Malik, Talha

INTRODUCTION: The American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) has compiled risk factors that may be predictive of disease complications in Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of the AGA risk factors for risk stratification in UC and CD. METHODS: We included participants of 2 cohorts: the Ocean State Crohn's and Colitis Area Registry cohort and the Mayo Clinic cohort. Baseline clinical risk factors were extracted according to the AGA pathway. Our primary end point was defined as follows: (i) any inflammatory bowel disease related–hospitalization, (ii) any inflammatory bowel disease–related bowel surgery, or (iii) any progression of disease. We analyzed the association of the number of AGA risk factors with our end point. Statistical multivariable modeling was performed with Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: A total of 412 patients with CD were included. Comparing ≥3 risk factors with 0–1 risk factor, we found a significantly increased risk of complications in both the Ocean State Crohn's and Colitis Area Registry cohort (hazard ratio [HR] 2.75, 95% confidence interval 1.71–4.41) and Mayo Clinic cohort (HR 2.07, 95% confidence interval 1.11–3.84). Diagnosis at younger age (HR 2.07), perianal disease (HR 1.99), and B2/B3 behavior (HR 1.92) were significantly associated with disease complications. We did not observe a consistent association between number of risk factors nor any specific individual risk factors and risk of disease complications in the 265 patients with UC included. DISCUSSION: We found a significant association between the number of AGA risk factors and the risk of disease complication in CD; this association was not significant in UC. The presence of ≥ 3 risk factors in CD leads to the highest risk of complications. The AGA care pathway is a useful tool to stratify patients who are at higher risk of disease complications in patients with CD.

INTRODUCTION: Prometheus IBD sgi Diagnostic (SGI) is an Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) advanced diagnostic test developed by Prometheus Laboratories. It employs a diagnostic algorithm combining serologic, genetic, and inflammatory markers to help with clinical decision making in determining the accuracy of a diagnosis of IBD in patients suspected to have the disease. Moreover, among those it identifies as having IBD, it also seeks to assist in distinguishing those with Crohn's vs. those with ulcerative colitis (UC). In this observational clinical decision making study, we sought to examine the real world application of the SGI at a single tertiary care IBD practice especially in correctly identifying those with Crohn's vs. those with UC. METHODS: We included all adult IBD patients seen at a single tertiary IBD center practice from 2014 to 2017 that had baseline SGI done and during care at the practice, had a diagnosis of IBD (Crohn's or UC) established. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), accuracy, and area under the curve based on results of SGI at baseline visit and the eventual established diagnosis of UC or CD. RESULTS: Of a total of 275 patients, there were 96 (34.9%) male patients and 179 (65.1%) female patients. The median age of these patients was 45.8. There were a total of 201 patients with biopsy proven CD. Of these, 104 were identified as having CD based on the baseline SGI and 97 who were identified as not having CD. Based on these data, the sensitivity of the SGI for CD at the practice was 52%, specificity was 88%, PPV was 92%, NPV was 40.1%, diagnostic accuracy was 61.5%, and Area under ROC was 70%. There were 66 patients with biopsy proven UC. Of these, 44 were identified as having UC based on the baseline SGI and 22 were identified as not having UC. Based on these data, the sensitivity of the SGI for UC at the practice was 67%, specificity was 85%, PPV was 58%, NPV was 89%, accuracy was 80%, and Area under ROC was 76%. CONCLUSION: Based on the results of this study, we conclude that the SGI is not a robust initial test in identifying those with Crohn's or those with UC. However, in a cohort of IBD patients seen at a tertiary care IBD practice, it is reasonably specific and accurate when it comes to correctly confirming Crohn's and even more so UC in patients with a caveat that the results should be interpreted in the proper clinical context and with the backing of other clinical indicators.

INTRODUCTION: Crohn's Disease (CD) is a chronic inflammatory condition, primarily of the gastrointestinal tract with an increasing incidence and prevalence worldwide. In clinical practice, gastroenterologists are often faced with challenges in evaluating disease activity, severity, and prognosis to guide appropriate management of CD. We studied the association between serum albumin level and the rate of active clinical disease in CD patients seen at a tertiary care Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) referral center. METHODS: We designed a retrospective cohort study using adult patients (>18 years) with CD followed for at least one year at University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) IBD center by a single trained IBD specialist between 2014-2018. Serum albumin levels were divided into: low mean serum albumin (≤3.2 mg/dL) vs. appropriate mean serum albumin (>3.2 mg/dL). Clinical disease activity was measured using the Harvey-Bradshaw index (HBI). Active disease was defined as HBI score of 8 or higher. Poisson Regression Models (GPR) for Rate Data were used to estimate partially adjusted and fully adjusted incidence rate ratios (IRR) of active clinical disease among CD patients. We also examined IRRs for serum albumin level as a continuous variable. RESULTS: In this single IBD practice at UAB, 269 patients with CD had albumin drawn at initial visit and serially at each subsequent visit. Poisson regression model adjusted for age, gender, race, duration of disease, steroid use, smoking and Crohns location demonstrated that CD patients with a low mean serum albumin during clinical observation were approximately 1.5 times more likely to have active clinical disease during observation (IRR 1.49, 95% CI 1.04-2.15, P = 0.032) compared to those with a serum albumin level of >3.2 mg/dL. The adjusted model with serum albumin as a continuous variable demonstrated that with every unit (0.1 mg/dL) reduction in mean serum albumin, there was 30% higher likelihood of active Crohns in clinic (IRR 1.30, 95% CI 1.02-1.66, P = 0.037). CONCLUSION: Lower mean serum albumin during clinical observation is associated with a higher likelihood of active clinical disease among CD patients. Whether interventions designed to correct or increase serum albumin stores/levels in these patients would be beneficial remains to be examined.