Citations

Abstract BACKGROUND Despite multimodal treatment, brain tumors frequently recur and are often life-threatening. Patients commonly experience progressive neurologic decline, significantly impacting quality of life. We aimed to characterize the symptom burden of central nervous system tumors and to explore patient and caregiver experiences. METHODS In this observational study (NCT06676306), we conducted semi-structured interviews with 22 patients receiving care through the Mayo Clinic Neuro-oncology division. Caregivers were invited to participate. Demographic data were obtained from electronic medical records. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed thematically. RESULTS Twenty-two patients (9/22, 41% female; median age 41.5 years, range 24–71) and 13 caregivers (13/22, 59%) participated. Diagnoses included astrocytoma, IDH mutant (8/22, 36%), glioblastoma (4/22, 18%), oligodendroglioma (3/22, 14%), astrocytoma, IDH wildtype (2/22, 9%), and other (5/22, 23%). The most frequently reported symptoms were headaches (13/22, 59%), cognitive changes (8/22, 36%), and fatigue (7/22, 32%). Among twenty patients who discussed treatment impacts, the most common were fatigue (45%), cognitive changes (40%), and mood changes (40%). Caregivers reported emotional toll (13/13, 100%), career changes (7/13, 54%), and difficulty balancing responsibilities (6/13, 46%). Twenty-one patients shared coping strategies, including faith (29%), hobbies (24%), and exercise (19%). All 20 respondents who discussed overall experience with neuro-oncology care reported a positive overall experience (100%), with the patient–neuro-oncologist relationship (40%) and communication (39%) cited as key contributors. For 19 patients who discussed treatment outcomes, quality of life (26%), maintaining function (21%), and tumor stability (21%) were paramount. For 9 caregivers who discussed treatment outcomes, 44% prioritized quality of life and 44% reported desire for a cure. CONCLUSIONS Brain tumors and their treatments affect patients and caregivers across physical, emotional, and social domains. Strong relationships and communication with the care team are central to patient satisfaction. Quality of life should be prioritized in neuro-oncology research and trials.

Abstract BACKGROUND Adamantinomatous craniopharyngiomas (ACPs) are rare, partially cystic central nervous system tumors driven by the WNT/β-catenin pathway. As they grow, ACPs compress the surrounding pituitary gland, optic chiasm, and third ventricle. ACPs are highly morbid tumors with enormous quality of life impact on patients, often early in life. Thus, better treatments are needed. Current ACP treatment consists of maximally safe surgical resection with radiation for residual disease. Complete surgical resection is challenging, and recurrence is common. Targeted systemic chemotherapy is not routinely used for ACP treatment. Interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels are elevated within ACPs compared to normal brain tissue, making IL-6 an intriguing therapeutic target. Treatment response of ACP to tocilizumab alone or in combination with bevacizumab has been reported in children. MATERIAL AND METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of three adults with recurrent ACP who received combination treatment with bevacizumab and tocilizumab on a compassionate basis between June 2022 and April 2025 at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, MN. We collected demographic, clinical, treatment, radiologic, and outcome data. RESULTS All three patients were male and median age at initial ACP diagnosis was 38 years (range: 32-42 years). All patients underwent subtotal resection followed by radiation therapy. One patient had repeat surgical resection and two patients required interventions for hydrocephalus. At the time of ACP recurrence, all patients had visual impairment, endocrine dysfunction, and headaches. All patients received bevacizumab (7.5 mg/kg q3 weeks) and tocilizumab (8 mg/kg q3 weeks [n=2] or 4 mg/kg q4 weeks [n=1]). While receiving combination therapy, ACP tumor volume decreased on magnetic resonance imaging for all three patients (64%, 68%, and 29% reduction). None exhibited tumor growth since starting combination therapy. One patient had a small intraparenchymal hemorrhage, suspected secondary to radiation-induced cavernous malformation, so bevacizumab was discontinued, and he remains on tocilizumab alone. The other two patients continue combination therapy (for 344 and 351 days). Two patients experienced improvement in vision, and one had improvement in cognition. Possible adverse effects of treatment included sinus infections, fatigue, neutropenia, and hypertension. CONCLUSION Treatment with combination bevacizumab and tocilizumab was associated with shrinkage of ACP tumors and clinical improvements and obviated the need for further surgery or radiation in all three patients. This combination of medications may reprogram the tumor microenvironment, leading to ACP involution. This well-tolerated regimen provides a noninvasive option for treatment of recurrent ACP, and potentially initial ACP treatment, and may improve quality of life for patients.

BACKGROUND Adamantinomatous craniopharyngiomas (ACPs) are slow-growing, cystic, highly morbid central nervous system tumors located adjacent to vital structures including the pituitary, hypothalamus, and optic chiasm. Tumor recurrence is common. Treatment relies on resection with or without adjuvant radiation and is highly individualized. Targeted chemotherapies have not been routinely used in the treatment of ACPs. OBSERVATIONS The authors present the case of an adult patient with recurrent ACP that was clinically and radiologically stabilized with a combination of bevacizumab and tocilizumab every 3 weeks. LESSONS The combination of tocilizumab and bevacizumab could be an effective therapy for shrinkage of the cystic and solid components of ACP, sparing patients from further neurological damage from the tumor, additional surgery, or radiation. The patient’s positive response to tocilizumab and bevacizumab supports the growing literature that interleukin-6 and vascular endothelial growth factor are important for ACP pathogenesis. The patient’s response supports prior research, suggesting that systemic chemotherapy can be effectively delivered to this rare brain tumor. https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE24410

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common malignant primary brain tumor in adults. Despite an established standard of care including surgical resection, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy, GBM unfortunately is associated with a dismal prognosis. Therefore, researchers are extensively evaluating avenues to expand GBM therapy and improve outcomes in patients with GBM. In this review, we provide a broad overview of novel GBM therapies that have recently completed or are actively undergoing study in clinical trials. These therapies expand across medical, surgical, and radiation clinical trials. We additionally review methods for improving clinical trial design in GBM.

Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) is a devastating sequelae of metastatic spread that affects approximately 5% of cancer patients. The incidence of LMD is increasing due to advancements in systemic therapy and enhanced detection methods. The purpose of this review is to provide a detailed overview of the evidence in the detection, prognostication, and treatment of LMD. A comprehensive literature search of PUBMED was conducted to identify articles reporting on LMD including existing data and ongoing clinical trials. We found a wide array of treatment options available for LMD including chemotherapy, targeted agents, and immunotherapy as well as several choices for radiotherapy including whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT), stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), and craniospinal irradiation (CSI). Despite treatment, the prognosis for patients with LMD is dismal, typically 2–4 months on average. Novel therapies and combination approaches are actively under investigation with the aim of improving outcomes and quality of life for patients with LMD. Recent prospective data on the use of proton CSI for patients with LMD have demonstrated its potential survival benefit with follow-up investigations underway. There is a need for validated metrics to predict prognosis and improve patient selection for patients with LMD in order to optimize treatment approaches.

Background: Extracranial metastases occur in <2% of cases of glioblastoma (GBM). When metastases do occur, bone is the most common destination. Herein, we review clinical characteristics of GBM patients with osseous metastases and evaluate both potential risk factors and prognostic significance. Methods: Using an institutional database, we identified and retrospectively analyzed 6 patients with both GBM and osseous metastases. We collected data on patient demographics, tumor genetics, clinical courses, and outcomes. Given the rarity of metastatic GBM, we conducted historical comparisons using previously published literature. Results: Five patients with osseous metastases (83%) were male, with a median age of 46 years at GBM diagnosis (range: 20–84). All patients had IDH -wildtype, MGMT promoter unmethylated GBM and 5 (83%) had alterations in TP53 . All patients underwent surgical resection for GBM followed by radiation with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide. Four patients (67%) received bevacizumab prior to bone metastasis diagnosis. Bone metastases were discovered at a median of 12.2 months (range: 5.3–35.2) after GBM diagnosis and 4.8 months after starting bevacizumab (range: 3.5–13.2). Three patients (50%) received immunotherapy. After osseous metastasis diagnosis, the median survival was 25 days (range: 13–225). Conclusion: In our cohort, most patients were male and young at the time of GBM diagnosis. All patients had IDH -wildtype, MGMT promoter unmethylated GBM, and most had alterations in TP53 , which may be important for osseous metastasis. Most patients received bevacizumab, which has been associated with earlier metastasis. Osseous metastases of GBM occur and portend a dismal prognosis in an already aggressive malignancy.

Introduction: Glioblastoma is a uniformly lethal primary central nervous system neoplasm. Despite the increased understanding of its pathophysiology and treatment advancements, median overall survival for patients with glioblastoma, IDH-wild type remains 14 to 21 months from diagnosis. Case Report: We present the case of a 48-year-old female who presented with a focal seizure and was found to have a right frontal lobe mass on the brain magnetic resonance imaging. She underwent gross total resection and received a histological diagnosis of glioblastoma. She received radiotherapy and 6 cycles of carmustine (BCNU). Seventeen months later, she developed left hemiparesis. Imaging was concerning for tumor progression, and she was treated with 1 cycle of mechlorethamine, vincristine (oncovin), procarbazine, and prednisone (MOPP). Subsequent surveillance imaging demonstrated a therapeutic response. Twenty-seven years after her glioblastoma diagnosis, she developed status epilepticus and died from respiratory failure. Neuropathology on autopsy demonstrated extensive treatment-related changes but no evidence of recurrent glioblastoma. Genomic testing performed over 30 years after her original diagnosis revealed a profile diagnostic of glioblastoma, IDH-wild type per 2021 World Health Organization criteria. Conclusions: This patient is one of the longest-known survivors of glioblastoma, IDH-wild type, with pathologic confirmation of glioblastoma at the time of her resection and no evidence of residual disease 26 years after her last treatment. She presented with multiple factors associated with long-term glioblastoma survivorship, including female sex, young age, high Karnofsky score, and multimodal therapy. This case shows that long-term survival after glioblastoma diagnosis is possible and likely mediated through a combination of individual, tumor, and treatment factors.