Citations

ABSTRACT Objectives To investigate pharmacological treatment patterns in individuals with bipolar disorder (BD) with and without comorbid substance use disorder (SUD) and anxiety disorder (AX), we leveraged the Global Bipolar Cohort to analyze cross‐regional practices across North America, Europe, and the Pacific. Methods Fourteen cohorts contributed aggregate data on pharmacotherapy, demographics, diagnostic subtypes, and comorbidities. Proportional meta‐analyses using generalized linear mixed models were conducted to examine prescription trends and identify clinical differences. Results The sample ( N = 11,521) was 60% female and 84% Caucasian. Participants were categorized into four mutually exclusive groups based on comorbidity status: those with comorbid AX only, comorbid SUD only, both AX and SUD, or neither. The AX+SUD subgroup showed higher rates of attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), post‐traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), rapid cycling, obesity, and unemployment, reflecting a more severe clinical profile. Regional variations were notable: North American cohorts reported higher prevalence of AX and SUD than European and Pacific cohorts. Antidepressants use for AX were more common in Europe and the Pacific, while North American prescribing patterns were more variable. Benzodiazepine use was high among individuals with SUD across all regions. Lithium and first‐generation antipsychotic prescriptions varied, with higher rates observed in Europe. Conclusions Findings underscore the heterogeneity of BD and the influence of comorbid AX and SUD on illness burden and treatment. Regional prescribing variations underscore the need for context‐specific guidelines. Gaps in data on medication‐assisted treatment for SUD point to areas for future research. These insights can support more individualized and effective care for complex BD presentations.

AbstractBackgroundHearing loss occurs commonly with age and is more prevalent among adults with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) or Alzheimer’s Disease and related dementias (ADRD) than among older adults with typical cognitive abilities. Over‐the‐counter (OTC) hearing aids are a recently approved, lower‐cost method of hearing treatment which can be accessed directly by patients. However, there are almost no data which can guide whether to recommend this treatment for adults with MCI or ADRD. OTC aids also have technology constraints that may limit their benefit for wearers with ADRD, who have specific communication and rehabilitation needs.MethodParticipants in this randomized clinical trial will be recruited at the time of diagnosis of either MCI or early ADRD. The trial design embeds a brief hearing assessment within the structure of a memory assessment at Geriatrics and Neurology clinics, in both urban (Madison, WI) and rural (La Crosse, WI) settings. Trial participants will be randomized to receive either OTC aids or communication strategies tailored for adults with cognitive decline. To maximize access for patients (including patients from rural or underserved areas), treatment will be delivered via telehealth. Outcomes will be measured at baseline and after one month of use of the OTC hearing aids or communication strategies. The primary outcome is subjective assessment of dyadic communication by the listener’s primary communication partner. Additional outcomes include hearing‐related quality of life and a novel assessment of communication ability using structured conversation analysis.ResultThis presentation will describe the trial design, expertise and roles of the multidisciplinary study team, mechanism of treatment delivery via telehealth, and planned outcome measurements.ConclusionResults of this trial will provide important evidence to guide treatment recommendations in community‐dwelling older adults with MCI or early ADRD. This project will also establish feasibility of conducting hearing assessment as part of a memory assessment.

Abstract Objectives To understand treatment practices for bipolar disorders (BD), this study leveraged the Global Bipolar Cohort collaborative network to investigate pharmacotherapeutic treatment patterns in multiple cohorts of well‐characterized individuals with BD in North America, Europe, and Australia. Methods Data on pharmacotherapy, demographics, diagnostic subtypes, and comorbidities were provided from each participating cohort. Individual site and regional pooled proportional meta‐analyses with generalized linear mixed methods were conducted to identify prescription patterns. Results This study included 10,351 individuals from North America ( n = 3985), Europe ( n = 3822), and Australia ( n = 2544). Overall, participants were predominantly female (60%) with BD‐I (60%; vs. BD‐II = 33%). Cross‐sectionally, mood‐stabilizing anticonvulsants (44%), second‐generation antipsychotics (42%), and antidepressants (38%) were the most prescribed medications. Lithium was prescribed in 29% of patients, primarily in the Australian (31%) and European (36%) cohorts. First‐generation antipsychotics were prescribed in 24% of the European versus 1% in the North American cohort. Antidepressant prescription rates were higher in BD‐II (47%) compared to BD‐I (35%). Major limitations were significant differences among cohorts based on inclusion/exclusion criteria, data source, and time/year of enrollment into cohort. Conclusions Mood‐stabilizing anticonvulsants, second‐generation antipsychotics, and antidepressants were the most prescribed medications suggesting prescription patterns that are not necessarily guideline concordant. Significant differences exist in the prescription practices across different geographic regions, especially the underutilization of lithium in the North American cohorts and the higher utilization of first‐generation antipsychotics in the European cohorts. There is a need to conduct future longitudinal studies to further explore these differences and their impact on outcomes, and to inform and implement evidence‐based guidelines to help improve treatment practices in BD.

Objective Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody‐associated disease (MOGAD) can be monophasic or relapsing, with early relapse being a feature. However, the relevance of early relapse on longer‐term relapse risk is unknown. Here, we investigate whether early relapses increase longer‐term relapse risk in patients with MOGAD. Methods A retrospective analysis of 289 adult‐ and pediatric‐onset patients with MOGAD followed for at least 2 years in 6 specialized referral centers. “Early relapses” were defined as attacks within the first 12 months from onset, with “very early relapses” defined within 30 to 90 days from onset and “delayed early relapses” defined within 90 to 365 days. “Long‐term relapses” were defined as relapses beyond 12 months. Cox regression modeling and Kaplan–Meier survival analysis were used to estimate the long‐term relapse risk and rate. Results Sixty‐seven patients (23.2%) had early relapses with a median number of 1 event. Univariate analysis revealed an elevated risk for long‐term relapses if any “early relapses” were present (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.11, p < 0.001), whether occurring during the first 3 months (HR = 2.70, p < 0.001) or the remaining 9 months (HR = 1.88, p = 0.001), with similar results yielded in the multivariate analysis. In children with onset below aged 12 years, only delayed early relapses were associated with an increased risk of long‐term relapses (HR = 2.64, p = 0.026). Interpretation The presence of very early relapses and delayed early relapses within 12 months of onset in patients with MOGAD increases the risk of long‐term relapsing disease, whereas a relapse within 90 days appears not to indicate a chronic inflammatory process in young pediatric‐onset disease. ANN NEUROL 2023;94:508–517

AbstractObjectivesPersistent functional impairment is common in bipolar disorder (BD) and is influenced by a number of demographic, clinical, and cognitive features. The goal of this project was to estimate and compare the influence of key factors on community function in multiple cohorts of well‐characterized samples of individuals with BD.MethodsThirteen cohorts from 7 countries included n = 5882 individuals with BD across multiple sites. The statistical approach consisted of a systematic uniform application of analyses across sites. Each site performed a logistic regression analysis with empirically derived “higher versus lower function” as the dependent variable and selected clinical and demographic variables as predictors.ResultsWe found high rates of functional impairment, ranging from 41 to 75%. Lower community functioning was associated with depressive symptoms in 10 of 12 of the cohorts that included this variable in the analysis. Lower levels of education, a greater number of prior mood episodes, the presence of a comorbid substance use disorder, and a greater total number of psychotropic medications were also associated with low functioning.ConclusionsThe bipolar clinical research community is poised to work together to characterize the multi‐dimensional contributors to impairment and address the barriers that impede patients' complete recovery. We must also identify the core features which enable many to thrive and live successfully with BD. A large‐scale, worldwide, prospective longitudinal study focused squarely on BD and its heterogeneous presentations will serve as a platform for discovery and promote major advances toward optimizing outcomes for every individual with this illness.