Citations

Clear

768 citation(s) found for "Su, Leon".

Evaluating the Performance of Mammogram-Based AI Risk Model in Predicting Subsequent Breast Cancer in Women with a Prior History of Breast Cancer
Ogunlade, Samuel B. , Dakkak, Andrew, Leon, Amie , Robinson, Kristin A. , Maimone, Santo , Villalba, Michael , Letter, Haley , Letter, Haley P , Maimone, Santo , Robinson, Kristin A , Dakkak, Andrew

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Medicine | August 24, 2026 | Volume: 15 | Issue: 17 | Pages: 6507

10.3390/jcm15176507 | PMID 42739514 Get It

Objectives: Women with a history of breast cancer are at increased risk of developing subsequent breast cancer, including ipsilateral recurrence and contralateral new primary breast cancer. This study evaluated the discriminatory performance of a mammogram-based artificial intelligence (AI) risk model for predicting subsequent breast cancer within one year after a negative screening mammogram. Methods: This enriched retrospective case–control study included women with a prior history of breast cancer who underwent screening digital breast tomosynthesis between January 2018 and December 2023 at three affiliated academic breast imaging centers. Digital breast tomosynthesis examinations classified as BI-RADS 1 or 2 were retrospectively analyzed using the ProFound AI® Risk model version 1.0 to estimate 1-year breast cancer risk. Patients were classified according to whether they developed subsequent breast cancer within one year of the index screening examination. Model discrimination was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic analysis. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated at an exploratory cutoff selected by maximizing the Youden index. Results: The study included 96 women (mean age, 65.3 ± 8.7 years), of whom 32 developed subsequent breast cancer within one year, and 64 did not. The mean AI risk score was significantly higher in the subsequent breast cancer group than in the control group (1.18 ± 0.59 vs. 0.49 ± 0.41; p < 0.001). The AI model demonstrated an AUC of 0.824 (95% CI: 0.728–0.921). At an exploratory cutoff of 0.39, sensitivity was 81.3%, specificity was 76.6%, PPV was 63.4%, and NPV was 89.1%. In separate exploratory analyses, the AUC was 0.790 (95% CI: 0.641–0.939) for ipsilateral recurrence and 0.860 (95% CI: 0.752–0.974) for contralateral new primary breast cancer. AI risk scores were not significantly correlated with tumor size or age at subsequent breast cancer diagnosis. Conclusions: In this enriched retrospective case–control study, higher mammogram-based AI risk scores were associated with subsequent breast cancer within one year after a negative screening examination. The model demonstrated discriminatory performance for both ipsilateral recurrence and contralateral new primary breast cancer; however, these analyses were exploratory. Because the cohort was enriched for subsequent breast cancer events, the reported predictive values are specific to the study sample and should not be extrapolated to routine surveillance populations. Larger prospective cohorts are needed to validate discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility.
Sedentary Behavior and Physical Activity in Individuals With Bipolar Disorder: An Evidence Synthesis and Position Statement From the ISBD Nutrition and Exercise Task Force (NExT)
Lafer, Beny , Neves, Lucas Melo , Vancampfort, Davy , Stubbs, Brendon, Gonzalez‐Pinto, Ana, Nierenberg, Andrew A. , Goldstein, Benjamin I. , Koning, Elena , Gomes, Fabiano A., Saraf, Gayatri , Sylvia, Louisa G. , Solmi, Marco, Frye, Mark A. , Berk, Michael , Mansur, Rodrigo B., Marx, Wolfgang, Schuch, Felipe, Brietzke, Elisa , Stubbs, Brendon , Neves, Lucas M , Nierenberg, Andrew A , Olagunju, Andrew T , Goldstein, Benjamin I , Vieta, E , Koning, Elena , Fiedorowicz, Jess G , Yatham, Lakshmi N , Sylvia, Louisa , Vinberg, Maj , Gardea-Resendez, Manuel , Frye, Mark , Berk, Michael , Alsuwaidan, Mohammad , Milev, Roumen , Rosenbaum, Simon , Van Rheenen, Tamsyn , Balanzá-Martínez, Vicent , Solmi, Marco , Gonzalez-Pinto, Ana, Olagunju, Andrew T , Vieta, Eduard , Fiedorowicz, Jess G. , Yatham, Lakshmi N. , Gardea‐Resendez, Manuel , Solmi, Marco , Mansur, Rodrigo Barbachan , Marx, Wolfgang , Schuch, Felipe Barreto

Mayo Clinic

Bipolar Disorders | August 3, 2026 | Volume: 28 | Issue: 5 | Pages: No page available

10.1111/bdi.70164 | PMID 42545207 Get It

ABSTRACT Background Higher time in sedentary behavior and insufficient physical activity are very common in bipolar disorder (BD). Whereas physical activity and exercise offer significant benefits across mental health, brain health, and heart health in BD. The International Society for Bipolar Disorders Nutrition and Exercise Task Force (NExT) synthesized evidence to evaluate the impacts of sedentary behavior, physical activity, and exercise on illness course, physical health, and treatment outcomes. Methods A best‐evidence synthesis was conducted using a question‐and‐answer format. We searched PsycINFO, SPORTDiscus, Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science from inception to March 1st, 2026, supplemented by reference lists and existing guidelines. Search terms included combinations of physical activity, exercise, sedentary behavior, and bipolar disorder‐related terms. Results Observational studies show that individuals with BD exhibit significantly higher sedentary behavior and lower physical activity compared to the general population, with notable discrepancies between self‐reported and objective measurements. Evidence on physical activity's protective role against BD onset is mixed, with some prospective and Mendelian randomization studies suggesting reduced risk, while others report bidirectional or null associations. Preliminary findings from clinical trials indicate that exercise improves overall functioning, reduces mood episode frequency and hospitalizations, and alleviates depressive symptoms, with one pilot study showing an 82% antidepressant response rate. Exercise also shows potential to reduce anxiety and improve sleep, though robust data are limited. Conclusions Despite limited high‐quality evidence, physical activity and exercise demonstrate promising physical and mental health benefits for individuals with BD. Future research should prioritize multicenter randomized controlled trials, enhanced assessment tools, and accessible, tailored programs to integrate physical activity into routine BD management.
ASCO 2026: Highlights in Breast Cancer Research
Advani, Pooja , Leon‐Ferre, Roberto A.

Mayo Clinic

American Medical Journal Oncology | July 23, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: 24

10.33590/oncolamj/05f66y3r Get It

Temporal Trends and Predictors of Access Site Crossover During PCI in Contemporary Practice: A Report From the NCDR CathPCI Registry
Reynolds, E O R , Marks, Angel , Wojdyla, Daniel, Smilowitz, Nathaniel R. , Gilchrist, Ian C. , Gulati, Rajiv , Rao, Sunil V. , Reynolds, Eli , Shah, Binita , Marks, Angel , Wojdyla, Daniel , Smilowitz, Nathaniel R , Rymer, Jennifer A , Gilchrist, Ian C , Gulati, Rajiv , Rao, Sunil V , Shah, Binita

Mayo Clinic

Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions | July 20, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1161/circinterventions.126.016673 | PMID 42473791 Get It

BACKGROUND: Randomized trials comparing radial and femoral access report access site crossover rates of 3% to 9% for radial access and 1% to 3% for femoral access. However, contemporary real-world crossover rates are not well characterized. The aim was to evaluate contemporary trends and predictors of vascular access site crossover during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: We analyzed index PCI procedures recorded in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCI Registry from 2018 to 2024. Access site crossover was identified using documented access data, with radial-to-femoral crossover inferred when the final successful access site was femoral. Temporal trends and clinical predictors of crossover were examined. Operator experience was assessed using cumulative total and radial PCI volumes from 2011 to 2024 as captured in CathPCI Registry versions 4 and 5. RESULTS: Among 3 861 790 index PCIs, 192 902 (5.0%) involved access site crossover, with a modest increase over time. Radial-to-femoral crossover accounted for 81.2% of crossover events. Factors independently associated with crossover included older age, female sex, higher body mass index, and peripheral vascular disease. Operators with the lowest total PCI volume and the lowest radial PCI volume experienced the highest crossover rates. Notably, operators with low radial PCI volume demonstrated a substantial decline in radial-to-femoral crossover over the study period. CONCLUSIONS: In contemporary clinical practice, access site crossover rates are consistent with those reported in randomized trials. Although crossover occurs more frequently among lower-volume operators, rates decline with increasing operator experience, supporting the presence of a radial access learning curve and improvement in procedural performance over time.
Clarifying risk-factor associations with quantitative breast tumor features: a pooled analysis of 24 studies
Adams, Daniel , Hurson, Amber N. , Ahearn, Thomas U, Andrulis, Irene L, Antoniou, Antonis C, Auvinen, Päivi, Bane, Anita, González, Amy Berrington de , Bodelon, Clara, Bolla, Manjeet K. , Borrero, Maria , Brenner, Hermann, Brock, Ian W., Camp, Nicola J. , Cessna, Melissa H., Chanock, Stephen J, Chenevix-Trench, G, Copson, ER, Fh, Couch, Devilee, P, Easton, Douglas F, Eccles, Diana, Figueroa, Jonine D, Glendon, Gord, Hamann, U, Hartman, Mikael, Heemskerk-Gerritsen, Bernadette A M, Hodge, James M, Holleczek, Bernd, Hollestelle, A M, Mj, Hooning, Investigators, kConFab, Amor, David, Andrews, Lesley , Antill, Y , Rl, Balleine, Beesley, Jonathan, Bennett, Ian, Bogwitz, Michael, Bodek, Simon, Botes, Leon, Brennan, Meagan, Brown, Melissa, Buckley, Michael, Caldon, Liz, Campbell, Ian, Chakrabarti, Anannya , Chauhan, Deepa, Chauhan, Manisha, Christian, Alice, Cohen, Paul, Colley, Alison, Cui, James, Courtney, Eliza, Cummings, Margaret, Delatycki, Martin, Dickson, Rebecca, Dixon, Joanne, Duijf, Pascal, Edwards, Stacey, Farshid, Gelareh , Fellows, AM, Fenton, Georgina, Field, Michael, Flanagan, James, Fong, Peter, Forrest, Laura, Fox, Stephen, French, Juliet , Friedlander, Michael, Gattas, Mike, George, Peter, Greening, Sian, Harris, Marion, Harraka, Philip, Hayward, Nick, Hoskins, Cass , Hunt, Clare, James, Paul, Jenkins, Mark, Kidd, Alexa, Koehler, Jessica, Kollias, J, Lakhani, Sunil, Lawrence, Mitchell, Lee, Jason , Li, Shuai, Lindeman, Geoff, Lippey, Jocelyn, Lipton, Lara, Loi, Sherene, Mann, Graham, Marsh, Deborah, McLachlan, Sue Anne, Reed, Amy McCart, Milne, Roger, Nightingale, Sophie , O’Connell, Shona, O’Sullivan, Sarah, Reilly, Robert O', Ortega, David Gallego, Pachter, Nick, Pang, Jia-Min, Pathak, Gargi, Patterson, Briony, Phillips, Kelly, Pieper, Ellen, Ramus, Susan, Rickard, Edwina, Ragunathan, Abi, Robinson, Bridget, Skandarajah, Anita, Salisbury, Elizabeth, Saunders, Christobel, Saunus, Jodi, Scott, Rodney, Scott, Clare, Sexton, Adrienne, Shaw, Joanne, Shelling, Andrew, Srinivasa, Shweta , Simpson, Peter, Mc, Southey, Spurdle, Amanda, Taylor, Jessica, Taylor, Renea, Thorne, Heather, Trainer, A H, Tucker, Kathy , Visvader, Jane, Walker, Logan, Williams, Rachael, Winship, I, Young, Mary Ann, Zaheed, Milita , Investigators, S On Behalf Of The Chlovis Study, Tan, Veronique Kiak Mien , Lim, Geok Hoon, Tan, Ern Yu , Tan, Su-Ming, Iau, Philip Tsau Choong , Jakubowska, A, Jones, Michael E. , Jones, Louise , Jones, Brandt, Jung, Audrey, Kaaks, Rudolf, Keeman, Renske , Lawrence, Scott, Li, J M, Lubiński, J, Mannermaa, Arto, Manoochehri, Mehdi, Martens, John W M, Mesker, Wilma E, Muhammad, Noor , Obi, Nadia, Olson, Janet E, Patel, Alpa V, Prajzendanc, Karolina , Ruddy, Kathryn J, Safizadeh, Fatemeh , Schöttker, Ben, Tengström, Maria , Le, Teras, Timmermans, M, Tollenaar, RA, Vachon, Celine M, Wang, Q, Yang, Xiaohong R, Zamora, M Pilar, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Schmidt, M K, Pharoah, Paul D P, Abubakar, Mustapha, Eccles, Diana , Ahearn, Thomas U. , Eccles, Diana , Jones, Michael E , Jones, J. Louise , Berrington de Gonzalez, Amy , Antoniou, Antonis C. , Bane, Anita, Behrens, Sabine , Białkowska, Katarzyna , Bodelón, Clara , Brenner, Hermann , Broeks, Annegien , Chanock, Stephen Jacob , Chenevix‐Trench, Georgia , Copson, Ellen , Couch, Fergus J, Cox, Angela , Cross, Simon S. , Devilee, Peter , Dunning, Alison M. , Easton, Douglas F. , Figueroa, Jonine D. , Glendon, Gord, González‐Neira, Anna , Hartikainen, Jaana M. , Hartman, Mikael , Heemskerk‐Gerritsen, Bernadette A. M. , Ho, Peh Joo , Hodge, James M. , Holleczek, Bernd , Hollestelle, Antoinette , Hooning, Maartje J. , Investigators, kConFab, Balleine, Rosemary L. , Bennett, Ian, Bogwitz, Michael R. , Bodek, Simon , Botes, Leon P., Buckley, Michael , Cohen, Paul A. , Crook, Ashley , Courtney, Eliza , Dawson, Sarah‐Jane , DeFazio, Anna , Delatycki, Martin B. , Duijf, Pascal H. G. , Fellows, Andrew, Fenton, Georgina L. , Flanagan, James M. , Forrest, Laura Elenor , Friedländer, Michael , Harraka, Philip A. , Kidd, Alexa, Kollias, James, Lakhani, Sunil R. , Lawrence, Mitchell, Lindeman, Geoffrey J. , Lippey, Jocelyn , Loi, Sherene , Reed, Amy E. McCart , Milne, Roger L , Gallego‐Ortega, David , Pathak, Gargi, Pearn, Amy , Robinson, Bridget A. , Skandarajah, Anita Rohini , Salisbury, Elizabeth, Saunders, Christobel , Saunus, Jodi M. , Savas, Peter Stephen , Sexton, Adrienne , Shelling, Andrew Neil , Simpson, Peter, Spurdle, Amanda B. , Visvader, Jane E. , Williams, Rachael, Tan, Bien‐Keem , Lim, Geok Hoon , Kaaks, Rudolf , Lawrence, Scott M. , Lissowska, Jolanta , Mannermaa, Arto , Manoochehri, Mehdi, Mesker, Wilma E. , Mulligan, Anna Marie , Obi, Nadia , Olson, Janet E. , Osório, Ana , Ottewell, Penelope Dawn , Patel, Alpa V , Pita, Guillermo , Rashid, Muhammad Usman , Ruddy, Kathryn J. , Schöttker, Ben , Seibold, Petra , Tapper, William , Teras, Lauren R , Timmermans, Mieke, Vachon, Celine M. , Wesseling, Jelle , Yadav, Siddhartha , Chang‐Claude, Jenny , Schmidt, Marjanka K. , Abubakar, Mustapha , García‐Closas, Montserrat

Mayo Clinic

JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute | July 18, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1093/jnci/djag244 | PMID 42498670 Get It

Abstract Background Breast cancer is etiologically heterogeneous, but which risk factors differ in their associations across tumor subtypes remains unclear. We conducted a large, pooled analysis to evaluate independent, dose-response associations between breast cancer risk factors and quantitative tumor features. Methods Analyses of 15,731 invasive breast cancers from 24 studies evaluated associations (p-trend) between reproductive and hormonal factors, body mass index (BMI), alcohol, smoking, and family history in relation to quantitative immunohistochemistry measures on tissue microarrays (ER, PR, HER2, KI67, TP53) and tumor grade. Analyses in a subset of 10 population-based studies estimated subtype-specific odds ratios (ORs) comparing cases to controls. A Bayesian False Discovery Probability (BFDP) &lt;0.2 was used to identify associations with strong statistical evidence. Results Nulliparity and later age at menopause were associated with higher ER-positivity (p-trend=0.021 and 0.001, respectively), with corresponding OR[ER+] (95% CI) = 1.49 (1.16-1.90) for nulliparous vs. parous and 1.07 (1.03-1.11) per 5 years. Current combined menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) use was associated with lower grade (p-trend&lt;0.001), with OR [grade1] = 3.37 (2.69-4.21) for current vs. never users. Higher BMI was associated with lower ER-positivity and higher grade in premenopausal women (p-trend&lt;0.001 and &lt;0.001), with OR[ER+] = 0.80 (0.74-0.87) and OR[grade1] = 0.75 (0.63-0.88) per 5 units, and with higher PR-positivity and higher grade in postmenopausal women (p-trend&lt;0.001 and &lt;0.001), with OR[PR+] = 1.08 (1.03-1.14) and OR[grade 3] = 1.10 (1.04-1.17) per 5 units. Conclusion This pooled analysis of 15,731 cases showed that nulliparity, age at menopause, MHT, and BMI have independent, dose-response associations with ER, PR, and grade, clarifying patterns of etiologic heterogeneity. Associations with HER2, KI67 and TP53, or other risk factors did not meet our threshold for strong evidence.
Development and Validation of a Simplified Martin-Hopkins LDL-C Equation Using Machine Learning
Park, Jihwan, Fan, Leon, Marzinke, Mark A., Sokoll, Lori J., Muthukumar, Alagarraju, Murphy, Sabina A., Sabatine, Marc S., Gurudu, Rachana, Meeusen, Jeff W., Martin, Seth S., Marzinke, Mark A. , Sokoll, Lori J. , Muthukumar, Alagarraju , Murphy, Sabina A. , Sabatine, Marc S. , Gurudu, Rachana, Meeusen, Jeffrey W. , Martin, Seth S.

Mayo Clinic

JAMA Cardiology | July 15, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1001/jamacardio.2026.2314 | PMID 42455545 Get It

Importance Although the Martin-Hopkins equation is widely validated and used to estimate low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) for clinical care, a simplified equation could streamline implementation and enable broader adoption. Objective To develop a simplified machine learning–based alternative to the Martin-Hopkins equation using multivariate adaptive regression splines (LDL-C–MH-MARS) and compare its performance with the Friedewald (LDL-C–F), Sampson–National Institutes of Health (LDL-C–S), Modified Sampson (LDL-C–MS), and Martin-Hopkins (LDL-C–MH) equations. Design, Setting, and Participants The Very Large Database of Lipids is a cross-sectional database of clinical lipid measurements from a population-representative convenience sample of adult and pediatric patients. Lipid measurements were performed by Vertical Auto Profile ultracentrifugation between October 1, 2015, and June 30, 2019. The study included patients with complete lipid panel data who were randomly assigned to a training set and a test set. External validation against preparative ultracentrifugation-based LDL-C measurements was performed in reference laboratory datasets from the Mayo Clinic (broad LDL-C concentrations) and the Further Cardiovascular Outcomes Research With Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9 (PCSK9) Inhibition in Subjects with Elevated Risk (FOURIER) trial (observations from patients with low LDL-C concentrations while taking evolocumab). Study data were analyzed from January to October 2025. Exposures LDL-C–F, LDL-C–S, LDL-C–MS, LDL-C–MH, and LDL-C–MH-MARS equations. Main Outcomes and Measures Accuracy of estimated vs ultracentrifugation-measured LDL-C concentration based on bias, root mean square error (RMSE), and concordance by guideline-based categories. Results The study included 4 939 528 patients (mean [SD] age, 56 [16] years; 2 635 486 female [53%]) with complete lipid panel data who were randomly assigned to a training set (n = 3 292 889) and a test set (n = 1 646 639). LDL-C–MH-MARS equation demonstrated a very low median (IQR) bias of −0.1 (−2.1 to 1.8) mg/dL (to convert to millimoles per liter, multiply by 0.0259), comparable with LDL-C–MH. The median (IQR) difference between the MARS and original Martin-Hopkins equations (ie, LDL-C–MH-MARS – LDL-C–MH) was −0.5 (−1.2 to 0) mg/dL, further suggesting comparability between the 2 methods. The RMSE was smallest for LDL-C–MH-MARS (4.7 mg/dL) and LDL-C–MH (4.9 mg/dL), followed by LDL-C–S (5.8 mg/dL), LDL-C-MS (6.0 mg/dL), and LDL-C–F (7.2 mg/dL). The proportion of patients correctly classified according to clinical categories was nearly identical for LDL-C–MH-MARS (89.7%) and LDL-C–MH (89.6%) but lower for LDL-C–S (86.3%), LDL-C–MS (84.7%), and LDL-C–F (83.1%). The LDL-C–MH-MARS, LDL-C–MH, LDL-C–MS, LDL-C–S, and LDL-C–F equations underestimated LDL-C concentration in 16%, 17%, 28%, 39%, and 60%, respectively, when classifying LDL-C less than 70 mg/dL in patients with triglyceride concentrations of 200 to 399 mg/dL (to convert to millimoles per liter, multiply by 0.0113). The patterns of results were similar in external validation datasets, with the LDL-C–MH-MARS and LDL-C–MH equations demonstrating the highest accuracy. Conclusions and Relevance Study results suggest that the new machine learning–based LDL-C equation provided results comparable with those of the original Martin-Hopkins method while simplifying implementation to a single equation.
Standardized endpoint definitions for trials of transcatheter left atrial appendage closure: a consensus from the Left Atrial Appendage Academic Research Consortium
Garot, Philippe , Mehran, Roxana , Backer, Ole De , Freeman, James V. , Wunderlich, Nina, Hibbert, Benjamin , Tzikas, Apostolos , Nair, Devi, Berti, Sergio, Saw, Jacqueline , Freixa, Xavier, Doshi, Shephal K. , Cruz-Gonzalez, I, Coylewright, Megan, Aminian, Adel, Sanchis, L, Ruff, Christian T, Landmesser, Ulf, Lakkireddy, Dhanunjaya , Alasnag, Mirvat, Yamamoto, Masanori , Iwamoto, Shin, Shiba, Takeshi , Jin, Y Z, Jagadeesan, Vikrant, Krucoff, Mitchell W., Nielsen-Kudsk, Jens Erik, Gibson, C Michael, Gurol, Edip Mahmut, Cutlip, Don E, Leon, Martin B, Holmes, David R. , Morice, M C, Alkhouli, Mohamad, De Backer, Ole , Räber, Lorenz , Lakkireddy, Dhanunjaya , Ellis, Christopher , Yamamoto, Masanori , Schmidt, Boris , Hildick-Smith, David , Oliva, Angelo , Spitzer, Ernest , Holmes, David R , Mehran, Roxana , Hibbert, Benjamin , Freeman, James V , Tzikas, Apostolos , Freixa, Xavier , Cruz‐González, Ignacio , Coylewright, Megan , Aminian, Adel , Price, Matthew J. , Räber, Lorenz , Yao, Xiaoxi , Sanchís, Laura , Ruff, Christian Thomas , Landmesser, Ulf , Ellis, Christopher R. , Alasnag, Mirvat , Ferro, Enrico Giuseppe , Shiba, Takeshi, Jin, Yu, Reddy, Vivek Y. , Spitzer, Ernest , Nielsen‐Kudsk, Jens Erik , Gibson, C. Michael , Gurol, M. Edip , Cutlip, Donald E. , Leon, Martin B. , Alkhouli, Mohamad

Mayo Clinic

European Heart Journal | July 9, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1093/eurheartj/ehag482 | PMID 42425446 Get It

Abstract Since its introduction in 2002, left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) has rapidly expanded as an alternative to anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation at high risk of stroke. Harmonized processes for data collection, analysis, and reporting in LAAC trials are essential to enhance research quality and improve clinical practice. The Left Atrial Appendage Academic Research Consortium (LAARC) initiative is an independent collaboration of academic research organizations, cardiology and neurology experts, clinical trialists, and regulatory authorities from the USA, Europe, and Asia. The consortium engaged clinical experts, regulators—including the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), European Notified Bodies, and Japan’s Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA)—and industry leaders to define standardized study elements and endpoints for LAAC trials. Key considerations included alignment with prior Academic Research Consortium initiatives, procedural and mechanistic insights, and clinical relevance. Consensus definitions were proposed for mortality, stroke, bleeding, and device performance, along with composite endpoints for safety and effectiveness. The proposed LAARC consensus definitions aim to standardize endpoint reporting, improve comparability across studies, and support regulatory and clinical trial applications for this evolving therapy through broad dissemination in the peer-reviewed literature.
Expanding Microgel Parameters to Model the Tumor Microenvironment and Examine Temozolomide Resistance in Glioblastoma
Payan, Brittany A. , Kattoor, Joel, Leon, Annika Carrillo Diaz De, Thompson, Gunnar, Molley, Tom, Sarkaria, Jann N., Harley, Brendan A.C. , Harley, Brendan A C , Thompson, Gunnar B. , Kilian, Kristopher Alan , Sarkaria, Jann N.

Mayo Clinic

No container title available | July 9, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.64898/2026.07.08.737105 | PMID 42465419 Get It

ABSTRACT Glioblastoma (GBM) is a highly aggressive brain tumor with a five-year survival rate of less than 5%. The current standard of care established 20 years ago includes maximal surgical resection and administration of alkylating agent temozolomide (TMZ). GBM is highly invasive, and GBM cells that evade surgical resection can become resistant to TMZ and develop new aggressive secondary tumors. Post-relapse there are few treatment options available to patients. Tissue engineering approaches suggest the opportunity to develop in vitro models of the GBM tumor microenvironment that may accelerate the discovery of novel therapies for GBM. Here, we report the adaptation of hydrogel microdroplets (microgels) to encapsulate GBM cells in a tailorable 3D matrix to assess patters of growth and to screen TMZ drug response using patient-derived xenograft (PDX) specimens. We exploit a unique aspect of the microgel system to account for the cellular heterogeneity within the tumor microenvironment (TME). We combine cell-laden microgels generated from TMZ-resistant and TMZ responsive variants of the same PDX specimens to create heterogeneous populations with varying levels of drug sensitivity. We demonstrate a range of drug resistance phenotypes as a function of the ratio of TMZ-responsive to resistance cells and identify the population required for TMZ-resistance to overtake take the response. We then investigate the influence of tumor mimetic shifts in hyaluronic acid bioavailability and hypoxia on patterns of TMZ resistance. We show exposure to matrix-bound hyaluronan increases TMZ resistance and the glioma stem cell population in both cell variants. Lastly, we report an increase in TMZ sensitivity but divergent changes in the GSC subfraction for TMZ resistant vs responsive GBM in the presence of hypoxia. Together, we demonstrate the versatility of cell-laden microgel approach to replicate heterogenous tumor populations, model shifts in the tumor microenvironment, and rapidly screen therapeutic response.
ATR senses stiff extracellular matrix to promote epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and immune suppression
Tu, Xinyi , 孙要良, Ouyang, Yaobin, Zhu, Lingling, Pavelko, Kevin D. , Leon-Ferre, Roberto A., Jiang, Yanxia , Dong, Haidong , Sarkaria, Jann N., Wang, Liewei , Huang, J, Luo, Kuntian, Mutter, Robert W. , Pavelko, Kevin D , Dong, Haidong , Zeng, Xiangyu , Ouyang, Yaobin , Yin, Ping , Carter, Jodi M. , Zhu, Shouhai , Sarkaria, Jann N. , Han, Yiqun , Wu, Zheming , Lou, Zhenkun

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Investigation | July 7, 2026 | Volume: 136 | Issue: 16 | Pages: No page available

10.1172/jci192285 | PMID 42412560 Get It

Our research uncovers a role for ATR in responding to ECM stiffness and promoting epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and metastasis. ATR, when deubiquitinated and upregulated by USP21 under enhanced ECM stiffness conditions, phosphorylates the nuclear protein SUN2, which promotes β-catenin nuclear translocation and EMT. ATM-mediated EMT promotes polymorphonuclear myeloid-derived suppressor cell recruitment and inhibits CD103 + dendritic cells, fostering an immunosuppressive tumor milieu. ATR inhibition disrupts this malignant cascade by promoting mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition to enhance antitumor immunity and mitigate metastases. Consistently, circulating HLA-DR + dendritic cells were also enhanced following treatment with the ATR inhibitor berzosertib in patients with therapeutically resistant early-stage breast cancer. Our data suggest that ATR-targeted therapy may be optimized by considering both DNA damage–dependent and EMT-inducing effects of ATR ATR promotes metastasis and immunosuppression through EMT process
Mammogram-Based Artificial Intelligence Risk Assessment in High-Risk Women Undergoing Supplemental Screening with MRI
Ogunlade, Samuel B. , Wang, Lian, Tavana, Anahita , Maimone, Santo , Robinson, Kristin A. , Moran, Kaitlin M., Leon, Amie , Morozov, Andrey P, Nwachukwu, Chidi T., Letter, Haley P, Maimone, Santo , Moran, Kaitlin M , Letter, Haley

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Breast Imaging | July 2, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1093/jbi/wbag046 | PMID 42747416 Get It

Abstract Objective Current clinical risk models were developed for longer-term breast cancer risk stratification and therefore have limited utility for predicting short-term (1-year) breast cancer risk. This study evaluates the performance of a mammogram-based artificial intelligence (MB-AI) risk model for predicting breast cancer diagnosis within 1 year in high-risk women. Methods This retrospective case-control study included 340 women who underwent supplemental MRI screening within 1 year following a negative mammogram, of whom 101 (29.7%) developed breast cancer and 239 (70.3%) remained cancer-free during the same interval. Artificial-intelligence–assigned absolute 1-year risk scores, Tyrer–Cuzick (TC) lifetime and 10-year scores, and Gail lifetime and 5-year scores were analyzed. Model discrimination was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were estimated at optimal cutoffs. Subgroup analyses examined model performance across genetic, menopausal, reproductive, and tumor-based strata. Results The MB-AI model demonstrated the highest overall discriminative ability (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.812), with strong performance in extremely dense breasts (AUC = 0.976). By comparison, TC lifetime (AUC = 0.625) and Gail lifetime (AUC = 0.668) models showed modest discrimination, while TC 10-year and Gail 5-year models did not discriminate (AUCs ≤0.49). Subgroup analyses showed consistent performance across clinical and pathological categories. The MB-AI model also showed an AUC comparable to that of previously developed AI models. Conclusions A mammogram-based AI model demonstrated improved performance compared with traditional clinical risk models for predicting breast cancer diagnosis within 1 year in women undergoing supplemental screening. These findings support that AI-based approaches may reflect both short-term risk and early imaging features of occult disease and suggest further investigation of AI as a complement to existing risk stratification strategies.