Redenbaugh, Vyanka

ABSTRACT Objective The optimal treatment for neurosarcoidosis myelitis is uncertain. We characterize incident neurosarcoidosis myelitis and assess treatment response by MRI and clinical scales. Methods Incident probable or definite neurosarcoidosis myelitis in adults was retrospectively identified from 13 academic medical centers. Cases were analyzed by initial treatment. The primary outcome was T1 post‐contrast gadolinium enhancement resolution at 6 months post‐treatment. Secondary outcomes were changes in modified Rankin scale (mRS) and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) from nadir to final follow‐up. Results Two hundred two patients were identified (median diagnosis age: 47 years (IQR 39–55); male: female 1.3:1). Median nadir mRS and EDSS were 2 (IQR 2–3) and 4 (IQR 2.5–6). At initial treatment, 129 (63.9%) received prolonged corticosteroids ≥ 4 weeks (group A 1 ), 36 (17.8%) received corticosteroids < 4 weeks (B 1 ), 21 (10.4%) received corticosteroids plus sarcoidosis‐directed immunosuppressant (E), and 16 (7.9%) received corticosteroids plus non‐sarcoidosis‐directed agents (F). In 167 cases with sufficient imaging, there were no significant differences in contrast enhancement resolution at 6 months (A 1 27/106 (25.5%), B 1 9/28 (32.1%), E 5/19 (26.3%), F 5/14 (35.7%); Fisher's exact p = 0.76). There were no significant differences in changes in mRS or EDSS among treatment groups (Kruskal–Wallis p = 0.69 and 0.63, respectively) after median follow‐up of 46.5 months (IQR 18–91.3). Interpretation Different initial immunosuppression strategies did not correlate with MRI contrast enhancement resolution at 6 months or clinical scales (mRS, EDSS). However, conclusions are limited by retrospective design, imbalanced cohorts, and insensitivity of binary MRI outcomes and available clinical scales for treatment response in neurosarcoidosis.

Background: Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM) is a demyelinating syndrome observed in myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease (MOGAD) but there are limited data on application of this definition to its cerebral attacks or in adults with this disease. Methods: We analyzed patients from the Mayo Clinic MOGAD cohort ( n = 263) with cerebral attacks. We assessed whether children (<18 years-old) and adults (⩾18 years-old) fulfilled the 2013 ADEM definition. Results: We identified 89 patients (children, 34; adults, 55) and 55/89 (62%) were of female sex. Acute magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) abnormalities included: poorly demarcated T2 lesions (white matter, 85 (96%); deep gray matter, 41 (46%); T1-hypointense lesions (42 (47%)). Forty-two patients did not fulfill the ADEM definition due to: monofocal syndrome, 9; or no encephalopathy, 33. The remaining 47 patients (53%: children, 27/34 (79%); adults, 20/55 (36%)) fulfilled the ADEM definition, and 14 had preceding attacks, and 34 had subsequent attacks relative to ADEM episode. The features in children and adults with ADEM were broadly comparable. Conclusion: Applying the ADEM definition to MOGAD cerebral attacks highlighted that an update of the 2013 ADEM definition would be beneficial and could explicitly state its application to both adults and children and allow it to be applied to attacks at any time during the disease course.

Background Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease (MOGAD) and multiple sclerosis (MS) have both overlapping and distinct MRI lesion features, which vary with imaging timing. This study identified distinguishing MRI characteristics using paired MRIs at clinical attack and remission. Methods We retrospectively identified Mayo Clinic patients with MOGAD and MS that: (1) fulfilled respective diagnostic criteria; (2) had paired attack (≤30 days) and remission MRI scans (≥12 months) without interval attacks. MRIs were compared between groups for key features. Results We included 43 patients with MOGAD (median age 31 years (range, 3–67); 63% female) and 49 patients with MS (median age 39 years (range, 17–65); 65% female). Resolution of at least one T2-lesion differentiated MOGAD from MS (sensitivity, (95% CI 77% to 100%), specificity, (95% CI 86% to 99%); Youden’s index (YI)=0.90). Resolution of at least two T2-lesions indicated MOGAD (sensitivity 62% (95% CI 41% to 79%); specificity, 100% (95% CI 94% to 100%); YI=0.62). MOGAD patients were more likely to have normal MRI scans at follow-up compared with MS (brain 14/44 (32%) vs 0/60 (0%), p<0.001; spine 21/27 (78%) vs 7/36 (19%), p<0.001). In addition, the presence of T1-hypointense, ovoid periventricular T2, and enhancing lesions were more common in MS versus MOGAD at attack and remission and in the spine, longitudinally extensive T2 lesions were more common in MOGAD attacks (8/27 (30%)). Conclusion Paired MRI at attack and remission revealed distinctive characteristics of MOGAD and MS, with greater diagnostic value at remission driven by the discriminating power of T2-lesion resolution. In MOGAD patients with initial parenchymal involvement, a 1-year follow-up MRI may aid diagnosis and serve as a new baseline.

AbstractObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of dried blood spot (DBS) compared with conventional serum Aquaporin‐4‐IgG (AQP4‐IgG) testing.MethodsProspective multicenter diagnostic study was conducted between April 2018 and October 2023 across medical centers in the United States, Uganda, and the Republic of Guinea. Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) patients and controls collected blood on filter paper cards along with concurrent serum samples. These samples underwent analysis using flow cytometric live‐cell‐based assays (CBA) and enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to determine AQP4 serostatus. The accuracy of AQP4‐IgG detection between DBS and serum (gold standard) was compared.ResultsAmong 150 participants (47 cases, 103 controls), there was a strong correlation between DBS and serum samples (Spearman's correlation coefficient of 0.82). The AUC was 0.97 (95% CI: 0.92–0.99). AQP4‐IgG detection through DBS showed 87.0% sensitivity (95% CI: 0.74–0.95) and 100% specificity (95% CI: 0.96–1.00) using CBA, and 65.2% sensitivity (95% CI: 0.43–0.84) and 95.2% specificity (95% CI: 0.76–0.99) using ELISA. Serum ELISA demonstrated 69.6% sensitivity (95% CI: 0.47–0.87) and 98.4% specificity (95% CI: 0.91–0.99). The stability of DBS in detecting AQP4‐IgG persisted over 24 months for most cases.InterpretationThe DBS represents a viable alternative for detecting AQP4‐IgG in resource‐limited settings to diagnose NMOSD, offering high sensitivity and specificity comparable to serum testing. Moreover, DBS has low shipping costs, is easy to administer, and is suitable for point‐of‐care testing.