Citations

Objective This study aims to identify factors associated with patient global assessment (PtGA) and physician global assessment (PhGA) and discordance between them in systemic sclerosis (SSc). Methods Data from adults with early SSc (<5 years) from the Collaborative National Quality and Efficacy Registry were included. PtGA and PhGA (0–10 scale), clinical evaluations, and patient‐reported outcomes (PROs) were collected every six months. Multivariable mixed‐effects linear regression identified factors associated with PtGA and PhGA using (1) clinical variables and (2) clinical variables plus PROs. Relative weight analysis (RWA) determined the relative importance of each variable. Discordance (≥2 points between PtGA and PhGA) was assessed using multinomial mixed‐effects logistic regression. Results Among 956 patients (83% women, 33% limited disease), mean PtGA and PhGA at enrollment were 4.2 (SD 2.6) and 3.4 (SD 2.0), respectively ( P < 0.001). RWA of clinical variables identified modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS) and New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class as most influential for both global assessments. After including PROs, PtGA was most influenced by measures of pain, skin symptoms, and physical function. Discordance occurred in 53% of patients (35% PtGA worse, 18% PhGA worse). Worse PtGA was associated with higher overall pain and discomfort. Worse PhGA was associated with higher mRSS, worse NYHA class, higher pain interference, and lower diffusing capacity of the lung. Conclusion Discordance between PtGA and PhGA occurs commonly, highlighting the need for comprehensive symptom management and measurement of disease burden in this complex disease. In SSc, differences in PtGA and PhGA reflect dissimilar weighting of data elements.

Many older adults, particularly older women, use over-the-counter supplements for antiaging benefits, including for hair and skin. The supplement industry is unregulated by the Food and Drug Administration, and the interactions between supplements and medications are often overlooked by both patients and physicians. This article discusses the proposed mechanism of action, common misconceptions, possible benefits, and potential side effects of the most commonly used antiaging skin supplements by women, including biotin, nicotinamide, hyaluronic acid, collagen, zinc, vitamin C, vitamin A, vitamin E, and other antioxidants. Supplements may also interfere with common blood tests, such as biotin with the thyroid and troponin cardiac enzyme tests, which patients and their clinicians must be aware of and account for when interpreting lab results. Other supplements, such as zinc, are commonly taken in excess and may result in deficiencies in the absorption of other minerals, such as copper. Over-supplementation of fat-soluble vitamins, such as vitamin A and vitamin E, can result in toxic levels since excess is not excreted in the urine. The clinician caring for older patients’ skin and nails must ask older patients about supplement use and be aware of the potential harms of these supplements in some patients.

Background: The gap between artificial intelligence-derived age (ECG-Age) and chronological age has been validated as a strong predictor of increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, independent of age, and is a potential biomarker of biological aging. Acute stress may cause real-time, transient changes in autonomic function via electrophysiological signals that, when repeated over time, may contribute to biological aging and represent mechanisms linking stress and Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE). We hypothesized that acute mental stress induced in a laboratory is associated with increased ECG and that this increase is associated with a higher risk of MACE among individuals with stable coronary heart disease (CHD). Methods: We pooled two prospective cohorts of participants with stable CHD from a university-based hospital network in Atlanta. Stress was induced using a standardized mental stress test (public speaking task) and measured 12-lead ECGs during rest, mental stress, and recovery periods. To measure ECG-age, we utilized a published algorithm using a neural network on >500,000 independent patients. The study endpoint was MACE including nonfatal myocardial infarction, hospitalization for heart failure, or cardiovascular death. The difference in ECG-Age between resting and acute mental stress was used to define the stress Age-Gap. Cox proportional hazard regression modeled the association of stress Age-Gap operationalized as tertiles adjusting for chronological age, sex, race, cardiovascular risk factors, and baseline Cohen perceived stress scale. Results: 442 participants in the total sample pool (38% women). Over a 5-year median follow-up, 95 participants (21%) experienced MACE. At rest, the mean chronologic age was 55.7±9.9 years, and ECG-Age was 57.1 ±10.7 years, with rest Age-Gap of 0. 9±9.6 (p=0.16). During stress, the stress Age-Gap of 1.95±9.8 (p<0.0001), while recovery Age-Gap was 1.1±10.3 (p=0.13). Those that demonstrated the largest ECG-Age positive change between rest and stress by ECG (top tertile) had a higher risk for MACE when compared to those with the lowest or negative ECG age change (bottom tertile), see Figure. Conclusion: Among patients with stable CHD, acute mental stress caused changes in biological age as measured by AI-ECG consistent with accelerated biological aging. Such changes were associated with MACE. These results uncover accelerated biological aging as a mechanism linking acute stress to CVD outcomes.

Abstract Purpose Medical student education in geriatrics is a critical need for every doctor-in-training as the population ages, with fewer than 7,000 geriatricians, and older patients, who now approach 20% of the U.S. population, having unique health care needs. This study presents the updated competencies in geriatrics for graduating medical students, framed by the Geriatrics 5Ms (Mind, Mobility, Medications, Multicomplexity, and What Matters Most). Method From 2019–2022, a working group of the American Geriatrics Society (AGS) drafted the updated medical student geriatrics education competencies, using a modified Delphi approach. The working group reviewed the literature, conducted an initial survey of working group members, and drafted and refined proposed updates to the competencies. The 27 resulting competencies were disseminated as a national survey to geriatrics experts and medical school education deans. Following the national survey, the competencies were updated and presented at the 2021 AGS Annual Scientific Meeting and open to public comment before they were finalized. Results The 27 updated geriatrics competencies for medical students included several new competencies, such as a focus on health equity, frailty, deprescribing, and patient priorities. A total of 211 respondents completed the national survey, including geriatrics experts (187/398, response rate: 47.0%) and education deans (24/191, response rate: 12.6%). All 27 proposed competencies met the predetermined threshold of 70% cumulative agreement, with a range of 93.0% (174/187) to 100% (187/187) among geriatrics experts and 87.5% (21/24) to 100% (24/24) among education deans. Conclusions The updated Geriatrics Competencies for Graduating Medical Students met with broad agreement among the geriatrics experts and medical school education deans who responded to the national survey. By focusing on the Geriatrics 5Ms, the competencies highlight key knowledge and skills graduating medical students need for the first day of internship to be prepared to deliver age-friendly care to older adults under their care.

Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported. NRG Oncology RTOG 0415 is a randomized phase III noninferiority (NI) clinical trial comparing conventional fractionation (73.8 Gy in 41 fractions) radiotherapy (C-RT) with hypofractionation (H-RT; 70 Gy in 28) in patients with low-risk prostate cancer. The study included 1,092 protocol-eligible patients initially reported in 2016 with a median follow-up of 5.8 years. Updated results with median follow-up of 12.8 years are now presented. The estimated 12-year disease-free survival (DFS) is 56.1% (95% CI, 51.5 to 60.5) for C-RT and 61.8% (95% CI, 57.2 to 66.0) for H-RT. The DFS hazard ratio (H-RT/C-RT) is 0.85 (95% CI, 0.71 to 1.03), confirming NI ( P < .001). Twelve-year cumulative incidence of biochemical failure (BF) was 17.0% (95% CI, 13.8 to 20.5) for C-RT and 9.9% (95% CI, 7.5 to 12.6) for H-RT. The HR (H-RT/C-RT) comparing biochemical recurrence between the two arms was 0.55 (95% CI, 0.39 to 0.78). Late grade ≥3 GI adverse event (AE) incidence is 3.2% (C-RT) versus 4.4% (H-RT), with relative risk (RR) for H-RT versus C-RT 1.39 (95% CI, 0.75 to 2.55). Late grade ≥3 genitourinary (GU) AE incidence is 3.4% (C-RT) versus 4.2% (H-RT), RR 1.26 (95% CI, 0.69 to 2.30). Long-term DFS is noninferior with H-RT compared with C-RT. BF is less with H-RT. No significant differences in late grade ≥3 GI/GU AEs were observed between assignments (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00331773 ).

5094 Background: In prior studies, basal vs. luminal differentiation portends differential response to a) androgen suppression (AS) duration for high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) (NRG-GU-TS006) and b) docetaxel chemotherapy (CT) and AS for metastatic hormone-sensitive disease (CHAARTED). In NRG-GU-TS006, basal tumors appeared to benefit the most from longer duration of AS while those with luminal subtype did not whereas, in CHAARTED, luminal subtype had greater benefit from addition of CT. Herein, we examined basal-luminal subtyping to predict differential response to the addition of CT in the setting of high-risk PCa treated with AS and definitive radiotherapy (AS + RT) in NRG/RTOG 0521. Methods: Per pre-specified and approved NCI analysis plan (Navigator #1061), we obtained available NRG biobank biopsy specimens from patients enrolled on the NRG/RTOG 0521 phase III trial, which randomized patients to AS + RT +/- CT. The highest-grade tumors were profiled on clinical-grade whole-transcriptome arrays (Veracyte, San Diego, CA). Basal-luminal subtypes were generated using a 215-gene PCa subtyping classifier (PSC), a second generation PAM50 basal-luminal model. Treatment effects in Luminal Proliferating (LP) and non-LP subtypes were examined with Cox (for overall survival, OS, and metastasis-free survival, MFS) and Fine & Gray (for distant metastasis, DM) multivariable (MVA) models adjusted for age and trial risk stratification, as well as with restricted mean survival times (RMST). Results: Of 183 samples available for analysis (91 from control and 92 from the CT arm), 52 (28%) were classified as LP subtype. Median follow-up for OS was 9.9 years. No significant differences in clinical or pathological variables were observed between LP and non-LP subtypes. In MVA, we did not detect any significant LP subtype-by-CT treatment interaction but observed evidence of non-proportional hazards (Grambsch-Therneau test, p<0.05). In unselected patients, 5- and 10-year RMST difference between the arms was 0.9 (95% CI [-1.5, 3.4], p=0.46) and 5.7 (95% CI [-2.5, 13.9], p=0.17) months of OS. Stratifying by tumor subtype, at 5 years the RMST difference in months was 3.8 (95% CI [0.3, 7.2], p=0.03) for LP and -0.2 ([-3.4, 2.9], p=0.89) for non-LP. The RMST difference in months at 10-years was 13.7 (95% CI [-0.2, 27.5], p=0.053) for LP and 2.5 ([-7.6, 12.5], p=0.63) for non-LP. Conclusions: In pre-treatment biopsy samples from a Phase 3 trial cohort of localized high-risk men, luminal-basal subtyping of tumors demonstrated differential response to docetaxel CT. Similar to results from the CHAARTED trial of metastatic disease, LP tumors may derive greater benefit from addition of CT. Validation of these findings may enable effective earlier use of CT in men with PCa.

PURPOSE To compare the predictive ability of mapping algorithms derived using cross-sectional and longitudinal data. METHODS This methodological assessment used data from a randomized controlled noninferiority trial of patients with low-risk prostate cancer, conducted by NRG Oncology (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00331773 ), which examined the efficacy of conventional schedule versus hypofractionated radiation therapy (three-dimensional conformal external beam radiation therapy/IMRT). Health-related quality-of-life data were collected using the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC), and health utilities were obtained using EuroQOL-5D-3L (EQ-5D) at baseline and 6, 12, 24, and 60 months postintervention. Mapping algorithms were estimated using ordinary least squares regression models through five-fold cross-validation in baseline cross-sectional data and combined longitudinal data from all assessment periods; random effects specifications were also estimated in longitudinal data. Predictive performance was compared using root mean square error. Longitudinal predictive ability of models obtained using baseline data was examined using mean absolute differences in the reported and predicted utilities. RESULTS A total of 267 (and 199) patients in the estimation sample had complete EQ-5D and EPIC domain (and subdomain) data at baseline and at all subsequent assessments. Ordinary least squares models using combined data showed better predictive ability (lowest root mean square error) in the validation phase for algorithms with EPIC domain/subdomain data alone, whereas models using baseline data outperformed other specifications in the validation phase when patient covariates were also modeled. The mean absolute differences were lower for models using EPIC subdomain data compared with EPIC domain data and generally decreased as the time of assessment increased. CONCLUSION Overall, mapping algorithms obtained using baseline cross-sectional data showed the best predictive performance. Furthermore, these models demonstrated satisfactory longitudinal predictive ability.

Background: Understanding the accuracy of a woman's perceived breast cancer risk can enhance shared decision-making about breast cancer screening through provider and patient discussion. We aim to report and compare women's perceived lifetime breast cancer risk to calculated lifetime breast cancer risk. Methods: Women presenting to Mayo Clinic in Arizona and Minnesota in July 2016 completed a survey assessing their perceived breast cancer risk. Lifetime Gail risk scores were calculated from questions pertaining to health history and were then compared with perceived breast cancer risk. Results: A total of 550 predominantly white, married, and well-educated (≥college) women completed surveys. Using lifetime Gail risk scores, 5.6% were classified as high risk (>20% lifetime risk), 7.7% were classified as intermediate risk (15%–20%), and 86.6% were classified as average risk (<15%). Of the 27 women who were classified as high risk, 18 (66.7%) underestimated their risk and of the 37 women who were intermediate risk, 12 (32.4%) underestimated risk. Women more likely to underestimate their risk had a reported history of an abnormal mammogram and at least one or more relative with a history of breast cancer. Surveyed women tended to overestimate risk 4.3 (130/30) times as often as they underestimated risk. Conclusion: In a group of predominantly white, educated, and married cohort of women, there was a large portion of women in the elevated risk groups who underestimated risk. Specific aspects of medical history were associated with underestimation including a history of abnormal mammogram and family history of breast cancer. Overall, in our sample, more women overestimated than underestimated risk.