Back to Authors

Tward, Jonathan D.

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7765-4473

Mayo Clinic

Huntsman Cancer Institute

Citations 15

NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Prostate Cancer, Version 5.2026
Spratt, Daniel E., Srinivas, Sandy, Ahmed, Bilawal, An, Yi , Bitting, Rhonda, Chapin, Brian, Cheng, Heather H., D’Amico, Anthony Victor, Desai, Neil, Dorff, T. B., Eastham, James A., Farrington, Thomas A., Gao, Xin, Gupta, S, Karnes, R. Jeffrey, Kishan, Amar U., Kuettel, Michael, Lang, J., Lee, Daniel, Lotan, Tamara, McDonald, Andrew, Morgan, Todd M. , Pessoa, Rodrigo, ROACH, M, Robin, Tyler, Rosenfeld, Stan, Scarpato, Kristen R., Seibert, Tyler, Shabsigh, Ahmad, Szmulewitz, Russell, Tward, Jonathan, Valicenti, Richard, VanderWeele, David, Wong, J.K. , Kovách, E, Freedman-Cass, Deborah, Morgan, Todd M , Robin, Tyler P. , Spratt, Daniel E. , Adra, Nabil , Bitting, Rhonda L. , Chapin, Brian F. , Cheng, Heather H., Cho, Steve Y. , D’Amico, Anthony V. , Dorff, Tanya B. , Eastham, Jeff , Gupta, Shilpa , Ippolito, Joseph E. , Kishan, Amar U. , McDonald, Andrew M. , Rais‐Bahrami, Soroush , Roach, Mack , Scarpato, Kristen R., Shabsigh, Ahmad , Szmulewitz, Russell Z , Teply, Benjamin A. , Tward, Jonathan D. , Valicenti, Richard K., VanderWeele, David James , Freedman-Cass, Deborah A.

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network | May 14, 2026 | Volume: 24 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 140-149

10.6004/jnccn.2026.0023 Get It

The NCCN Guidelines for Prostate Cancer include recommendations for staging and risk assessment after a prostate cancer diagnosis and for the care of patients with localized, regional, recurrent, and metastatic disease. These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize the panel’s discussions on select 2026 updates to the guidelines regarding nonmetastatic disease: the elimination of the very-low-risk group, updates to the Principles of Active Surveillance, and caution in the use of focal therapy in newly diagnosed patients.
Prostate Cancer, Version 3.2026, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines In Oncology
Srinivas, Sandy, Ahmed, Bilawal , An, Yi , Bitting, Rhonda L. , Chapin, Brian F. , D’Amico, Anthony V. , Desai, Neil , Dorff, Tanya B. , Eastham, James A., Farrington, Thomas A., Gao, Xin , Gupta, Shilpa , Karnes, R. Jeffrey, Kishan, Amar U. , Kuettel, Michael, Lee, Daniel , Morgan, Todd M. , Pessoa, Rodrigo Rodrigues , Roach, Mack , Rosenfeld, Stan, Scarpato, Kristen R., Shabsigh, Ahmad , Valicenti, Richard K., Wong, J.K. , Kovách, E, Freedman-Cass, Deborah A., Morgan, Todd M , Robin, Tyler P. , Spratt, Daniel E. , Adra, Nabil , Cheng, Heather H. , Cho, Steve Y. , Ippolito, Joseph E. , Lang, Joshua M. , Lotan, Tamara Levin , McDonald, Andrew, Rais‐Bahrami, Soroush , Szmulewitz, Russell Z , Teply, Benjamin A. , Tward, Jonathan D. , VanderWeele, David James , Kovach, Emily

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network | November 10, 2025 | Volume: 23 | Issue: 11 | Pages: 469-493

10.6004/jnccn.2025.0052 Get It

The NCCN Guidelines for Prostate Cancer provide a framework on which to base decisions for patients with prostate cancer across the disease spectrum. The Guidelines sections included in this article focus on metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC), nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), and metastatic CRPC (mCRPC). For patients with mCSPC, disease characteristics, such as whether metastases arose synchronously or metachronously and the degree of metastatic burden, impact therapy decisions, including how much treatment intensification is appropriate and when prostate-directed and/or metastasis-directed therapy should be considered. In the mCRPC setting, androgen deprivation therapy is continued with the sequential or concurrent addition of certain androgen receptor pathway inhibitors, chemotherapies, immunotherapies, radiopharmaceuticals, and/or targeted therapies. The NCCN Prostate Cancer Panel emphasizes a shared decision-making approach in all disease settings based on patient preferences, prior treatment exposures, biomarkers, the extent and location of metastases, symptoms, and potential side effects.
Bladder Cancer, Version 3.2024
Flaig, Thomas W. , Abern, Michael, Agarwal, Neeraj , Bangs, Rick , Buyyounouski, Mark K. , Chang, Paul, Friedlander, Terence W. , Greenberg, Richard E. , Guru, Khurshid A. , Herr, Harry W., Hoffman‐Censits, Jean , Kaimakliotis, Hristos Z. , Kishan, Amar U. , Kundu, Shilajit , Lele, Subodh M. , Mamtani, Ronac , Michalski, Jeff M., Montgomery, Jeffrey S., Patterson, Anthony, Peyton, Charles C. , Preston, Mark A. , Sexton, Wade J. , Stewart, Tyler F. , Sundi, Debasish , Tollefson, Matthew K. , Wright, Jonathan L. , Cassara, Carly J., Gurski, Lisa A., Tollefson, Matthew, Spiess, Philippe E. , Agarwal, Neeraj , Chan, Kevin , Chang, Sam S. , Chang, Paul, Mian, Omar Y. , Parikh, Mamta , Plimack, Elizabeth R. , Richards, Kyle A. , Siefker-Radtke, Arlene Odelia , Tward, Jonathan D.

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network | May 16, 2024 | Volume: 22 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 216-225

10.6004/jnccn.2024.0024 Get It

Bladder cancer, the sixth most common cancer in the United States, is most commonly of the urothelial carcinoma histologic subtype. The clinical spectrum of bladder cancer is divided into 3 categories that differ in prognosis, management, and therapeutic aims: (1) non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC); (2) muscle invasive, nonmetastatic disease; and (3) metastatic bladder cancer. These NCCN Guidelines Insights detail recent updates to the NCCN Guidelines for Bladder Cancer, including changes in the fifth edition of the WHO Classification of Tumours: Urinary and Male Genital Tumours and how the NCCN Guidelines aligned with these updates; new and emerging treatment options for bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG)–unresponsive NMIBC; and updates to systemic therapy recommendations for advanced or metastatic disease.
Prostate Cancer, Version 3.2024
Schaeffer, Edward M. , Srinivas, Sandy, An, Yi , Bitting, Rhonda L. , Chapin, Brian F. , D’Amico, Anthony V. , Desai, Neil , Dorff, Tanya B. , Eastham, James A., Farrington, Thomas A., Gupta, Shilpa , Guzzo, Thomas, Karnes, R. Jeffrey , Kuettel, Michael, McKay, Rana R. , Morgan, Todd M. , Pow‐Sang, Julio M. , Reiter, Robert E. , Roach, Mack , Rosenfeld, Stan, Shabsigh, Ahmad , Valicenti, Richard K., Wong, J.K. , Snedeker, Jenna, Freedman-Cass, Deborah A., Morgan, Todd M , Robin, Tyler P. , Adra, Nabil , Cheng, Heather H. , Gao, Xin Yuan , Ippolito, Joseph E. , Lang, Joshua M. , Lotan, Tamara Levin , Spratt, Daniel E. , Szmulewitz, Russell Z , Teply, Benjamin A. , Tward, Jonathan D.

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network | April 16, 2024 | Volume: 22 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 140-150

10.6004/jnccn.2024.0019 Get It

The NCCN Guidelines for Prostate Cancer include recommendations for staging and risk assessment after a prostate cancer diagnosis and for the care of patients with localized, regional, recurrent, and metastatic disease. These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize the panel's discussions for the 2024 update to the guidelines with regard to initial risk stratification, initial management of very-low-risk disease, and the treatment of nonmetastatic recurrence.
Prostate Cancer, Version 4.2023, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology
Schaeffer, Edward M. , Srinivas, Sandy, An, Yi , Barocas, Daniel A. , Bitting, Rhonda L. , Bryce, Alan H. , Chapin, Brian F. , D’Amico, Anthony V. , Desai, Neil , Dorff, Tanya B. , Eastham, James A., Farrington, Thomas A., Gao, Xin , Gupta, Shilpa , Guzzo, Thomas, Kuettel, Michael, McKay, Rana R. , Morgan, Todd M. , Pow‐Sang, Julio M. , Reiter, Robert E. , Roach, Mack , Rosenfeld, Stan, Shabsigh, Ahmad , Valicenti, Richard K., Wong, J.K. , Shead, Dorothy A. , Snedeker, Jenna, Freedman-Cass, Deborah A., Bryce, Alan, Bryce, Alan H , Morgan, Todd M , Robin, Tyler P. , Adra, Nabil , Cheng, Heather H. , Ippolito, Joseph E. , Lang, Joshua M. , Lotan, Tamara Levin , Netto, George J. , Spratt, Daniel E. , Teply, Benjamin A. , Tward, Jonathan D.

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network | October 12, 2023 | Volume: 21 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 1067-1096

10.6004/jnccn.2023.0050 Get It

The NCCN Guidelines for Prostate Cancer provide a framework on which to base decisions regarding the workup of patients with prostate cancer, risk stratification and management of localized disease, post-treatment monitoring, and treatment of recurrence and advanced disease. The Guidelines sections included in this article focus on the management of metastatic castration-sensitive disease, nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), and metastatic CRPC (mCRPC). Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with treatment intensification is strongly recommended for patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer. For patients with nonmetastatic CRPC, ADT is continued with or without the addition of certain secondary hormone therapies depending on prostate-specific antigen doubling time. In the mCRPC setting, ADT is continued with the sequential addition of certain secondary hormone therapies, chemotherapies, immunotherapies, radiopharmaceuticals, and/or targeted therapies. The NCCN Prostate Cancer Panel emphasizes a shared decision-making approach in all disease settings based on patient preferences, prior treatment exposures, the presence or absence of visceral disease, symptoms, and potential side effects.
NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Bladder Cancer, Version 2.2022
Flaig, Thomas W. , Abern, Michael, Agarwal, Neeraj , Bangs, Rick , Boorjian, Stephen A. , Buyyounouski, Mark K. , Chan, Kevin , Friedlander, Terence W. , Greenberg, Richard E. , Guru, Khurshid A. , Herr, Harry W., Hoffman‐Censits, Jean , Kishan, Amar U. , Kundu, Shilajit , Lele, Subodh M. , Mamtani, Ronac , Margulis, Vitaly , Michalski, Jeff M., Montgomery, Jeffrey S., Nandagopal, Lakshminarayanan , Pagliaro, Lance C. , Patterson, Anthony, Pohar, Kamal S. , Preston, Mark A. , Sexton, Wade J. , Tollefson, Matthew K. , Wright, Jonathan L. , Dwyer, Mary A., Cassara, Carly J., Gurski, Lisa A., Tollefson, Matthew, Spiess, Philippe E. , Agarwal, Neeraj , Chang, Sam S. , Mian, Omar Y. , Parikh, Mamta , Plimack, Elizabeth R. , Richards, Kyle A. , Siefker-Radtke, Arlene Odelia , Tward, Jonathan D.

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network | August 10, 2022 | Volume: 20 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 866-878

10.6004/jnccn.2022.0041 Get It

The NCCN Guidelines for Bladder Cancer provide recommendations for the diagnosis, evaluation, treatment, and follow-up of patients with bladder cancer and other urinary tract cancers (upper tract tumors, urothelial carcinoma of the prostate, primary carcinoma of the urethra). These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize the panel discussion behind recent important updates to the guidelines regarding the treatment of non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer, including how to treat in the event of a bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) shortage; new roles for immune checkpoint inhibitors in non–muscle invasive, muscle-invasive, and metastatic bladder cancer; and the addition of antibody–drug conjugates for metastatic bladder cancer.
Performance of a Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography–Derived Risk-Stratification Tool for High-risk and Very High-risk Prostate Cancer
Martin, Ting , Savjani, Ricky R. , Pollom, Erqi L., Karnes, R. Jeffrey , Wong, J.K. , Motterle, Giovanni , Tosoian, Jeffrey J. , Klein, Eric A. , Stish, Bradley J. , Dess, Robert T. , Spratt, Daniel E. , Pilar, Avinash , Levin-Epstein, Rebecca , Wedde, Trude B. , Lilleby, Wolfgang , Fiano, Ryan , Stock, Richard G. , Demanes, D. Jeffrey, Huland, Hartwig , Martin, Santiago, Krauss, Daniel , Abu‐Isa, Eyad, Schwen, Zeyad , Pisansky, Thomas M. , Choo, C. Richard, Greco, Stephen , Deville, Curtiland , McNutt, Todd , DeWeese, Theodore L. , Ross, Ashley E. , Ciezki, Jay P. , Nickols, Nicholas G. , Bhat, Prashant , Shabsovich, David , Juarez, Jesus E. , Chong, Natalie, Kupelian, Patrick A. , Reiter, Robert E. , Steinberg, Michael L. , Elashoff, David , Horwitz, Eric M. , Tendulkar, Rahul D. , Czernin, Johannes, Gafita, Andrei , Romero, Tahmineh , Calais, Jérémie , Kishan, Amar U. , Davis, Brian J. , Deville, Curtiland , Spratt, Daniel E , Dess, Robert T , Klein, Eric A , Ma, Ting Martin , Calais, Jeremie , Xiang, Michael H. , Grogan, Tristan , Trock, Bruce J , Reddy, Chandana A. , Merrick, Gregory Stephen , Moran, Brian Joseph , Tran, Phuoc T , Martínez‐Monge, Rafael , Alam, Ridwan , Song, Daniel Y. , Boutros, Paul C. , Rettig, Matthew B. , Zaorsky, Nicholas G. , Berlin, Alejandro , Tward, Jonathan D. , Tilki, Derya

JAMA Network Open | December 13, 2021 | Volume: 4 | Issue: 12 | Pages: e2138550

10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.38550 Get It

Cancer Misinformation and Harmful Information on Facebook and Other Social Media: A Brief Report
Johnson, Skyler B. , Parsons, Matthew, Dorff, Tanya B. , Moran, Meena S. , Akerley, Wallace , Bauman, Jessica R. , Spratt, Daniel E. , Bylund, Carma L. , Swire‐Thompson, Briony , Scherer, Laura D. , Spratt, Daniel E , Parsons, Matthew, Ward, John Headley , Cohen, Stacey A. , Hubbard, Joleen M. , Onega, Tracy , Tward, Jonathan D. , Fagerlin, Angela

JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute | July 14, 2021 | Volume: 114 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 1036-1039

10.1093/jnci/djab141 Get It

Abstract There are few data on the quality of cancer treatment information available on social media. Here, we quantify the accuracy of cancer treatment information on social media and its potential for harm. Two cancer experts reviewed 50 of the most popular social media articles on each of the 4 most common cancers. The proportion of misinformation and potential for harm were reported for all 200 articles and their association with the number of social media engagements using a 2-sample Wilcoxon rank-sum test. All statistical tests were 2-sided. Of 200 total articles, 32.5% (n = 65) contained misinformation and 30.5% (n = 61) contained harmful information. Among articles containing misinformation, 76.9% (50 of 65) contained harmful information. The median number of engagements for articles with misinformation was greater than factual articles (median [interquartile range] = 2300 [1200-4700] vs 1600 [819-4700], P = .05). The median number of engagements for articles with harmful information was statistically significantly greater than safe articles (median [interquartile range] = 2300 [1400-4700] vs 1500 [810-4700], P = .007).