Back to Authors

Sexton, Matthew A.

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6825-7297

Mayo Clinic

Cooper University Health Care

Citations 6

A 16-Year-Old Male with Thoracic Compression following Posterior Spinal Instrumentation and Fusion for Marfan-Associated Syndromic Scoliosis
Uvodich, Mason E. , Barman, Ross , Reitz, Adam , Sexton, Matthew A. , Uvodich, Mason , Sexton, Matthew , Barman, Ross A

Case Reports in Orthopedics | December 11, 2020 | Volume: 2020 | Issue: No issue available | Pages: 1-5

10.1155/2020/6617028 Get It

Introduction. Marfan syndrome is an autosomal dominant disorder caused by a mutation in the FBN1 gene which affects connective tissue. The features of Marfan syndrome include many musculoskeletal abnormalities which require orthopaedic surgical intervention. Given the expansive phenotypic variations and comorbidities associated with Marfan syndrome, knowledge of perioperative risk factors and potential complications is essential. Case. In this case report, the authors describe a patient with Marfan syndrome who underwent spinal instrumentation and fusion from T3 to L4 for correction of syndromic scoliosis. The patient had a complicated perioperative course requiring significant fluid resuscitation and vasoactive medications to support blood pressure. He required intensive care unit level care for continued hemodynamic instability despite resuscitation in the postoperative period. Common causes of postoperative hypotension such as hypovolemic shock, sepsis, ongoing hemorrhage, and prolonged effects of anesthesia were diagnostically ruled out. Ultimately, the patient’s refractory hypotension was determined to be from mechanical compression, both from prolonged intraoperative prone positioning exacerbated by pectus excavatum and from the surgically corrected spine decreasing the diameter of his thoracic cavity (as referenced by his postoperative Haller index). Conclusion. Mechanical compression of thoracic contents as a result of a worsening chest wall deformity can be a complication of spinal deformity correction.
Urgent Airway Management and Postoperative Complications in a Patient with Trichorhinophalangeal Syndrome
Esmaeilzadeh, Sarvie , D’Souza, Ryan S. , Stewart, Thomas M. , Sexton, Matthew A. , D'Souza, Ryan S

Case Reports in Anesthesiology | September 14, 2020 | Volume: 2020 | Issue: No issue available | Pages: 1-4

10.1155/2020/8835533 Get It

Trichorhinophalangeal syndrome (TRPS) is a genetic disorder that may pose anesthetic challenges. We present a case of airway management for urgent surgery in a 56-year-old female with TRPS and difficult airway (macroglossia, narrow glottic opening, and hypoplastic epiglottis). Intubation was successful with video laryngoscopy using a size 2.5 pediatric blade and size 5.0 endotracheal tube. During emergence, she experienced bronchospasm and persistent urosepsis, necessitating intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Her pulmonary reserve was hindered by a Morgagni hernia causing lung compression. Our case demonstrates challenges in TRPS including challenging airway, decreased pulmonary reserve, and joint laxity introducing potential for spinal cord injury.
Coinfection of Aspergillus and Cryptococcus in Immunocompromised Host: A Case Report and Review of Literature
Awari, Daniel W. , Shah, Aditya , Sexton, Amber M., Sexton, Matthew A. , Shah, Aditya S

Case Reports in Infectious Diseases | July 24, 2020 | Volume: 2020 | Issue: No issue available | Pages: 1-3

10.1155/2020/8888270 Get It

Management of infections in the immunocompromised patient requires unique considerations that are not typically seen in the immunocompetent. Immunocompromised hosts require a broad set of differential diagnoses when presenting with febrile illness involving a wide variety of microbiology. Moreover, fungal infections are common, and cotreatment of fungal and bacterial infections occurs with regularity. Fungal coinfection, however, is rare. Here, we describe a patient with Aspergillus and recurrent Cryptococcus neoformans coinfection following completion of treatment for pulmonary cryptococcosis.
Intraoperative Management of Large Resuscitation-Associated Venous Air Embolism (VAE) for Emergent Neurological Surgery
D’Souza, Ryan S. , Abcejo, Arnoley S., Sexton, Matthew A. , D'Souza, Ryan S

Case Reports in Anesthesiology | June 6, 2020 | Volume: 2020 | Issue: No issue available | Pages: 1-5

10.1155/2020/8868037 Get It

Venous air embolism (VAE) is a well-described phenomenon that may have life-threatening cardiopulmonary and neurological consequences. Accidental administration of air during resuscitation while using a rapid infuser is rare. Furthermore, there is a paucity of published data describing the intraoperative management of VAE during emergent nonseated neurological surgery. We report a 22-year-old previously healthy female who experienced a motor vehicle accident with severe facial and head trauma, and mixed subdural and epidural hematomas with an 8 mm midline shift. Computed tomography revealed significant air entrainment in the right heart and main pulmonary artery, with venous air tracking from the right axillary vein. Given her age, lack of preexisting cardiac comorbidities, hemodynamic stability, and critical cerebral herniation risk, further cardiac evaluation was deferred, and the patient was transferred to the operating room for emergent decompressive craniotomy. Intraoperatively, she experienced acute decrease in mean arterial pressure and end-expiratory carbon-dioxide with loss of pulse oximetry waveform concerning for obstructive VAE physiology. She was responsive to fluid resuscitation and epinephrine administration and did not experience any recurrence of obstructive VAE. This challenging case report describes positive neurologic and hemodynamic outcomes after resuscitation-associated VAE and cardiopulmonary collapse during emergency neurosurgery. Comprehensive evaluation of risk, urgency of procedure, and need for diagnostic monitoring and treatment should be personalized.
Recent Preoperative Concussion and Postoperative Complications: A Retrospective Matched-cohort Study
D’Souza, Ryan S. , Sexton, Matthew A. , Schulte, Phillip J. , Pasternak, Jeffrey J., Abcejo, Arnoley S., D'Souza, Ryan S

Journal of Neurosurgical Anesthesiology | October 25, 2019 | Volume: 33 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 221-229

10.1097/ana.0000000000000654 Get It

Background: Physiological alterations during the perianesthetic period may contribute to secondary neurocognitive injury after a concussion. Methods: Patients exposed to concussion and who received an anesthetic within 90 days were matched to unexposed patients without concussion. Intraoperative and postoperative events were compared. Subgroup analyses assessed relationships among patients with a concussion in the prior 30, 31 to 60, and 61 to 90 days and their respective unexposed matches. To facilitate identification of potential targets for further investigation, statistical comparisons are reported before, as well as after, correction for multiple comparisons. Results: Sixty concussion patients were matched to 176 unexposed patients. Before correction, 28.3% postconcussion versus 14.8% unexposed patients reported postanesthesia care unit pain score≥7 (P=0.02); 16.7% concussion versus 6.5% unexposed patients reported headache within 90 days of anesthesia (P=0.02) and 23.5% of patients who received surgery and anesthesia within 30 days of concussion experienced headache within 90 days of anesthesia compared with 7.1% in the unexposed group (P=0.01). Patients who experienced concussion and had anesthesia between 31 and 60 days after injury had a postanesthesia care unit Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale score of −1.61±1.29 versus a score of −0.2±0.45 in unexposed patients (P=0.002). After adjusting the P-value threshold for multiple comparisons, the P-value for significance was instead 0.0016 for the overall cohort. Our study revealed no significant associations with application of adjusted significance thresholds. Conclusions: There were no differences in intraoperative and postoperative outcomes in patients with recent concussion compared with unexposed patients. Before correction for multiple comparisons, several potential targets for further investigation are identified. Well-powered studies are warranted.