Citations

Clear

20 citation(s) found for "Taylor, Justin".

Local immune networks promote respiratory IgA responses after mucosal vaccination 2260370
Wu, Yue, Xu, You, Fang, An, Zhu, Fangming , Kobayashi, Takao, Taylor, J., Hu, Hui , Kita, Hirohito, Hu, Haitao, Liu, Shan-lu, Sun, Jie, Tang, Jinyi , Chaudhuri, Arka Sen , Qu, Panke , Taylor, Justin, Kita, Hirohito , Zhang, Nu , Zhu, Guizhi

Mayo Clinic

The Journal of Immunology | July 28, 2026 | Volume: 215 | Issue: Supplement_1 | Pages: No page available

10.1093/jimmun/vkag141.911 Get It

Abstract Introduction Mucosal immunization and respiratory IgA offer significant promise in protecting against airborne pathogens, including SARS-CoV-2. However, the conditions and mechanisms that lead to the robust induction of respiratory IgA responses following mucosal vaccination remain poorly understood. Methods In this project, we established SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infection and mucosal adenovirus-based booster vaccination models. Using genetic mouse models and various in vivo and in vitro blockade or depletion approaches, we further investigated the mechanisms regulating respiratory IgA responses. Results Here we found that a mucosal adenovirus-based booster vaccination in mouse models revealed that respiratory booster immunization elicited markedly stronger and more durable respiratory IgA, T cell response, and protective immunity against SARS-CoV-2, supporting the promise of respiratory mucosal vaccination. Mechanistically, we identified that local CD4+ T cells support respiratory IgA production by promoting IgA+ B cell class switching, proliferation, and survival in situ. This T cell help depended on interactions between local Blimp-1+ T-bet+ Th1 cells and B cells, mediated through ICOS/CD40L/MHC-II engagement and IL-21 signaling. Furthermore, lung macrophages contributed to the mucosal IgA response via TGF-β production. Consequently, mucosal administration of SARS-CoV-2 Spike-encoding mRNA encapsulated in pulmonary surfactant (PS)- incorporated lipid nanoparticles designed to target lung macrophages elicited a stronger mucosal IgA response. Conclusion Our results uncover a local cellular network supporting enhanced mucosal IgA responses, with implications for the development of optimal mucosal immunization strategies against SARS-CoV-2 and other respiratory pathogens such as H5N1 influenza. Funding Source AI147394, AG069264, AI112844, HL170961, AI154598, AI176171 to J.S., AI67986, AI177467 to Hui.H; U54CA260582 to S.L.L; R01AI168684 to G. Z.; S.L.L was also supported by a fund provided by an anonymous private donor to The Ohio State University. Topic Categories Mucosal and Regional Immunology (MUC)
Molecular and Structural Basis of Pan-Resistance to BTK Degraders and Inhibitors
Sievers, Quinlan , Lu, Hao , Cool, Allison , Gajewski, Stefan , Kong, Tim , Noviski, Mark , Whelan, Sarah , Wang, Yuhan , Navarrete, Lizbeth Mendoza, Mi, Xiaoli , Mukerji, Ratul , Ye, Jordan , Rios, Mateo Sanchez Garcia de los, Bousquet, Hugo , Tan, Y. , Brathaban, Nivetha , Narasappa, Nell , Lu, Ya‐Wen , Elechko, Jennifer, Phelps, Christopher B., Sekeres, Samantha, Bravo, Eduardo , Alencar, Alvaro J. , Islam, Prioty , Mato, Anthony R. , Noviski, Mark A , Wang, Yuhan , Mendoza Navarrete, Lizbeth , Ficici, Emel , Mukerji, Ratul , Iuliano, James N , Ye, Jordan , Sanchez Garcia De Los Rios, Mateo , Bousquet, Hugo , Tan, May , Brathaban, Nivetha , Narasappa, Nell , Lu, Ya-Wen , Elechko, Jennifer , Maron, Maxim I , Phelps, Christopher B , Rahman, Jahan , Notti, Ryan Q , Sekeres, Samantha , Lamkin, Erica N , Bravo, Eduardo , Alencar, Alvaro J , Ewalt, Mark D , Islam, Prioty , Mato, Anthony , Roeker, Lindsey , Bhatt, Shruti , Taylor, Justin , Thompson, Meghan C , Hansen, Gwenn M , Abdel-Wahab, Omar , Lamkin, Erica , Ewalt, Mark D. , Roeker, Lindsey E. , Abdel‐Wahab, Omar

Mayo Clinic

Cancer Discovery | July 22, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1158/2159-8290.cd-26-0251 | PMID 42484277 Get It

Abstract Early-phase clinical trials of Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) degraders have demonstrated efficacy in patients with BTK inhibitor-resistant chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). How clinical resistance to BTK degraders arises is unknown. Here we sequenced serial CLL samples from patients enrolled in the phase I trials of zelebrudomide and bexobrutideg and observed recurrent expansion of preexisting BTK A428D mutations at relapse. Unlike previously studied BTK inhibitor resistance mutations, BTK A428D conferred pan-resistance to BTK inhibitors and degraders. In the absence of BTK-directed therapies, however, cells bearing BTK A428D exhibited a competitive disadvantage. A crystal structure of BTK A428D revealed that the mutant aspartate clashes with the adenine ring of ATP and the adenine-mimetic moiety of BTK inhibitors and degraders. Combining BTK degraders with venetoclax mitigated the expansion of BTK A428D. These results provide the molecular basis for clinical resistance to BTK degraders and will inform the development of next-generation BTK degrader therapies.
Abstract PR004: BTK A428D is a recurrent pan-resistance mutation to BTK degraders in clinical trials
Sievers, Quinlan, Lu, Hao, Cool, Allison , Grajewski, Stefan, Kong, Tim , Noviski, Mark, Mukerji, Ratul , Iuliano, James, Ye, Jordan , Rios, Mateo Sanchez Garcia de los, Bousquet, Hugo , Whelan, Sarah , Tan, May, Phelps, Christopher, Raman, Jahan, Notti, Ryan, Navarrete, Lizbeth Mendoza, Sekeres, Samantha, Lamkin, Eria, Bravo, Eduardo , Ewalt, Mark, Islam, Prioty , Mato, Anthony, Roeker, Lindsey, Taylor, Justin, Thompson, Meghan, Hansen, Gwenn, Abdel-Wahab, Omar, Sievers, Quinlan , Noviski, Mark , Mi, Xiaoli , Ficici, Emel , Iuliano, James N , Bousquet, Hugo, Notti, Ryan Q , Ewalt, Mark D. , Mato, Anthony R. , Roeker, Lindsey E. , Hansen, Gwenn M , Abdel‐Wahab, Omar

Mayo Clinic

Blood Cancer Discovery | June 24, 2026 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 3_Supplement | Pages: PR004-PR004

10.1158/2643-3249.lymphoma26-pr004 Get It

Abstract Early-phase clinical trials of BTK degraders in relapsed/refractory CLL have shown response rates of over 80%, including in patients with BTK mutations that confer resistance to conventional BTK inhibitors (BTKi). The molecular basis of resistance to BTK degraders is unknown and, given the promise of this class of drugs, would hold implications for therapy sequencing and the design of next-generation BTK degraders. To this end we identified five patients at Memorial Sloan Kettering who developed progressive disease while being treated on the phase 1 trials of zelebrudomide (NCT04830137, 4 patients) or bexobrutideg (NCT05131022, 1 patient). In two patients, one treated with zelebrudomide and the other with bexobrutideg, a pre-existing BTK A428D mutation had expanded at progression, rising from <1.5% at the start of treatment to >25%. In both cases, the increase in frequency of BTK A428D coincided with the loss of BTK degradation in peripheral blood B cells. No mutation in cereblon, the ligase utilized by these BTK degraders, was detected. To validate these clinical findings we generated wild-type and BTK A428D knock-in single-cell clones in TMD8 and HBL1 cells. BTK A428D conferred resistance to BTKi, including ibrutinib, acalabrutinib, zanubrutinib, and pirtobrutinib, as well as the clinical-stage BTK degraders zelebrudomide, bexobrutideg, BGB-16673, and AbbVie-1 (Compound 1, WO 2023183811). BTK A428D’s pan-resistance is unique compared to previously studied BTKi resistance mutations which remain susceptible to at least one BTKi and all clinical-stage BTK degraders tested. To understand how BTK A428D confers pan-resistance to BTKi and BTK degraders we conducted surface plasmon resonance studies which demonstrated that BTKi and all four clinical-stage BTK degraders tested are unable to bind BTK A428D. We next solved the crystal structure of apo BTK A428D to 1.8Å, which revealed that the mutant aspartate, which is larger and negatively charged compared to the wild-type alanine, sterically blocks BTKi and degraders from accessing residues in the hinge region of the kinase that are required for drug binding. We next asked why BTK A428D, despite conferring pan-resistance, has only been detected in 1.1% of patients treated with BTK inhibitors. Intriguingly, we noted that in one of our index patients, the frequency of BTK A428D declined and became undetectable after the withdrawal of zelebrudomide, suggesting a fitness defect. To assess this hypothesis, we compared the proliferation rates of five TMD8 wild-type and five BTK A428D single-cell clones; the BTK A428D clones grew more slowly and were consistently outcompeted in mixing studies. In summary, low-frequency BTK A428D mutations can expand under the selection pressure of BTK degraders and confer clinical resistance by preventing drug binding. The mutation, however, is outcompeted in the absence of BTK-targeted therapies. These findings provide rationale for the investigation of combination therapies and the development of next-generation BTK degraders capable of circumventing BTK A428D. Citation Format: Quinlan Sievers, Hao Lu, Allison Cool, Stefan Grajewski, Tim Kong, Mark Noviski, Xiaoli Mi, Emel Ficici, Ratul Mukerji, James Iuliano, Jordan Ye, Mateo Sanchez Garcia de los Rios, Hugo Bousquet, Sarah Whelan, May Tan, Christopher Phelps, Jahan Raman, Ryan Notti, Lizbeth Mendoza Navarrete, Samantha Sekeres, Eria Lamkin, Eduardo Bravo, Mark Ewalt, Prioty Islam, Anthony Mato, Lindsey Roeker, Justin Taylor, Meghan Thompson, Gwenn Hansen, Omar Abdel-Wahab. BTK A428D is a recurrent pan-resistance mutation to BTK degraders in clinical trials [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Fifth AACR International Meeting on Advances in Malignant Lymphoma: From Discovery to Clinical Impact; 2026 Jun 24-27; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Blood Cancer Discov 2026;7(3_Suppl):Abstract nr PR004.
Real‐world, multi‐omics validation of the clinical relevance of molecular taxonomy for myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS)
Sauta, Elisabetta, Lanino, Luca, Bewersdorf, Jan P, Kewan, Tariq, Ali, Najla H. Al, Fenaux, Pierre, Platzbecker, Uwe, Santini, Valeria, Brunner, Andrew M., Kuykendall, Andrew T., Bennett, John M. , Buckstein, Rena, Bejar, Rafael, Carraway, Hetty E., DeZern, Amy E., Hasserjian, R., Loghavi, Sanam, Odenike, Olatoyosi, Padron, Eric , Patnaik, Mrinal M., Stahl, Maximilian, Sekeres, M., Steensma, David P., Savona, Michael R., Taylor, Justin, Xu, Mina L., Sallman, David A., Nimer, Stephen D. , Hourigan, Christopher S., Wei, Andrew H., Riva, Elena , Ventura, Denise, Pinocchio, Nicole, Buizza, Alessandro , Russo, Antonio, D'Amico, Saverio, Delleani, Mattia , Travaglino, Erica , Tentori, Cristina A., Ferrari, Ivan, Crespi, Alessandra, Figini, Giulia , Matteo, Maria Di, Milanesi, Chiara, Castellani, Gastone, Borate, Uma M., Gore, Steven D., Kim, Tae K., Loosdrecht, Arjan A. van de , Daver, N., Wang, Sa A. , Foucar, Kathryn, Iastrebner, Marcelo, Miyazaki, Yasushi, Al‐Kali, Aref, Mittelmann, Moshe, Cluzeau, Thomas , Ades, Lionel, Germing, Ulrich, Garcia‐Manero, Guillermo, Kordasti, Shahram, Haferlach, Torsten, Zeidan, Amer M., consortia, An international study on behalf of GenoMed4all, Synthema, and icMDS, Zeidan, Amer M. , Buizza, Alessandro , Ficara, Francesca , Efficace, Fabio , Diez-Campelo, Maria , Orfao, Alberto , Wang, Sa A , Cluzeau, Thomas , Komrokji, Rami S , Della Porta, Matteo Giovanni , Zeidan, Amer M , Maggioni, Giulia , Todisco, Gabriele , Sauta, Elisabetta , Lanino, Luca , Ball, Somedeb , Bewersdorf, Jan Philipp , Fenaux, Pierre , Platzbecker, Uwe , Santini, Valeria , Xie, Zhuoer , Brunner, Andrew M. , Kuykendall, Andrew , Buckstein, Rena , Bejar, Rafael , Carraway, Hetty E. , Dezern, Amy Elizabeth , Griffiths, Elizabeth A. , Halene, Stephanie , Hasserjian, Robert P. , List, Alan F. , Loghavi, Sanam , Odenike, Olatoyosi , Patnaik, Mrinal M. , Roboz, Gail J. , Sekeres, Mikkael A. , Steensma, David P. , Savona, Michael R. , Sallman, David A. , Hourigan, Christopher S. , Wei, Andrew H. , Campagna, Alessia , Ubezio, Marta , Ventura, Denise , Pinocchio, Nicole , Zampini, Matteo , Russo, Antonio , Pesce, Francesco , D'Amico, Saverio , Asti, Gianluca , Tentori, Cristina Astrid , Ferrari, Ivan , Matteo, Maria Di, Brindisi, Matteo , Manes, Nicla , Crisafulli, Laura , Ficara, Francesca , Castellani, Gastone , Borate, Uma , Efficace, Fabio , Gore, Steven D. , Díez‐Campelo, María , Rozman, Marı́a , Órfão, Alberto , Foucar, Kathryn , Iastrebner, Marcelo , Scheinberg, Phillip , Miyazaki, Yasushi , Madanat, Yazan F. , Al‐Kali, Aref , Mittelman, Moshe , Adès, Lionel , Germing, Ulrich , Garcia‐Manero, Guillermo , Kordasti, Shahram , Haferlach, Torsten , Komrokji, Rami S.

Mayo Clinic

HemaSphere | June 22, 2026 | Volume: 10 | Issue: 6 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/hem3.70406 | PMID 42339339 Get It

Abstract Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are clinically and biologically diverse disorders, emphasizing the need for personalized treatment approaches. The International Working Group for Prognostication of MDS (IWG_PM) recently introduced a molecular classification, referred to as the MDS taxonomy, that categorizes patients into 16 subgroups based on 21 gene mutations, 6 cytogenetic abnormalities, and loss of heterozygosity (LOH) at TP53 and TET2 loci. This study sought to validate and enhance the clinical relevance of the MDS taxonomy by analyzing a large retrospective cohort ( n = 5136) and transcriptomic data from a prospective cohort ( n = 477). The taxonomy successfully identified subgroups with distinct clinical characteristics and disease progression patterns. However, incorporating gene interactions from taxonomy subgroups did not improve the prognostic performance of the Molecular International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS‐M). We further assessed whether the taxonomy could guide management in patients receiving disease‐modifying therapies. Except for the “ TP53 ‐complex” subgroup, taxonomy classifications were not predictive of hypomethylating agent response or transplant outcomes. Nonetheless, they correlated with overall survival, suggesting that while both IPSS‐M and the taxonomy capture disease biology, other non‐genetic factors may influence treatment response. RNA sequencing confirmed the biological distinctiveness of the taxonomy groups. Transcriptomic profiling of CD34+ bone marrow cells revealed unique, homogeneous gene expression patterns, particularly within the AML‐like, bi TET2 , SF3B1 , and TP53 ‐complex subgroups. Further integration of multi‐omics data may refine MDS classification, improving clinical decision‐making and guiding the development of targeted therapies.
Molecular and structural basis of pan-resistance to BTK targeting therapies via BTK A428D mutation
Sievers, Quinlan , Lu, Hao , Cool, Allison , Gajewski, Stefan , Kong, Tim , Noviski, Mark , Mukerji, Ratul , Ye, Jordan , Rios, Mateo Sanchez Garcia de los, Bousquet, Hugo , Whelan, Sarah , Tan, May, Phelps, Chris B., Sekeres, Samantha, Lamkin, Erica , Bravo, Eduardo , Mato, Anthony R. , Lamkin, Erica N , Ficici, Emel , Iuliano, James N , Bousquet, Hugo, Mi, Xiaoli , Rahman, Jahan , Ewalt, Mark D. , Roeker, Lindsey E. , Taylor, Justin , Thompson, Meghan C , Hansen, Gwenn M , Abdel‐Wahab, Omar

Mayo Clinic

Blood | December 5, 2025 | Volume: 146 | Issue: Supplement 1 | Pages: 2102-2102

10.1182/blood-2025-2102 Get It

Abstract BTK degraders promote proteasomal degradation of BTK and can overcome resistance to covalent and noncovalent BTK inhibitors in patients with relapsed CLL. Currently the molecular basis for BTK degrader resistance is unknown. We therefore set out to understand BTK degrader resistance based on observations from the phase 1 trial of zelebrudomide (NX-2127) (NCT04830137), the first BTK degrader to enter clinical studies. Targeted 500-gene sequencing was performed on blood and/or tissue from four CLL patients treated with zelebrudomide. In one patient previously treated with chemoimmunotherapy, ibrutinib, venetoclax, and pirtobrutinib, BTK A428D was detected in the baseline blood sample with variant allele frequency (VAF) of <2%, along with BTK V416L (13%) and mutations in TP53 (60%) and SF3B1 (37%). Following daily treatment with 100mg zelebrudomide and subsequent dose escalation to 200mg, at 6 months the VAF of all four mutations increased, with BTK A428D VAF increasing to 6% in the blood and 29% in a lymph node. BTK A428D was detected at baseline but not at progression in a second patient. To evaluate the impact of BTK A428D on drug response, we transduced BTK-dependent TMD8 cells with BTK WT, C481S, L528W, and A428D, and found that BTK A428D uniquely conferred resistance to all FDA-approved BTK inhibitors (ibrutinib, acalabrutinib, zanubrutinib, pirtobrutinib) as well as three BTK degraders under clinical evaluation (zelebrudomide, bexobrutideg, BGB-16673). To model the subclonal nature of BTK A428D we conducted a competition assay in which TMD8 cells expressing GFP + BTK A428D (5%) were mixed with TMD8 cells expressing mCherry + BTK WT (95%); over 9 days the GFP + BTK A428D expanded from 5% to 88-97% with all four BTKi and all three BTK degraders. In vitro kinase assays revealed that the BTK A428D mutant protein lacks kinase activity yet facilitates calcium flux and ERK/AKT signaling upon B-cell receptor activation, suggesting a scaffolding effect similar to other kinase deficient BTK mutations. To determine whether BTK A428D affects BTK degradation, we developed a reporter that fuses the BTK kinase domain to GFP. BTK A428D showed minimal degradation following 20 hours of treatment with a titration of all three BTK degraders. Similarly, we knocked BTK A428D into the endogenous BTK locus of HBL1 cells and confirmed a lack of degradation at doses up to 1 µM of all 3 degraders. Consistent with these findings, surface plasmon resonance revealed that the FDA-approved BTK inhibitors as well as zelebrudomide, bexobrutideg, BGB-16673, and AbbVie-1 (Compound 1 from WO 2023183811) are unable to bind to BTK A428D. Additionally, an in-cell NanoBRET assay demonstrated that zelebrudomide was unable to mediate the interaction between cereblon and BTK A428D. Strikingly, NanoBRET also demonstrated that a panel of promiscuous kinase-binding compounds was unable to bind to BTK A428D. The lack of binding of both selective and promiscuous kinase binders to BTK A428D led us to speculate that the mutation disrupted the ATP binding pocket to an unusual degree. We therefore solved the crystal structure of apo BTK A428D and found that, in addition to its predicted steric clash with ligand binding in the hinge region, the mutation led the protein to crystallize with its activation loop occupying the catalytic cleft, rendering it inaccessible. This is the first apo BTK structure observed in this autoinhibited conformation, and explains the observed binding profile. We hypothesized that the addition of a second targeted agent such as venetoclax might mitigate expansion of the A428D subclone. To test this, we introduced the BTK A428D mutation into the endogenous BTK gene in 3% of TMD8 cells and then exposed them to 0.1µM of zelebrudomide, bexobrutideg, or BGB-16673 +/- venetoclax 0.1µM. Combining the BTK degraders with venetoclax slowed the emergence of the BTK A428D resistant population and, in the case of zelebrudomide, eradicated both the wild-type and A428D clones. In summary, we identified and validated BTK A428D as a clinically relevant acquired pan-resistance mutation that confers resistance by blocking access to the ATP binding pocket. This mechanism differs from other kinase dead BTK mutations in which the kinase's enzymatic pocket remained accessible.These data also provide rationale for combining BTK degraders with BCL2 inhibitors, particularly in patients with BTK A428D mutations, or high-risk mutations such as in TP53.
Wide variability and inconsistency in reporting of results of Myelodysplastic Syndromes/neoplasms (MDS) clinical trials: An icMDS systematic review of published manuscripts
Getz, Ted M. , Pugh, Kelly , Brunner, Andrew M. , Borate, Uma , Buckstein, Rena , Hasserjian, Robert P. , Fenaux, Pierre, Sallman, David A. , Nimer, Stephen D. , Little, Richard F. , Odenike, Olatoyosi , Greenberg, Peter L. , Xu, Mina L. , Bejar, Rafael, Patnaik, Mrinal M. , Padron, Eric , Gore, Steven D. , Bennett, John M. , Metzeler, Klaus H. , Pleyer, Lisa , Loosdrecht, Arjan van de, Cluzeau, Thomas , Mufti, Ghulam, Sébert, Marie , Götze, Katharina S. , Miyazaki, Yasushi , Al‐Kali, Aref , Yacoub, Abdulraheem , Li, Bing, Stahl, Maximilian , Götze, Katharina , Brunner, Andrew, Bewersdorf, Jan Philipp , Dezern, Amy Elizabeth , Kewan, Tariq Zuheir , Platzbecker, Uwe , Sekeres, Mikkael A. , Wei, Andrew H. , Kordasti, Shahram , Roboz, Gail J. , Savona, Michael R. , Loghavi, Sanam , Fenaux, Pierre , Hourigan, Christopher S. , Porta, Matteo Giovanni Della , Santini, Valeria , Efficace, Fabio , Taylor, Justin , Kim, Tae Kon , Halene, Stephanie , Komrokji, Rami S. , Griffiths, Elizabeth A. , Xie, Zhuoer , Bejar, Rafael , Sanz, Guillermo , Figueroa, María E. , Carraway, Hetty E. , Abdel‐Wahab, Omar , Starczynowski, Daniel T. , Boultwood, Jacqueline , Daver, Naval , Churpek, Jane E. , Majeti, Ravindra , List, Alan F. , Orgueira, Adrián Mosquera , Solé, Françesc , Steensma, David P. , Adès, Lionel , Lanino, Luca , Madanat, Yazan F. , Platzbecker, Anne Sophie , Lindsley, R Coleman , Gurnari, Carmelo , Li, Bing, Kotsianidis, Ιoannis , Zeidan, Amer M.

Mayo Clinic

Blood | December 4, 2025 | Volume: 146 | Issue: Supplement 1 | Pages: 3852-3852

10.1182/blood-2025-3852 Get It

Abstract Introduction: Standardized reporting of clinical trials results for MDS is essential to improve clinical interpretation and cross-study comparison. However, reporting of patient characteristics, response criteria, and endpoints in publications is often inconsistent; there is no systemic analysis of MDS trial reporting available. We conducted a systematic review of published MDS trial manuscripts on behalf of the international consortium for MDS (icMDS) to assess variability in reporting practices. Methods We searched ClinicalTrials.gov to identify all clinical trials registered for adults (≥18 years) with MDS that reported results between 2015-2024. Clinical trials that included acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or MDS/myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) were included if they enrolled ≥5 MDS patients. We excluded trials without an MDS cohort; non-therapeutic trials; trials focused on transplant interventions; or those which enrolled solid malignancies or other hematologic malignancies (chronic myeloid leukemia or lymphoid diseases). Finally, trials were required to have a manuscript available on Larvol, PubMed, or Google Scholar. Trials were categorized by disease risk (lower-risk [LR] vs. higher-risk [HR]) and trial phase (early phase [EP] vs. late phase [LP]). Results We identified 502 MDS trials on ClinicalTrials.gov, of which 351 did not meet inclusion criteria and 79 lacked a manuscript. A total of 72 trials (32 EP, 40 LP) with 80 publications (34 EP, 46 LP) were analyzed. Frequently reported baseline characteristics included age (100% EP, 100% LP), disease risk (74% EP, 74% LP), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (85% EP, 72% LP), prior treatments (71% EP, 67% LP), and RBC transfusion dependency (32% EP, 70% LP). Less frequently reported characteristics included blood counts (hemoglobin [Hb; 38% EP, 54% LP], platelet count [38% EP, 54% LP], neutrophil count [24% EP and LP]) and bone marrow blasts (29% EP, 43% LP). Although disease risk was widely reported, definitions varied: IPSS and IPSS-R were each reported in 54% of manuscripts, while IPSS-M appeared in only 3%. Cytogenetic risk was separately reported in 39% of manuscripts (38% EP, 39% LP), and mutational data in 45% (47% EP, 43% LP). Responses per IWG 2006 criteria were reported in 84% of manuscripts. The primary endpoint involved safety/tolerability in 85% of EP manuscripts, though definitions were variable; recommended phase 2 dose was the most common (26% of EP manuscripts). In LP trials, primary endpoints were risk-specific: transfusion independence (TI) in 77% of LR, overall response rate (ORR) in 28% of HR, and complete remission (CR) or overall survival (OS) in 22% of HR. In HR manuscripts, CR was reported in 100%, ORR in 73%, hematologic improvement (HI) in 48%, RBC-TI in 23%, and OS in 80%. However, seven different definitions were used for ORR: CR + marrow CR + partial remission + HI per IWG 2006 was most common (35%). Event-free survival was reported in 25%; progression-free survival and relapse-free survival in 13%; and leukemia-free survival in 5%. Early mortality rate was reported in 35% (18% EP, 56% LP) and transplant rate in 58% (50% EP, 67% LP). Only 47% of HR and 90% of LR manuscripts identified HI-eligible patients. In LR-MDS, RBC-TI was reported in 72% of manuscripts but used six definitions. The most common were RBC-TI ≥8 weeks at any time during treatment (24%), ≥8 weeks within 28 weeks of treatment (13%), ≥8 weeks with Hb increase ≥1.0 (4%), ≥12 weeks with Hb increase ≥1.5 (4%), and ≥16 weeks within 24 weeks of treatment (12%). The remainder did not report RBC-TI, did not define it, or used a custom definition not used in another trial. HI was reported in 80% of LR papers with most of those reporting HI using IWG 2006 criteria (90%). Conclusion Reporting of baseline characteristics, response criteria, and outcomes is inconsistent in MDS clinical trials, with wide variability in response definitions, including ORR and TI. This heterogeneity limits interpretability, hampers historical comparisons and may obscure efficacy signals. Our findings highlight the need for standardized reporting guidelines to ensure clarity and consistency in MDS trial publications. As a next phase of this effort, we will conduct a formal Delphi process among icMDS experts to establish consensus recommendations for minimal and optimal MDS clinical trial reporting in manuscripts by disease risk (LR/HR) and trial phase (EP/LP).
Reducing clinical trial eligibility barriers for patients with MDS: an icMDS position statement
Borate, Uma , Pugh, Kelly , Waller, Allyson, Welkie, Rina Li , Huang, Ying , Stahl, Maximilian , Platzbecker, Uwe , Wei, Andrew H. , Buckstein, Rena , Hasserjian, Robert P. , Fenaux, Pierre , Sallman, David A. , Nimer, Stephen D. , Little, Richard F. , Garcia‐Manero, Guillermo , Odenike, Olatoyosi, Kim, Tae Kon , Greenberg, Peter L. , Xu, Mina L. , Patnaik, Mrinal M. , Padron, Eric , Gore, Steven D. , Churpek, Jane E. , Bennett, John M., Brunner, Andrew M. , Zeidan, Amer M., Zeidan, Amer M. , Platzbecker, Uwe , Sekeres, Mikkael A , Wei, Andrew H , Roboz, Gail J , Loghavi, Sanam , Hasserjian, Robert P , Sallman, David A , Hourigan, Christopher S , Della Porta, Matteo Giovanni , Little, Richard F , Santini, Valeria , Taylor, Justin , Kim, Tae Kon , Halene, Stephanie , Komrokji, Rami S , Griffiths, Elizabeth A. , Greenberg, Peter L , Xie, Zhuoer , Sanz, Guillermo F , Patnaik, Mrinal , Carraway, Hetty E. , Boultwood, Jacqueline , Daver, Naval , Zeidan, Amer M , Churpek, Jane E , Bewersdorf, Jan Philipp , Dezern, Amy Elizabeth , Sekeres, Mikkael A. , Roboz, Gail J. , Savona, Michael R. , Loghavi, Sanam , Hourigan, Christopher S. , Santini, Valeria , Efficace, Fabio , Odenike, Olatoyosi , Komrokji, Rami S. , Xie, Zhuoer , Bejar, Rafael , Sanz, Guillermo , Figueroa, María E. , Abdel‐Wahab, Omar , Starczynowski, Daniel T. , Boultwood, Jacqueline , Daver, Naval , Majeti, Ravindra , List, Alan F. , Brunner, Andrew M., Churpek, Jane

Mayo Clinic

Blood | March 27, 2025 | Volume: 145 | Issue: 13 | Pages: 1369-1381

10.1182/blood.2023023717 | PMID 40146152 Get It

Abstract Excessively restrictive inclusion and exclusion criteria in clinical trials are one of many barriers to clinical trial enrollment for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms (MDSs). Many organizations are developing efforts to increase clinical trial eligibility; yet, several recent publications focused on patients with MDS suggest that many patients with this disease may be excluded from clinical trials unnecessarily. Clinical trial eligibility should reflect the phase of the study and risks of the agent being studied. Phase 3 trials should be less restrictive than early-phase trials to represent the real-world population as closely as possible. We hypothesize that many clinical trials, particularly phase 3 trials, have unnecessarily restrictive eligibility criteria. This study aims to evaluate the most common eligibility criteria according to phase of trial and to determine whether criteria correspond with drug safety signals. We identified MDS clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov from 1 January 2000 to 1 September 2023 and analyzed the eligibility criteria of 191 therapeutic MDS trials. We found that categorical inclusion and exclusion criteria are remarkably similar in representation across trial phases. Additionally, only 13% of trials are concordant with drug safety signals, suggesting that the eligibility criteria are often arbitrary. On behalf of the icMDS (International Consortium for Myelodysplastic Syndromes), an association of international MDS experts, we provide a position statement on restrictive eligibility criteria for MDS clinical trials that should be avoided with the aim of removing barriers to clinical trial enrollment.
Risk prediction for clonal cytopenia: multicenter real-world evidence
Xie, Zhuoer , Komrokji, Rami S. , Al‐Ali, Najla, Regelson, Alexandra, Geyer, Susan, Patel, Anand , Saygin, Caner , Zeidan, Amer M. , Mendez, Lourdes , Coombs, Catherine C. , Madanat, Yazan F. , Chung, Stephen S. , Badar, Talha , Foran, James M. , Tsai, Charlton , Amanam, Idoroenyi , Deeg, H. Joachim , Adès, Lionel, Osman, Afaf E.G. , Dinner, Shira, Chandhok, Namrata S. , Soong, Deborah, Brunner, Andrew M. , Ferrari, Jacqueline, Pozzi, Sara , Padron, Eric , Patnaik, Mrinal M. , Al‐Kali, Aref , Adès, Lionel , Komrokji, Rami S , Mendez, Lourdes , Zeidner, Joshua F , Madanat, Yazan , Badar, Talha , Griffiths, Elizabeth A. , Al Malki, Monzr M , Lai, Catherine , Arana Yi, Cecilia , Osman, Afaf E G , Abaza, Yasmin , Taylor, Justin , Chandhok, Namrata , Carraway, Hetty E. , Elena, Chiara , Gallì, Anna , Patnaik, Mrinal , Malcovati, Luca , Savona, Michael R , Al-Kali, Aref , Patel, Anand , Xie, Zhuoer , Zeidan, Amer M , Bewersdorf, Jan Philipp , Kishtagari, Ashwin , Zeidner, Joshua F. , Desai, Pinkal , Malki, Monzr M. Al , Lai, Catherine , Yi, Cecilia Arana , Abaza, Yasmin , Singh, Abhay , Malcovati, Luca , Savona, Michael R.

Mayo Clinic

Blood | July 12, 2024 | Volume: 144 | Issue: 19 | Pages: 2033-2044

10.1182/blood.2024024756 | PMID 38996210 Get It

Abstract Clonal cytopenia of undetermined significance (CCUS) represents a distinct disease entity characterized by myeloid-related somatic mutations with a variant allele fraction of ≥2% in individuals with unexplained cytopenia(s) but without a myeloid neoplasm (MN). Notably, CCUS carries a risk of progressing to MN, particularly in cases featuring high-risk mutations. Understanding CCUS requires dedicated studies to elucidate its risk factors and natural history. Our analysis of 357 patients with CCUS investigated the interplay between clonality, cytopenia, and prognosis. Multivariate analysis identified 3 key adverse prognostic factors: the presence of splicing mutation(s) (score = 2 points), platelet count of <100 × 109/L (score = 2.5), and ≥2 mutations (score = 3). Variable scores were based on the coefficients from the Cox proportional hazards model. This led to the development of the clonal cytopenia risk score (CCRS), which stratified patients into low- (score of <2.5 points), intermediate- (score of 2.5 to <5), and high-risk (score of ≥5) groups. The CCRS effectively predicted 2-year cumulative incidence of MN for low- (6.4%), intermediate- (14.1%), and high-risk (37.2%) groups, respectively, by the Gray test (P < .0001). We further validated the CCRS by applying it to an independent CCUS cohort of 104 patients, demonstrating a c-index of 0.64 (P = .005) in stratifying the cumulative incidence of MN. Our study underscores the importance of integrating clinical and molecular data to assess the risk of CCUS progression, making the CCRS a valuable tool that is practical and easily calculable. These findings are clinically relevant, shaping the management strategies for CCUS and informing future clinical trial designs.
Data-Driven Harmonization of 2022 Who and ICC Classifications of Myelodysplastic Syndromes/Neoplasms (MDS): A Study By the International Consortium for MDS (icMDS)
Ball, Somedeb , Travaglino, Erica , Ali, Najla H. Al, Fenaux, Pierre , Tinsley-Vance, Sara M., Schwabkey, Zaker , Brunner, Andrew M. , Bennett, John M. , Buckstein, Rena , Hasserjian, Robert P. , Odenike, Olatoyosi , Padron, Eric , Patnaik, Mrinal M. , Stahl, Maximilian , Xu, Mina L. , Sweet, Kendra , Sallman, David A. , Nimer, Stephen D. , Borate, Uma , Gore, Steven D. , Garcia‐Manero, Guillermo , Wang, Sa A. , Foucar, M K, Germing, Ulrich , Haferlach, Torsten , Miyazaki, Yasushi, Iastrebner, Marcelo , Cluzeau, Thomas , Loosdrecht, Arjan A. van de , Lanino, Luca , Bewersdorf, Jan Philipp , Marchetti, Monia , Maggioni, Giulia , Platzbecker, Uwe , Santini, Valeria , Díez‐Campelo, María , Singh, Avani , Jain, Akriti Gupta , Aguirre, Luis E. E. , Tinsley-Vance, Sara M., Chan, Onyee , Xie, Zhuoer , Kuykendall, Andrew , Bejar, Rafael , Carraway, Hetty E. , Dezern, Amy Elizabeth , Griffiths, Elizabeth A. , Halene, Stephanie , Lancet, Jeffrey E. , List, Alan F. , Loghavi, Sanam , Roboz, Gail J. , Sekeres, Mikkael A. , Steensma, David P. , Savona, Michael R. , Taylor, Justin , Hourigan, Christopher S. , Wei, Andrew H. , Sauta, Elisabetta , D'Amico, Saverio , Asti, Gianluca , Castellani, Gastone , Sanz, Guillermo , Efficace, Fabio , Kim, Tae Kon , Daver, Naval , Rozman, Marı́a , Órfão, Alberto , Scheinberg, Phillip , Miyazaki, Yasushi , Kulasekararaj, Austin , Kordasti, Shahram , Adès, Lionel , Zeidan, Amer M. , Komrokji, Rami S. , Della Porta, Matteo Giovanni

Mayo Clinic

Blood | December 1, 2023 | Volume: 142 | Issue: Supplement 1 | Pages: 998-998

10.1182/blood-2023-186580 Get It

Background. The inclusion of gene mutations and chromosomal abnormalities in the 2022 WHO and ICC Classifications of MDS has enhanced diagnostic precision and is expected to improve clinical decision-making process. Although these two systems share similarities, clinically relevant discrepancies still exist and potentially cause inconsistency in their adoption in a clinical setting. In this study on behalf of the International Consortium for MDS (icMDS), we adopted a data-driven approach to provide a harmonization roadmap between the 2022 WHO and ICC classification for MDS. A modified Delphi Process consensus approach is currently ongoing among icMDS experts to finalize a harmonized MDS classification scheme. Methods. We analyzed retrospective international cohorts of patients with a diagnosis of MDS (n=7017) and AML (n=1002) according to WHO 2016 criteria. Hierarchical Dirichlet Processes were applied to define clusters capturing broad dependencies among all gene mutations and cytogenetic abnormalities. To investigate the features of importance and their impact on the clustering process, we employed the SHapley Additive exPlanations approach (SHAP). This allowed to define harmonized labels for each clinical entity. The clinical relevance of the unsupervised clustering was assessed through the analysis of phenotypic features and outcomes among each group. ( Blood 2022;140: 9828-9830) Results. Patients' characteristics are summarized in Table 1. We identified 9 clusters, defined by specific genomic features. The cluster of highest hierarchical importance was characterized by biallelic inactivation of TP53 (biTP53). According to SHAP analysis, bi TP53 was defined as 2 or more TP53 mutations, or 1 mutation with copy number loss or cnLOH. Most patients assigned to bi TP53 cluster had TP53 VAF>10% (77.9%) and complex karyotype (70.1%). Assignment to bi TP53 cluster was irrespective of blast count. Patients with monoallelic TP53 mutation segregated into other clusters. Hierarchically, the second cluster included patients with del(5q). SHAP analysis highlighted 5q deletion alone, or with one other chromosomal abnormality other than -7, and absence of bi TP53, as the most relevant features. Most of these patients had blast counts <5% (88.1%). The third distinct cluster included patients with SF3B1 mutations (in the absence of concurrent del(7q), abn3q26.2, complex karyotype or RUNX1 mutation). Most patients with MDS and SF3B1 mutation had <5% blasts (94.2%). Common co-mutated variants in the SF3B1 cluster included mutant DNMT3A (25.2%) and TET2 (38.3%). Morphologically defined MDS cases (i.e., not meeting criteria for bi TP53, del(5q) or SF3B1) were preferentially assigned to the following additional clusters: SF3B1 and concurrent higher-risk mutations (e.g., RUNX1 and ASXL1); SRSF2 and concomitant TET2 mutations; U2AF1 mutations with del(20q), del(7q) or -7; SRSF2 with TET2 mutations and co-mutational patterns including RUNX1 and ASXL1; and AML-like genomic signatures. Our analyses suggest that morphologically defined MDS is characterized by a large heterogeneity in terms of mutation profiles, not entirely captured by the presence of unilineage versus multilineage dysplasia, percentage of bone marrow blasts, and presence of hypocellularity and fibrosis. To better investigate the continuum between high risk MDS (i.e., patients with ≥10% blasts) and AML, an exploratory comparison was made using a cohort of AML (defined according to WHO 2016) patients analyzed using the same statistical methods. Only a partial overlap in genetic signatures was observed between MDS with ≥10% blasts and AML. However, similarities were observed between the AML-like MDS clusters (characterized by mutant NPM1, bZIP CEBPA, and Core Binding Factor abnormalities) and AML clusters defined by the same genetic signature, thus supporting the classification of these entities as AML, irrespective of blast count. Conclusion. Our study demonstrated the utility of a data-driven approach based on advanced statistical methods to generate a harmonized classification for MDS. Table 2 shows a provisional, hierarchical classification algorithm. Further refinement of entity labels and classification criteria is the subject of the ongoing modified Delphi Process consensus approach among icMDS experts.
Intramuscular mRNA prime plus intranasal adenoviral vector booster elicit robust respiratory mucosal IgA responses against SARS-CoV-2
Wu, Yue , Tang, Jinyi , Liu, Shan-Lu , Taylor, Justin J. , Zhu, Guizhi , Weissman, Drew , Liu, Shan-Lu , Sun, Jie

Mayo Clinic

The Journal of Immunology | August 10, 2023 | Volume: 210 | Issue: Supplement_1 | Pages: 253.14-253.14

10.4049/jimmunol.210.supp.253.14 Get It

Abstract Current SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines induce robust humoral and cellular immunity in the circulation, but its ability in eliciting respiratory mucosal immunity is less characterized. Here, we demonstrated that systemic mRNA expressing ancestral spike (mRNA-S) vaccination alone induced weak respiratory mucosal neutralizing antibody and cellular immunity, particularly against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron strain. In contrast, an immunization strategy combining systemic mRNA-S administration plus mucosal adenoviral vector expressing ancestral spike (Ad5-S) booster induced strong T cell, B cell, and antibody responses in the respiratory tract, which can last for a long time. Furthermore, we found that Ad5-S mucosal booster promoted robust IgA-producing B cells in the respiratory tract, which were correlated with the levels of mucosal S-specific IgA levels. Strikingly, these local IgA-producing B cells were more cross-reactive to the Delta and Omicron Spike proteins compared to those IgG-producing B cells. We further showed that CD4 T cell help was required for the development of IgA-producing B cell in the respiratory mucosa. Taken together, our study identified a vaccination strategy and its associated mechanisms for the induction of strong cross-reactive IgA responses, which were shown to correlate with optimal protection against breakthrough infection, especially by Omicron sub-lineages. Hence, our data provide insights into the rational design of next-generation SARS-CoV-2 mucosal vaccines required for the protection against infection by SARS-CoV-2 Omicron sub-lineages or future variants.