Back to Authors

Cao, Xiaoming

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7884-0814

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic

Citations 12

Novel Methylated DNA Markers Discriminate Advanced Neoplasia in Pancreatic Cysts: Marker Discovery, Tissue Validation, and Cyst Fluid Testing
Majumder, Shounak , Yab, Tracy C. , Dukek, Brian A. , Cao, Xiaoming , Wu, Chung Wah, Aslanian, Harry R., Castillo, Carlos Fernández-del, Doyle, Leona A. , Farrell, James J. , Fisher, William E., Lee, Yvonne N., Park, Walter G. , Rodrigues, Clifton, Salem, Ronald R. , Simeone, Diane M. , Urs, Sumithra, Buren, George Van , Smyrk, Thomas C. , Allawi, Hatim T. , Lidgard, Graham P. , Chari, Suresh T. , Kendrick, Michael L. , Topazian, Mark , Ahlquist, David A. , Berger, Calise K. , Foote, Patrick H. , Mahoney, Douglas W. , Raimondo, Massimo , Kisiel, John B. , Majumder, Shounak , Taylor, William R. , Lee, Linda , Rodrigues, Clifton, Gould Rothberg, Bonnie E , Chari, Suresh T

American Journal of Gastroenterology | July 15, 2019 | Volume: 114 | Issue: 9 | Pages: 1539-1549

10.14309/ajg.0000000000000284 Get It

OBJECTIVES: Pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) may be precancerous. Those likely to harbor high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or pancreatic cancer (PC) are targets for surgical resection. Current algorithms to predict advanced neoplasia (HGD/PC) in PCLs lack diagnostic accuracy. In pancreatic tissue and cyst fluid (CF) from PCLs, we sought to identify and validate novel methylated DNA markers (MDMs) that discriminate HGD/PC from low-grade dysplasia (LGD) or no dysplasia (ND). METHODS: From an unbiased whole-methylome discovery approach using predefined selection criteria followed by multistep validation on case (HGD or PC) and control (ND or LGD) tissues, we identified discriminant MDMs. Top candidate MDMs were then assayed by quantitative methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction on archival CF from surgically resected PCLs. RESULTS: Of 25 discriminant MDMs identified in tissue, 13 were selected for validation in 134 CF samples (21 cases [8 HGD, 13 PC], 113 controls [45 ND, 68 LGD]). A tree-based algorithm using 2 CF-MDMs ( TBX15 , BMP3 ) achieved sensitivity and specificity above 90%. Discrimination was significantly better by this CF-MDM panel than by mutant KRAS or carcinoembryonic antigen, with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.93 (95% confidence interval: 0.86–0.99), 0.71 (0.57–0.85), and 0.72 (0.60–0.84), respectively. Cutoffs for the MDM panel applied to an independent CF validation set (31 cases, 56 controls) yielded similarly high discrimination, areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.86 (95% confidence interval: 0.77–0.94, P = 0.2). DISCUSSION: Novel MDMs discovered and validated in tissue accurately identify PCLs harboring HGD/PC. A panel of 2 MDMs assayed in CF yielded results with potential to enhance current risk prediction algorithms. Prospective studies are indicated to optimize and further evaluate CF-MDMs for clinical use.
Methylated DNA markers (MDMs) in primary (pCRC) and metastatic colorectal cancers (mCRC).
Peterson, Molly M, Burger, Kelli N. , Cao, Xiaoming , McGlinch, Maria, Wu, Tsung‐Teh, Ahlquist, David A. , Xie, Hao , Mahoney, Douglas W. , Foote, Patrick H. , Doering, Karen A. , Taylor, William R. , Berger, Calise K. , Hubbard, Joleen M. , Kisiel, John B.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | May 27, 2019 | Volume: 37 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: 3599-3599

10.1200/jco.2019.37.15_suppl.3599 Get It

3599 Background: Existing tools for post-treatment CRC surveillance and monitoring are insensitive and expensive. MDMs are broadly informative for early detection of CRC but have not been extensively studied for disease monitoring. As a first step, we sought to assess the concordance of novel CRC-associated MDMs in pCRC and mCRC. Methods: A panel of 14 MDMs previously identified to be highly discriminant for pCRC was selected on the basis of high median fold-change of MDM levels relative to buffy coat (682 (IQR: 132-19347)). Surgically resected pCRC and paired mCRC were identified from institutional pathology databases. Quantitative methylation-specific PCR was used to assay MDMs. 30 paired samples per metastatic subtype were calculated to be sufficient. MDM levels were compared using two-sample and paired Wilcoxon rank sum tests. Results: 87 patients with paired pCRC and mCRC including 57 synchronous and 30 metachronous metastases were included. 41/87 (47%) had neoadjuvant and 59/87 (68%) had adjuvant chemotherapy. All synchronous metastases were to liver. Metachronous metastases were to liver in 19/30 (63%) and to lung in 11/30 (37%). The levels of 14 selected MDMs were remarkably similar between paired pCRC and mCRC (Table). Individual MDM levels and the average level of all MDMs combined were not significantly different ( p> 0.0018 by Bonferroni correction). Conclusions: MDM levels are highly concordant in pCRC and mCRC. Thus, MDMs discovered from pCRC should be further studied for non-invasive surveillance after surgical resection and monitoring of treatment response in mCRC. [Table: see text]