic percent density (MPD) is an independent risk factor for developing breast cancer, but its inclusion in clinical risk models provides only modest improvements in individualized risk prediction, and MPD is not typically assessed in younger women because of ionizing radiation concerns. Previous studies have shown that tissue sound speed, derived from whole breast ultrasound tomography (UST), a non-ionizing modality, is a potential surrogate marker of breast density, but prior to this study, sound speed has not been directly linked to breast cancer risk. To that end, we explored the relation of sound speed and MPD with breast cancer risk in a case-control study, including 61 cases with recent breast cancer diagnoses and a comparison group of 165 women, frequency matched to cases on age, race, and menopausal status, and with a recent negative mammogram and no personal history of breast cancer. Multivariable odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated for the relation of quartiles of MPD and sound speed with breast cancer risk adjusted for matching factors. Elevated MPD was associated with increased breast cancer risk, although the trend did not reach statistical significance (OR per quartile = 1.27, 95% CI: 0.95, 1.70; ptrend = 0.10). In contrast, elevated sound speed was significantly associated with breast cancer risk in a dose–response fashion (OR per quartile = 1.83, 95% CI: 1.32, 2.54; ptrend = 0.0003). The OR trend for sound speed was statistically significantly different from that observed for MPD (p = 0.005). These findings suggest that whole breast sound speed may be more strongly associated with breast cancer risk than MPD and offer future opportunities for refining the magnitude and precision of risk associations in larger, population-based studies, including women younger than usual screening ages.