Citations

ABSTRACT Introduction Cardiogenic shock (CS) carries high morbidity and mortality. However, evidence for mechanical circulatory support (MCS) in non‐ischemic CS remains limited, as prior trials have focused on infarct‐related shock. Methods We performed a retrospective cross‐sectional study using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (2017–2019), identifying hospitalizations with a principal diagnosis of CS and excluding acute myocardial infarction. Patients were categorized into mutually exclusive groups: no MCS, intra‐aortic balloon pump (IABP) only, Impella only, or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) only. Primary outcomes were in‐hospital mortality, length of stay (LOS), and total hospital cost. Survey‐weighted multivariable models adjusted for demographics, hospital characteristics, and comorbidity burden using Elixhauser and Charlson indices. Results Among 104 045 hospitalizations, 6040 received MCS. IABP was most common, followed by Impella and ECMO. Among patients receiving a single MCS strategy, overall in‐hospital mortality was 29.5%., with lower mortality in the IABP group (19.9%) compared with Impella (37.4%) and ECMO (44.3%). After adjustment, IABP was associated with lower observed in‐hospital mortality versus no MCS (aOR 0.58, 95% CI 0.53–0.64; p < 0.01), whereas Impella and ECMO showed increased aOR. IABP and ECMO were associated with longer LOS, while Impella was not. All MCS strategies were associated with higher costs, with ECMO showing the greatest increase (cost ratio 3.30, 95% CI 3.12–3.50). Conclusion In non‐ischemic CS, MCS strategies demonstrate distinct profiles of mortality and resource utilization. IABP was associated with lower observed in‐hospital mortality, whereas all MCS were linked to higher costs, highlighting heterogeneity in outcomes and the need for further research.

Autonomous robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) has emerged as a promising objective in biomedical technology, further enhanced by miniaturization toward microrobotic-assisted surgery (μ-RAS). This reduction in scale promises minimally invasive, partially or fully automated surgical procedures, with the potential to reduce patient recovery times, lower medical costs, and enable previously unavailable procedural options. This perspective highlights the specific advances in RAS that potentially map to the microscale (μ-RAS), organized across five surgical domains: endovascular, endoluminal, laparoscopic, ophthalmic, and orthopedic. We examine both clinical demands and technological advances in surgical robotics and identify the key innovations required for progress across these surgical fields. Our contribution is distinct in combining the perspectives of both surgical experts and bioengineering innovators, outlining a roadmap for the advancement and eventual integration of autonomous RAS and μ-RAS into mainstream surgical practice.

Background COVID‐19 and other respiratory viral infections can cause cardiovascular complications. SARS‐CoV‐2 virions are found in the blood, and circulating viral RNA levels are associated with death. We hypothesized that viremia can induce thrombotic endotheliopathy that contributes to death and studied this relationship in patients hospitalized for COVID‐19 and enrolled in the ACTIV‐4a (Accelerating COVID‐19 Therapeutic Interventions and Vaccines) randomized trial of antithrombotic therapy. Methods We quantified SARS‐CoV‐2 nucleocapsid RNA and protein in plasma and measured their associations with clinical outcomes and biomarkers of thromboinflammation and endotheliopathy. We used Cox regression and Fine–Gray competing risk models to analyze survival and thrombosis. We conducted causal mediation analysis to explore whether thrombotic endotheliopathy mediates the relationship between viral RNA and death. Results In 93 patients, SARS‐CoV‐2 RNA and N‐antigen were higher in nonsurvivors. Baseline viral RNA levels were associated with increased 90‐day death (hazard ratio [HR], 1.31 [95% CI, 1.17–1.46]) and thrombosis (HR, 1.35 [95% CI, 1.24–1.47]). Viral RNA more effectively predicted survivorship than N‐antigen levels. Soluble thrombomodulin, a biomarker of thrombotic endotheliopathy, positively correlated with viral RNA levels. Mediation analysis revealed that soluble thrombomodulin accounts for 12.2% (95% CI, 0.1%–32.3%; P =0.048) after adjustment for age and sex of the relationship between viral RNA and the 90‐day mortality rate. Conclusions Elevated plasma SARS‐CoV‐2 RNA levels are associated with death in ACTIV‐4a, which is causally mediated in part by soluble thrombomodulin. We propose that lung–blood viral dissemination is a potential mechanism for cardiovascular complications of respiratory viruses. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique Identifier: NCT04505774.

Abstract Background In 2021, the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation established the Multi‐Disciplinary Post‐Acute Sequelae of SARS‐CoV‐2 Infection Collaborative to provide guidance from established Long COVID clinics for the evaluation and management of Long COVID. The collaborative previously published eight Long COVID consensus guidance statements using a primarily symptom‐based approach. However, Long COVID symptoms most often do not occur in isolation. Aims This compendium aims to equip clinicians with an efficient, up‐to‐date clinical resource for evaluating and managing adults experiencing Long COVID symptoms. The primary intended audience includes physiatrists, primary care physicians, and other clinicians who provide first‐line assessment and management of Long COVID symptoms, especially in settings where subspecialty care is not readily available. This compendium provides a holistic framework for assessment and management, symptom‐specific considerations, and updates on prevalence, health equity, disability considerations, pathophysiology, and emerging evidence regarding treatments under investigation. Because Long COVID closely resembles other infection‐associated chronic conditions (IACCs) such as myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome, the guidance in this compendium may also be helpful for clinicians managing these related conditions. Methods Guidance in this compendium was developed by the collaborative's established modified Delphi approach. The collaborative is a multidisciplinary group whose members include physiatrists, primary care physicians, pulmonologists, cardiologists, psychiatrists, neuropsychologists, neurologists, occupational therapists, physical therapists, speech and language pathologists, patients, and government representatives. Over 40 Long COVID centers are represented in the collaborative. Results Long COVID is defined by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine as “an IACC that occurs after SARS‐CoV‐2 infection and is present for at least 3 months as a continuous, relapsing and remitting, or progressive disease state that affects one or more organ systems.” The current global prevalence of Long COVID is estimated to be 6%. Higher prevalence has been identified among female gender, certain racial and ethnic groups, and individuals who live in nonurban areas. However, anyone can develop Long COVID after being infected with the SARS‐CoV‐2 virus. Long COVID can present as a wide variety of symptom clusters. The most common symptoms include exaggerated fatigue and diminished energy windows, postexertional malaise (PEM)/postexertional symptom exacerbation (PESE), cognitive impairment (brain fog), dysautonomia, pain/myalgias, and smell and taste alterations. Holistic assessment should include a traditional history, physical examination, and additional diagnostic testing, as indicated. A positive COVID‐19 test during acute SARS‐CoV‐2 infection is not required to diagnose Long COVID, and currently, there is no single laboratory finding that is definitively diagnostic for confirming or ruling out the diagnosis of Long COVID. A basic laboratory assessment is recommended for all patients with possible Long COVID, and consideration for additional labs and diagnostic procedures is guided by the patient's specific symptoms. Current management strategies focus on symptom‐based supportive care. Critical considerations include energy conservation strategies and addressing comorbidities and modifiable risk factors. Additionally, (1) it is essential to validate the patient's experience and provide reassurance that their symptoms are being taken seriously because many patients have had their symptoms dismissed by loved ones and clinicians; (2) physical activity recommendations must be carefully tailored to the patient's current activity tolerance because overly intense activity can trigger PEM/PESE and worsened muscle damage; and (3) treatment recommendations should be delivered with humility because there are many persistent unknowns related to Long COVID. To date, there are limited data to guide medication management specifically in the context of Long COVID. As such, medication use generally follows standard practice regarding indications and dosing, with extra attention to prioritize (1) patient preference via shared decision‐making and (2) cautious use of medications that may improve some symptoms (eg, cognitive/attention impairment) but may worsen other symptoms (eg, PEM/PESE). Numerous clinical trials are investigating additional treatments. The return‐to‐work process for individuals with Long COVID can be challenging because symptoms can fluctuate, vary in nature, affect multiple functional areas (eg, physical and cognitive), and often manifest as an “invisible disability” that may not be readily acknowledged by employers or coworkers. Clinicians can help patients return to work by identifying suitable workplace accommodations and resources, providing necessary documentation, and recommending occupational or vocational therapy when needed. If these efforts are unsuccessful and work significantly worsens Long COVID symptoms or impedes recovery, applying for disability may be warranted. Long COVID is recognized as a potential disability under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Conclusion To contribute to the overall health and well‐being for all patients, Long COVID care should be delivered in a holistic manner that acknowledges challenges faced by the patient and uncertainties in the field. For more detailed information on assessment and management of specific Long COVID symptoms, readers can reference the collaborative's symptom‐specific consensus guidance statements.

PURPOSE The TRK inhibitor larotrectinib is US Food and Drug Administration approved for NTRK fusion–positive solid tumors that lack a satisfactory alternative or have progressed after treatment but has not been systematically studied as a frontline therapy with a defined duration of treatment. ADVL1823 evaluated larotrectinib in patients with newly diagnosed NTRK fusion–positive solid tumors with response-adapted duration of therapy and local control. METHODS Patients received larotrectinib twice daily in 28-day cycles for a predefined duration of treatment, ranging from 6 to 26 cycles depending on response to therapy and surgical resectability. The primary end point was the objective response rate (ORR) within six cycles in patients with infantile fibrosarcoma (IFS); patients with other histologic diagnoses were analyzed in a separate cohort. Secondary objectives included event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS Thirty-three patients were enrolled: 18 with IFS and 15 with other solid tumors. The ORR within six cycles was 94% (17/18; 95% adjusted CI, 72.7 to 98.6) among children with IFS and 60% (9/15; 95% CI, 32.3 to 83.7) among children with other solid tumors. Six percent (2/33; 95% CI, 0.7 to 22.2) patients developed progressive disease while on therapy. Two-year EFS and OS among these groups were 82.2% (95% CI, 54.3 to 93.9) and 93.8% (95% CI, 63.2 to 99.1) for IFS and 80% (95% CI, 50.0 to 93.1) and 93.3% (95% CI, 61.3 to 99.0) for other solid tumors, respectively. Patients undergoing surgical resection of their tumor had prolonged EFS, with only 1 of 16 such patients experiencing disease progression. Four of 33 patients had dose-limiting toxicities. CONCLUSION Larotrectinib is highly active in patients with newly diagnosed NTRK fusion–positive solid tumors. Larotrectinib should be a frontline option for patients with IFS and other NTRK fusion–positive solid tumors. Local control with surgical resection remains important in the treatment of patients with IFS.

ObjectivesTo report an autoimmune paraneoplastic encephalitis characterized by immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody targeting synaptic protein calmodulin kinase‐like vesicle‐associated (CAMKV).MethodsSerum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples harboring unclassified antibodies on murine brain‐based indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) were screened by human protein microarray. In 5 patients with identical cerebral IFA staining, CAMKV was identified as top‐ranking candidate antigen. Western blots, confocal microscopy, immune‐absorption, and mass spectrometry were performed to substantiate CAMKV specificity. Recombinant CAMKV‐specific assays (cell‐based [fixed and live] and Western blot) provided additional confirmation.ResultsOf 5 CAMKV‐IgG positive patients, 3 were women (median symptom‐onset age was 59 years; range, 53–74). Encephalitis‐onset was subacute (4) or acute (1) and manifested with: altered mental status (all), seizures (4), hyperkinetic movements (4), psychiatric features (3), memory loss (2), and insomnia (2). Paraclinical testing revealed CSF lymphocytic pleocytosis (all 4 tested), electrographic seizures (3 of 4 tested), and striking MRI abnormalities in all (mesial temporal lobe T2 hyperintensities [all patients], caudate head T2 hyperintensities [3], and cortical diffusion weighted hyperintensities [2]). None had post‐gadolinium enhancement. Cancers were uterine adenocarcinoma (3 patients: poorly differentiated or neuroendocrine‐differentiated in 2, both demonstrated CAMKV immunoreactivity), bladder urothelial carcinoma (1), and non‐Hodgkin lymphoma (1). Two patients developed encephalitis following immune checkpoint inhibitor cancer therapy (atezolizumab [1], pembrolizumab [1]). All treated patients (4) demonstrated an initial response to immunotherapy (corticosteroids [4], IVIG [2]), though 3 died from cancer.InterpretationCAMKV‐IgG is a biomarker of immunotherapy‐responsive paraneoplastic encephalitis with temporal and extratemporal features and uterine cancer as a prominent oncologic association. ANN NEUROL 2024;96:21–33

10008 Background: NTRK1/2/3 gene fusions (TRK fusions) occur in a range of pediatric cancers and are the canonical molecular alterations in IFS. Larotrectinib is a highly selective TRK inhibitor that is FDA-approved for TRK fusion solid tumors in patients with no satisfactory alternative treatments or whose cancer has progressed following initial treatment. ADVL1823 (NCT03834961) evaluated larotrectinib in children with newly diagnosed TRK fusion positive solid tumors in two histology-based cohorts. Cohort A enrolled patients with IFS and is the focus of this analysis. Methods: Newly diagnosed patients ≤30 years old with unresectable or metastatic IFS and a locally identified NTRK gene fusion were eligible for Cohort A utilizing a Simon 2-stage design. Patients received larotrectinib at a dose of 100 mg/m2/dose BID (max of 100 mg/dose) continuously in 28-day cycles until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, the tumor becoming surgically resectable following a minimum of 6 cycles of therapy, or completion of 12 cycles (for those with CR) or 26 cycles (for those with PR) of therapy. The primary endpoint was the centrally confirmed objective response rate within 6 cycles according to RECIST 1.1; response assessment occurred every 2 cycles for the first 6 cycles. The data cutoff was December 31, 2022. Results: Between October 2019 and May 2022, 18 patients with IFS were enrolled from 14 centers. The median age was 2 months (range <1 month to 4.6 years). NTRK fusions included presumed/confirmed ETV6: NTRK3, n=15, NTRK3 (partner unconfirmed), TMP3: NTRK1 and DCTN1: NTRK1, n=1 each, and were identified by FISH (n=8), NGS (n=7), and PCR (n=3). 17 of 18 patients (94%) demonstrated confirmed objective responses (16 PR and 1 CR,) resulting in closure to enrollment after meeting the pre-specified efficacy threshold. The only patient without confirmed response demonstrated 79% tumor reduction after cycle 2, but no confirmatory scan was obtained within the first 6 cycles. No patient discontinued therapy within the first 6 cycles due to disease progression or toxicity. Four (22%) patients had dose limiting toxicities: 2 neutropenia (both CTCAE V5 grade (G)4) and 1 each G3 AST increase and G3 weight loss. All patients resumed therapy following a dose reduction. Treatment-related grade ≥ 3 toxicities occurred in 7 patients, most commonly neutropenia (n=5, 3 G3, 2 G4). Conclusions: Larotrectinib is highly active and well tolerated in newly diagnosed patients with IFS. Enrollment of this very rare molecularly defined patient population was feasible within the COG. Ongoing follow-up will evaluate durability of response after treatment discontinuation at protocol specified response-adapted timepoints with or without surgical resection of tumor. Clinical trial information: NCT03834961 .