Citations

Background: Since publication of the American Society of Hematology 2019 Guidelines for Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP), new clinical trials have been completed and new treatments have become available. Objective: These evidence-based guidelines from the American Society of Hematology (ASH) are a focused update of the 2019 ASH ITP guidelines, centering on treatment of adults with primary ITP. Methods: ASH formed a multidisciplinary guideline panel including two patient representatives that was balanced to minimize potential bias from conflicts of interest. The University of Oklahoma supported the guideline development process, including updating or performing systematic evidence reviews (up to July 19, 2025). The panel prioritized clinical questions and outcomes according to their importance for clinicians and patients and identification of areas with new data or where application of new methods would be of benefit. The panel used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach, including GRADE Evidence-to-Decision frameworks and the GRADE framework for multiple comparisons, to assess evidence and make recommendations, which were subject to public comment. Results: The panel agreed on recommendations in adults with primary ITP regarding initial therapy and second-line treatment in patients who failed first-line corticosteroids. The panel also issued good practice statements on thrombopoietic agent switching and splenectomy. Conclusions: Novel recommendations of these guidelines include: (1) initial therapy with a combination of rituximab plus corticosteroids or a thrombopoietic agent plus corticosteroids rather than corticosteroids alone (conditional recommendation) and (2) a thrombopoietic agent (strong recommendation) or rituximab (conditional recommendation) for patients who failed first-line corticosteroids.

Abstract Systems-based hematology (SBH) is an emerging discipline focused on optimizing care delivery for patients with hematologic disorders within complex health care systems. Despite its growing importance, the field lacks a formal definition, standardized curriculum, and clear career pathway, hindering widespread adoption and training of future SBH experts. We sought to define core principles, competencies, challenges, and future directions of SBH to identify foundational components for a potential educational curriculum. Semistructured interviews were conducted with 8 SBH experts. Expert participants were identified through their committee involvement with the American Society of Hematology. Five overarching themes emerged: (1) The accidental expert: SBH careers have developed organically and reactively in response to pressing institutional needs, not through formal training; (2) Defining the unseen: experts define the field pragmatically by its function and roles; (3) The SBH toolkit: success requires a hybrid skillset combining clinical hematology expertise with health systems science (HSS) principles; (4) The architect's dilemma: the field's growth is hindered by interdependent challenges of building a curriculum, awareness, and securing resources; and (5) Charting the future: the discipline is poised for growth, driven by increasing health care complexity and specialization. SBH represents the nexus of HSS principles and hematology care. Formalizing SBH requires a multipronged approach, including developing a standardized curriculum that equips learners with a hybrid skillset, creating clear value for health systems and patients, and fostering a community of practice through professional societies. These findings provide a foundational framework for developing educational resources and institutional support necessary to continue advancing SBH.

Abstract Background: Autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) is a condition in which the immune system erroneously attacks and damages red blood cells. While the epidemiology of AIHA has been examined in various European and Asian nations (Hansen 2020; Kao 2025), there is limited data available from the United States (US). Using US insurance claims data, this research aimed to determine the prevalence and demographic characteristics of AIHA over a five-year span. Methods: Five databases were used: Merative MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters; Optum's de-identified Clinformatics® Data Mart Database; Closed and Open claims sourced through HealthVerity; Merative MarketScan Medicare Supplemental Database; Merative MarketScan Multi-State Medicaid. AIHA was defined by ICD-10 diagnosis codes D59.1x in a given calendar year and a second code within 365 days prior. Annual prevalence in years 2019 – 2023 was calculated among people with insurance enrollment for at least 6 months in the calendar year. Annual prevalence was stratified by age group, sex, and prescription fill for an AIHA-related treatment (systemic steroids, immunosuppressants [azathioprine, mycophenolate, cyclosporin, cyclophosphamide, danazol, bortezomib, rituximab], splenectomy) in the calendar year. Extrapolation of prevalence rates for commercial and government assistance insurance to the US population for 2023 was implemented by age and sex-standardization to the US Census population. For data sources that included both commercial and government assistance insurance, patients aged <65 years were analyzed as commercial insurance and aged ≥65 years as government assistance. Results: AIHA prevalence in 2023 across databases ranged from 2.7 to 4.3 per 100,000 for ages <18 years; 4.2 to 9.4 per 100,000 for ages 18 – 34 years; 8.2 to 11.8 per 100,000 for ages 35 – 49 years; 15.4 to 23.9 per 100,000 for ages 50 – 64 years; 26.6 to 37.0 per 100,000 for ages 65 – 74 years; and 30.6 to 61.2 per 100,000 for age 75 years and older. Across databases and over time, the proportion of AIHA patients that were female was 55% – 67%. Across all databases, in year 2023, half (44% - 55%) of patients received any AIHA-related treatment, out of which one third (26%-34%) received systemic steroids, less than one quarter (9% – 17%) received rituximab, and one third (25% – 31%) received a different immunosuppressant. Compared to patients with commercial insurance, Medicaid-insured patients had lower AIHA-related treatment utilization, whereas Medicare-insured patients had higher utilization. Within age group and sex and by insurance type, low and high estimates of prevalence were used to define a range of prevalence. After standardization to the 2023 US Census population, the estimated prevalence in 2023 ranged from 38,459 to 57,235 patients diagnosed with AIHA, corresponding to prevalence rates of 11.6 to 17.3 per 100,000. This marked an increase from 2019 US Census-standardized estimates of 32,777 to 48,482, with corresponding prevalence rates of 10.1 to 14.9 per 100,000. Discussion: AIHA prevalence was higher in older age groups, with a peak prevalence in ages 65 and older. Prevalence increased approximately 15% over a 5-year interval and was notably higher in patients with commercial health insurance compared to government insurance programs, which may in part be due to the older age of the Medicare population. Fewer than half of patients received an AIHA-related treatment in 2023, which could reflect heterogeneity in disease severity necessitating treatment, in addition to the relapse-remitting nature of AIHA whereby patients experience remission for periods of time. Additionally, insurance claims do not specify an indication for treatment nor a reason for discontinuation; some treatments could have been prescribed for an underlying condition contributing to AIHA. Finally, prevalence extrapolation assumes Americans without health insurance are diagnosed with AIHA at the same rate as those with insurance, which may slightly overestimate the total number of diagnosed patients.Conclusion: AIHA prevalence in this study was consistent with estimates from European countries and has been increasing in recent years, providing evidence of consistent disease epidemiology across several geographies.

Abstract Introduction: Monoclonal gammopathy of thrombotic significance (MGTS) is a recently recognized thrombophilia where monoclonal platelet factor 4 (PF4)-specific IgG antibodies initiate a chronic prothrombotic state characterized by recurrent and potentially life-threatening thrombosis. Studies from large data sets demonstrate that patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) have a heightened risk of experiencing thromboembolic events without a precise explanatory mechanism. The prevalence of MGTS in MGUS-related thrombosis is unknown; however, the recent identification of MGTS antibodies as a cause of thrombosis suggests a potentially causative mechanism. Emerging evidence indicates that detecting pathogenic MGTS antibodies presents diagnostic challenges due to the insensitivity of FDA-approved diagnostic assays adopted from HIT (HIT ELISAs) and gold-standard functional tests that use heparin-treated platelets, such as the serotonin release assay (SRA). Only PF4-enhanced functional assays, including the PF4-dependent P-selectin expression assay (PEA) and PF4-SRA, have proven sensitive for detecting MGTS antibodies. In this study, the PEA was utilized to better define the incidence of pathogenic anti-PF4 antibodies among a cohort of MGUS patients with a history of thrombosis. Methods: A search of the Mayo Clinic Dysproteinemia Bank was conducted to identify two cohorts of IgG MGUS patients, one with venous thromboembolism-associated diagnosis code(s) and the other without. A diagnosis of multiple myeloma was exclusionary. Each serum sample was assessed using the PEA. Mayo Clinic's Institutional Review Board approved the research study. Results: Among the 134 patients studied in the thrombosis cohort, 17 (13%) stimulated platelet activation in the PEA (positive cut-off ≥19%), some weakly. Of these, four patients (Patients 1-4) were confirmed to have PF4-dependent platelet-activating antibodies inhibitable with high concentrations of heparin and sensitive to blockade of the IgG receptor on platelets, FcGRIIa. The thrombotic complications experienced included recurrent deep venous thrombosis (DVT) over several years (Patient 1), a single DVT (Patient 2), a thrombotic cerebrovascular accident (CVA) (Patient 3), and a series of thrombotic events, including DVTs, left atrial thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and acute limb ischemia (Patient 4). Notably, longitudinal samples spanning twelve years (Patient 1), six years (Patient 2), three years (Patient 3), and on a single sample date (Patient 4) were confirmed positive by PEA. The prolonged persistence of platelet-activating anti-PF4 antibodies in Patients 1-3 supported a diagnosis of MGTS in these patients. Strikingly, all four patients tested negative in two FDA-approved HIT ELISAs (Immucor PF4 IgG and Zymutest HIA IgG). SRA was negative for Patients 1 and 2, weakly positive for Patient 3 (33%), and positive for Patient 4 (72%). Of the 166 patients in the MGUS minus thrombosis cohort, one patient demonstrated a non-heparin induced HIT-like antibody that was HIT ELISA (Optical Density >1.0) and PEA-positive, and inhibitable using high concentrations of heparin and FcGRIIa blockade. No follow-up samples were available to assess antibody longevity. The patient had no history of thrombosis, and testing demonstrated that the anti-PF4 antibody was not synonymous with the MGUS antibody.Conclusions: Among a cohort of 134 MGUS patients with thrombosis, the prevalence of MGTS was found to be 2.2% (3 patients with persistent platelet-activating anti-PF4 antibodies). The identification of anti-PF4 antibodies among MGUS patients provides a mechanism contributing to the increased thrombotic risk associated with monoclonal gammopathies. Antibody negativity in HIT ELISA and variable positivity in the SRA highlight the nonclassical serology associated with anti-PF4 antibodies in MGTS and support performing PF4-enhanced functional testing. In addition, some patients appear to produce coincidental (non-monoclonal) platelet-activating anti-PF4 antibodies without evidence of thrombosis, although the longevity of such antibodies could not be examined in the one patient where it was identified. These findings highlight the need for larger, prospective MGUS studies to validate these observations, further define the interplay between monoclonal gammopathies and thrombotic risk, and to better understand the long-term outcomes of patients with MGTS.

Abstract Background Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura (TTP) is a rare, typically acquired disorder due to an immune-mediated deficiency of ADAMTS13, a metalloprotease responsible for cleaving large multimers of von Willebrand Factor (vWF). In the absence of ADAMTS13 activity, ultra-large vWF multimers accumulate, promoting widespread platelet aggregation and microvascular thrombosis. This consumptive cascade leads to thrombocytopenia, microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, fever, neurological symptoms, and rarely renal dysfunction. Although therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) has long been the cornerstone of TTP treatment, the FDA approved Caplacizumab as a first-line treatment for TTP in 2019. This drug is a bivalent single-domain antibody that binds to the A1 domain of vWF and prevents its interaction with platelets, thus effectively interrupting the pathogenic cascade, which is associated with a risk of bleeding. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX Global Collaborative Network, comprising data from 152 healthcare organizations. Adults (≥18 years) with a diagnosis of TTP who received Caplacizumab plus TPE were compared to patients with TTP who received TPE alone. 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance characteristics between cohorts. The primary outcomes assessed were all-cause mortality and major bleeding events over a period of 1 month. Results A total of 4084 patients with TTP were identified, of whom 356 received caplacizumab with TPE and 3728 received TPE. After PSM, 2 balanced cohorts were created: C+P (Caplacizumab + TPE), P only (TPE), each comprising 356 patients. The average age in C+P and P only, after PSM, was 50.4 +/- 16.2 and 50.8 +/- 16.2 years, respectively. Females formed 65.7% of both C+P and P only, and males accounted for 28.4% and 28.7% of C+P and P only, respectively. 2.8% patients in C+P and 7.06% patients in P only had all-cause mortality at the end of 1 month. One-month all-cause mortality was significantly lower in C+P (2.8%) compared to P only (7.06%), with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.385 (95% CI 0.182 to 0.814, p=0.010). Upon assessment of bleeding outcomes, no statistically significant risk difference was noted between the 2 groups, with the odds ratio being 0.974 (95% CI 0.399 to 2.379, p=0.954). Conclusion Our large database study suggests that the addition of caplacizumab to standard TPE therapy is associated with a reduction in one-month all-cause mortality in patients with TTP, without a corresponding increase in major bleeding. However, given the lack of granular clinical data, such as contraindications to caplacizumab use, it is possible that patients who received TPE alone were inherently at a higher risk. As such, while these findings support the potential benefit of early caplacizumab use, they should be interpreted with caution and warrant prospective validation to confirm causality and assess long-term outcomes.

Abstract INTRODUCTION: Warm autoimmune hemolytic anemia (wAIHA) is a rare, autoimmune-mediated hematologic disorder associated with significant morbidity and mortality and may occur as a primary condition or secondary to an underlying disorder. It is the most common subtype of autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA), accounting for 75-80% of AIHA cases. Older adults with wAIHA are particularly vulnerable, as they often have multiple comorbidities and are already at elevated risk of death. This study aimed to assess mortality associated with wAIHA. METHODS: Adults with wAIHA (wAIHA cohort) and without AIHA (non-AIHA cohort) were identified from the 100% Medicare Fee-for-Service database (10/01/2019–12/31/2023). Evidence of wAIHA was defined as one of the following: 1) a primary wAIHA diagnosis (International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification [ICD-10-CM]: D59.11) in the inpatient setting (first instance of wAIHA diagnosis defined the index date), 2) ≥2 wAIHA diagnosis in any setting ≥30 days apart (second instance of wAIHA diagnosis defined the index date), or 3) a wAIHA diagnosis preceded ≥30 days by any AIHA diagnosis (ICD-10-CM: D59.10, D59.19, D59.8, D59.9; first instance of wAIHA diagnosis defined the index date). Patients in the wAIHA cohort were excluded if they had a diagnosis for cold or mixed-type AIHA (ICD-10-CM: D59.12, D59.13) during the baseline period (12 months before index). The non-AIHA cohort had no diagnoses for any AIHA during the study period; a random index date during continuous Medicare eligibility was selected and patients were matched 1:10 with the wAIHA cohort based on age on index date. Using overlap weighting, age-matched cohorts were further weighted on sex, race, region, index year, and baseline comorbidities associated with mortality, excluding conditions defining secondary wAIHA. Mortality during the follow-up period was evaluated between the weighted cohorts using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard models. Patients whose death was not observed were censored at the earlier of the end of continuous Medicare eligibility or data availability. RESULTS: 3,112 and 31,120 patients were included in the wAIHA and non-AIHA cohorts, respectively. After weighting, among the wAIHA vs non-AIHA cohorts, mean [standard deviation; SD] age was 74.4 [11.6] vs 74.6 [11.2] years, the proportion of female were 56.1% vs 56.1%, mean [SD] Quan-CCI without secondary wAIHA-defining conditions was 1.9 [2.0] vs 1.9 [2.1], and mean [SD] follow-up time was 17.2 [11.7] vs 14.9 [11.4] months, respectively. In addition, 53.7% of the wAIHA cohort had secondary wAIHA. The most common secondary wAIHA-defining conditions were autoimmune and inflammatory diseases (wAIHA cohort: 27.8%; non-AIHA cohort: 11.0%), hematologic and lymphoproliferative disorders (wAIHA cohort: 23.8%; non-AIHA cohort: 1.3%), and solid tumors (wAIHA cohort: 16.8%; non-AIHA cohort: 12.6%). The most common comorbidities for both cohorts were hypertension (wAIHA cohort: 77.4%; non-AIHA cohort: 78.3%) and dyslipidemia (wAIHA cohort: 72.2%; non-AIHA cohort: 74.7%). Survival rates in the wAIHA and non-AIHA cohorts were 80.3% vs 84.0% at 12 months, 70.7% vs 77.6% at 24 months, and 63.7% vs 73.1% at 36 months, respectively (all p<0.001). Patients with wAIHA were at 20%, 27%, and 30% higher risk of death at 12, 24, and 36 months, respectively, compared to patients without AIHA (hazard ratios: 1.20, 1.27, and 1.30; all p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This large retrospective study is the first to assess real-world incremental mortality associated with wAIHA among Medicare beneficiaries. Patients with wAIHA were at significantly greater risk of death following the initial diagnosis. These results may point to potential gaps in early diagnosis and effective disease management, which could contribute to increased mortality. Future research should focus on specific subgroups within the wAIHA cohort to identify differences in mortality as well as characteristics that may be associated with death.