Lunning, Matthew A.

Background: Emavusertib (CA-4948) is a novel oral inhibitor of interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase 4 (IRAK4), which is essential for toll-like receptor (TLR) and interleukin-1 receptor (IL-1R) signaling in B cell proliferation. Additional inhibitory activity against FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) and CDC-like kinases (CLK1/2/4) is also present in emavusertib. IRAK4 forms a Myddosome complex with MYD88 adaptor protein and drives overactivation ofnuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB), causing inflammation and tumor growth. Emavusertib has been reported to be well tolerated and active as monotherapy in heavily pretreated patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) (Nowakowski 2020). Preclinical studies demonstrated that tumor resistance and survival via IRAK4 activation could be delayed or reversed. Emavusertib crossed the blood-brain barrier in a murine PDX model of PCNS lymphoma, blocked the activated IRAK4 pathway, and induced tumor response and prolonged survival (von Roemeling 2022). In combination with Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors, emavusertib showed in vitro synergy and re-sensitization of resistant cell lines, overcoming BTK resistance (Guidetti 2023a and 2023b). In vivo synergy in B-cell NHL was also demonstrated. Adaptive chemotherapy treatment resistance through IRAK4 upregulation and activation was also described in other disease models (Melgar 2019, Li 2019). This abstract presents preliminary efficacy and safety data of emavusertib + ibrutinib in R/R NHL patients. Aim:Assessment of safety and clinical activity of emavusertib in combination with ibrutinib. Methods: This is an ongoing open-label trial (NCT03328078) of emavusertib as monotherapy and in combination with ibrutinib. Part A1 - completed; dose escalation of emavusertib as monotherapy; the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) is 300 mg BID with continuous oral dosing (Nowakowski 2020). Part A2 - completed; dose escalation of emavusertib in combination with ibrutinib at 420 and 560 mg QD (Joffe 2022). Part B - ongoing; an expansion cohort of PCNSL patients with resistance to prior BTK inhibitors for additional safety and efficacy related to exposure: emavusertib at 100 or 200 mg BID + ibrutinib at 560 mg QD in 28-Day cycles. Results:As of 19 July 2023, 18 heavily pretreated NHL (including five PCNSL) patients received emavusertib at 100, 200, or 300 mg BID in combination with full ibrutinib doses per label. Median age was 63.5 years (range 50-92). Median number of prior lines of anti-cancer therapies was 3 (range 1-10). Eleven of 18 patients failed prior BTK inhibitors. Median treatment duration was 95.5 days (21-587 days), suggesting acceptable safety and tolerability. No DLTs were observed at the 200 mg BID dose level, and two reversible DLTs (stomatitis and syncope) were observed at the 300 mg BID dose level. The preliminary efficacy data of 16 evaluable patients in combination with ibrutinib showed 5 CRs (2 MCL, 3 PCNSL) and 1 PR (1 CLL). All 3 PCNSL patients with CR were previously treated with BTK inhibitors. Conclusion: The combination ofemavusertib plus ibrutinib (ema+ibr) is well tolerated with an acceptable long-term safety profile and promising efficacy, showing several objective responses in heavily pretreated and/or BTK inhibitor resistant patients. Emavusertib may have the potential to overcome BTK inhibitor resistance and the combination of ema+ibr has the potential to show increased anti-cancer activity compared to ibrutinib monotherapy.

Introduction Axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) is an autologous anti-CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy that induces durable responses in patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma. At a median of 63.1 months follow-up on the ZUMA-1 trial, median overall survival (OS) was 25.8 months with 5-year OS and PFS (progression-free survival) estimates of 42.6% (95% CI, 32.8-51.9) and 31.8% (95% CI, 22.9-41.1), respectively (Neelapu, Blood 2023). We previously reported outcomes of axi-cel patients treated with standard of care therapy, including 42% who did not meet eligibility criteria for ZUMA-1 based on co-morbidities (Nastoupil, JCO 2020). Here we report results from this cohort at a median follow up of 58 months, as well as late outcomes of interest. Results The US Lymphoma CAR-T Consortium is comprised of 17 US academic centers who contributed data independent of the manufacturer. Two hundred and ninety-eight patients underwent leukapheresis with intent to manufacture standard of care axi-cel (n=298) as of September 30, 2018. In infused patients (n=275), OS and PFS were calculated from date of infusion. After a median follow-up of 58 months, median OS was 34.9 months (95% CI 23.4 - 44.8) with the OS at 3, 4, and 5 years of 49.1% (95% CI 42.9 - 54.9%), 43% (95% CI 36.8 - 48.9%), and 40.3% (95% CI 34.2 - 46.4%), respectively. The median PFS was 8.7 months (95% CI 5.87 - 16.6) and the 3-,4-, and 5- year PFS were 36.1% (95% CI 30.4 - 41.8%), 30.7 (95% CI 25.2 - 36.4%), and 28.5% (95% CI 23 - 34.2%), respectively. Results of multi-variable modeling were similar to our prior analysis: male sex (HR 1.56, 95% CI 1.08 - 2.27, p =0.02); LDH above the upper limit of normal (HR 1.6, 95% CI 1.12 - 2.30, p = 0.01); ECOG status of 2-4 (HR 2.02, 95% CI 1.33 - 3.07, p = <0.001); and elevated bilirubin > 1.5 (HR 5.68, 95% CI 2.21 - 14.6, p = <0.001) were associated with decreased OS. Factors associated with decreased PFS included male sex (HR 1.68, 95% CI 1.20 - 2.37, p = 0.003), LDH above the upper limit of normal (HR 1.82, 95% CI 1.31 - 2.53, p = <0.001), ECOG status of 2-4 (HR 1.93, 95% CI 1.30 - 2.86, p = 0.001), elevated bilirubin (HR 3.68, 95% CI 1.45 - 9.37, p = 0.006) and receipt of 3 or more prior lines of therapy (HR 1.49, 95% CI 1.03 - 2.13, p = 0.032). We also assessed events of interest including late PFS events and causes of non-relapse mortality (NRM). One hundred and ninety-one PFS events occurred after axi-cel infusion during the follow-up period, 151 due to lymphoma progression and 40 NRM. In the first 12 months post infusion, 131 progression events occurred,13 between 1 and 2 years post infusion, and 7 relapses after 2 years with the latest occurring 46.4 months after infusion. Thirteen NRM events occurred in the 1st year post infusion, 6 between 1- and 2-years post infusion and 21 occurring later than 2 years after infusion. Of the 40 NRM events, 21 were secondary to infection including fungal infections (n = 3, 2 candidemia, 1 candidemia and pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia), JC encephalitis (n=1) and COVID-19 (n = 2). Nine deaths were attributed to secondary malignancy. Other causes of NRM included cerebral edema (n=1), HLH (n=1), intracranial hemorrhage (n=1), suicide (n=1), and unknown (n=6). The 5-year cumulative risk of relapse was 55.2% and the 5-year risk of non-relapse mortality was 16.2%. Excluding non-melanoma skin cancers, twenty-three of 275 (8%) patients were diagnosed with subsequent malignancy after axi-cel treatment: 14/275 (5%) patients were diagnosed with myeloid malignancies (MDS (n=11), AML (n=2), CMML (n=1)); other malignancies included anal squamous cell carcinoma (ca) (n=1); histiocytic sarcoma (n=1); prostate ca (n=1); endometrial ca (n=1); lung ca (n=1); merkel cell ca (n = 1), mesothelioma (n=1), B-ALL (n = 1), and AITL (n=1). Conclusion This multi-center retrospective study showed similar 5-year results to the ZUMA-1 trial with a 5-year PFS and OS of 28.5% and 40.3%, despite including patients who did not meet ZUMA-1 eligibility criteria based on comorbidities. Non-relapse mortality was primarily due to infection and secondary malignancy. This report supports the curative potential of axi-cel but highlights the competing risk of NRM in this high-risk patient population.

SummaryThere remains no one standard induction for nodal‐based peripheral T‐cell lymphoma (PTCL). We conducted a phase II study of lenalidomide plus CHOEP as a novel induction strategy. Patients received CHOEP at standard doses in combination with 10 mg of lenalidomide on days 1–10 of a 21‐day cycle for six cycles of therapy followed by observation, high‐dose therapy with autologous stem cell rescue, or maintenance lenalidomide per provider preference. Among 39 patients evaluable for efficacy, the objective response rate after six cycles was 69%, with complete response in 49%, partial response in 21%, stable disease in 0% and progressive disease in 13%. Thirty‐two patients (82%) completed full induction, and seven patients (18%) discontinued for toxicity, primarily hematologic. Any grade hematologic toxicity occurred in over 50% of patients, with grade 3 or 4 febrile neutropenia occurring in 35% of patients despite mandated growth factors. With a median followup of surviving patients of 21.3 months, the estimated 2‐year progression‐free and overall survival were 55% (95% CI 37%–70%) and 78% (95% CI 59%–89%), respectively. In sum, six cycles of lenalidomide plus CHOEP resulted in a modest response rate primarily due to hematologic toxicity, which prevented all patients from completing planned induction.

Abstract This global phase 3 study compared lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel) with a standard of care (SOC) as second-line therapy for primary refractory or early relapsed (≤12 months) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). Adults eligible for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT; N = 184) were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to liso-cel (100 × 106 chimeric antigen receptor–positive T cells) or SOC (3 cycles of platinum-based immunochemotherapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy and ASCT in responders). The primary end point was event-free survival (EFS). In this primary analysis with a 17.5-month median follow-up, median EFS was not reached (NR) for liso-cel vs 2.4 months for SOC. Complete response (CR) rate was 74% for liso-cel vs 43% for SOC (P < .0001) and median progression-free survival (PFS) was NR for liso-cel vs 6.2 months for SOC (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.400; P < .0001). Median overall survival (OS) was NR for liso-cel vs 29.9 months for SOC (HR = 0.724; P = .0987). When adjusted for crossover from SOC to liso-cel, 18-month OS rates were 73% for liso-cel and 54% for SOC (HR = 0.415). Grade 3 cytokine release syndrome and neurological events occurred in 1% and 4% of patients in the liso-cel arm, respectively (no grade 4 or 5 events). These data show significant improvements in EFS, CR rate, and PFS for liso-cel compared with SOC and support liso-cel as a preferred second-line treatment compared with SOC in patients with primary refractory or early relapsed LBCL. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03575351.

Abstract BACKGROUND Emavusertib, an oral interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase 4 (IRAK4) inhibitor, targets toll-like receptor (TLR) and interleukin-1 receptor (IL-1R) signaling pathway in B-cell proliferation. IRAK4 forms a Myddosome complex with MYD88 adaptor protein and drives overactivation of NF-κB, causing inflammation and tumor growth. Emavusertib has been reported to be well tolerated and active as monotherapy in heavily pretreated relapsed/refractory (R/R) non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). In a murine PDX model of primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL), emavusertib crossed the blood-brain barrier, resulting in tumor response and prolonged survival. In combination with Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors, emavusertib showed in vivo anti-cancer synergy in B-cell NHL. METHODS This is an ongoing open-label trial (NCT03328078) in patients with R/R NHL. Currently, we are in the dose escalation portion of combination therapy to evaluate safety and efficacy following treatment of emavusertib at dose levels of 200 or 300mg BID with ibrutinib at full prescribed dose. As of May 6th, 2022, 13 patients have been treated with emavusertib+ibrutinib combination therapy. RESULTS Among the 13 patients, two were diagnosed with R/R PCNSL and had several prior lines of anti-cancer therapy. Emavusertib in combination with ibrutinib (560 mg daily) appeared to be well tolerated in these two subjects. One patient experienced Gr3 treatment-related adverse events (thrombocytopenia, muscle weakness, pain). The preliminary efficacy data demonstrated one CR and one SD. The patient who achieved CR after the combination therapy was originally intolerant to high-dose methotrexate based chemoimmunotherapy and did not achieve complete remission after switching to ibrutinib, providing early clinical evidence of CNS penetration and anti-tumor activity of emavusertib. CONCLUSION In R/R PCNSL, these preliminary data suggest that combination therapy has a tolerable safety profile with promising anti-cancer activity and may overcome ibrutinib resistance.