Kuriakose, Philip

Introduction: Pregnancy is considered a hypercoagulable state, with levels of multiple coagulation factors including Factor VIII (FVIII) and von Willebrand Factor (VWF), progressively increasing throughout, reaching their peak levels during the third trimester. However, in women with von Willebrand disease (VWD), these changes are variable and could be blunted or absent due to the wide heterogeneity of phenotypes and pathophysiological mechanisms linked to this disorder, posing a significant clinical challenge. This study aims to describe the trend in the VWF profile in women with VWD during each trimester of pregnancy and in the postpartum period. Methods: This is a retrospective single-center study that included adult pregnant women diagnosed with VWD, who were followed at Henry Ford Health between 03/2012 and 11/2022. Patients with other bleeding disorders were excluded from the study. Data on baseline characteristics, including age, race, age at childbirth, and parity were collected. Additional data collected included VWF antigen (VWF:Ag) level, FVIII activity level, and VWF ristocetin cofactor (VWF:Rco) activity during the first, second, and third trimesters, as well as in the postpartum period. Results: A total of 33 cases were included in our study. At baseline, the mean VWF:Ag level in our patients was 50.5% (reference range 50%-150%). Compared to baseline, the VWF:Ag level increased by 48.71% in the first trimester, 80.59% in the second trimester, and 168.71% in the third trimester. Postpartum, the VWF:Ag level decreased by 51.29% compared to the third trimester; however, it remained 30.89% higher than baseline levels. While the FVIII level (reference range 50%-150%) was an average of 64.8% at baseline, it increased by 21.91% in the first trimester, 74.23% in the second trimester, and 143.67% in the third trimester, compared to baseline. Postpartum, the FVIII level decreased by 48.45% from the third trimester but remained 25.62% higher than baseline. Additionally, the VWF:Rco level was an average of 44.3% (reference range 51%-215%) at baseline. Compared to baseline, the VWF:Rco level increased by 61.85% in the first trimester, 90.52% in the second trimester, and 142.66% in the third trimester. It decreased by 49.12% postpartum compared to the third trimester but remained 23.48% higher than baseline. Conclusion: In women with VWD, VWF:Ag level, FVIII level, and VWF:Rco levels steadily increase during pregnancy, reaching their maximum levels during the third trimester. All three levels decreased in the postpartum period; however, they remain higher compared to baseline at a median follow up of 105 days after delivery.

7559 Background: Patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who relapse after or are ineligible for hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) or chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapy generally have poor outcomes. Preclinical data provide the rationale for combining brentuximab vedotin (BV), lenalidomide (len), and rituximab for the treatment of R/R DLBCL. BV+len showed promising clinical activity in a Phase 1 trial with a 57% overall response rate (ORR), 10.2-month median progression-free survival, and 14.3-month overall survival (Ward 2021). We report the results of the open-label safety run-in that was conducted prior to the randomized portion of the study. Methods: ECHELON-3 (NCT04404283) is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, active-comparator, multicenter Phase 3 study. Prior to randomization, an open-label safety run-in was conducted; pts received BV (1.2 mg/kg) and rituximab (375 mg/m2) both q3w, and len 20 mg qd. Pts must have received ≥2 prior lines of therapy and be previously treated with or were ineligible for HSCT or CAR-T, ECOG score ≤2, and PET-avid, bidimensional measurable disease ( > 1.5 cm by CT). Pts with negligible CD30 expression ( < 1%) were eligible. Response was assessed by the investigator according to the Lugano Classification Revised Staging System (Cheson 2014). Results: 10 pts with R/R DLBCL were enrolled. Median age was 70.5 years, 7 pts were male, and all had an ECOG ≤1. Median prior lines of therapy was 3 (range, 2 to 6); no pts received prior HSCT and 6 pts received prior CAR-T. At a median follow-up of 6.9 months (range, 2.3 to 14.1), the most common treatment emergent adverse events (TEAE) were fatigue (n = 5), anemia (n = 4) and constipation (n = 4). Grade ≥3 events were experienced by 8 pts, most commonly anemia and pneumonia (n = 3 each), and neutropenia and thrombocytopenia (n = 2 each). Serious adverse events were observed in 7 pts. Seven pts each had BV and rituximab dose modifications, and 6 pts had a len dose modification. The most common reasons for any dose modification were anemia (n = 3), neutropenia, peripheral neuropathy, or pneumonia (n = 2 each). 4 pts discontinued treatment due to an AE, 2 of which were treatment related (n = 1 each of Grade 2 fatigue; Grade 3 anemia). There was 1 death due to a TEAE that was not treatment related. The ORR (best response) was 70%, including 4 pts with a complete metabolic response, 2 pts with a partial metabolic response, and 3 pts with progressive disease. Responses were seen in both CD30 (+) and (-) pts, as well as in 4 pts who received prior CAR-T. Conclusions: This novel triplet regimen appears active in R/R DLBCL with an acceptable safety profile. The randomized portion of the study is currently enrolling. Clinical trial information: NCT04404283.

Background: Von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most common inherited bleeding disorder, affecting 1% of the population, and characterized by deficient or defective von Willebrand factor (VWF). Among women with VWD, up to 80% have heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB), many of whom have depleted iron stores and iron deficiency anemia with reduced physical functioning, anxiety, depression, and poor quality of life. HMB is a serious problem causing significant health burden for those affected. The lack of effective therapies for menorrhagia is a major unmet healthcare need in women with VWD: in up to 30% desmopressin (DDAVP), combined oral contraceptives (COCs) hormones, or the recommended non-hormonal agent, tranexamic acid (Lysteda®, TA) may be ineffective or poorly tolerated. VWF concentrates, including plasma-derived VWF (pdVWF, Humate-P®) and recombinant VWF (rVWF, Vonvendi®) safely reduce bleeds in VWD, but few data exist on VWF use in menorrhagia, and no prospective trials are available to guide treatment. As rVWF has higher purity, potency, and a longer half-life than pdVWF, this phase III trial will compare rVWF with TA in reducing menorrhagia in women with type 1 VWD. Methods: This is an NHLBI-funded U01 phase III multicenter, prospective, randomized, crossover trial in to compare IV rVWF vs. po TA in reducing menorrhagia in type 1 VWD, clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02606045. Women with type 1 VWD, VWF:RCo<0.50 IU/dL and menorrhagia, defined as pictorial blood assessment chart score (PBAC)>100 in at least one of the last two cycles, are eligible. Exclusions include hypothyroidism, past thrombosis, and renal disease. Subjects are randomized to rVWF 40 IU/kg IV day 1 vs. TA 1300 mg po three times daily days 1-5 in each of two consecutive cycles. The order of treatment is determined by randomization: in Group 1, rVWF is given in cycles 1 and 2, and TA in cycles 3 and 4; while in Group 2, TA is given in cycles 1 and 2, and rVWF in cycles 3 and 4. A rescue dose day of rVWF 40 IU/kg may be given day 2 of cycles in which rVWF is given. The primary endpoint is a 40-point reduction in PBAC, a validated measure of menstrual loss, after 2 cycles. As rVWF is a greater burden (IV, cost), to show it is superior to TA, it should improve PBAC 40 points more from baseline than TA. Secondary endpoints are cycle severity, cycle length, QoL (SF-36, Ruta, CDC-HRQ0L-14, CES-D), and satisfaction survey. Treatment response will also be compared with VWF assays and VWF genotype. Safety is assessed by number of rescue doses, other bleeding, thrombosis, and allergic reaction. Our research hypothesis is that rVWF will be superior, producing a greater improvement, by at least 40 points, in PBAC, than TA. We also hypothesize that rVWF will be as safe, tolerable, and acceptable as TA, and that VWF assays and VWF genotype will predict response to treatment. A sample size of 60 (inflated to 66 for 5% attrition) will provide 84% power to detect a difference in improvement of 40 points between rVWF and TA. Analysis will be by intent-to-treat analyses, with a two-tailed alternative hypothesis with type 1 error rate of 0.05, a 4-period 2-group (AABB/BBAA) crossover design, and an estimated between-subject standard deviation (SD) of 63 points and within subject SD of 100 points. Results: A total of 442 potential subjects have been identified at 19 participating HTCs, of whom 33 (7.5%) are eligible, and 2 enrolled. The most common reason for ineligibility is use of an IUD (15.6%), COCs (9.4%), age <18 years (6.2%), pregnancy (6.2%), breastfeeding (6.2%), and VWF prophylaxis (3.1%). Nursing services have been contracted for weekend rVWF infusions. In-person site visits include hands-on web portal training, including a password-protected, FDA-validated data entry system, eSYSDM, use of real-time data form completion by tablet, infusion tracking and training, real-time cycle reporting, patient-training checklists, and protocol training and monitoring. Local gynecologists have been invited to refer potentially eligible patients. Discussion: In conclusion, rVWF is a high-purity VWF concentrate with a longer half-life than pdVWF. In this multicenter phase III trial, rVWF is being compared to the current non-hormonal standard, TA, to reduce menorrhagia in adult women with type 1 VWD. rVWF is safe and effective in prevention and treatment of bleeds, and this trial will determine if rVWF reduces menorrhagia to a degree sufficient to justify its IV route and cost. Disclosures Ragni: Sangamo: Research Funding; Alnylam/Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding; ICER: Consultancy; OPKO: Research Funding; Bioverativ/Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy; Biomarin: Consultancy, Research Funding; Shire/Takeda: Consultancy, Other: Study drug; Spark Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding. Seaman:Spark Therapeutics: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy. Sidonio:Novo Nordisk: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genetech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda-Shire: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bioverativ: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Grifols: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Uniqure: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kedrion: Research Funding; Octapharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Biomarin: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kuriakose:Alexion: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Consultancy. Malec:Hemostasis and Thrombosis Research Society: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Spark: Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Honoraria; CSL: Honoraria. Rodgers:AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Octapharma: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy. Wheeler:Shire: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novo Nordisk: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Octapharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.