Dubey, Divyanshu

Objective To characterize regional brain atrophy patterns, evaluate their association with regional leucine‐rich glioma‐inactivated‐1 ( LGI1 ) gene expression, and identify clinical predictors of hippocampal atrophy in LGI1 autoimmune encephalitis (AE). Methods This study compared regional brain volumes in LGI1‐AE patients versus age‐ and sex‐matched healthy controls (HC) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients. LGI1 gene expression was derived from the Allen Human Brain Atlas. Multivariable linear regression and generalized linear models were utilized. Results A total of 55 LGI1‐AE patients were included. Median age was 68 years (IQR 62.5–74.2 years) at volumetric analysis, after 19 months (IQR 11–45 months) from symptom onset. Compared with HC ( n = 55) and AD patients ( n = 55), LGI1‐AE patients had greater regional atrophy of the hippocampus, insula, caudate, and putamen ( p < 0.002). Longitudinal analyses demonstrated hippocampal and pallidal atrophy after covariate adjustment. Among those who did not fulfill limbic encephalitis criteria and/or had non‐lesional magnetic resonance imaging, limbic and striatal atrophy were identified compared with HC ( p < 0.01). Regions with the greatest differential atrophy corresponded to higher LGI1 gene expression (Spearman ρ = 0.7, p = 0.005). Severe cognitive deficits at diagnosis ( β = −0.56; p = 0.002) and longer disease duration ( β = −0.01; p = 0.001) independently predicted total hippocampal volume ( R 2 = 0.31). Interpretation LGI1‐AE demonstrates a distinct pattern of limbic and striatal atrophy that differs from AD and aligns with regional LGI1 expression, supporting a model of selective network vulnerability. Greater baseline cognitive impairment and longer disease duration independently associated with hippocampal atrophy, underscoring the potential importance of early diagnosis and treatment to limit structural brain injury. ANN NEUROL 2026

ABSTRACT Objective To (1) validate GAD65‐ELISA detection and quantification for type 1 diabetes mellitus and autoimmune neurological diagnoses, (2) correlate ELISA results (reference range < 5 IU/mL) with established radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIA; ≤ 0.02 nmol/L), and (3) define ELISA clinical utility and pitfalls. Methods Serum performance for diabetes (FDA‐cleared, undiluted) was verified, and neurological laboratory‐developed serum and CSF dilution protocols were validated to extend the reportable range beyond > 250 IU/mL. ELISA and RIA values were correlated, including established neurological RIA cut‐offs (serum ≥ 20 nmol/L; CSF any positive). Results ELISA met analytical criteria (precision, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, reference range) in serum and CSF and was clinically equivalent to RIA for autoimmune diabetes. Neurological ELISA cut‐offs were established at 10,000 IU/mL (serum) and 100 IU/mL (CSF). Precision was better below 10,000 IU/mL (CVs < 20%) than above (CVs 30.8% serum; 26.5% CSF). ELISA–RIA correlation and agreement was stronger below the neurological cut‐off (R 2 = 0.89) than above (R 2 = 0.36). Positive agreement for RIA‐defined neurological disease was 100% in serum and CSF; all serums were > 10,000 IU/mL. Clinical specificity was 97.5% in serum and 100% in CSF, exceeding reported RIA specificity. Screen results > 250 IU/mL spanned a wide range of dilution values; many were below the neurological cut‐off. Most patients with paired serum/CSF positivity showed elevated GAD65 IgG indices. Interpretation GAD65 ELISA and RIA have equivalent sensitivity for autoimmune diabetes and neurological testing, with higher specificity for ELISA. A serum cut‐off of 10,000 IU/mL is informative but requires clinical context, and dilution of screen > 250 IU/mL samples is essential for neurological interpretation.

ABSTRACT Objective We sought to characterize the sixth most common finding in our neuroimmunological laboratory practice (tissue assay‐observed unclassified neural antibodies [UNAs]), combining protein microarray and phage immunoprecipitation sequencing (PhIP‐Seq). Methods Patient specimens (258; 133 serums; 125 CSF) meeting UNA criteria were profiled; October 2022–September 2023. Top‐ranking candidate antigens were validated in silico, by dual‐staining confocal microscopy, and ≥ 1 protein‐specific assay. Clinical data were reviewed. Results Among 21 patients, 11 autoantibodies were characterized (serum, 19; CSF, all 9 available). Autoantigens were CACNA1I, 1; CAMK2B, 2; CLIP2, 1; FMN2, 2; MAP1A, 2; MAP2, 5; NECAB1, 1; SNAP91, 3; SRCIN1, 1; SYNJ1, 1; SYT3, 2. Analytical validation was by confocal TIIFA (all), western blot (10/10 available), and cell‐based assay (5/5 performed). Clinical accompaniments were: encephalitis, 6; brainstem encephalitis, 2; encephalomyelitis, 2; cerebellar ataxia, 2; longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis (LETM), 2; sensory neuronopathy, 1; peripheral neuropathy, 4, and movement disorders, 2. Inflammatory MRI abnormalities were identified in 5/16 patients (31%) with CNS disorders: T2 signal change (2), LETM (2), leptomeningeal enhancement (1). Seven of 8 (88%) had inflammatory CSF (pleocytosis, 5 [median 25.5 cells, range 7–294]; elevated IgG index/synthesis rate, 4; CSF‐exclusive oligoclonal bands, 4). Six had paraneoplastic causation (lung cancer, 2; other, 4); 3 were postinfectious (1 each of COVID‐19, HSV‐1, and post‐Group A streptococcal infection). Of 9 immunotherapy‐treated patients, 5 improved. Interpretation UNAs are partly accounted for by a repertoire of diverse mostly intracellular synaptic antigens. Their characterization is expedited by protein arrays and PhIPSeq. Further individual studies are needed to assess them as disease biomarkers.

ABSTRACT Objectives To investigate the value of cytokine, chemokine, and neurofilament light chain (NfL) concentrations in predicting relapse risk, chronic epilepsy, and functional impairment in LGI1 autoimmune encephalitis (AE). Methods Cytokines/chemokines (IL‐1‐beta, IL‐2, IL‐4, IL‐5, IL‐6, IL‐8/CXCL8, IL‐10, IL‐12p70, IL‐13, IL‐17A, GM‐CSF, TNF‐alpha, IFN‐gamma, CXCL9, CXCL10, CXCL13, BAFF) and NfL concentrations were measured in CSF and paired serum from LGI1‐AE patients evaluated at Mayo Clinic (01/2015–02/2024), using a multiplex immunoassay system (ELLA, Bio‐Techne) and correlated with clinical outcomes. A laboratory‐based cohort of LGI1‐IgG‐positive patients and control cohorts, including patients with mixed non‐inflammatory disorders (MNID), Alzheimer's disease (AD), and temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) were analyzed. Results Forty‐four patients with LGI1‐AE were included; 29 (66%) were male, with a median age of 68.5 years (range, 8–85). Median time from symptom onset to CSF sampling was eight months (IQR, 3–17); 19/42 (45%) experienced a clinical relapse and 27% developed chronic epilepsy. Serum IL‐6, serum and CSF IL‐8/CXCL8, and IL‐17A were higher in LGI1‐IgG positive patients than MNID ( p < 0.05). TLE cytokine/chemokine profiles were similar to LGI1 AE; AD patients had lower serum IL‐6 and CSF IL‐8/CXCL8 ( p = 0.04; p = 0.01), and higher serum IL‐17A and GM‐CSF ( p = 0.004; p = 0.01) than LGI1‐AE. Higher CSF IL‐6 and IL‐8/CXCL8 in LGI1‐AE associated with clinical relapse ( p < 0.05) and higher CSF NfL associated with chronic epilepsy ( p = 0.01). Conclusion Elevations in IL‐6, IL‐8/CXCL8, and IL‐17A were identified in this LGI1‐AE cohort. CSF IL‐6, IL‐8/CXCL8, and NfL levels are potential prognostic biomarkers for risk of relapse and chronic epilepsy in LGI1‐AE.

ABSTRACTCavin‐4 was identified as a potential autoantigen for immune‐mediated rippling muscle disease (iRMD). To validate this, we developed and tested various immunoassays, including a cell‐based assay (CBA), cavin‐4 recombinant protein ELISA, and multi‐peptide ELISA. Among 19 iRMD patients, all exhibited muscle rippling, and 13 had percussion‐induced mounding. All immunoassays demonstrated clinical and analytical specificities greater than 95%. The protein ELISA had the highest sensitivity (94.7%) and specificity (99.9%), outperforming CBA (sensitivity 89.5%, specificity 99.6%) and the multi‐peptide ELISA (sensitivity 79.0%, specificity 97.2%). Our results suggest that the cavin‐4 protein ELISA is a promising tool for high‐throughput clinical testing in iRMD.

AbstractObjectiveWe describe neurologic phenotype, clinical associations, and outcomes in autoimmune brainstem encephalitis.MethodsMedical records of neural‐IgG positive autoimmune brainstem encephalitis patients diagnosed at Mayo Clinic (January 1, 2006–December 31, 2022) were reviewed.ResultsNinety‐eight patients (57 male) were included. Median age of symptom onset was 51 years (range, 8 months‐85 years). Frequent presenting features were ≥1: diplopia (80%), ataxia (78%), dysarthria (68%), vestibulocochlear symptoms (67%), dysphagia (61%), nausea/vomiting (42%), and facial weakness (32%). Altered mental status (11%) was uncommon. Neural antibodies detected were as follows: KLHL‐11 (26 patients), GAD65 (high titer, 12), ANNA‐1 (anti‐Hu, 8), ANNA‐2 (anti‐Ri, 8), Ma2 (7), IgLON‐5 (6), AQP4 (6), MOG (4), glycine receptor (4), GQ1B (4), PCA‐1 (anti‐Yo, 4), DPPX (2), neurochondrin (2), neurofilament (2), NMDA‐R (2), AGNA‐1 (SOX‐1, 1), ANNA‐3 (DACH1, 1), amphiphysin (1), CRMP‐5 (1), ITPR‐1 (1), PCA‐Tr (DNER, 1), and PDE10A (1). Cancer was identified in 55 patients: germ cell (23 patients; 3 extra‐testicular), ductal breast adenocarcinoma (8), small cell carcinoma (6, lung 4), adenocarcinomas (6), neuroendocrine carcinoma (3), hematologic (2), squamous cell (2), and other (7). Median modified Ranking score (mRS) at last follow‐up was 3 (range, 0–6). Factors associated with poor outcome included abnormal brain MRI, bulbar symptoms, and elevated CSF IgG index. Kaplan–Meier analysis revealed faster progression to wheelchair in patients who were immunotherapy refractory and with elevated CSF IgG index. Diagnostic criteria for autoimmune brainstem encephalitis (definite and probable) are proposed.InterpretationAutoimmune brainstem encephalitis is a distinct clinical subphenotype of autoimmune encephalitis. Abnormal brain MRI, bulbar symptoms, and elevated CSF‐IgG index associate with poor outcome.

AbstractObjectiveTo describe the phenotypes, oncological associations, biomarker profiles, and outcomes across different age groups in patients with ANNA1 (anti‐Hu) autoimmunity.MethodsA retrospective review of patients with ANNA1‐IgG in serum/CSF between January 1, 2001, and December 31,2019 was performed. Patients were classified into three groups based on the age of symptom onset. Phage immunoprecipitation sequencing (PhIP‐Seq) and neurofilament light chain (NfL) measurements were done in patient sera/CSF with archived samples.ResultsOf 122 patients, 81 (66%), 20 (16%), and 21 (17%) patients belonged to older adults, young adults, and pediatric groups, respectively. Lung cancer and neuromuscular presentations were more common in older adults (p < 0.001), while limbic encephalitis and neuroblastoma were more common in pediatric patients (p < 0.005). Most young adults (75%) did not have cancer identified. Proportions of patients with a favorable response to immunotherapy were 20%, 30%, and 52% among older adults, young adults, and pediatric groups, respectively. PhIP‐Seq demonstrated significant enrichment for ELAVL4 peptides especially for amino acids 240–289, in the majority of samples evaluated (36/67, 54%). ZIC and SOX2 peptides were significantly enriched in those with central nervous system presentations. Serum NfL levels were elevated in patients with cancer and those with poor long‐term outcomes.InterpretationYoung adults with ANNA1 autoimmunity phenotypically resembled older adults but rarely had an underlying cancer. Pediatric patients frequently presented with limbic encephalitis and neuroblastoma and often responded favorably to immunotherapy. Distinct antigenic signatures may underlie differences in clinical presentations. Serum NfL levels may be a biomarker of poor long‐term outcomes in ANNA1 autoimmunity.

ObjectivesTo report an autoimmune paraneoplastic encephalitis characterized by immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody targeting synaptic protein calmodulin kinase‐like vesicle‐associated (CAMKV).MethodsSerum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples harboring unclassified antibodies on murine brain‐based indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) were screened by human protein microarray. In 5 patients with identical cerebral IFA staining, CAMKV was identified as top‐ranking candidate antigen. Western blots, confocal microscopy, immune‐absorption, and mass spectrometry were performed to substantiate CAMKV specificity. Recombinant CAMKV‐specific assays (cell‐based [fixed and live] and Western blot) provided additional confirmation.ResultsOf 5 CAMKV‐IgG positive patients, 3 were women (median symptom‐onset age was 59 years; range, 53–74). Encephalitis‐onset was subacute (4) or acute (1) and manifested with: altered mental status (all), seizures (4), hyperkinetic movements (4), psychiatric features (3), memory loss (2), and insomnia (2). Paraclinical testing revealed CSF lymphocytic pleocytosis (all 4 tested), electrographic seizures (3 of 4 tested), and striking MRI abnormalities in all (mesial temporal lobe T2 hyperintensities [all patients], caudate head T2 hyperintensities [3], and cortical diffusion weighted hyperintensities [2]). None had post‐gadolinium enhancement. Cancers were uterine adenocarcinoma (3 patients: poorly differentiated or neuroendocrine‐differentiated in 2, both demonstrated CAMKV immunoreactivity), bladder urothelial carcinoma (1), and non‐Hodgkin lymphoma (1). Two patients developed encephalitis following immune checkpoint inhibitor cancer therapy (atezolizumab [1], pembrolizumab [1]). All treated patients (4) demonstrated an initial response to immunotherapy (corticosteroids [4], IVIG [2]), though 3 died from cancer.InterpretationCAMKV‐IgG is a biomarker of immunotherapy‐responsive paraneoplastic encephalitis with temporal and extratemporal features and uterine cancer as a prominent oncologic association. ANN NEUROL 2024;96:21–33

Objective The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic utility of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibodies (MOG‐IgG) testing. Methods We retrospectively identified patients for CSF MOG‐IgG testing from January 1, 1996, to May 1, 2023, at Mayo Clinic and other medical centers that sent CSF MOG‐IgG for testing including: controls, 282; serum MOG‐IgG positive MOG antibody‐associated disease (MOGAD), 74; serum MOG‐IgG negative high‐risk phenotypes, 73; serum false positive MOG‐IgG with alternative diagnoses, 18. A live cell‐based assay assessed CSF MOG‐IgG positivity (IgG‐binding‐index [IBI], ≥2.5) using multiple anti‐human secondary antibodies and end‐titers were calculated if sufficient sample volume. Correlation of CSF MOG‐IgG IBI and titer was assessed. Results The pan‐IgG Fc‐specific secondary was optimal, yielding CSF MOG‐IgG sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 98% (Youden's index 0.88). CSF MOG‐IgG was positive in: 4/282 (1.4%) controls; 66/74 (89%) serum MOG‐IgG positive MOGAD patients; and 9/73 (12%) serum MOG‐IgG negative patients with high‐risk phenotypes. Serum negative but CSF positive MOG‐IgG accounted for 9/83 (11%) MOGAD patients, and all fulfilled 2023 MOGAD diagnostic criteria. Subgroup analysis of serum MOG‐IgG low‐positives revealed CSF MOG‐IgG positivity more in MOGAD (13/16[81%]) than other diseases with false positive serum MOG‐IgG (3/15[20%]) ( p = 0.01). CSF MOG‐IgG IBI and CSF MOG‐IgG titer (both available in 29 samples) were correlated (Spearman's r = 0.64, p < 0.001). Interpretation CSF MOG‐IgG testing has diagnostic utility in patients with a suspicious phenotype but negative serum MOG‐IgG, and those with low positive serum MOG‐IgG results and diagnostic uncertainty. These findings support a role for CSF MOG‐IgG testing in the appropriate clinical setting. ANN NEUROL 2024;96:34–45

AbstractRecent studies have reported the involvement of peripheral nervous system (PNS) in association with MOG‐IgG, including isolated neuropathies. In this retrospective study we characterized the PNS involvement in MOG antibody associated disease (MOGAD). Six out of 215 MOGAD patients had PNS involvement (all polyradiculopathy) that occurred concurrently with a CNS demyelinating episode. We also demonstrated MOG expression in healthy human controls' proximal nerve root. Nine patients with true‐positive MOG‐IgG1 had PNS involvement temporally unrelated to a CNS demyelinating event. All these patients had an alternate etiology of PNS involvement. Isolated peripheral neuropathy is not a feature of MOGAD, but inflammatory nerve root involvement can occur concurrently with CNS demyelinating events.