Back to Authors

Mooney, Sean D.

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2654-0833

Mayo Clinic

National Institutes of Health

Citations 3

Language-model-based patient embedding using electronic health records facilitates phenotyping, disease forecasting, and progression analysis
Su, Xian , Grabowska, Monika E. , Kullo, Iftikhar J. , Luo, Yuan , Wei, Wei‐Qi, Crosslin, David R. , Xian, Su , Wei, Wei-Qi , Kullo, Iftikhar J , Luo, Yuan , Smoller, Jordan W. , Jarvik, Gail P. , Mooney, Sean D.

No container title available | September 23, 2024 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.21203/rs.3.rs-4708839/v1 Get It

Abstract Current studies regarding the secondary use of electronic health records (EHR) predominantly rely on domain expertise and existing medical knowledge. Though significant efforts have been devoted to investigating the application of machine learning algorithms in the EHR, efficient and powerful representation of patients is needed to unleash the potential of discovering new medical patterns underlying the EHR. Here, we present an unsupervised method for embedding high-dimensional EHR data at the patient level, aimed at characterizing patient heterogeneity in complex diseases and identifying new disease patterns associated with clinical outcome disparities. Inspired by the architecture of modern language models—specifically transformers with attention mechanisms, we use patient diagnosis and procedure codes as vocabularies and treat each patient as a sentence to perform the patient embedding. We applied this approach to 34,851 unique medical codes across 1,046,649 longitudinal patient events, including 102,739 patients from the electronic Medical Records and GEnomics (eMERGE) Network. The resulting patient vectors demonstrated excellent performance in predicting future disease events (median AUROC = 0.87 within one year) and bulk phenotyping (median AUROC = 0.84). We then illustrated the utility of these patient vectors in revealing heterogeneous comorbidity patterns, exemplified by disease subtypes in colorectal cancer and systemic lupus erythematosus, and capturing distinct longitudinal disease trajectories. External validation using EHR data from the University of Washington confirmed robust model performance, with median AUROCs of 0.83 and 0.84 for bulk phenotyping tasks and disease onset prediction, respectively. Importantly, the model reproduced the clustering results of disease subtypes identified in the eMERGE cohort and uncovered variations in overall mortality among these subtypes. Together, these results underscore the potential of representation learning in EHRs to enhance patient characterization and associated clinical outcomes, thereby advancing disease forecasting and facilitating personalized medicine.
The status of digital pathology and associated infrastructure within Alzheimer’s Disease Centers
Scalco, Rebeca , Hamsafar, Yamah, Reichard, R. Ross , Perrin, Richard J. , Nelson, Peter T. , Lieberman, Andrew P. , Kukull, Walter A. , Kofler, Julia , Gutman, David A. , Crary, John F. , Chan, Kwun C, Dugger, Brittany N. , Reichard, Robert Ross, Dugger, Brittany N , White, Charles L. , Schneider, Julie A. , Prokop, Stefan , Mooney, Sean D. , Keene, C. Dirk , Kapasi, Alifiya , Irwin, David J. , Flanagan, Margaret E. , Murray, Melissa E.

Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology | January 24, 2023 | Volume: 82 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 202-211

10.1093/jnen/nlac127 Get It

Abstract Digital pathology (DP) has transformative potential, especially for Alzheimer disease and related disorders. However, infrastructure barriers may limit adoption. To provide benchmarks and insights into implementation barriers, a survey was conducted in 2019 within National Institutes of Health’s Alzheimer’s Disease Centers (ADCs). Questions covered infrastructure, funding sources, and data management related to digital pathology. Of the 35 ADCs to which the survey was sent, 33 responded. Most respondents (81%) stated that their ADC had digital slide scanner access, with the most frequent brand being Aperio/Leica (62.9%). Approximately a third of respondents stated there were fees to utilize the scanner. For DP and machine learning (ML) resources, 41% of respondents stated none was supported by their ADC. For scanner purchasing and operations, 50% of respondents stated they received institutional support. Some were unsure of the file size of scanned digital images (37%) and total amount of storage space files occupied (50%). Most (76%) were aware of other departments at their institution working with ML; a similar (76%) percentage were unaware of multiuniversity or industry partnerships. These results demonstrate many ADCs have access to a digital slide scanner; additional investigations are needed to further understand hurdles to implement DP and ML workflows.