Back to Authors

Sechi, Elia

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4698-663X

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic

Citations 54

Cerebral Cortical Encephalitis in Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein Antibody‐Associated Disease
Guo, Yong , Krecke, Karl N. , Chen, John J. , Redenbaugh, Vyanka , Montalvo, Mayra , Elsbernd, Paul , Tillema, Jan‐Mendelt , López‐Chiriboga, A. Sebastian , Budhram, Adrian , Kunchok, Amy , Dubey, Divyanshu , Pittock, Sean J. , Lucchinetti, Claudia F. , Dubey, Divyanshu , Valencia-Sánchez, Cristina , Pittock, S J , Flanagan, E P , Lopez-Chiriboga, A Sebastian , Budhram, Adrian , Dubey, Divyanshu , Pittock, Sean J , Chen, John J , Dubey, Divyanshu , Valencia Sanchez, Cristina , Sechi, Elia , Flanagan, Eoin P.

Annals of Neurology | November 14, 2022 | Volume: 93 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 297-302

10.1002/ana.26549 Get It

Cerebral cortical encephalitis (CCE) is a recently described myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody‐associated disease (MOGAD) phenotype. In this observational retrospective study, we characterized 19 CCE patients (6.7% of our MOGAD cohort). Headache (n = 15, 79%), seizures (n = 13, 68%), and encephalopathy (n = 12, 63%) were frequent. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed unilateral (n = 12, 63%) or bilateral (n = 7, 37%) cortical T2 hyperintensity and leptomeningeal enhancement (n = 17, 89%). N‐Methyl‐D‐aspartate receptor autoantibodies coexisted in 2 of 15 tested (13%). CCE pathology (n = 2) showed extensive subpial cortical demyelination (n = 2), microglial reactivity (n = 2), and inflammatory infiltrates (perivascular, n = 1; meningeal, n = 1). Most received high‐dose steroids (n = 17, 89%), and all improved, but 3 had CCE relapses. This study highlights the CCE spectrum and provides insight into its pathogenesis. ANN NEUROL 2023;93:297–302
Cerebrospinal fluid evaluation in patients with progressive motor impairment due to critical central nervous system demyelinating lesions
Barakat, Benan , Messina, Steve, Nayak, Shreya, Kassa, Roman, Sechi, Elia , Kantarci, Orhun H. , Keegan, B. Mark , Flanagan, E P , Keegan, B Mark , Sechi, Elia , Barakat, Benan , Nayak, Shreya, Flanagan, Eoin P. , Weinshenker, Brian G.

Multiple Sclerosis Journal - Experimental, Translational and Clinical | January 12, 2022 | Volume: 8 | Issue: 1 | Pages: No page available

10.1177/20552173211052159 Get It

Background Elevated intrathecal immunoglobulin G (IgG; oligoclonal bands (OCBs)) or IgG in people with progressive motor impairment due to “critical” demyelinating lesions are of uncertain significance. Objective Compare clinical/radiological features of people with “critical” demyelinating lesion-induced progressive motor impairment with/without elevated intrathecal IgG synthesis. Methods A total of 133 people with progressive motor impairment attributable to “critical” demyelinating lesions (corticospinal tract location, consistent with the progressive motor deficit) were compared regarding clinical and radiological presentation with and without ≥2 unique cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) OCB and/or IgG index ≥0.85. Results Ninety-eight (74%) had CSF-elevated OCB and/or IgG index, higher with increased magnetic resonance imaging-lesion burden. No differences were found with/without CSF abnormalities in sex (46 of 98 female (47%) vs. 22 of 35 (63%), p = 0.11), onset-age (median 49 vs. 50 years, p = 0.5), progression from onset (62 of 98 (63%) vs. 25 of 35 (71%)), progression post-relapse (36 of 98 (37%) vs. 10 of 35 (29%), p = 0.4), and duration between demyelinating disease onset and CSF examination (30 (0–359) vs. 48 (0–323) months p = 0.7). “Critical” lesions were radiologically similar, most commonly cervical spine located (72 of 98 (74%) vs. 19 of 35 (54%), p = 0.18) both with/without CSF abnormalities. Conclusions People with “critical” demyelinating lesion-induced progressive motor impairment typically have elevated intrathecal IgG (OCB and/or IgG) and similar clinical and radiological presentation regardless of CSF findings, therefore representing valid presentations of progressive demyelinating disease.
Diagnostic value of aquaporin-4-IgG live cell based assay in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders
Redenbaugh, Vyanka , Montalvo, Mayra , Sechi, Elia , Fryer, James P., Lennon, Vanda A. , Mills, John R. , Wingerchuk, Dean M. , Chen, John J. , Bhatti, M. Tariq , López‐Chiriboga, A. Sebastian , Pittock, Sean J, Pittock, Sean J. , Lopez-Chiriboga, A Sebastian , Pittock, Sean J , Flanagan, E P , Pittock, S J , Chen, John J , Sechi, Elia , Redenbaugh, Vyanka , Buciuc, Marina , McKeon, Andrew , Weinshenker, Brian G. , Flanagan, Eoin P.

Multiple Sclerosis Journal - Experimental, Translational and Clinical | November 26, 2021 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 4 | Pages: No page available

10.1177/20552173211052656 Get It

Objective Determine the utility of aquaporin 4 IgG (AQP4-IgG) testing (live cell-based assay) for Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders (NMOSD). Methods We included Mayo Clinic patients (1/1/2018-12/31/2019) tested for serum AQP4-IgG by live cell-based flow-cytometric assay. Medical records were reviewed to assess if patients fulfilled 2015 NMOSD criteria. Results Of 1371 patients tested, 41 were positive (3%) and all fulfilled NMOSD criteria with AQP4-IgG (specificity = 100%). Only 10/1330 testing negative met NMOSD criteria without AQP4-IgG (sensitivity = 80%) and seven of these 10 were MOG-IgG positive. Conclusions AQP4-IgG by live cell-based assay was highly specific and without false positives in a high throughput setting.
Clinical Significance of Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein Autoantibodies in Patients with Typical MS Lesions on MRI
Zara, Pietro , Floris, Valentina , López‐Chiriboga, A. Sebastian , Solla, Paolo , Sechi, Elia , Flanagan, E P , Lopez-Chiriboga, A Sebastian , Sechi, Elia , Flanagan, Eoin P. , Weinshenker, Brian G.

Multiple Sclerosis Journal - Experimental, Translational and Clinical | November 19, 2021 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 4 | Pages: No page available

10.1177/20552173211048761 Get It

Background Myelin-oligodendrocyte-glycoprotein (MOG)-IgG-positivity in patients with typical MS lesions on MRI may lead to diagnostic/therapeutic uncertainty. Objective and Methods We reviewed reports of cases with MS phenotype on MRI and MOG-IgG-positivity published in Pubmed between 01/2012–06/2021. Results Sixteen patients were included (median age [range], 37,5 [25–66] years; 60% female). Three patients initially tested negative for MOG-IgG. Disease course was: relapsing-remitting, 10; or progressive, 6. Intrathecal IgG-synthesis was common (79%). Low and high-efficacy MS-targeted agents prevented relapses in 30% and 100%, respectively. None of the patients showed resolution of MRI T2-lesions over time. Conclusions MOG-IgG-positivity is unlikely to alter the expected treatment response and outcomes in patients with otherwise typical MS phenotype on MRI.
Evaluation and Management of Acute Myelopathy
Sechi, Elia , Flanagan, Eoin P.

Seminars in Neurology | October 7, 2021 | Volume: 41 | Issue: 05 | Pages: 511-529

10.1055/s-0041-1733792 Get It

AbstractAcute myelopathies are spinal cord disorders characterized by a rapidly progressive course reaching nadir within hours to a few weeks that may result in severe disability. The multitude of underlying etiologies, complexities in confirming the diagnosis, and often unforgiving nature of spinal cord damage have always represented a challenge. Moreover, certain slowly progressive myelopathies may present acutely or show abrupt worsening in specific settings and thus further complicate the diagnostic workup. Awareness of the clinical and magnetic resonance imaging characteristics of different myelopathies and the specific settings where they occur is fundamental for a correct diagnosis. Neuroimaging helps distinguish compressive etiologies that may require urgent surgery from intrinsic etiologies that generally require medical treatment. Differentiation between various myelopathies is essential to establish timely and appropriate treatment and avoid harm from unnecessary procedures. This article reviews the contemporary spectrum of acute myelopathy etiologies and provides guidance for diagnosis and management.
Autoimmune encephalopathies presenting as dementia of subacute onset and rapid progression
Banks, Samantha A. , Sechi, Elia , Flanagan, E P , Sechi, Elia , Banks, Samantha , Flanagan, Eoin P.

Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders | March 20, 2021 | Volume: 14 | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1177/1756286421998906 Get It

The terms autoimmune dementia and autoimmune encephalopathy may be used interchangeably; autoimmune dementia is used here to emphasize its consideration in young-onset dementia, dementia with a subacute onset, and rapidly progressive dementia. Given their potential for reversibility, it is important to distinguish the rare autoimmune dementias from the much more common neurodegenerative dementias. The presence of certain clinical features [e.g. facio-brachial dystonic seizures that accompany anti-leucine-rich-glioma-inactivated-1 (LGI1) encephalitis that can mimic myoclonus] can be a major clue to the diagnosis. When possible, objective assessment of cognition with bedside testing or neuropsychological testing is useful to determine the degree of abnormality and serve as a baseline from which immunotherapy response can be judged. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) head and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis are useful to assess for inflammation that can support an autoimmune etiology. Assessing for neural autoantibody diagnostic biomarkers in serum and CSF in those with suggestive features can help confirm the diagnosis and guide cancer search in paraneoplastic autoimmune dementia. However, broad screening for neural antibodies in elderly patients with an insidious dementia is not recommended. Moreover, there are pitfalls to antibody testing that should be recognized and the high frequency of some antibodies in the general population limit their diagnostic utility [e.g., anti-thyroid peroxidase (TPO) antibodies]. Once the diagnosis is confirmed, both acute and maintenance immunotherapy can be utilized and treatment choice varies depending on the accompanying neural antibody present and the presence or absence of cancer. The target of the neural antibody biomarker may help predict treatment response and prognosis, with antibodies to cell-surface or synaptic antigens more responsive to immunotherapy and yielding a better overall prognosis than those with antibodies to intracellular targets. Neurologists should be aware that autoimmune dementias and encephalopathies are increasingly recognized in novel settings, including post herpes virus encephalitis and following immune-checkpoint inhibitor use.