Endell, Jan

Abstract In the development of various strategies of anti-CD19 immunotherapy for the treatment of B-cell malignancies, it remains unclear whether CD19 monoclonal antibody therapy impairs subsequent CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CART19) therapy. We evaluated the potential interference between the CD19-targeting monoclonal antibody tafasitamab and CART19 treatment in preclinical models. Concomitant treatment with tafasitamab and CART19 showed major CD19 binding competition, which led to CART19 functional impairment. However, when CD19+ cell lines were pretreated with tafasitamab overnight and the unbound antibody was subsequently removed from the culture, CART19 function was not affected. In preclinical in vivo models, tafasitamab pretreatment demonstrated reduced incidence and severity of cytokine release syndrome and exhibited superior antitumor effects and overall survival compared with CART19 alone. This was associated with transient CD19 occupancy with tafasitamab, which in turn resulted in the inhibition of CART19 overactivation, leading to diminished CAR T apoptosis and pyroptosis of tumor cells.

Abstract With the development of various strategies of anti-CD19 immunotherapy for treatment of B cell malignancies, it remains to be elucidated whether CD19 targeting with a monoclonal antibody impairs subsequent CD19 targeted chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CART19) therapy. In this study, we evaluated the potential interference between the CD19 targeting monoclonal antibody tafasitamab and CART19 treatment (using a construct similar to the FDA approved therapy, FMC63-41BBζ, tisagenlecleucel) in preclinical lymphoma and leukemia models. For in vitro assays, the CD19 + cell lines JeKo-1 (mantle cell lymphoma), Nalm6 (acute lymphoblastic leukemia), and OCI-Ly7 (diffuse large B cell lymphoma) were used. When CART19 were co-cultured with CD19 + tumor cells in the presence of increasing concentrations of tafasitamab (10-400 µg/mL) or the isotype control, an impairment of CART19 functions at the highest concentration of tafasitamab was observed. However, when tafasitamab was cocultured with tumor cells overnight and removed from the culture by washing, there was no impairment of CART19 anti-tumor activity or effector functions compared to a pre-culture with isotype control. We then aimed to validate these findings in xenograft mouse models by determining whether prior tafasitamab treatment impairs subsequent CART cell function. First, a two-step JeKo-1 xenograft model was created through inoculation of 1x10 6 luciferase + JeKo-1 cells to immunocompromised NOD-SCID-γ -/- (NSG) mice via tail vein injection. One week later, tumor burden was assessed by bioluminescence imaging (BLI) and mice were randomized to receive either 1) PBS (Group 1) or 2) 10 mg/kg of tafasitamab (Group 2) (Fig. 1A). Treatment was performed until the mice reached the endpoint due to the high tumor load. When reaching the endpoint, mice were euthanized and spleen was harvested. Splenic cells were then injected to naïve NSG mice. Two weeks after the inoculation of splenic cells (PBS or tafasitamab treated), mice were imaged with BLI and randomized according to their tumor burden to receive 2x10 6 of 1) untransduced T cells (UTD) or 2) CART19 (i.v.) (Fig. 1B). Mice, treated with CART19 demonstrated potent anti-tumor effects and showed prolonged survival compared to UTD control mice. Interestingly, CART19-treated mice inoculated with Group 2 splenic cells (pretreated with tafasitamab) showed a significantly better tumor control and overall survival compared with mice engrafted Group 1 splenic cells (PBS pretreatment) (Fig. 1C). This finding led us to further investigate the effects of prior tafasitamab therapy on subsequent CART19 treatment. In this context, we studied the sequential treatment with tafasitamab and CART19 in an additional JeKo-1 xenograft model (Fig. 1D). In brief, NSG mice were inoculated with luciferase + JeKo-1 on day -14. On day -8, mice were imaged and randomized to the PBS (Group I) or tafasitamab (10 mg/kg) group. On day -1 tafasitamab treated mice were imaged again, randomized to the tafasitamab discontinuation (Group II) or continuation (Group III). Treatment with PBS was continued in Group I. All groups were administered with 1x10 6 of CART19 on day 0. Cotreatment of JeKo-1 xenografts with tafasitamab and CART19 led to impaired anti-tumor activity presumably as a result of CD19 binding competition between tafasitamab and CART19 (Group III). Mice treated with tafasitamab followed by CART19 had improved tumor control compared to mice treated with PBS followed by CART19 (Fig. 1E-F). Serial peripheral blood analysis demonstrated that mice from Group I showed the highest CART19 expansion on day 10. Strikingly, Group II exhibited weak CART19 expansion at day 10, but strongest expansion on day 23 (Fig. 1G). We therefore hypothesized that prior treatment with tafasitamab results in modulation of CART19 cell activation. To test this hypothesis, spleens of satellite mice were harvested 24 hours after CART19 administration. Flow cytometric analysis revealed that the mice from Group II showed significantly lower CD69 and HLA-DR expression on CART19 cells compared with Group I, and reduced apoptosis as measured by the Annexin assay (Fig. 1H-I). In summary, concomitant treatment of tafasitamab and CART19 led to impaired anti-tumor activity while, in contrast, sequential treatment of tafasitamab and CART19 did not inhibit CART19 anti-tumor activity but rather promoted anti-tumor effects in xenograft models. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Sakemura: Humanigen: Patents & Royalties. Augsberger: MorphoSys AG: Current Employment. Schanzer: MorphoSys AG: Current Employment. Patra-Kneuer: MorphoSys AG: Current Employment. Heitmüller: MorphoSys AG: Current Employment. Steidl: MorphoSys AG: Current Employment. Endell: MorphoSys AG: Current Employment. Ding: DTRM: Research Funding; Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Octapharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Parikh: Pharmacyclics, MorphoSys, Janssen, AstraZeneca, TG Therapeutics, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, AbbVie, and Ascentage Pharma: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics, AstraZeneca, Genentech, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Verastem Oncology, and AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kay: Acerta Pharma: Research Funding; Targeted Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncotracker: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Juno Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Morpho-sys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Dava Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Behring: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CytomX Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Rigel: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MEI Pharma: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol Meyer Squib: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Tolero Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios Pharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Research Funding; Sunesis: Research Funding. Nowakowski: Celgene, NanoString Technologies, MorphoSys: Research Funding; Celgene, MorphoSys, Genentech, Selvita, Debiopharm Group, Kite/Gilead: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cox: Humanigen: Patents & Royalties. Kenderian: Humanigen, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

Background: CD19 and CD20 are B-cell lineage-specific antigens expressed on the cell surface of most B-cell lymphomas. While CD20 is acquired during late stages of B-cell lymphogenesis and is then lost upon differentiation into plasma cells, CD19 expression covers the entire spectrum of early B-cell genesis and maturation. CD20-targeting agents have been broadly integrated into the therapeutic armamentarium for B-cell lymphomas. More recently, CD19-targeting agents have emerged as promising alternatives with demonstrated therapeutic value. Given the imminent availability of both CD19 and CD20 targeted therapies, and potential for combinational approaches, we studied the surface expression of these antigens at the single-cell level on lymphoma cells and benign background lymphoid subsets from biopsy specimens. Methods: Flow cytometric analysis (seven-color) was performed on biopsy specimens from 47 patients with newly diagnosed B-cell lymphomas, including diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (n=15), follicular lymphoma (n=15), marginal zone lymphoma (n=9), mantle cell lymphoma (n=9), Burkitt lymphoma (n=2), and unclassifiable low-grade B-cell lymphoma (n=2). Small lymphocytic lymphoma was intentionally excluded, given its well-described loss of CD20 expression. Biopsies from eight additional patients with persistent/recurrent B-cell lymphomas after anti-CD20 therapy (greater than 6 months after last dose) were also evaluated. Thresholds for CD19 or CD20 antigen positivity were defined for each case, based on the 95th percentile fluorescence intensity of the respective marker on tumor-infiltrating T-cells (internal negative control). In addition, CD19 or CD20 fluorescence intensities of tumor cells were normalized to background benign B-cells (internal positive control) using the median fluorescence ratio (MFR). Results: Both CD19 and CD20 were highly expressed on CD20 treatment naïve tumor cells, with a slightly higher median percentage of positive tumor cells for CD19 (98%) compared with CD20 (93%) (p=0.003), and one case lacking CD20 expression. When compared with background benign B-cells, CD20 was frequently overexpressed on tumor cells (mean MFR=1.8), while CD19 expression was overall similar to background benign B-cells (mean MFR=0.9) (p=0.001). As the surface density of CD20 on benign B-cells is reportedly higher than CD19 (~100,000 vs ~20,000 molecules per cell, respectively), these findings are consistent with a higher density of surface CD20 than CD19 on most B-cell lymphomas. However, CD20 expression was more heterogeneous (within individual patient samples and across patients), with a higher median percentage of CD20-negative tumor events (median=0.5%, range=0-98%) compared with CD19-negative events (median=0%, range=0-28%) (p=0.003). Interestingly, expression of CD19 within the CD20-negative tumor subsets was largely preserved (mean % CD19-positive events=97.86%, min=40%). In addition, percentages of CD19/CD20 double-negative tumor events were very small (median=0%, range=0-4.9%), and only detectable in 15 cases (32%). Of eight additional cases studied post-anti-CD20 immunotherapy (6-84 months after last dose), the percentage of antigen-positive events by tumor cells was largely preserved for both CD19 (median=99.6%, range=93.5-100%) and CD20 (median=95.7%, range=55.6-100%), similar to the pre-therapy cohort. Conclusions: CD19 and CD20 are both highly and consistently expressed in B-cell lymphomas. While CD20 has a higher average density of surface molecules per tumor cell, CD19 expression is more homogenous and is preserved in small CD20-negative tumor subsets and after anti-CD20 targeted therapy. These findings support the clinical evaluation of anti-CD19 immunotherapies and combinational therapies targeting both surface antigens. Disclosures Horna: MorphoSys AG: Research Funding. Nowakowski:Selvita: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Curis: Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Research Funding; Genentech, Inc.: Research Funding; MorphoSys: Consultancy, Research Funding; NanoString: Research Funding. Endell:MorphoSys AG: Employment, Patents & Royalties. Boxhammer:MorphoSys AG: Employment, Patents & Royalties.

CD19 directed chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CART) therapy has shown remarkable activity in B cell lymphoma and acute lymphoblastic leukemia leading to the approval of two CART therapies. With the emergence of therapeutic anti-CD19 antibodies for the treatment of B cell malignancies, it remains to be elucidated whether such antibodies would interfere with the ability of CD19 targeting CARTs to exert their anti-tumor effect in a subsequent therapy. To address a part of this question, we investigated the potential for functional interference between the monoclonal anti-CD19 antibody tafasitamab (MOR208) and CD19 directed CART cells (CART19). CART19 cells were generated through lentiviral transduction of healthy donor T cells with a second generation CD19 CAR construct (FMC63-CD8h-CD8TM-41BBζ) which is similar to the construct used for the FDA-approved CART tisagenlecleucel. Tafasitamab, is an Fc-enhanced humanized monoclonal antibody which mediates antibody-dependent cellular toxicity (ADCC), antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis (ADCP) and direct cytotoxicity. It is currently being studied in phase 2 and 3 clinical trials in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in combination with the immunomodulatory agent lenalidomide (L-MIND) and the chemotherapeutic drug bendamustine (B-MIND). As a first step we confirmed the relevance of the tested CD19-positive target cell lines, JEKO (mantel cell lymphoma), Ly7 (DLBCL) and NALM-6 (ALL) based on functional activity of tafasitamab and CART19. In a 24 hours ADCC (tafasitamab titration plus natural killer (NK) cells; Figure 1A) and T cell cytotoxicity assays (CART19, E:T titrations; data not shown) distinct activity was observed for both therapies on all tested cell lines. Secondly, we studied whether the observed CART19 activity may be influenced by tafasitamab in case of a direct CD19 binding competition between tafasitamab and the CAR. To test for such binding competition we incubated the CD19+ cell lines NALM6 or JEKO with up to 100 µg/ml tafasitamab, to saturate the receptors. Subsequent flow cytometry analysis using the FMC63 antibody (carrying the same CD19 binding domain as contained in CART19) failed to detect CD19 expression, indicating a direct binding competition between FMC63 and tafasitamab (Figure 1B). Next, to investigate the potential impact of such binding competition on CART19 cell effector functions, we co-cultured tafasitamab CD19+ JEKO cell line at increasing concentrations of up to 100µg/ml, and then added CART19 cells at different effector to target ratios to the cell culture. The presence of tafasitamab, binding to the CD19 antigen, did not affect important CART cell effector functions such as antigen specific killing (Figure 1C), degranulation (Figure 1D), cytokine production or proliferation of CART19 (Figure 1E). In summary, our studies indicate that CART19 continue to exhibit potent antigen specific effector functions despite presence of tafasitamab and the related competition for CD19 binding. Besides the presented in vitro work the questions of therapeutic sequencing of tafasitamab and CART19 is being studied in xenograft models and will be presented at the meeting. Disclosures Sakemura: Humanigen: Patents & Royalties. Cox:Humanigen: Patents & Royalties. Schanzer:MorphoSys AG: Employment. Endell:MorphoSys AG: Employment, Patents & Royalties. Nowakowski:Selvita: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; NanoString: Research Funding; MorphoSys: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech, Inc.: Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Research Funding; Curis: Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding. Kay:MorphoSys: Other: Data Safety Monitoring Board; Infinity Pharmaceuticals: Other: DSMB; Celgene: Other: Data Safety Monitoring Board; Agios: Other: DSMB. Kenderian:Novartis: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Tolero: Research Funding; Humanigen: Other: Scientific advisory board , Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Lentigen: Research Funding; Morphosys: Research Funding; Kite/Gilead: Research Funding.