Philipp, Claire S.

Abstract Menorrhagia is a common clinical problem among reproductive age women and annually 5% of reproductive age women seek medical attention, usually with gynecologists and other primary care physicians, for this symptom. Since underlying bleeding disorders are common in women presenting with menorrhagia, and referral for comprehensive hemostatic testing of substantial numbers of women with otherwise unexplained menorrhagia is problematic from the public health and cost perspective, a short, easy-to-administer screening tool comprised of 8 questions for identifying women with menorrhagia for hemostatic evaluation was previously developed (Am J Ob Gyn2008;198:e1–163e8). In the present study, the validity of the screening tool was evaluated in a multi-site, prospectively recruited cohort of women with menorrhagia. 232 women with menorrhagia age 18 and older with a pictorial blood assessment chart (PBAC) score > 100 were recruited from 5 US centers as potential subjects for a prospective cross-over study for evaluation of intranasal DDAVP versus tranexamic acid. All subjects underwent comprehensive laboratory testing for bleeding disorders, including VWF, platelet aggregation/ATP release, and factor assays. Study participants were administered a questionnaire which included the 8 screening tool questions in 4 categories, including history of duration and severity of menorrhagia, anemia treatment, excessive bleeding with hemostatic challenges, and family diagnosis of bleeding disorder. A screening tool was considered positive if there was a positive response for any of the questions in the four categories. Sensitivity of the screening tool with 95% confidence interval was calculated for bleeding disorders and also separately for low VWF (ristocetin cofactor < 50%), and platelet function defects.217 women with menorrhagia including 78% white and 16% black women with complete data were evaluated. In this population, a positive screening tool had a sensitivity of 89% (95% CI, 83–93) for bleeding disorders, 89% for platelet function defects (95% CI, 82–94), and 73% for low VWF (95% CI, 39–94). The sensitivity for bleeding disorders was 87% (95% CI, 79–92) among white women and 94% (95% CI, 79–99) among black women. Adding a PBAC score > 185 increased the sensitivity of the screening tool for bleeding disorders to 95% (95% CI, 90–98). Using a multi-site US population of adult women with menorrhagia, this study confirms the benefit of a short screening tool to assist primary care physicians in the selection of women with menorrhagia to refer for comprehensive hemostatic testing and evaluation. population of adult women with menorrhagia, this study confirms the benefit of a short screening tool to assist primary care physicians in the selection of women with menorrhagia to refer for comprehensive hemostatic testing and evaluation.

Background: Von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most common inherited bleeding disorder, affecting 1% of the population, and characterized by deficient or defective von Willebrand factor (VWF). Among women with VWD, up to 80% have heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB), many of whom have depleted iron stores and iron deficiency anemia with reduced physical functioning, anxiety, depression, and poor quality of life. HMB is a serious problem causing significant health burden for those affected. The lack of effective therapies for menorrhagia is a major unmet healthcare need in women with VWD: in up to 30% desmopressin (DDAVP), combined oral contraceptives (COCs) hormones, or the recommended non-hormonal agent, tranexamic acid (Lysteda®, TA) may be ineffective or poorly tolerated. VWF concentrates, including plasma-derived VWF (pdVWF, Humate-P®) and recombinant VWF (rVWF, Vonvendi®) safely reduce bleeds in VWD, but few data exist on VWF use in menorrhagia, and no prospective trials are available to guide treatment. As rVWF has higher purity, potency, and a longer half-life than pdVWF, this phase III trial will compare rVWF with TA in reducing menorrhagia in women with type 1 VWD. Methods: This is an NHLBI-funded U01 phase III multicenter, prospective, randomized, crossover trial in to compare IV rVWF vs. po TA in reducing menorrhagia in type 1 VWD, clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02606045. Women with type 1 VWD, VWF:RCo<0.50 IU/dL and menorrhagia, defined as pictorial blood assessment chart score (PBAC)>100 in at least one of the last two cycles, are eligible. Exclusions include hypothyroidism, past thrombosis, and renal disease. Subjects are randomized to rVWF 40 IU/kg IV day 1 vs. TA 1300 mg po three times daily days 1-5 in each of two consecutive cycles. The order of treatment is determined by randomization: in Group 1, rVWF is given in cycles 1 and 2, and TA in cycles 3 and 4; while in Group 2, TA is given in cycles 1 and 2, and rVWF in cycles 3 and 4. A rescue dose day of rVWF 40 IU/kg may be given day 2 of cycles in which rVWF is given. The primary endpoint is a 40-point reduction in PBAC, a validated measure of menstrual loss, after 2 cycles. As rVWF is a greater burden (IV, cost), to show it is superior to TA, it should improve PBAC 40 points more from baseline than TA. Secondary endpoints are cycle severity, cycle length, QoL (SF-36, Ruta, CDC-HRQ0L-14, CES-D), and satisfaction survey. Treatment response will also be compared with VWF assays and VWF genotype. Safety is assessed by number of rescue doses, other bleeding, thrombosis, and allergic reaction. Our research hypothesis is that rVWF will be superior, producing a greater improvement, by at least 40 points, in PBAC, than TA. We also hypothesize that rVWF will be as safe, tolerable, and acceptable as TA, and that VWF assays and VWF genotype will predict response to treatment. A sample size of 60 (inflated to 66 for 5% attrition) will provide 84% power to detect a difference in improvement of 40 points between rVWF and TA. Analysis will be by intent-to-treat analyses, with a two-tailed alternative hypothesis with type 1 error rate of 0.05, a 4-period 2-group (AABB/BBAA) crossover design, and an estimated between-subject standard deviation (SD) of 63 points and within subject SD of 100 points. Results: A total of 442 potential subjects have been identified at 19 participating HTCs, of whom 33 (7.5%) are eligible, and 2 enrolled. The most common reason for ineligibility is use of an IUD (15.6%), COCs (9.4%), age <18 years (6.2%), pregnancy (6.2%), breastfeeding (6.2%), and VWF prophylaxis (3.1%). Nursing services have been contracted for weekend rVWF infusions. In-person site visits include hands-on web portal training, including a password-protected, FDA-validated data entry system, eSYSDM, use of real-time data form completion by tablet, infusion tracking and training, real-time cycle reporting, patient-training checklists, and protocol training and monitoring. Local gynecologists have been invited to refer potentially eligible patients. Discussion: In conclusion, rVWF is a high-purity VWF concentrate with a longer half-life than pdVWF. In this multicenter phase III trial, rVWF is being compared to the current non-hormonal standard, TA, to reduce menorrhagia in adult women with type 1 VWD. rVWF is safe and effective in prevention and treatment of bleeds, and this trial will determine if rVWF reduces menorrhagia to a degree sufficient to justify its IV route and cost. Disclosures Ragni: Sangamo: Research Funding; Alnylam/Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding; ICER: Consultancy; OPKO: Research Funding; Bioverativ/Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy; Biomarin: Consultancy, Research Funding; Shire/Takeda: Consultancy, Other: Study drug; Spark Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding. Seaman:Spark Therapeutics: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy. Sidonio:Novo Nordisk: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genetech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda-Shire: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bioverativ: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Grifols: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Uniqure: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kedrion: Research Funding; Octapharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Biomarin: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kuriakose:Alexion: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Consultancy. Malec:Hemostasis and Thrombosis Research Society: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Spark: Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Honoraria; CSL: Honoraria. Rodgers:AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Octapharma: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy. Wheeler:Shire: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novo Nordisk: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Octapharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Abstract Background: Compared to Whites, Black-Americans may have a 40% higher incidence of idiopathic VTE. However, whether other VTE characteristics vary by race is uncertain. Objective: To compare demographic and baseline characteristics among White- and Black-Americans with VTE. Methods: Using a standardized data-collection form, demographic and baseline characteristics were prospectively collected from consecutive consenting patients enrolled in seven Thrombosis and Hemostasis Centers from August 2003 to March 2008. For patients with objectively diagnosed VTE, demographic and baseline characteristics were compared among White- and Black-American VTE patients, both overall, and by age and gender. Results: Among 1960 White- and 368 Black-Americans with VTE, compared to Whites, Blacks had significantly less isolated DVT (73.9% vs. 86.5%, p<0.001) and significantly more PE ± DVT (45.1 vs. 39.6%, p=0.05). Blacks and Whites did not differ in mean age (43.4 vs. 44.3 years), but a significantly higher proportion of Black men VTE patients were in age groups 20–39 and 80+ years. Blacks and Whites differed significantly by gender, with a significantly higher proportion of Black women with VTE (69.8% vs. 59.1%, p=0.0001). Blacks had a significantly higher mean BMI (32.3 vs. 29.4 kg/m2, p<0.0001), a significantly lower proportion with recent surgery or trauma, active cancer and infection, and a significantly lower proportion with a family history of VTE or documented thrombophilia (solely due to reduced Factor V Leiden and Prothrombin G20210A prevalence). Conversely, Blacks had a significantly higher proportion with hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus, chronic renal disease and dialysis, HIV and sickle cell disease. The two races did not differ significantly regarding the proportion with idiopathic VTE, CHF, CAD/MI, peripheral artery disease, stroke or other chronic neurological disease (i.e., cerebral palsy), chronic liver disease or autoimmune disease, including antiphospholipid syndrome. Compared to White women VTE patients, Black women VTE patients had a significantly lower proportion with recent surgery, trauma, infection, oral contraceptive use and possibly hormone therapy; and a significantly higher proportion with idiopathic VTE, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, chronic renal disease, HIV and sickle cell disease. Compared to White men VTE patients, Black men VTE patients did not differ significantly regarding recent surgery, trauma, cancer, infection or autoimmune disease, but Black men had a significantly higher proportion with hypertension, diabetes mellitus, HIV and sickle cell disease. Black and White men with VTE did not differ significantly regarding idiopathic VTE, CHF, CAD/MI, stroke, peripheral arterial disease and chronic renal disease. Conclusion: White- and Black-Americans with VTE differ significantly regarding demographic and baseline characteristics that may be risk factors for VTE.

Abstract Abstract 2305 Background. Recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) occurs in ∼30% of patients with spontaneous VTE after completion of a standard course of anticoagulant therapy. D-dimer levels and selected clinical parameters have been used to identify patients at low risk for recurrent VTE, who may safely discontinue antithrombotic therapy. We have used gene expression profiles to distinguish patients with a single VTE from patients with recurrent VTE. The purpose of this study was to extend this initial report and identify unique gene expression patterns from whole blood that correlate with different risk profiles for VTE recurrence. Methods. Patients with ≥1 prior VTE, with the first event occurring at age 18 years or older and >3 months from the most recent event were recruited for this study. Patients were allocated into 4 groups: (1) ‘low-risk’ patients had sustained ≥1 provoked VTE; (2) ‘moderate-risk’ patients had sustained 1 unprovoked VTE (with or without provoked VTE); (3) ‘high-risk’ patients had sustained ≥2 unprovoked VTE and had no evidence for antiphospholipid antibodies; and (4) antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) patients met established consensus criteria for APS. A similar number of individuals with no prior history of VTE were enrolled as a control population. Citrated plasma, serum and PAXgene RNA tubes were collected, processed and stored at −80°C until shipped to the CDC for analysis. Antiphospholipid testing was performed on all participants to confirm correct group distribution. Total RNA was isolated from whole blood drawn into PAXgene tubes. Following sample labeling and normalization, cRNA samples were hybridized to Illumina HT-12 Beadchips to assay whole genome gene expression with over 47,000 probes against human transcripts. Two hundred and twenty six unique samples passed initial quality control measures. Quality assessment of raw data was done using GenomeStudio. The raw data files were converted to a text file using the IlluminaExpression FileCreator in GenePattern and then log transformed, normalized and median-centered using Cluster. Both unsupervised (hierarchical clustering using Cluster) and supervised analyses (SAM) were used to identify genes that were differentially expressed between the groups. GATHER was used to help understand the biological processes and gene ontology of the gene lists generated by Cluster and SAM. Results. A total of 226 participants were enrolled into the study. Characteristics of the patient groups are summarized in the Table. Demographically, the groups were similar except that patients in the high-risk group tended to be older and were more likely male. The number of events per patient, and the proportion on anticoagulant therapy, increased with the risk group. Antiphospholipid antibodies were detected in several patients in each of the 3 non-APS VTE patient groups, but in most cases this was a single test positive; antiphospholipid antibodies were present in the majority of patients with APS, typically with more than one test positive (37 of 45 with complete testing, 82%). Preliminary analysis of the gene expression profiles using an unsupervised clustering by gene on the high-risk and low-risk groups identified multiple genes that distinguished the two groups, including 18 immune response genes identified by GATHER. These two patient groups were also distinguished by SAM analysis, and multiple genes in the MAPK signaling pathway that separated the two groups were identified by the KEGG pathways in GATHER. Additional analyses are being performed on all of the groups. Conclusions. Whole blood gene expression profiling can be used to develop profiles that distinguish patients with VTE who differ based on their risk of recurrent events. Individual genes identified in these profiles may provide biological insights into the molecular basis for recurrent VTE. Disclosures: Heit: Daiichi Sankyo: Honoraria; Ortho-McNeil Janssen: Honoraria; Covidien: Honoraria. Manco-Johnson:Octapharma AG: Consultancy; Bayer: Research Funding.

Abstract Abstract 4219 Background: Clinical characteristics associated with abdominal vein thrombosis (including hepatic, portal, and mesenteric veins; renal veins; and inferior vena cava [IVC]) overlap with characteristics associated with deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in the legs and pulmonary embolism (PE) but also possess unique attributes. These characteristics may differ between adult and pediatric patient groups. Methods: Using a standardized data-collection form, demographic and baseline characteristics were prospectively collected from consecutive consenting patients enrolled within one of seven Thrombosis and Hemostasis Centers over a seven-year period, August 2003 to June 2010. Patients with intra-abdominal venous thrombosis (defined as abdominal and renal veins, and IVC) were divided into pediatric (age <18 years) and adult (age ≥18 years) groups and compared to patients in the same age ranges with lower extremity DVT and/or PE. RESULTS: As of June 2010, the Patient Registry contained a total of 3105 patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE). A total of 270 patients had intra-abdominal thrombosis (9%) compared to 2276 with lower extremity DVT and/or PE (73%). Of the intra-abdominal clots, pediatric patients were more likely to have IVC thrombus (22 of 42; 52%) than adults (38 of 228; 17%; p<0.0001); conversely, pediatric patients were less likely to have hepatic, portal, and mesenteric thrombosis (n=25; 60%) than adults (n=195; 86%, p<.0001). For adult patients, proportionately more women had abdominal thrombosis (157 of 228; 68.9%) than DVT/PE (1306 of 2140; 61%; p=0.02); in contrast, comparable numbers of female pediatric patients had abdominal thrombosis (20 of 42; 47.6%) and DVT/PE (68 of 136; 50%). The mean age for patients having abdominal thrombosis was lower than patients having DVT/PE for both adults (38.3 vs 43.0 yrs; p<0.0001) and pediatric patients (9.0 vs 11.9 yrs; p=0.014). Similarly, the mean body mass index was lower for patients having abdominal thrombosis than patients having DVT/PE for both adults (28.1 vs 30.8; p<0.0001) and pediatric patients (21.5 vs. 24.7; p=0.05). There were no relationships with race, ethnicity, or inherited thrombophilic disorders. In adults, autoimmune conditions (21.9 vs 13.6; p=0.0007) and recent surgery (14.0 vs 9.2; p=0.02) were more common in patients with abdominal thrombosis, whereas, hyperlipidemia was more frequent in patients with DVT/PE (8.3 vs 13.2; p=0.04). None of these relationships were seen in the pediatric patients, but trauma was more frequently seen in pediatric patients with DVT/PE than abdominal thrombosis. Sixty-one adult (26.8%) and 6 pediatric patients (14.3%) had another VTE elsewhere, with most occurring after the initial event (21 DVT and 7 PE). Similar proportions of adult and pediatric patients had arterial thromboembolic events for both abdominal thrombosis and DVT/PE. CONCLUSIONS: Adult patients with abdominal thrombosis are more likely female, have hepatic, portal and/or mesenteric vein thrombosis, and common co-morbid conditions include recent surgery and autoimmune disorders. Pediatric patients are evenly divided between male and female, more commonly have IVC thrombosis, and co-morbid conditions include recent trauma. Both adult and pediatric patients with abdominal thrombosis tend to be younger and have a lower BMI than patients with DVT and/or PE. We also found a high rate of concurrent thrombosis in both adult and pediatric patients with abdominal thrombosis. In summary, patients with abdominal thrombosis display different clinical characteristics when compared to those with DVT/PE, specifically in terms of gender, location of thrombosis, and associated co-morbidities. Some of these differences, such as higher rates of IVC thrombosis in pediatric patients with abdominal thrombosis, might be caused by variance between genetic and anatomic factors. Further studies are warranted to explain these differences. Disclosures: Kulkarni: Novo Nordisk: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Participate in clinical trials. Philipp:Baxter: Research Funding; Wyeth: Research Funding; Octapharma: Research Funding. Ortel:Sanofi-Aventis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ortho-McNeil: Consultancy; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Eisai: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding.

Introduction: Menorrhagia is a common health problem affecting ∼5-10% of women. The optimal management of menorrhagia among women with abnormal laboratory hemostasis is uncertain. The goal of this study was to determine the effect of intranasal desmopressin (IN-DDAVP) vs. oral tranexamic acid (TA) on menstrual blood loss (MBL) and quality of life (QOL). Methods: In a cross-over study design, 117 consenting women 18–50 years of age with menorrhagia (defined as subjective report of heavy bleeding and a pictorial blood assessment chart [PBAC] score > 100) with a negative gynecological evaluation and abnormal laboratory hemostasis (62% platelet dysfunction, 15% von Willebrand disease, 23% other coagulation defect or combined) were randomly assigned to initial IN-DDAVP or TA therapy each for two menstrual cycles, followed by cross-over to the second study drug for an additional two cycles. MBL by PBAC was measured at baseline and after each menstrual cycle while QOL was assessed by four validated instruments: Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL), SF-36®, Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) and the Ruta menorrhagia questionnaire. Results: There was a statistically significant decrease in the PBAC for both treatments. On average, the estimated decrease in the PBAC from baseline for IN-DDAVP was −66.0 (CI = (−89.5, −42.6)) and for TA, −107.8 (CI = (−131.5, −84.1)). The decrease in the PBAC score was larger for TA with a difference of 41.8 (p-value = 0.0002, CI = (20.4, 63.2)) between the two treatments. In the multivariable analysis, the test for treatment-cycle number interaction was not significant, suggesting no carry-over effect. The test for a treatment type effect was significant (p<0.0001) suggesting a greater reduction in PBAC score with TA compared to IN-DDAVP. Both IN-DDAVP and TA generally improved QOL as assessed by each of the four instruments. Over-all, the Ruta Menorrhagia Questionnaire and the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale measurements showed the most statistically significant improvements. Conclusion: Both TA and IN-DDDAVP reduce MBL and improve QOL in females with menorrhagia and abnormal laboratory hemostasis.The significance of these findings are underscored by the fact that prior studies of menorrhagia treatment in these patients have not included validated QOL instruments. The marked improvement in MBL and QOL noted with TA and IN-DDAVP appears to justify hemostasis screening in women presenting with menorrhagia for whom no gynecological cause can be found.