Citations

ABSTRACT Chronic liver disease (CLD) is a major cause of global morbidity and mortality, with outcomes closely linked to the severity of liver fibrosis. While liver biopsy has historically been the reference standard for fibrosis staging, its invasiveness, sampling variability and limited suitability for longitudinal monitoring have driven the widespread adoption of non‐invasive tests (NITs). Imaging‐based biomarkers, particularly elastography, now play a central role in the clinical assessment and care pathway design. This review focuses on imaging techniques for non‐invasive assessment of liver fibrosis, with emphasis on elastography techniques: vibration‐controlled transient elastography (VCTE), ultrasound‐based shear wave elastography (SWE) and magnetic resonance elastography (MRE). Technical principles, advantages, limitations and implementation considerations are discussed to support informed selection across clinical contexts. VCTE offers rapid point‐of‐care assessment with extensive validation for identifying advanced fibrosis but is limited by operator dependence, reduced repeatability and lack of anatomical information. SWE provides real‐time, radiologist‐controlled assessment with improved applicability in obesity and ascites, though intervendor variability and operator dependence remain challenges. MRE demonstrates the highest diagnostic accuracy, reproducibility and technical success, with assessment of larger liver volume and strong performance across etiologies, albeit with limited access due to the requirement of an MRI system. Adjunct MRI biomarkers, including proton‐density fat fraction and iron‐corrected T1 mapping, further enhance liver phenotyping by characterising steatosis and fibro‐inflammatory activity. Understanding the strengths and limitations of each technique is essential for radiologists supporting multidisciplinary CLD management and service implementation, particularly in evolving healthcare environments such as Australia.

Background: Accurate identification of patients with metabolic dysfunction–associated steatohepatitis (MASH) at risk of disease progression (at-risk MASH) is critical for guiding resmetirom and semaglutide therapy. Inconsistent definitions of at-risk MASH complicate clinical risk classification and comparisons across studies. This study aimed to standardize the definition of at-risk MASH and propose optimized MRE-based liver stiffness (LS-MRE) cutoffs to improve noninvasive risk stratification and better guide pharmacotherapy. Methods: In this prospective study, 413 patients with suspected or diagnosed MASLD from two medical centers underwent liver biopsy and MRE. Results: A simplified definition of at-risk MASH (MASH with fibrosis stage≥2) identified a broader group of patients requiring clinical attention than a stricter definition requiring NAFLD Activity Score≥4 with ≥1 point in steatosis, inflammation, and ballooning (n=122 vs. 77). LS-MRE alone showed the highest diagnostic accuracy for identifying at-risk MASH using the simplified definition (AUC 0.91 [0.87, 0.95]) and cirrhosis (AUC 0.93 [0.88, 0.99]), compared with FIB-4 and individual laboratory parameters (AST, ALT, and platelet count) ( p <0.01 for all, paired DeLong tests). Optimized LS-MRE cutoffs (2.8–6.4 kPa) captured 25 additional biopsy-proven pharmacotherapy candidates (28% of all eligible patients) compared to AASLD guidelines–recommended cutoffs (3.1–4.4 kPa), improving sensitivity (80% vs. 50%) with acceptable specificity (73% vs. 88%). Conclusions: A simplified definition of at-risk MASH enables broader identification of treatment candidates. LS-MRE demonstrates excellent diagnostic performance and improves noninvasive risk stratification when paired with optimized cutoffs. These findings support the use of MRE to guide resmetirom and semaglutide eligibility and improve access to emerging therapies.

Background: Societal guidance recommends sequential noninvasive testing for metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), using Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) ≥1.3 as a gatekeeper before second-line assessment with the Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) score (<7.7 as a rule-out). The impact of this pathway design on the detection of fibrotic MASH remains uncertain. We aimed to evaluate the performance of guideline-endorsed sequential testing and to determine optimized ELF thresholds within alternative strategies. Methods: In this prospective study, patients with or at risk for MASLD underwent FIB-4, ELF testing, magnetic resonance elastography (MRE), and liver biopsy within 1 month. Fibrotic MASLD was defined as fibrosis stage ≥2 on histology or liver stiffness ≥3.1 kPa on MRE. Diagnostic performance of ELF was assessed, and sequential (ELF applied after FIB-4 ≥1.3) and concurrent (either test positive) testing strategies were compared. Results: Among 186 participants (median age 51 years; 69% women), fibrotic MASLD was present in 71 (38%). ELF demonstrated AUROC 0.77 (95% CI 0.70–0.84); the cohort-derived cutoff was 9.4 (80% sensitivity, 65% specificity). Lower cutoffs (8.7 and 7.7) increased sensitivity (≥90% and 100%) but low specificity (34% and 4%). FIB-4 ≥1.3 showed limited sensitivity (57%), resulting in 43% of fibrotic MASH cases being excluded from second-line testing. Sequential application of ELF, therefore, failed to overcome this sensitivity ceiling. A concurrent strategy using FIB-4 ≥1.3 or ELF ≥9.4 improved sensitivity to 87% with 64% specificity. Conclusions: Sequential FIB-4–based testing substantially limits the detection of fibrotic MASLD due to gatekeeping sensitivity constraints. Concurrent first-line testing with FIB-4 and ELF improves case identification, underscoring the importance of pathway design in optimizing noninvasive fibrosis assessment.

Background: Qualification of non-invasive tests (NITs) and blood biomarkers for fibrosis severity and risk assessment is an unmet need in clinical care for cirrhosis. The paucity of reproducibility data for imaging and blood biomarkers in cirrhosis hinders their application for longitudinal monitoring. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reproducibility of imaging and blood biomarkers in a prospective cohort of adults with cirrhosis. Methods: We prospectively enrolled adults with cirrhosis in an observational, longitudinal cohort study. Participants completed a research visit with vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) with liver stiffness measurement (LSM) and controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) and blood testing, including AST, ALT, platelets, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), and the Fibrosis-4 Index (FIB-4). Biomarkers were repeated a median of 3 months apart without any interim intervention. The primary outcome was the reproducibility of each biomarker as assessed by the reproducibility coefficient (RDC%), within-participant coefficient of variation (wCV), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and Bland–Altman analysis. Results: In total, 40 participants (mean age 62, 60% female, mean BMI 28.6 kg/m 2 ) had VCTE/CAP, 38 AST/ALT, and 26 had AFP at both time points. The RDC% for VCTE-LSM was 54.4, wCV 0.19, and ICC 0.91. VCTE CAP had an RDC% of 56, a wCV of 0.30, and ICC 0.47. AFP had an RDC% of 58, a wCV of 0.21, and an ICC of 0.95. RDC% for AST, ALT, and FIB-4 ranged from 70% to 79%. On Bland–Altman analyses, VCTE-LSM demonstrated the lowest relative bias (0.4%). Conclusions: Prospective assessment of repeat biomarkers in adults with cirrhosis found that VCTE-LSM and CAP provide consistent assessments across individuals but may yield substantial within-individual variation. Blood-based biomarkers had poor reproducibility within individuals but were consistent in detecting between-patient variability. These data can inform ultrasound-based non-invasive testing qualification by defining thresholds that may reflect measurement variability rather than true biologic change over time.

Background: It is crucial to evaluate liver fibrosis in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). Digital pathology, an automated method for quantitative fibrosis measurement, provides valuable support to pathologists by providing refined continuous metrics and addressing inter-observer variability. Although non-invasive tests (NITs) have been validated as consistent with manual pathology, the relationship between digital pathology and NITs remains unexplored. Methods: This study included 99 biopsy-proven MASLD patients. Quantitative-fibrosis (Q-Fibrosis) used second-harmonic generation/two-photon excitation fluorescence microscopy (SHG/TPEF) to quantify fibrosis parameters (q-FPs). Correlations between eight NITs and q-FPs were analyzed. Results: Using manual pathology as standard, Q-Fibrosis exhibited excellent diagnostic performance in fibrosis stages assessment with area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) ranging from 0.924 to 0.967. In addition, magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) achieved the highest diagnostic accuracy (AUC: 0.781–0.977) among the eight NITs. Furthermore, MRE-assessed liver stiffness measurement (MRE-LSM) showed the strongest correlation with q-FPs, particularly adjusted by string length, string width, and the number of short and thick strings within the portal region. Conclusions: Both MRE and digital pathology demonstrated excellent diagnostic accuracy. MRE-LSM was primarily determined by collagen extent, location and pattern, which provide a new perspective for understanding the relationship between the change in MRE and histological fibrosis reverse.

ABSTRACT Background and Aims Clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH; hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) ≥ 10 mmHg) is a severe complication of chronic liver disease, with increased risk of variceal bleeding and liver decompensation (at HVPG ≥ 12 mmHg). This study evaluated the performance of multiparametric (mp)MRI for diagnosing CSPH and predicting liver decompensation, compared to ultrasound‐based shear wave elastography (SWE) and blood tests. Methods In this prospective single‐centre study (2018–2022), 59 patients (M 30, mean age 52.7 years) underwent mpMRI and HVPG measurement, with an average interval of 32 ± 31 days. The mpMRI protocol included 2D/3D MR elastography (MRE), T 1 /proprietary iron‐compensated T 1 (cT 1 )/T 1ρ mapping, gadoxetate‐enhanced dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI (DCE‐MRI) of the liver and spleen, SWE and blood tests. Statistical analyses included Mann–Whitney U tests, ROC analysis, logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models. Results CSPH was present in 13 patients (22%). Several MRI parameters showed high diagnostic performance for CSPH (AUC ≥ 0.8), with spleen stiffness‐2D MRE (AUC 0.88, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.78–0.98) and liver uptake on DCE‐MRI (AUC 0.83, 95% CI 0.70–0.96) performing best, while SWE had AUCs of 0.63 (95% CI 0.45–0.81) for liver and 0.67 (95% CI 0.44–0.89) for spleen. Combining spleen stiffness‐2D MRE and liver uptake achieved an AUC of 0.93 (95% CI 0.86–1.00) for diagnosing CSPH. For predicting decompensation, spleen stiffness‐3D MRE and liver uptake rate had AUCs of 0.83 (95% CI 0.68–0.99) and 0.83 (95% CI 0.70–0.95), respectively, outperforming SWE. Conclusions Spleen stiffness measured with MRE combined with gadoxetate liver uptake (measured with DCE‐MRI) can diagnose CSPH and predict liver decompensation, with superior performance compared to SWE. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03436550

Spatial heterogeneity of liver viscoelasticity, measured at three-dimensional vector MR elastography, positively correlated with metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease progression.