Back to Authors

Widemann, Brigitte C.

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9198-7175

Mayo Clinic

National Institutes of Health

Citations 15

A phase 1 study of cabozantinib in children and adolescents with recurrent or refractory solid tumors, including CNS tumors: Trial ADVL1211, a report from the Children's Oncology Group
Chuk, Meredith K. , Widemann, Brigitte C. , Liu, Xiaowei , Bernhardt, M. Brooke , Kudgus, Rachel A. , Voss, Stephan D. , Blaney, Susan M. , Fox, Elizabeth , Weigel, Brenda J. , Bernhardt, Melanie Brooke , Reid, Joel M. , Voss, Stephan D , Minard, Charles G. , Kim, AeRang

Pediatric Blood & Cancer | April 25, 2018 | Volume: 65 | Issue: 8 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/pbc.27077 Get It

Abstract Background We conducted a phase 1 trial to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), toxicity profile, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and preliminary activity of cabozantinib in children with refractory or relapsed solid tumors. Methods Patients received cabozantinib tablets on a continuous dosing schedule in a rolling‐six escalating phase 1 trial design. PK and PD studies were performed. Results Forty‐one patients, median (range) age 13 (4–18) years, received cabozantinib to achieve a weekly cumulative dose equivalent to 30 (n = 6), 40 (n = 23). or 55 (n = 12) mg/m 2 /day. At 40 mg/m 2 /d, dose‐limiting toxicities (DLTs) were palmar‐plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome, mucositis, and elevated alanine aminotransferase, lipase, and bilirubin. At 55 mg/m 2 /d, hypertension, reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome, headache, fatigue, and proteinuria were DLTs. Frequent non‐DLTs included diarrhea, hypothyroidism, fatigue, nausea, vomiting, elevated hepatic transaminases, and proteinuria. In subsequent cycles, DLTs occurred at all dose levels. Across all dose levels, the steady‐state exposure and peak cabozantinib concentrations were similar. Four patients experienced a confirmed partial response: medullary thyroid cancer (MTC; n = 2), Wilms tumor, and clear cell sarcoma. Stable disease (>6 cycles) was seen in seven patients (MTC [n = 2], Ewing sarcoma, synovial sarcoma, alveolar soft part sarcoma, paraganglioma, and ependymoma). Conclusions A protocol‐defined MTD was not reached; DLTs and dose reductions for toxicity occurred in the first and subsequent cycles at all dose levels. Based on the toxicity profile, pharmacokinetics, and responses, the recommended dose of cabozantinib in pediatric patients with refractory solid tumors is 40 mg/m 2 /day. A phase 2 study of cabozantinib is being conducted.
Consensus Recommendations to Accelerate Clinical Trials for Neurofibromatosis Type 2
Evans, D. Gareth , Kalamarides, Michel , Hunter‐Schaedle, Kim, Allen, Jeffrey C. , Babovic-Vuskanovic, Dusica, Belzberg, Allan J. , Bollag, Gideon , Chen, Ruihong , DiTomaso, Emmanuelle, Golfinos, John G. , Harris, Gordon J. , Jacob, Abraham, Kalpana, Ganjam V. , Karajannis, Matthias A. , Korf, Bruce R. , Law, Meng , McClatchey, Andrea I. , Packer, Roger J. , Roehm, Pamela C. , Rubenstein, Allan E., Slattery, William H. , Tonsgard, James H. , Widemann, Brigitte C. , Yohay, Kaleb , Giovannini, Marco , Blakeley, Jaishri O. , Kurzrock, Razelle , Welling, D. Bradley , Evans, D Gareth , Karajannis, Matthias A

Clinical Cancer Research | August 12, 2009 | Volume: 15 | Issue: 16 | Pages: 5032-5039

10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-08-3011 Get It

Abstract Purpose: Neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) is a rare autosomal dominant disorder associated primarily with bilateral schwannomas seen on the superior vestibular branches of the eighth cranial nerves. Significant morbidity can result from surgical treatment of these tumors. Meningiomas, ependymomas, and other benign central nervous system tumors are also common in NF2. The lack of effective treatments for NF2 marks an unmet medical need. Experimental Design: Here, we provide recommendations from a workshop, cochaired by Drs. D. Gareth Evans and Marco Giovannini, of 36 international researchers, physicians, representatives of the biotechnology industry, and patient advocates on how to accelerate progress toward NF2 clinical trials. Results: Workshop participants reached a consensus that, based on current knowledge, the time is right to plan and implement NF2 clinical trials. Obstacles impeding NF2 clinical trials and how to address them were discussed, as well as the candidate therapeutic pipeline for NF2. Conclusions: Both phase 0 and phase II NF2 trials are near-term options for NF2 clinical trials. The number of NF2 patients in the population remains limited, and successful recruitment will require ongoing collaboration efforts between NF2 clinics. (Clin Cancer Res 2009;15(16):5032–9)