Betcher, Hannah K.

ABSTRACT Background This study aimed to explore the effect of family history (FH) and polygenic risk scores (PRS) for multiple psychiatric disorders on lithium response in bipolar disorder (BD). Method The sample included patients from the Mayo Clinic BD Biobank. FH in first‐degree relatives was obtained via the patient questionnaire. Linear regression models tested the association of FH and PRS for BD, major depressive disorder (MDD), schizophrenia (SCZ), alcohol use disorder (AUD), anxiety disorder (ANX), and attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) with lithium response measured by the Alda A score adjusted for the Alda B sum score. Post hoc models additionally adjusted for clinical covariates (age at onset, rapid cycling, and BD subtype). Results 716 patients had Alda scores for lithium response (61.9% females, mean age = 43.4 years). FH‐BD ( β = −0.57, p = 0.015), AUD ( β = −0.44, p = 0.045), and ANX ( β = −0.61, p = 0.050) were associated with worse lithium response. After adjusting for clinical covariates, associations for FH‐BD and FH‐ANX were no longer significant. PRS‐BD was associated with better response ( β = 0.22, p = 0.041), while PRS‐MDD ( β = −0.28, p = 0.01) and PRS‐ADHD ( β = −0.24, p = 0.028) were associated with worse response, with effects largely unchanged after adjusting for clinical covariates. In the combined model considering all FHs simultaneously, only FH‐BD remained significantly associated with worse lithium response ( β = −0.71, p = 0.039). In the combined model for PRS, only PRS‐BD ( β = 0.31, p = 0.008; better response) and PRS‐MDD ( β = −0.29, p = 0.020; worse response) showed significant associations. Conclusions In this exploratory study, FH‐BD, AUD, and ANX were associated with poor response, though only FH‐AUD remained significant after adjusting for clinical factors. PRS‐BD predicted better response, while PRS‐MDD was associated with worse response. These findings suggest independent and potentially complementary roles of FH and PRS. Integrating both familial and genetic risk measures may improve personalized treatment strategies and outcomes for BD patients.

ABSTRACT Objectives To explore the clinical impact of social determinants of health (SDoH) stress in bipolar disorder (BD) course of illness and to explore potential gender differences in SDoH stress endorsement. Methods 2280 individuals living with BD type I or II (62% women; 67.5% BD‐I) participating in the Mayo Clinic Bipolar Biobank who completed a questionnaire assessing positive and negative‐valent stressors in the 12 months prior to study enrollment were included for this analysis. Six negative stressors were used as proxies of SDoH. Generalized linear models were used to test the association between SDoH stressors and markers of illness severity as well as potential differences by sex by including an interaction term. Results After adjusting for age, sex, and recruitment site, SDoH‐related stressors were significantly associated with a more severe course of illness in both men and women. Except for unemployment rates, women reported more frequently SDoH‐related stress (i.e., lack of family support, financial problems, health coverage and access problems). Conclusions The study found significant gender differences in both the endorsement of specific SDoH stressors and in the prevalence of specific illness severity markers; however, it did not directly test the predictive relationship between gender differences in SDoH and illness severity markers. Future studies aiming to achieve health equity in mental health care should continue assessing social determinants of health stressors, incorporating a gender perspective to better understand their influence on bipolar disorder.

ABSTRACTObjectivesPrior studies have raised concerns about postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) risk associated with selective serotonin and serotonin‐norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs and SNRIs), although limitations include possible confounding by maternal indications. The current study examined the risk of PPH associated with prenatal S/NRIs accounting for diagnosed maternal depression during pregnancy.MethodsThe current study is a secondary analysis of data from a cohort of 2213 pregnancies (1997–2010) identified from a large electronic medical record‐linkage system. Exposures were identified from electronic prescriptions records and resulted in three main groups: S/NRI‐exposed pregnancies (S/NRI users), antidepressant‐unexposed pregnancies (non‐users), and S/NRI exposure in the year prior to (but not during) pregnancy (former users). Data used to identify PPH occurrences included obstetrician chart diagnoses, diagnosis codes, and recorded estimated blood loss (EBL). The risk of PPH by exposure group was estimated using unadjusted, minimally adjusted (maternal age at delivery, delivery year, parity, and maternal smoking), and depression‐adjusted models (previous covariates and maternal depression). Supplemental analyses included an examination of PPH risk with prenatal bupropion monotherapy.ResultsThe study cohort consisted of 837 S/NRI users, 401 former users, and 786 non‐users, as well as 114 bupropion users identified for additional analyses. The frequency of PPH was 11.6% in the overall cohort, and was 14.7% for S/NRI users, 10.2% for former users, and 8.7% for non‐users. The risk of PPH was significantly higher for S/NRI users than non‐users in unadjusted (OR 1.82 [95% CI 1.33, 2.49]), minimally adjusted (aOR 1.66 [1.19, 2.31]), and depression‐adjusted models (aOR 1.46 [1.02, 2.10]). The risk of PPH was also higher for S/NRI former users than non‐users in unadjusted models (OR 1.54 [1.05, 2.26]) but not minimally adjusted (aOR 1.42 [0.95, 2.11]) or depression‐adjusted models (aOR 1.41 [0.95, 2.10]). No significant differences in PPH risk were observed between S/NRI users and former users, between bupropion users and non‐users, or between S/NRI users and bupropion users.ConclusionsPrenatal S/NRI exposure was associated with an increased risk of PPH after adjusting for maternal depression, although residual confounding and confounding by other factors (including unmeasured factors) may be possible, as the risk of PPH appeared to be similar between S/NRI users and former users. Best‐practice PPH risk management strategies should be adhered to for depressed patients, especially those who require treatment with antidepressants during pregnancy.

ABSTRACTObjectiveTo build consensus from different stakeholders on the content and digital interactivity of a shared decision making (SDM) tool to guide patient‐clinician collaborative conversations about treatment for bipolar depression.Patients and MethodsThis study was conducted between September 2022 and September 2023. In the first phase, we conducted a narrative review on pharmacological, neuromodulatory, and psychotherapeutic treatments available for bipolar depression. For each option, we assessed treatment effectiveness, side effects, need for clinical monitoring, clinical considerations, and cost. In the second phase, committees comprised of mental health clinicians and people with lived experience with bipolar disorder from a national mood disorders advocacy group identified key features and content to be included in the SDM tool. A thematic analysis of these data then contributed to populate the SDM tool.ResultsTwenty‐one evidence‐based treatment options identified from the narrative review were presented to the four convened committees (clinical, lived experience, peer council, and integrated steering committees) in five meetings. After discussions and thematic analysis, 12 outcomes of interest for each of the therapeutic interventions were delineated for inclusion in a web‐based SDM tool. A detailed description of the development process and SDM tool is provided.ConclusionThis is the first partnership between clinicians and persons with bipolar disorder lived experience charged with the development of a patient‐centered SDM tool to integrate clinical evidence with real‐world clinical practice and patient preferences for use during clinical encounters. Human‐centered design and testing in real clinical encounters will now contribute to refining the instrument and readying it for rigorous evaluation and implementation in practice.

Introduction: Despite advances in obstetric care, postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is a leading cause of maternal mortality worldwide. Prior reviews of studies published through 2016 suggest an association of antidepressant use during late pregnancy and increased risk of PPH. However, a causal link between prenatal antidepressants and PPH remains controversial. Objectives: This systematic literature review aimed to synthesize the empirical evidence on the association of antidepressant exposure in late pregnancy with the risk of PPH, including studies published before and after 2016. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, OVID Medline, EMBASE, SCOPUS, PsycINFO, and CINAHL from inception to September 9, 2023. Original, peer-reviewed studies (published in English) that reported on the frequency or risk of PPH in women with evidence of antidepressant use during pregnancy and included at least one control group were included. Results: Twenty studies (eight published after 2016) met inclusion criteria, most of which focused on the risks of PPH associated with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) or serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs). The main findings from the individual studies were mixed, but the majority documented statistically significant associations of PPH with late prenatal exposure, especially for exposures occurring within 30 days of delivery, compared with unexposed deliveries. Fourteen studies addressed underlying antidepressant indications or their correlates. Few studies focused on prenatal antidepressants and the risk of well-defined severe PPH or on antidepressant dose changes and general PPH risk. None examined competing risks of antidepressant discontinuation on mental health outcomes. Conclusions: Late pregnancy exposure to antidepressants may be a minor risk factor for PPH, but it is unclear to what extent reported associations are causal in nature, as opposed to correlational (effects related to nonpharmacological factors including maternal indication). For patients needing antidepressants during pregnancy, current evidence does not favor routinely discontinuing antidepressants specifically to reduce the risk of PPH.

Introduction: Lithium remains a gold standard treatment for bipolar disorder including during peripartum. Historically, guidelines advised against breastfeeding while taking lithium though recent data suggest it is acceptable for a healthy infant. Lack of awareness of acceptability contributes to decreased patient and clinician comfort and low breastfeeding rates. We report current breastfeeding rates, monitoring practices, and infant outcomes with lithium exposure in breastmilk at our institution. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted at a single academic medical center using records from 2013 to 2023. Electronic medical records were queried to identify patients prescribed lithium postpartum. Data were collected on timing of lithium initiation, lithium dose and concentration, breastfeeding status, and infant outcomes. Results: A total of 18 cases of lithium use in the postpartum period were identified. A total of 39% ( n = 7) of patients taking lithium postpartum breastfed. Most patients, 61% ( n = 11), initiated lithium prior to pregnancy, 11% ( n = 2) initiated during pregnancy and 27% ( n = 5) started postpartum. Four infant charts were reviewed with no reports of adverse events. Of these infants, average maternal lithium dose was 750 mg daily, with an average maternal serum lithium concentration of 0.62 mmol/L and average infant serum lithium concentration of 0.16 mmol/L. Conclusion: Our data demonstrate most patients using lithium postpartum have been taking lithium long-term and are not breastfeeding. Lithium exposure in breastmilk appears to be tolerated by healthy infants. There is a need for ongoing research and education on acceptability and infant monitoring recommendations to support patients who would like to breastfeed while on lithium.

Abstract There is increasing interest in individualizing treatment selection for more than 25 regulatory approved treatments for major depressive disorder (MDD). Despite an inconclusive efficacy evidence base, antidepressants (ADs) are prescribed for the depressive phase of bipolar disorder with oftentimes an inadequate treatment response and or clinical concern for mood destabilization. This study explored the relationship between antidepressant response in MDD and antidepressant-associated treatment emergent mania (TEM) in bipolar disorder (BD). We conducted a genome-wide association study (GWAS) and polygenic score analysis of TEM and tested its association with a subset of BD-I patients treated with SSRIs or SNRIs. Our results did not identify any genome-wide significant variants although, we found that a higher polygenic score (PGS) for antidepressant response in MDD was associated with higher odds of TEM in BD. Future studies with larger transdiagnostic cohorts treated with antidepressants are encouraged to identify a neurobiological mechanism associated with a spectrum of depression improvement (response- emergent mania).

INTRODUCTION: Perinatal mental illness imparts a significant health burden. A multitude of factors are hypothesized to increase the incidence of perinatal mood and anxiety disorders (PMADs) in the fetal surgical population, including uncertain fetal prognosis and the inherent risks of surgery and preterm delivery. We sought to determine the disease course of PMADs in the fetal surgery population. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted of fetal surgery patients from 2017 to 2021 at a tertiary care center. Demographics, surgical, obstetric, and psychiatric diagnoses were recorded. Standard descriptive analyses were performed. RESULTS: One hundred nineteen eligible patients were identified. Fetal surgery was performed at a median gestational age of 23.0 (range 16.0–34.0) weeks. Laser ablation of placental anastomoses (n=51) and in utero myelomeningocele repair (n=22) were the most common procedures. 26.8% (32/119) had preexisting mood disorders, with 59.3% (19/32) and 53.1% (17/32) on a baseline medication for depression or anxiety, respectively, prior to surgery. 26.4% (23/87) of patients without a history of anxiety or depression had a new diagnosis of PMAD. Two patients experienced suicidal ideation. 6.7% (8/119) and 10.1% (12/119) initiated a new psychiatric medication during or post-pregnancy, respectively. 19.8% (21/113) received a therapy referral. Among patients with baseline anxiety or depression, 62.5% (20/32) experienced an exacerbation postpartum with 25.0% (8/32) referred for therapy, and 34.3% (11/32) changing dose or medication for anxiety and 37.5% (12/32) for depression. CONCLUSION: Among patients undergoing fetal surgery, a high incidence of PMAD was identified. Most patients with prepregnancy anxiety or depression experienced an exacerbation postpartum. Further research into effective supportive interventions is warranted.

Abstract Purpose The aim of the study was to appraise the current evidence on the optimal serum level for lamotrigine (LAM) in the treatment of mood disorders (major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder). Methods Major databases were searched for randomized controlled trials, open-label trials, and observational studies reporting serum LAM levels in adult patients treated with LAM for mood disorders. Results A total of 814 abstracts were screened and 24 articles were selected for full-text review. Seven studies (226 bipolar disorder and 17 major depressive disorder patients) including 1 randomized controlled trial (n = 43), 3 prospective (n = 53), and 3 retrospective (n = 147) studies met the study criteria with a study duration range from 6 to 96 weeks. Lamotrigine daily dosage varied from 25 to 425 mg/d among the studies. Studies reported inconsistent findings between LAM concentration and efficacy. Three studies did not identify a relationship between LAM levels and a significant improvement in mood symptoms. Two studies (n = 99) reported higher response rates with LAM serum levels of greater than 3.25 μg/mL and 1 study (n = 25) reported a wide therapeutic window of 5 to 11 μg/mL. Overall, LAM was well tolerated with no major significant adverse effects. Conclusions Most studies showed a minimum LAM threshold level of 3 μg/mL in patients with mood disorders; however, the data are inconsistent regarding the therapeutic range for LAM. Based on the pooled data, there is inconsistent evidence to make conclusive recommendations on therapeutic LAM serum levels for mood improvement. Further studies including larger sample sizes are required to address this relevant clinical question.