Back to Authors

Newcomb, Richard D.

https://orcid.org/0009-0008-2356-6169

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic

Citations 2

Analysis of a Standardized Approach to Healthcare Worker Hazardous Medication Surveillance: Lessons learned and future enhancements.
Breeher, Laura E. , Newcomb, Richard , Hanson, K A, Hainy, Caitlin , Fowler, LuAnn , Hoyer, Kelsey , Abbas, Alzhraa Salah , Severson, Krista , Swift, Melanie, Swift, Melanie D. , Newcomb, Richard D. , Breeher, Laura , Hanson, Kristine , Abbas, Alzhraa Salah , Swift, Melanie D , Hainy, Caitlin M.

Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine | May 5, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1097/jom.0000000000003743 Get It

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of a standardized hazardous medication surveillance program and identify occupational factors associated with adverse health outcomes among healthcare workers (HCWs). Methods: We analyzed data from 2,625 HCWs enrolled in a multi-site surveillance program (2020–2022). Participants completed a standardized questionnaire and underwent complete blood count testing. Exposure was categorized by weekly time handling hazardous medications. Associations were evaluated using univariate and multivariable analyses. Results: Higher exposure (>8 hours/week) was associated with increased symptom reporting, hazardous medication spills, and adverse reproductive outcomes. Female sex, older age, and spill exposure independently predicted symptom reporting and reproductive outcomes. No significant association was observed between exposure intensity and abnormal blood counts. Conclusion: Questionnaire-based surveillance effectively identified exposure-related health risks, whereas routine complete blood count testing showed limited utility.
Determinants of Latent Tuberculosis Treatment Acceptance and Completion in Healthcare Personnel
Swift, Melanie D. , Molella, Robin G., Vaughn, Andrew I. S., Breeher, Laura E. , Newcomb, Richard D. , Abdellatif, Shahnaz, Swift, Melanie D , Breeher, Laura , Murad, M. Hassan

Clinical Infectious Diseases | August 17, 2019 | Volume: 71 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 284-290

10.1093/cid/ciz817 Get It

Abstract Background US public health strategy for eliminating tuberculosis (TB) prioritizes treatment of latent TB infection (LTBI). Healthcare personnel (HCP) are less willing to accept treatment than other populations. Little is known about factors associated with HCP LTBI therapy acceptance and completion. Methods We conducted a retrospective chart review to identify all employees with LTBI at time of hire at a large academic medical center during a 10-year period. Personal demographics, occupational factors, and clinic visit variables were correlated with LTBI treatment acceptance and completion rates using multivariate logistic regression. Results Of 470 HCP with LTBI for whom treatment was recommended, 193 (41.1%) accepted treatment, while 137 (29.1%) completed treatment. Treatment adherence was better with 4 months of rifampin than 9 months of isoniazid (95% vs 68%, P < .005). Increased age of the healthcare worker was independently associated with lower rates of treatment acceptance (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 0.97 [0.94–0.99] per year), as was having an occupation of clinician (0.47 [0.26–0.85]) or researcher (0.34 [0.19–0.64]). Male gender was associated with higher treatment acceptance (1.90 [1.21–2.99]). Treatment completion was associated with being from a low- (9.49 [2.06–43.73]) or medium- (8.51 [3.93–18.44]) TB-burden country. Conclusions Geographic and occupational factors affect acceptance and completion of LTBI therapy. Short-course regimens may improve adherence. Physicians, researchers, and HCP from high-TB-burden countries have lower treatment rates than other HCP. Improving LTBI treatment in HCP will require attending to cultural and occupational differences.