Abdelwahab, Rewan

BACKGROUND: Prior literature notes increased rates of delayed diagnosis and increased morbidity and mortality for patients with Fitzpatrick skin types IV to VI with melanoma and nonmelanoma skin cancers, noting surgical delays and larger postoperative defects. Dyschromia is among the most common concerns in Fitzpatrick skin types IV to VI. OBJECTIVE: To consolidate the latest information on patient counseling, suture selection, and interventions related to postoperative pigmentary complications for Fitzpatrick skin types IV to VI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature review was conducted using the Embase, Scopus, Google Scholar, PubMed from 2014 to 2025 focused on surgical considerations, pathophysiology of surgical considerations, hypopigmented scars, suture selection, postinflammatory hyperpigmentation, and treatment and counseling of postsurgical complications or outcomes in Fitzpatrick skin types IV to VI. RESULTS: Preoperative factors that may worsen wound healing include the use of skin lightning agents. Intraoperative factors include secondary intention healing and full-thickness grafts., Opting for direct or flap closure and noninflammatory suture selection minimizes postoperative dyschromia. Postoperative considerations include Ultraviolet A/B and visible light photoprotection counseling and suture removal timing. Promising treatments need further research including microdermal grafting for hypopigmented scars. CONCLUSION: Special considerations in preoperative history taking, intraoperative repair and suture selection, and postoperative counseling minimize the risk of postoperative dyschromia.

BACKGROUND Health care resource use, pollution, and greenhouse gas emissions are increasingly studied to balance quality patient care with environmental, social, and financial impacts. However, consolidated sustainability recommendations for Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) remain unexplored. OBJECTIVE To assess current recommendations and studies on environmental sustainability in MMS. MATERIALS AND METHODS Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, a literature review was conducted across PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases from 2014 to 2024. English peer-reviewed studies using keywords “climate change,” “margin control,” “environment,” “sustainability,” “waste,” “resource,” “Mohs micrographic,” “Mohs,” and “micrographic” were included. Duplicates and conference abstracts were excluded. RESULTS Of 5,526 articles, nine met inclusion criteria after independent review. Recommendations included standardized surgical sets, limiting instruments to essentials, and redesigning procedure rooms to improve recycling access. Three articles found no significant difference in infection rates between sterile and nonsterile glove use. Other suggestions involved recycling plastics, using microtubules to reduce chromacoding dye waste by minimizing spillage and drying, and scheduling virtual preoperative visits to reduce travel emissions. Insurance reimbursement for virtual visits remains a limitation. CONCLUSION Restructuring surgical protocols and procedure room design encourages innovation and addresses workflow inefficiencies rooted in tradition rather than evidence, promoting sustainability in MMS.

Abstract Problem In the United States, physician bias is exhibited early in medical training and contributes to systemic inequities within the field of medicine. A lack of diversity, equity, inclusion, and antiracism (DEI-AR) content within medical curricula drives critical gaps in knowledge and deficiencies when preparing medical students to serve patients of diverse backgrounds. At the Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine (MCASOM), student-led curricular reviews between 2017 to 2018 and 2020 to 2021 revealed opportunities to improve DEI-AR content within preclinical courses. Course directors expressed concern of limited expertise and time to enact effective changes. Approach The MCASOM DEI-AR teaching assistant (TA) program aims to curate a collaborative partnership between course directors and compensated student TAs to facilitate course enhancements responsive to the prior preclinical course review while centering standardized DEI-AR best practices. Outcomes As of January 2024, the program has engaged 14 TAs and partnered with 24 preclinical courses. Postcourse student evaluation responses were collected from 8 courses for 2021 to 2022 (before enhancements) and 2022 to 2023 (after enhancements). Student satisfaction with DEI-AR content is tracked through postcourse evaluations, with preliminary data demonstrating improvement after DEI-AR curricular integration (improvement of mean preenhancement and postenhancement scores of 3.81 to 4.05; t12 = 1.79, P = .21). Qualitative student comments were sorted into general categories of positive, negative, or neutral, showing a 6.25% median increase in positive perception of DEI. Next Steps Plans for the MCASOM DEI-AR TA program include application of quality improvement strategies to improve program processes and outcomes. Development of a centralized dashboard that integrates course enhancement progress and ongoing feedback from evaluations is anticipated to facilitate this effort. The program additionally aims to develop partnerships with clinical clerkships, which would allow for a more comprehensive enhancement of the overall medical education experience related to DEI-AR.

AbstractAn otherwise healthy 4‐week‐old term female of Japanese heritage presented with a 1‐week history of asymptomatic progressive, generalized skin lesions. The lesion morphology, distribution, and dermatopathology result was consistent with Sweet syndrome. The patient was found to have a congenital type H rectovestibular fistula. This case highlights the rare association of rectovestibular fistula in neonatal Sweet syndrome which has only been described in neonates of Japanese heritage.

Abstract Background Although perceived barriers to applying to dermatology have been researched among medical students, there remains a dearth of literature dedicated to understanding perceptions that medical students have of the field of dermatology and dermatologists. Methods A review of the literature in Embase, Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect were carried out to identify articles and abstracts between 2016 and 2021 relating to medical student perceptions of the field of dermatology. Peer-reviewed English studies measuring attitudes/level of interest in dermatology or other specialities, understanding of dermatologic topics, procedures, and/or scope of practice were included. Duplicate studies and conference abstracts were excluded. All publications were screened using the PRISMA-Sc guidelines. Findings were summarised and tabulated accordingly. Results A total of nine articles met inclusion criteria and eight are included in this review since one was not accessible online. Notable findings include non-US medical students perceiving dermatology as monotonous, stigmatized, unfamiliar, and difficult to access with a misunderstanding of the diversity and severity of the conditions dermatologists treat. No data on US medical student perceptions was found. Perceptions were found to be influential in career planning: medical students may reject specialities after exposure to negative comments on the field. Factors attracting students to dermatology include the appeal of being a dermatologist, media portrayal, and dermatologists' influence on patients' lives. Completion of dermatology-related activities improved medical student interest, comfort, and understanding of the field. Early dermatology exposure in US undergraduate premedical students led to heightened interest in the field, more confidence in ability to find dermatology mentors, and increased perception that dermatology serves the needs of underserved communities. Conclusions This review demonstrates the need to further investigate medical student perceptions of dermatology, particularly in the United States. Perceptions of medical specialities can impact medical student career choices. Understanding which misconceptions may be preventing students from exploring dermatology can inform efforts towards improving diversity, equity, and inclusion: translating to an equitable match and improving patient outcomes. Limitations include exclusion of articles published before 2016, geographic variability in studies, and limited data on evolving student perceptions over time.