Lester, Scott C.

Background Limited stage (stage I−II) disease is an uncommon presentation of mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), and its optimal management remains controversial. A British Columbia study (Leitch, Ann Oncol, 2003) and a Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) study (Murthy, Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk, 2014) suggested the importance of radiotherapy (RT). A National Cancer Database (NCDB) study in the pre-BTK inhibitor (BTKi) era showed that chemotherapy (Chemo) plus RT (Chemo+RT) improved overall survival (OS) compared to Chemo or RT alone (Gill, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2015). However, a retrospective International Lymphoma Radiation Oncology Group study (Dabaja, Ann Oncol, 2017) reported comparable OS with Chemo+RT vs Chemo or RT alone. The potential differences in OS with different frontline therapy modalities may be modified by subsequent therapies for relapsed or refractory (R/R) disease. In this study, we used the NCDB data to analyze frontline treatment patterns and outcomes of limited stage MCL in the pre-BTKi vs BTKi eras. Methods The NCDB was queried to identify patients with stage I−II MCL diagnosed in 2004−2020. Because the first BTKi ibrutinib was approved by the FDA for R/R MCL in November 2013, we defined 2004−2013 as pre-BTKi era and 2014−2020 as BTKi era. Frontline treatment modalities were categorized to RT alone, Chemo alone, or Chemo+RT. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and the Cox proportional hazards model. Results Among 32,746 patients with newly diagnosed MCL in 2004−2020, 3,836 (11.7%) presented with stage I−II disease, with 2,428 having treatment information available. For patients diagnosed in the pre-BTKi era (n = 2005), 195 (9.7%) received RT alone, 1472 (73.4%) received Chemo alone, and 338 (16.9%) received Chemo+RT. For patients diagnosed in the BTKi era (n = 423), 45 (10.6%) received RT alone, 320 (75.7%) received Chemo alone, and 58 (13.7%) received Chemo+RT. Patients in the RT alone group were older (P <0.001) and had more females (P <0.001), but there were no statistically significant differences in Charlson-Deyo score, international prognostic index, or treating facility type (academic vs non-academic). For patients with stage I disease, in the pre-BTKi era, patients treated with Chemo+RT (n = 182) had improved OS compared to those treated with RT alone (n = 141) or Chemo alone (n = 647), with a 5-year OS of 75.4% vs 71.8% vs 61.4% (P <0.001). Similar results were observed in the BTKi-era, with a 5-year OS of 83.6% vs 69.5% vs 62.9% (P <0.001) for patients treated with Chemo+RT (n = 31), RT alone (n = 30), or Chemo alone (n = 130), respectively. After adjusting for age and sex, Chemo+RT was associated with improved OS compared to Chemo alone (pre-BTKi era, HR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.46−0.75, P <0.001; BTKi era, HR = 0.34, 95% CI = 0.14−0.79, P = 0.013), but not compared to RT alone (pre-BTKi era, HR = 0.62, 95% CI = 0.23−1.68, P = 0.343; BTKi era, HR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.56−1.05, P = 0.10) (Figure 1A). For patients with stage II disease, in the pre-BTKi era, patients treated with Chemo+RT (n = 156) had improved OS compared to those treated with RT alone (n = 54) or Chemo alone (n = 825), with a 5-year OS of 70.0% vs 47.3% vs 58.4% (P <0.001). In the BTKi-era, patients treated with Chemo+RT (n = 27) or RT alone (n = 15) both had improved OS compared to those treated with Chemo alone (n = 190), with a 5-year OS of 77.2% vs 78.8% vs 61.9% (P = 0.004) . After adjusting for age and sex, Chemo+RT was associated with improved OS compared to Chemo alone in BTKi era only (pre-BTKi era, HR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.67−1.07, P = 0.165; BTKi era, HR = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.25−0.95, P = 0.034), but not compared to RT alone (pre-BTKi era, HR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.53−1.13, P = 0.185; BTKi era, HR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.35−2.67, P = 0.952) (Figure 1B). Conclusions Treatment pattern for limited stage MCL has not changed significantly from the pre-BTKi era to the BTKi era, with approximately 15% of patients receiving Chemo+RT, 10% RT alone and 75% Chemo alone. In the BTKi era, Chemo+RT appeared to be associated with better OS compared to Chemo alone but not compared to RT alone. Interpretation of the results requires caution because (1) patient numbers are small in Chemo+RT and RT alone groups, (2) longer follow-up may be needed, and (3) selection of therapy was not random, eg, patients receiving Chemo alone may have had higher disease burden such as bulky disease and/or non-contiguous stage II involvement but these details are not available in NCDB.

Purpose The predominant pattern of relapse for patients with B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) who undergo anti-CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell Therapy (CART) involves sites previously involved by NHL. Bridging radiotherapy (BRT) has shown to be an effective bridging treatment with excellent local control rates. Our previous work defined limited/oligometastatic lymphoma as disease involving <5 sites. This study is the first to report on the role of BRT for patients with limited (<5 involved sites) disease prior to CART. Methods Following Institutional Review Board approval, a retrospective review from 2018 to 2023 across 3 Mayo Clinic sites (Arizona, Florida, and Minnesota) was performed and identified 139 patients with relapsed/refractory (r/r) B-cell NHL without bone marrow involvement who received CART and had <5 disease sites prior to leukapheresis. Ann Arbor staging was used to define the number of involved disease sites. An involved disease site included the Ann Arbor anatomical lymph node region(s) harboring the pathological lymph node(s) or any extranodal lesion. Bridging treatment (radiation and/or systemic therapy) was defined as treatment administered between leukapheresis and CART infusion. The primary endpoint was event-free survival (EFS),defined from CART infusion to any disease progression or initiation of post-CART consolidative/salvage therapy. Secondary endpoints included progression -free survival (PFS),defined from CART infusion to any disease progression, and overall survival (OS), defined from CART infusion to death. Results Prior to CART infusion, 44 (32%) patients received BRT and 95 (68%) did not. Bridging systemic therapy was given to 5 (11%) and 34 (36%) patients in the BRT and no BRT groups, respectively (p=0.003). The median number of involved disease sites prior to leukapheresis was 2 (range: 1-4). There was no significant difference in the baseline characteristics prior to CART infusion between the BRT and no BRT groups, except for extranodal involvement that was more common in the BRT group (Table 1). The median equivalent 2 Gy dose was 27 Gy (Interquartile range 23-34), and the most common BRT regimen was 20 Gy in 5 fractions. Among the 44 BRT patients, 34 received radiation to all visible PET-avid disease sites, and 10 received radiation to some but not all disease sites. The median follow-up was 20 months. The rate of grade ≥2 cytokine release syndrome was 41% in both groups (p=0.99). The rate of grade ≥2 immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome was 21% and 37% in the BRT and no BRT groups, respectively (p=0.059). There were no observed grade ≥3 BRT-related toxicities. Objective response rate by PET 5 point scale was higher in the BRT group (93% versus 79%; p=0.036). Crude rates of progression were 30% in BRT and 55% in no BRT patients, with 9/13 (69%) and 43/52 (83%) patients relapsing in pre-existing sites of disease present prior to CART infusion in the BRT and no BRT group, respectively. Seven (16%) BRT patients relapsed in the radiation field. The 2-year EFS was 50% in the BRT group and 39% in the no BRT group (p=0.01). The 2-year PFS was 55% in the BRT group and 45% in the no BRT group (p=0.017). The 2-year OS was 55% in the BRT group and 62% in the no BRT group (p=0.7). Intriguingly, patients who received BRT to all visible PET-avid disease sites (n=34) had further improvement in 2-year EFS (67% vs 39%, p=0.003) and 2-year PFS (71% vs 46%, p=0.008) compared to no BRT or patients who received BRT to some but not all visible disease sites (n=105). Nine patients (2 in BRT and 7 in no BRT groups) received consolidative radiotherapy for day 30 residual disease with only one patient subsequently experiencing progression. Twenty-five patients (6 in BRT and 19 in no BRT groups) received salvage/palliative RT for post-CART relapsed disease. Thirty-seven (39%) patients in the no BRT group remained without disease progression and did not receive radiation in the bridging, consolidative or salvage/palliative setting. Conclusion Bridging radiotherapy prior to CART infusion for patients with limited (<5 involved disease sites) r/r NHL appears to improve response rate, EFS, and PFS without causing significant toxicities. Approximately one third of patients who do not receive BRT will require subsequent post-CART radiation, and another third will remain free of radiation and disease progression.

AbstractAnti‐CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T‐cell therapy (CART) has revolutionized the outcomes of relapsed and/or refractory B‐cell non‐Hodgkin lymphoma. However, CART is still limited by its availability, toxicity, and response durability. Not all patients make it to the CART infusion phase due to disease progression. Among those who receive CART, a significant number of patients experience life‐threatening cytokine release syndrome toxicity, and less than half maintain a durable response with the majority relapsing in pre‐existing sites of disease present pre‐CART. Radiation therapy stands as a promising peri‐CART and salvage treatment that can improve the outcomes of these patients. Evidence suggests that bridging radiotherapy prior to CART controls the disease during the manufacturing period, augments response rates and local control, cytoreduces/debulks the disease and decreases the severity of cytokine release syndrome, and may prolong disease‐free intervals and survival especially in patients with bulky disease. Consolidative radiotherapy for residual post‐CART disease alters the pattern of relapse and improves local recurrence‐free and progression‐free survivals. Salvage radiotherapy for relapsed post‐CART disease has favorable survival outcomes when delivered comprehensively for patients with limited relapsed disease and palliates symptoms for patients with diffuse relapsed disease. The biology of the disease during the peri‐CART period is poorly understood, and further studies investigating the optimal timing and dosing of radiation therapy (RT) are needed. In this review, we tackle the most significant challenges of CART, review and propose how RT can help mitigate these challenges, and provide The Mayo Clinic experts' approach on incorporating RT with CART.

Abstract Most patients with solitary bone plasmacytomas (SBP) progress to multiple myeloma (MM) after definitive radiation therapy as their primary treatment. Whether the presence of high-risk (HR) cytogenetic abnormalities by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in the clonal plasma cells, obtained either directly from the diagnostic SBP tissue or the corresponding bone marrow examination at the time of diagnosis, is associated with a shorter time to progression (TTP) to MM is unknown. This study evaluated all patients diagnosed with SBP at the Mayo Clinic from January 2012 to July 2022. The presence of del(17p), t(14;16), t(4;14), or +1q (gain or amplification) by FISH in clonal plasma cells was defined as HR. A total of 114 patients were included in this cohort, and baseline FISH was available for 55 patients (48%), of which 22 were classified as HR (40%). The median TTP to MM for patients with SBP and HR FISH was 8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.3-26) compared with 42 months (95% CI, 25-not reached [NR]) in patients with SBP without HR FISH (P < .001). In a multivariate analysis, only HR FISH was a significant predictor for shorter TTP to MM, independent of minimal marrow involvement and an abnormal serum free light chain ratio at diagnosis. Deletion (17p) and gain 1q abnormalities were the most common FISH abnormalities responsible for the short TTP to MM. Thus, assessing for HR FISH abnormalities in clonal plasma cells derived from either the diagnostic SBP tissue or the staging bone marrow examination of patients with newly diagnosed SBP is feasible and prognostic for a shorter TTP to MM.

e19507 Background: Patients (pts) with CLL are at elevated risk of developing non-hematologic malignancies. Radiation therapy (RT) is a critical component of management in localized solid organ malignancies. Novel agents (NA) are widely used in CLL treatment; however, safety data are lacking to guide treatment of pts requiring concurrent RT and NA. Methods: We identified pts treated concurrently with NA for CLL and RT for second primary malignancy (SPM) at Mayo Clinic from 2014-2022. Adverse events within 3 months of RT were evaluated using the International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (iwCLL) criteria for hematological toxicity and the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5 for non-hematological toxicity. Patients without seamless, concurrent treatment with NA and RT were excluded. Results: Twenty-six pts were included. NA therapy consisted of ibrutinib (n = 23), acalabrutinib (n = 2), and venetoclax (n = 1). Median follow up time since RT completion was 1.5 years. The median age at NA initiation was 67 years (range:46-85) and at RT start was 68 years (range: 51-85); 92% of pts were male. NA was first treatment in 23% of pts; the median number of prior lines of therapy was 1 (range: 0-4). IGHV was unmutated in 82% and TP53 aberration was present in 24% of evaluable patients. SPM sites included prostate (n = 9), head/neck (n = 8), lung (n = 3), and brain, breast, bone, skin, kidney, and thymus (n = 1 each). The most common conventionally fractionated prescriptions (cGy/fx) were 6000/30 (n = 6) and > 6000-7020/20-33 (n = 7). SBRT ranged from 3300/5 to 5400/3 (n = 8). Five pts received other, varied RT prescriptions. Overall, 3 (12%) pts experienced at least one grade 3/4 toxicity. Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia was observed in 2 (8%) pts and grade 3/4 neutropenia was observed in 2 pts per iwCLL criteria. Grade ≥3 non-hematological toxicities occurred in two pts that required hospitalization for critical illness, including 1 pt with grade 5 respiratory failure within 6 weeks after RT. Dose de-escalation of ibrutinib was reported in one case for pancytopenia attributed to use of a radiosensitizing agent. There were no cases of RT dose modification. Conclusions: Continuing NA CLL therapy during RT did not result in unexpected toxicities. This approach may maintain CLL disease control without compromising management of the SPM. [Table: see text]

AbstractBackgroundWe seek to inform radiotherapy (RT) delivery for adenoid cystic carcinoma of the head and neck (ACC) by evaluating RT techniques and recurrence patterns.MethodsWe identified patients with ACC treated with curative‐intent RT from 2005 to 2021. Imaging was reviewed to determine local recurrence (LR).ResultsNinety‐one patients were included. The 5‐year LR risk was 12.2% (6.6–22.7). One patient each experienced a marginal and out‐of‐field recurrence. Patients receiving >60 Gy postoperatively had a 5‐year LR risk of 0% compared to 10.7% (4.2–27.2) with ≤60 Gy. Those receiving 70 and <70 Gy definitively had a 5‐year LR risk of 15.2% (2.5–91.6) and 33.3% (6.7–100.0), respectively. No patients had regional nodal failure.ConclusionsModern, conformal RT for ACC results in low rates of LR. Doses >60 and 70 Gy may improve control in the postoperative and definitive settings, respectively. Elective nodal treatment can be omitted in well‐selected patients.

ObjectiveFailure to recognize symptoms of non‐human papillomavirus‐associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HPV(−)OPSCC) at presentation can delay diagnosis and treatment. We aim to identify patient factors and provider practice patterns that delay presentation and care in HPV(−)OPSCC.MethodsRetrospective review at a tertiary care center. Patients with HPV(−)OPSCC receiving treatment from 2006 to 2016. Patients were excluded if their date of symptom onset or diagnosis was unknown after thorough review of the electronic medical record or their tissue was not tested for HPV or p16. Clinical data, workup, and care timelines were abstracted. Univariate and multivariable linear regressions were performed to determine associations between patient and provider factors and delays in care.ResultsOf 70 included patients, 52 (74%) were male and mean age was 60.5 (SD = 9.0). Median time to diagnosis was 69 days (IQR = 32–127 days), with a median latency of 30 days (IQR = 12–61 days) from symptom onset to first presentation and 19.5 days (IQR = 4–46 days) from the first presentation to diagnosis. Most patients visited at least 2 providers (n = 52, 74%) before diagnosis. Evaluation by 3 or more providers prior to diagnosis was associated with significant delays in diagnosis of nearly a year (357.7 days, p < 0.001) and being treated or prescribed analgesia prior to diagnosis was significantly associated with delays in diagnosis (p = 0.004) on univariate regression analysis.ConclusionsDelays in care related to evaluations by multiple providers and misdiagnosis prolonged time to diagnosis in HPV(−)OPSCC. Improved patient and provider education is necessary to expedite the diagnosis of HPV(−)OPSCC.Level of Evidence4 Laryngoscope, 133:1394–1401, 2023

AbstractPurposeFor total skin electron (TSE) beam radiation therapy, the anterior eye and conjunctiva can be protected with eye shields to prevent keratitis, xerophthalmia, and cataractogenesis. Conventional metal eye shields can reduce patient balance by obscuring vision and thus increasing the risk for falls. We report on the design, fabrication, and clinical use of transparent acrylic eye shields for TSE.MethodsThe primary design goals were a seven‐fold reduction in the dose to the anterior eye and conjunctiva to meet published dose‐recommendations, preservation of vision for the wearer, and biocompatibility for external use. Resembling thick swim goggles, the design features 23 mm thick acrylic lenses that are mounted in a 3‐D printed support structure that conforms to the eye socket and can be worn with a strap. Dose measurements were performed in a simulated Stanford‐technique treatment with an anthropomorphic phantom using Gafchromic EBT filmResultsThe transparent eye shields were manufactured using a 3D‐printer and CNC‐machine. Based on measurements from the simulated treatments for each of the eye shields, the eye shields provided a 12‐fold reduction in dose to the lens. After use in more than 200 fractions, the shields were well tolerated by patients, and there were no reports of any incidents or adverse events.ConclusionTransparent TSE eye shields are able to reduce the dose to the eyes while maintaining vision during treatment at a reasonable cost.

e19532 Background: The traditional approach to the treatment of early-stage classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) has been combined modality therapy (CMT) with both chemotherapy and radiotherapy (RT). CMT has shown improved disease control, but RT can lead to long-term adverse effects, including secondary malignancies and cardiac toxicity. Multiple clinical trials have assessed treatment de-escalation strategies to chemotherapy-alone regimens, but results are conflicting. We aimed to assess the real-world implications of these trials by comparing patient outcomes based upon treatment with CMT or chemotherapy-alone. Furthermore, we proposed to assess differences in treatment outcomes stratified by disease bulk, favorable/unfavorable disease, and PET2 response. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, multi-center cohort study of consecutive adult patients with early-stage (stage IA-IIB) cHL treated between January 2010-December 2020. Baseline characteristics, treatment modality, and outcomes were abstracted by chart review. Available PET2 scans (n=110) were independently reviewed by a blinded nuclear radiologist. Deauville score (DS) ≥4 was characterized as positive (+), and DS≤3 negative (-). All analysis was conducted using intention-to-treat principles based upon the initial treatment plan (CMT or chemotherapy-alone). Results: In 125 patients [58% male, median age 34 (range, 18-78)] with early-stage cHL, CMT was intended in 63 (50%) patients, with chemotherapy-alone in 62 (50%). Bulky disease was observed in 43 (34%), unfavorable disease in 81 (65%), and 15 (14%) were found to be PET2+. With median follow-up of 59.8 months (95%CI, 48.6 to 71.0), 5 (4%) deaths occurred, and 17 (14%) patients had relapsed/refractory disease. No significant differences in overall survival (OS) were seen based upon treatment intention. However, there was substantially reduced progression-free survival (PFS) (Table) with chemotherapy-alone in the whole cohort, and also in those with bulky, unfavorable, and PET2+ disease. No significant PFS differences were seen based upon treatment intention for patients with non-bulky, favorable, or PET2- disease. Conclusions: Based on our real-world experience, CMT appears particularly beneficial for patients with bulky disease, unfavorable prognostic factors, and PET2+ disease. However, while recent trials showed a benefit of CMT in non-bulky, favorable and PET2- patients, chemotherapy-alone may be comparable for these patients in actual clinical practice.[Table: see text]