Citations

Abstract The Science of Community Outreach and Engagement (SoCOE) Cancer Advocacy Master Trainer Program is a theory-informed, community-engaged training model designed to advance cancer advocacy science and strengthen equitable cancer control infrastructure. Curriculum content was delivered using the Handbook for Cancer Advocacy (2nd edition, 2024), a 17-chapter structured curriculum developed by the Prostate Cancer Transatlantic Consortium and iCCaRE for Black Men Consortium. Grounded in the Social Ecological Model, Health Belief Model, Community-Based Participatory Research principles, implementation science, and cancer health equity frameworks, the program prepares advocates to function as knowledge brokers, dissemination agents, and implementation partners across individual, community, organizational, and policy levels. Forty advocates participated in the training; sixteen completed the post-training evaluation. Participants reported substantial increases in cancer-specific advocacy knowledge, confidence to train others, clinical trials literacy, and readiness for community-centered implementation. Qualitative findings indicated the emergence of a networked advocacy community characterized by peer learning and shared implementation strategies. These findings support science-based advocacy training as a scalable mechanism for integrating community voice into cancer care, research, and policy.

Background & Aims: To evaluate safety and efficacy of FGFR1–3 kinase inhibitor derazantinib, in advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) harboring FGFR2 fusions or rearrangements ( FGFR2 F ), mutations ( FGFR2 M ), or amplifications ( FGFR2 A ), previously treated with chemotherapy. Approach & Results: Open-label, non-controlled Phase 2 trial. Patients with advanced iCCA, ≥1 prior chemotherapy, and FGFR2 F (Substudy 1) or FGFR2 M /FGFR A (Substudy 2), received once-daily oral derazantinib 300 mg until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, consent withdrawal or investigator decision to stop. Efficacy was assessed by central radiology review using RECIST v1.1. Primary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR; Substudy 1) and 3-month progression-free survival (PFS3; Substudy 2). Other endpoints were PFS, ORR (Substudy 2), disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DOR), and overall survival (OS). In Substudy 1, ORR and DCR were 22.3% (23/103 partial responses) and 75.7%, respectively; median (95% CI) PFS was 8.1 (5.5,8.3) months, DOR was 6.5 (4.6,9.2) months, and OS was 17.2 (12.5,22.4) months. In Substudy 2, PFS3 was 63% (27/43), ORR was 9.3% (3 partial, 1 complete response), DCR was 69.8%, and OS was 11.9 (8.4,15.9) months. There were no Grade 4 or 5 drug-related events. FGFR inhibitor class-specific toxicities included drug-related hyperphosphataemia (38%, Grade 3: 3%) and dry eye (36%). Nail disorders (10%, any grade or causality), stomatitis (5%), retinal events (5%), and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (1%) were infrequent. Conclusions: In previously chemotherapy treated, FGFR-inhibitor-naïve patients with iCCA harboring FGFR2 fusions, mutations, or amplifications, derazantinib showed clinically meaningful efficacy with durable objective responses, and a manageable safety profile.

Abstract Background The rapid growth of FDA‐licensed and clinical trial cell and gene therapy products is causing significant growing pains for laboratories onboarding and processing these products for clinical use. While clinical programs have traditional and supplemental reimbursement models, many services provided by the laboratories are not directly reimbursed. Compounding this issue is the increasing diversity and complexity of products with unique processing requirements leading to resource‐intensive workflows. Study Design and Methods Our institution developed a three‐tiered cost structure for services provided by the cellular therapy laboratory billed to industry‐sponsored, externally manufactured clinical trials based on the level of start‐up and per product handling complexity. A list of tasks and time required to complete the tasks was recorded to account for the complexity of the specific trial. This data was used to determine the total cost billed to onboard and carry out cell processing and handling tasks by the cellular therapy laboratory to the principal investigator of the clinical trial. Results Our tiered fee structure enabled a more accurate accounting of laboratory personnel time based on the complexity of the clinical trial products, enabling our laboratory to recoup necessary costs. Conclusion A tiered fee structure corresponding to higher levels of onboarding and administrative complexities can more accurately estimate costs to enable cell processing laboratories to remain financially sustainable and continue to deliver cell and gene therapy products to patients.

This Perspective discusses whether secondary genomic findings in the clinical context of diagnostic genomic sequencing tests should be sought and reported.

Importance Recent case reports suggest that B antigen–containing blood products may be associated with anaphylactic transfusion reactions in recipients with preformed immunoglobulin E to galactose- α -1,3-galactose (alpha-gal). Objective To test the association of local alpha-gal syndrome (AGS) prevalence and allergic transfusion reaction (ATR) in patients with blood type O. Design, Setting, and Participants In this international, multicenter, retrospective cohort study at academic medical centers, sites were assigned to AGS high- or low-prevalence clusters based on the known geographic distribution of AGS. Data were collected on platelet or plasma transfusions and ATRs during 2020 to 2024. Consecutive patients receiving platelet or plasma transfusions were included. Exposures Patients with blood type O who received B or AB units and patients with blood type O who received O units (reference group) in AGS high- and low-prevalence clusters were compared. Main Outcomes and Measures Before data collection, the hypothesis was that if transfusion-related alpha-gal syndrome (TRAGS) is a true clinical entity, excess ATRs to group B or AB units would be detected in AGS high-prevalence regions exclusively. The main measure was the overall risk ratio (RR) for ATRs to B or AB plasma or platelets in AGS high- vs low-prevalence clusters. Results In total, 558 823 platelet and plasma transfusions at 40 sites in 5 countries were analyzed, of which ATRs occurred in 1744 transfusions (0.3%). In the US AGS high-prevalence cluster (9 sites), significantly more ATRs of any severity occurred among patients with blood type O who received B or AB units vs patients with blood type O who received O units (overall RR, 3.93; 95% CI, 2.96-5.21; P < .001). In contrast, in the primary analysis of the AGS low-prevalence cluster (15 sites), excess ATRs to B or AB units were not detected. In subgroup analyses among patients with blood type O receiving B units, the RR for moderate to severe ATRs was 9.14 (95% CI, 5.39-15.52; P < .001) in the AGS high-prevalence cluster vs 2.15 (95% CI, 1.34-3.47; P = .002) in the AGS low-prevalence cluster. Outside the US, a signal consistent with TRAGS was not detected. Conclusions and Relevance This cohort study provides provocative epidemiologic evidence that TRAGS may be a unique manifestation of AGS and a previously unrecognized risk associated with transfusion. In AGS high-prevalence regions, blood collectors and hospital transfusion services should consider approaches to preventing severe ATRs from B or AB plasma or platelet units.

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is a transformative modality for refractory hematologic malignancies; however, its adoption in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) is severely constrained by prohibitive manufacturing costs, limited specialized infrastructure, and fragmented regulatory frameworks. To address this translational gap, we propose a pragmatic, cost-adapted model for establishing Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) laboratories tailored to the socioeconomic realities of LAC. This model advocates for decentralized, modular cleanroom facilities that integrate fully closed automated manufacturing platforms with risk-based quality management systems. Furthermore, we emphasize the strategic implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) and digital health tools—such as electronic batch records and predictive analytics—to optimize resource utilization and ensure stringent regulatory compliance. Essential to this framework is the cultivation of a specialized local workforce and the promotion of regional regulatory harmonization through initiatives like PAHO’s Red PARF. Ultimately, this scalable approach provides a realistic roadmap to democratize CAR T-cell therapy in LAC, fostering regional biomanufacturing autonomy and promoting equitable patient access.

ABSTRACT Many real‐world patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) are excluded by TOPAZ‐1 criteria; this study assessed cisplatin and gemcitabine plus durvalumab (CGD) efficacy and safety in these patients. Data from 1358 patients with advanced BTC treated with first‐line CGD across 55 international centers were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were classified as TOPAZ‐1‐in (meeting all inclusion criteria) or TOPAZ‐1‐out (meeting ≥ 1 exclusion criterion). Primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression‐free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety. Furthermore, OS and PFS of the TOPAZ‐1‐out cohort were compared with reconstructed survival data from the phase III trial. 912 (67.1%) patients were classified as TOPAZ‐1‐in , and 446 (32.9%) as TOPAZ‐1‐out . After a median follow‐up of 14.5 months (95% CI: 13.7–36.5), OS was 16.1 months in TOPAZ‐1‐in and 12.5 months in TOPAZ‐1‐out (HR 0.69, 95% CI: 14.6–16.5, p = 0.0001); PFS was 8.2 versus 6.5 months (HR 0.73, 95% CI: 7.1–8.1, p < 0.0001). Median OS in the TOPAZ‐1‐out cohort (12.5 months) was nearly identical to the phase III trial experimental arm (12.9 months; HR 1.15, p = 0.13); for PFS the HR was 1.12 (95% CI 0.93–1.42; p = 0.09). Among TOPAZ‐1‐out patients, active infection, elevated bilirubin, and ECOG PS > 1 were linked to poorer OS, while no detrimental impact emerged for ALT/AST abnormalities, corticosteroid use, renal or hematologic parameters, or prior surgery within 6 months, suggesting treatment effectiveness was broadly maintained across clinical subgroups. Furthermore, TOPAZ‐1‐out patients experienced no significant increase in adverse events compared with the TOPAZ‐1‐in group. Real‐world data suggest CGD may be effective in TOPAZ‐1‐out patients, with no evident increase in toxicity, supporting the potential expanded use of the regimen in clinical practice.

Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women, causing more than 600,000 deaths every year. The human microbiome is increasingly recognized as a key regulator of cancer initiation, progression, and therapeutic response. Postbiotics—defined as non-viable microbial cells and/or their structural components and metabolites that confer health benefits—are emerging as promising and safer alternatives to live probiotics in oncology. This review provides a comprehensive mechanistic overview of the potential role of postbiotics against cancer, with a specific focus on breast cancer. Preclinical evidence demonstrates that selected postbiotics exert dose- and time-dependent anticancer effects against multiple breast cancer subtypes by modulating key oncogenic pathways (such as PI3K/AKT and NF-κB) and inducing epigenetic regulation through histone deacetylase inhibition. Beyond direct effects on tumor cell proliferation and apoptosis, postbiotics influence the breast cancer microenvironment by reshaping cytokine networks, suppressing pro-metastatic inflammation, and enhancing antitumor immune responses through the activation of NK cells and T cells. We also provide emerging links between microbiome composition, estrobolome activity, and breast cancer subtype-specific biology. Despite these encouraging findings, the clinical translation of postbiotics in oncology remains limited. Currently, only one registered clinical trial investigates postbiotics in the oncology setting (melanoma), and no clinical trials have specifically evaluated postbiotics in breast cancer patients. This highlights a substantial translational gap between preclinical evidence and clinical application. Accordingly, well-designed, tumor-specific clinical trials are urgently needed to validate the safety, efficacy, and therapeutic potential of postbiotics as novel strategies in personalized breast cancer management.

ABSTRACT Surgery after response to first‐line chemoimmunotherapy may offer a potential curative option for patients with locally advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) initially considered unresectable. However, robust real‐world evidence in this setting remains limited. We retrospectively analyzed patients with locally advanced BTC treated with first‐line cisplatin, gemcitabine, and durvalumab (CGD) across 55 centers in 12 countries. Endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression‐free survival (PFS), disease‐free survival (DFS) among resected patients, objective response rate (ORR), and the prognostic impact of surgery. A multivariable logistic regression model was developed to predict surgical conversion using baseline clinical and laboratory variables. Among 1358 screened patients, 219 had locally advanced disease and were included in the analysis. Median follow‐up was 14.5 months. ORR was 34.6%, with median PFS and OS of 10.0 and 20.7 months, respectively. Twenty‐four patients (10.9%) underwent surgical resection after systemic therapy. Median OS was 22.5 months in resected patients versus 19.9 months in those who did not undergo surgery. Median DFS after resection was 15.8 months. Pathological lymph node involvement was independently associated with shorter DFS. Larger baseline tumor size correlated with higher odds of radiological response but not with OS. An exploratory elastic‐net model retained four baseline variables and showed moderate discriminative ability for surgical conversion, with an apparent AUC of 0.72 and an optimism‐corrected AUC of 0.65. First‐line CGD enabled secondary resection in approximately 11% of patients with locally advanced BTC. A simple baseline model may support patient selection for conversion surgery, although prospective validation is needed.