Lu, Shao‐Chia

Uncontrolled systemic inflammatory responses are a critical pathological feature of fatal Ebola virus (EBOV) infection. While some inflammatory responses may originate from mononuclear phagocytes (MNPs), nonimmune cells vastly outnumber MNPs and may be an important source of inflammation. Here, we demonstrated that highly virulent EBOV induced a high and sustained pro-inflammatory response compared to less virulent ebolaviruses in non-MNPs through TLR4-independent NF-κB activation. We identified the EBOV matrix protein VP40 as a potent activator of NF-κB in non-MNPs, whose intrinsic inflammatory activation ability is higher than VP40 proteins from less virulent ebolaviruses. This suggests that VP40 is a virulence determinant inducing distinct degrees of pro-inflammatory responses among ebolaviruses. Mechanistically, VP40 activated the NF-κB signaling pathway, primarily via TNFR1 using a ligand-independent mechanism. These findings reveal mechanisms that may drive systemic inflammation and promote EBOV pathogenesis, suggesting potential therapeutic strategies to mitigate immune dysregulation in severe EBOV infections.

Ebola virus (EBOV) causes severe disease outbreaks in humans with high case fatality rates. EBOV requires adaptation to cause lethal disease in mice by acquiring single mutations in both the nucleoprotein (NP) and VP24 genes. As an attempt to model mouse-adapted EBOV (MA-EBOV), we engineered novel pentacistronic minigenomes (5xMG) containing a reporter gene, VP40, and glycoprotein genes as well as the NP and VP24 genes from either EBOV or MA-EBOV. The 5xMGs were constructed and optimized, and the produced transcription- and replication-competent virus-like particles (trVLPs) were demonstrated to infect several cell lines. Introduction of the mouse-adaptation mutations did not significantly impact the replication and transcription of the 5xMG or the relative infectivity of the trVLPs in vitro. This work demonstrates the development of the 5xMG system as a new versatile tool to study EBOV biology.

Abstract Most adenovirus vaccines are replication-defective RD-Ads. In contrast, replication-competent adenovirus (RC-Ad) replicate antigen genes 10,000-fold in each cell to amplify immune responses. While RC-Ads vaccines are more potent than RD-Ad, they risk causing adenovirus infections in humans. We engineered “single-cycle” Ad (SC-Ad) vectors that still amplify transgenes, but that do not produce infectious progeny. RD-, SC-, and RC-Ads were tested by single immunization against influenza, Ebola virus, HIV-1, Zika virus, HCV, CMV, Clostridium difficile, and cancers in mice, hamsters, and macaques and antibody and T cell responses were measured. SC-Ad expressing GFP, influenza HA, or HIV gp140 generated antigens with 33 to 100-times less virus than RD-Ad. SC-Ad generated vaginal antibodies that persisted beyond 6 months after single intranasal immunization. Intramuscular injection of 1010 vp of SC-Ad6 expressing HIV-1 gp160 generated env antibodies in sera within 4 weeks of a single immunization in rhesus macaques. SC-Ad expressing a C. difficile toxin A and B immunogen generated toxin-binding antibody reciprocal titers above 105 that persisted in excess of a half of a year after a single immunization. Single immunization with SC-Ad protected vaccinated animals against toxin and against challenge with C. difficile spores. When SC-Ads were used to amplify the expression of immune stimulatory proteins in the context of cancer, single intratumoral injection of SC-Ad expressing 4-1BBL or GMCSF mediated significant reductions in tumor growth and extension of survival without the need for exogenous cancer antigen expression. These data suggest that SC-Ads may have utility against infectious diseases and cancer.

The human species D Ad26 is being investigated as a low-seroprevalence vector for oncolytic virotherapy and gene-based vaccination against HIV-1 and SARS-CoV-2. However, there is debate in the literature about its tropism and receptor utilization, which directly influence its efficiency for certain applications. This work was aimed at determining which receptor(s) this virus uses for infection and its role in virus biology, vaccine efficacy, and, importantly, vaccine safety.

Oncolytic viruses (OVs) can have utility for direct killing of cancer cells, but may also serve to activate the immune system against cancer cells. While viruses alone can serve as immune stimulators, there is great interest in arming OVs with genes encoding immune stimulatory proteins to amplify their effects. In this work, we have tested the efficacy of conditionally-replicating adenoviruses (CRAds) with and without selected immunostimulatory payloads, murine CD40L (mCD40L) or 4-1BBL (m4-1BBL), in an immune competent mouse model of melanoma. When CRAd657-m4-1BBL and CRAd657-mCD40L were injected into B16-hCAR murine melanoma tumors, both single vectors delayed tumor growth and prolong survival compared to empty CRAd657. However, combined injection of both CRAd-m4-1BBL and CRAd-mCD40L mediated significantly better control of tumor growth. All of the payloads increased immune cell infiltration into tumors and notably reduced expression of PD-1 exhaustion marker on T cells. Tumor volumes were negatively associated with total infiltrating T cell population. We found that the payloads increased immune cell infiltration into tumors with some specificities: recruitment of CD8 + T cells was higher with m4-1BBL expression, while mCD40L expression induced more CD4 + T cell infiltration. Importantly, the combination of CRAd657-m4-1BBL and CRAd657-mCD40L induced the highest immune cells/T cell infiltration and the highest anti-TRP-2 tumor-associated antigen T cell responses than empty or single gene vector. This combination also caused depigmentation in areas adjacent to the tumor sites in more animals. These data indicate that driving two axes of the immune system with combined immune stimulatory payloads can lead to improved anticancer immune responses and better tumor control in an immune competent model of cancer.

Adenoviruses (Ads) are robust vectors for therapeutic applications and vaccines, but their use can be limited by differences in their in vitro and in vivo pharmacologies. This review emphasizes that there is not just one Ad, but a whole virome of diverse viruses that can be used as therapeutics. It discusses that true vector targeting involves not only retargeting viruses, but importantly also detargeting the viruses from off‐target cells.