Back to Authors

Gilliam, Courtney A.

https://orcid.org/0009-0000-1633-1347

Mayo Clinic

The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center

Citations 1

RIsk Stratification prior to lead Extraction and impact on major intraprocedural complications (RISE protocol)
Afzal, Muhammad R. , Daoud, Emile G. , Matre, Nancy, Burnside, Melissa , Gilliam, Courtney A. , Pinkhas, Daniel, Tyler, Jaret, Kalbfleisch, Steven S., Turner, Katja , Love, Charles J. , Augostini, Ralph , Shoben, Abigail B. , Okabe, Toshimasa , Houmsse, Mahmoud , Kalbfleisch, Steven Jack , Crestanello, Juan A. , Weiss, Raul , Hummel, John D.

Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology | September 10, 2019 | Volume: 30 | Issue: 11 | Pages: 2453-2459

10.1111/jce.14151 Get It

AbstractBackgroundAn internal risk stratification algorithm was developed to decrease the risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) during lead extractions (LEs).ObjectiveTo report upon the impact of a risk stratification algorithm (RISE [RIsk Stratification prior to lead Extraction] protocol) on outcomes of LEs in a high‐volume center.MethodsA retrospective review of a prospectively maintained LEs database was performed to identify features associated with MACEs. On the basis of the retrospective data, the RISE protocol differentiated LEs procedures into “High” and “Low” risk for occurrence of MACEs. High‐risk LEs included dual‐coil defibrillator lead (≥3 years), pacemaker and single‐coil lead (≥5 years), and any StarFix coronary sinus lead. During the prospective evaluation of the RISE protocol, “High‐risk” LEs were performed in an operating room (OR) or hybrid laboratory with the cardiac anesthesiologist, OR nursing team, perfusionist in the room, and a cardiac surgeon on the premises. “Low‐risk” LEs were performed in the electrophysiology (EP) laboratory with anesthesia provided by EP nursing team. The preintervention (pre‐RISE) and postintervention (post‐RISE) group spanned 19 and 40 months and consisted of 449 (632 leads) and 751 patients (1055 leads), respectively. The primary outcome of MACEs in the two groups was compared.ResultsProtocol compliance was 100%. The primary outcome of MACEs occurred in 15 patients (3.34%) before and 12 (1.6%) after implementation of the RISE protocol (P = .04).ConclusionRISE identified a low‐risk group where minimal resources are needed and allowed for rapid intervention in the high‐risk group that reduced the consequences of MACEs.