Citations

ABSTRACT Prolonged operative time is associated with increased surgical complications, resource utilization, and cost. While factors such as surgeon experience and patient habitus are well recognized, the impact of anatomical anomalies and variations remains poorly quantified. This systematic review evaluates the influence of abdominal structural anomalies and anatomical variations on operative time. Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, a search of PubMed (2000–2025) identified 82 eligible studies. Operative‐time impact was assessed using added operative time relative to reference benchmarks. The unit of analysis was the procedure‐level observation. Observations were stratified by procedure category and surgical complexity and summarized using median added operative time and range. Among procedure‐level observations with available benchmarks, 13 of 14 (92.9%) structural anomalies, 48 of 54 (88.9%) situs inversus cases, and 10 of 11 (90.9%) other anatomical variants demonstrated increased operative time relative to baseline. Structural anomalies were associated with larger median increases, particularly in colorectal procedures, whereas anatomical variations demonstrated a more heterogeneous effect across procedural systems. Higher‐complexity procedures, including pancreatic operations, showed greater absolute increases in operative time. Preoperative identification of anatomical differences was associated with attenuation of operative delays. Structural anomalies are frequently associated with increased operative duration, whereas anatomical variations demonstrate a more variable and context‐dependent effect. The magnitude of operative time impact is influenced by procedural complexity and preoperative planning. Incorporating anatomical variability into surgical planning may reduce avoidable operative delays and improve operative efficiency.

ABSTRACT Femoral nerve block is an essential regional anesthetic technique for surgery and analgesia of the anterior thigh, hip, and knee. Its effectiveness depends on understanding the femoral nerve's origin, branching pattern, fascial relationships, and common anatomical variations. This review summarizes current anatomical, cadaveric, and imaging studies to clarify the course of the femoral nerve and highlight variations such as high divisions, accessory branches, and vascular overlap that may influence block success. Approaches including landmark, nerve stimulator, and ultrasound‐guided techniques are reviewed with emphasis on procedural anatomy. Ultrasound features of the femoral nerve and fascia iliaca are correlated with cadaveric findings to outline optimal needle placement and spread of injectate. Continuous catheter methods, anesthetic selection, and volume considerations are also described. Comparative evidence indicates that ultrasound guidance improves accuracy, reduces vascular puncture, and decreases local anesthetic requirements compared with blind or stimulator‐based approaches. Clinical applications across orthopedic surgery, trauma care, and multimodal perioperative pathways are discussed, along with potential complications such as nerve injury, hematoma, systemic toxicity, and quadriceps weakness. Specifically, detailed knowledge of the femoral nerve's course beneath the fascia iliaca, its shifting proximity to the femoral vessels, and its variable early branching is the key to accurate needle placement, dependable block success, and fewer procedure‐related complications.

ABSTRACT Anatomical descriptions of left‐sided oblique coronary branches remain inconsistent, hindering imaging interpretation and surgical planning. To quantify the prevalence, branching patterns and morphometry of the ramus intermedius (RI) and diagonal branches, and propose a unified nomenclature. Following PRISMA guidelines, a PubMed search up to 12 June 2025 yielded 623 records. Forty‐six studies involving 25,602 hearts were included, and random‐effects meta‐analysis was applied to pool prevalence and continuous outcomes. Overall, an additional left‐main branch (RI) was present in 25.2% (95% CI: 8.7–54.5). Trifurcation dominated (22.7%), whereas quadrifurcation and pentafurcation occurred in 3.7% and 1.3% respectively. The pooled RI/diagonal diameter averaged 2.21 mm (95% CI 2.02–2.39), and mean branch length was 49.1 mm (95% CI 37.8–60.5). Methodological heterogeneity was high but consistent patterns emerged across cadaveric and imaging modalities. An oblique “diagonal artery”, whether arising from the left main (RI) or anterior interventricular artery, is present in roughly 25% of hearts, averages 2.2 mm in caliber and extends to 49 mm. Recognizing this vessel family and standardizing the term “diagonal arteries” will improve coronary imaging reporting and guide revascularization strategies.

When encountering diseases of the anterior vitreous and peripheral retina (ie, the “middle segment” of the eye), vitreoretinal (VR) surgeons are specifically trained in surgical techniques for managing the vitreous and visualizing the peripheral retina during anterior vitrectomy, and therefore, they are well equipped to address the complications of surgery involving the anterior vitreous space. This clinical update reviews and compares the current literature discussing techniques and patient outcomes related to complete pars plana vitrectomy versus incomplete, subtotal pars plana vitrectomy, and addresses the proposition of developing an abridged training curriculum for non-VR surgeons to acquire the knowledge and skills required to perform these procedures. Recent studies confirmed that operating in the anterior vitreous carries potential risk of retinal tear, retinal detachment, and other adverse events that may cause vision loss. To mitigate these risks, studies suggest that the use of dedicated visualization equipment and illumination instruments is necessary for surgeons to safely perform anterior vitrectomy and recognize complications, should any occur. Performing VR surgery in the absence of wide-angle viewing systems, endoillumination, careful peripheral examinations, modern vitrectomy platforms, and appropriate training may lead to outcomes that are detrimental to patient safety.

Health problems associated with post-acute COVID-19, also known as “Long COVID,” range from mild to severe. The best defense against this potentially serious condition is to prevent COVID-19 infection and reinfection. The same preventive measures for COVID-19 may be used to help prevent the spread of Long COVID. This study used the Health Belief Model (HBM) to examine whether and how public understanding and awareness of Long COVID and its prevention shape the adoption of COVID-19 preventive behaviors. N = 605 English-speaking U.S.-based adults were recruited via Qualtrics. Predictors of intention to carry out COVID-19 preventive behaviors were investigated. Outcomes included behaviors relevant to preventing both acute and Long COVID. Across all models, except the one examining intent to get a vaccine booster, Black respondents were more likely than White respondents to express intent to carry out COVID-19 preventive behaviors. In addition, HBM constructs added significantly to the regression models. Susceptibility to Long COVID was significant for all behavioral outcomes (all p s < .05), self-efficacy for wearing a mask ( p < .001), and self-efficacy for testing for COVID-19 after exposure and before a social event ( p s < .001). In addition, perceived benefits for Long COVID prevention predicted intent of mask-wearing ( p < .001), testing before a social event ( p = .002), and getting a vaccine booster ( p = .001). Perceived severity of Long COVID did not significantly predict adherence to preventive behaviors. U.S. adults are more likely to express intent to carry out COVID-19 preventive behaviors, such as masking and receiving booster vaccines, when they report feeling greater susceptibility to Long COVID as well as greater self-efficacy for engaging in these preventive behaviors. Public health messaging about Long COVID with incorporation of HBM constructs may be an effective means of increasing continued recommended COVID-19 preventive behaviors, which also hold co-benefits for prevention of infections, such as influenza and measles, as well as emerging viruses such as avian flu.

e19521 Background: Blindedindependent central review (BICR) committees are often established for oncology trials to assessbestoverall response (BOR), while real-world (RW) studies typically rely on physician-assessed responses. To emulate clinical trial rigor, a BICR committee was implemented in the R5458-ONC-21101 RW data-derived external control arm study (NCT05673967) to evaluate BOR using International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria. A pre-specified concordance analysis compared BOR assessments between the BICR committee and treating site physicians. Methods: RW data were obtained from chart reviews at 15 participating International Myeloma Foundation IMWG sites. The BICR committee, comprised of three multiple myeloma experts, evaluated BOR through consensus voting. Per protocol, the committee reviewed case report forms consisting of data on serum and urine myeloma protein and free light chain levels; and, where available, bone marrow plasma cell percentage, presence of plasmacytomas, and bone lesion changes. Concordance between BICR- and physician-assessed BOR was evaluated for objective response rate defined as ≥partial response (PR), ≥very good partial response (VGPR), ≥complete response (CR), and stringent complete response (sCR), with non-evaluable responses excluded from the analysis. Cohen’s kappa (κ) was used to measure agreement, with values >0.6 indicating strong concordance. 1 Results: Of 279 evaluable lines of therapy from 203 patients (Table), the BOR of ≥PR was 45.2% by BICR assessment and 42.3% by treating physicians (κ=0.622). Concordance improved for BOR of ≥VGPR (22.2% by BICR vs 24.7% by treating physicians; κ=0.731) but was low for BOR of ≥CR (3.9% vs. 10.8%; κ=0.508) and sCR (1.1% vs. 4.7%; κ=0.364). Conclusions: BICR- and physician-assessed responses showed strong concordance for BOR of ≥PR and ≥VGPR. However, as expected, lower concordance for ≥CR and sCR was observed, as evaluation of CR per IMWG criteria requires a bone marrow biopsy, which is rarely performed in clinical practice. While the reliability of CR and sCR in RW data is less certain, these results suggest that BOR of ≥VGPR or ≥PR may be reliably ascertained in academic settings based on treating physician evaluations. 1. Landis JR, Koch GG. Biometrics 1977;33(1):159–74. Clinical trial information: NCT05673967 . Agreement of BICR- and physician-assessed responses. BICR assessed Physician assessed Observed agreement, % Cohen’s kappa* Number of evaluable lines of therapy 279 279 - - ≥PR, n (%) 126 (45.2) 118 (42.3) 81.4 0.622 ≥VGPR, n (%) 62 (22.2) 69 (24.7) 90.3 0.731 ≥CR, n (%) 11 (3.9) 30 (10.8) 93.2 0.508 sCR, n (%) 3 (1.1) 13 (4.7) 96.4 0.364 *A kappa value >0.6 indicates strong concordance. 1

ABSTRACT Anatomy education is a cornerstone of medical training and relies on cadaveric dissection and 2D illustrations. Technological advancements and integrated curricula have reduced the focus on detailed anatomy and challenged educators to engage Generation Z learners with interactive, tech‐driven methods. Advanced imaging and artificial intelligence (AI) offer a solution, providing virtual dissection simulations and personalized learning tools that mimic 3D anatomy and adapt to individual student needs. Machine learning, a subset of AI, enhances this process by enabling predictive analytics, adaptive feedback, and tailored learning pathways based on performance data, significantly improving anatomical comprehension. Despite its benefits, AI integration raises concerns about over‐reliance on technology, biases, and diminished human interaction in training. This review examines AI's transformative potential in anatomy education while emphasizing the need for balanced implementation and ethical oversight. A systematic review following PRISMA guidelines was conducted, utilizing PubMed and backward citation searches. The search yielded 56 studies, with 47 additional articles from citations, resulting in 61 included studies. These explored AI applications such as virtual dissection simulations, machine learning algorithms for adaptive feedback, and gamified learning experiences, which were shown to enhance engagement, personalize learning, and improve anatomical understanding. Concerns about over‐reliance on AI and the loss of human interaction were also raised. AI has the potential to enhance anatomy education, but careful consideration of ethical and practical implications is essential. A balanced approach combining traditional methods with AI and robust oversight is crucial for effective integration.