Citations

Abstract Objective To measure the relative levels of signal and noise in expert diagnosis of epilepsy. Methods Twenty multinational epileptologists independently reviewed 50 vignettes of adult and pediatric patients presenting with suspected seizure(s) on two separate occasions with a ≥30‐day washout period. Experts provided a diagnosis of epilepsy or non‐epilepsy based on clinical information and, if requested, routine EEG and neuroimaging data. Cases had an established clinical diagnosis of epilepsy or non‐epilepsy based on capture of habitual paroxysmal events on video‐EEG or long‐term clinical follow‐up. Experts' judgments were analyzed to decompose variability into different sources: signal (objective differences between cases), level noise (experts' bias toward over/under‐diagnosis), pattern noise (experts' idiosyncratic reactions to specific case features), and occasion noise (inconsistency across occasions). Results The probability of an expert making a different diagnosis for a given case on two different occasions was 16%. The probability of two different experts making a different diagnosis for the same case was 26%. Signal (case “difficulty”) accounted for 66–69% of total variation, with 31–34% attributable to noise. Level noise was the largest contributor in the absence of EEG/neuroimaging results (23%), while pattern noise dominated when test results were available (24%). Occasion noise contributed relatively little (1%) but was still sufficient to cause diagnostic reversals in 16–22% between occasions. Significance The degree of noise in expert diagnosis of epilepsy is substantial, stemming primarily from physicians' idiosyncratic interpretations of case features and variable dispositions toward over‐ or under‐diagnosis. Strategies to improve reliability are needed, including standardized data collection protocols and structured decision algorithms. For “difficult cases,” where expert reliability and accuracy are lowest, our findings support current clinical practice which favors early referral for video‐EEG monitoring over reliance on diagnostic anchoring. This diagnostic pathway may become more accessible with advances in EEG technology (e.g., wearable devices) and artificial intelligence.

Purpose: These consensus guidelines by the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society (ACNS) describe best practices for performing intraoperative Electrocorticography (ioECoG) using subdural or depth electrodes for adult and pediatric population. Methods: A group of ACNS members was convened to develop technical standards for performing ioECoG. PubMed searches were performed to identify pertinent peer-reviewed literature. Sections were assigned to individual authors based on expertise. Consensus was achieved during subsequent group discussions to develop evidence-based recommendations to the extent possible. Recommendations: Communication between the neurosurgical and the neurophysiology teams is essential in verifying and documenting the location of the contacts. Most authors recommend ioECoG recordings of at least 5 and up to 30 minutes in duration to allow for sufficient observation of interictal activity. The anesthesia should be adjusted to allow continuous EEG activity and to minimize the effect on the ioECoG recording during general anesthesia or awake surgery. The surgical procedure and technical report should separate ioECoG recordings to define the irritative zone from ioECoG findings during functional mapping. The neurophysiology physician’s physical presence in the operating room is required in the definition of the services. Conclusion: These consensus guidelines by the ACNS describe best practices for performing intraoperative ECoG based on published literature and expert consensus.

Purpose: These American Clinical Neurophysiology Society technical standards suggest best practices for electrical stimulation mapping (ESM) with subdural and stereotactic depth electrodes for seizure induction and mapping of brain function. Methods: A working group was convened from American Clinical Neurophysiology Society membership with expertise in ESM. PubMed searches were performed to identify pertinent peer-reviewed literature. Recurrent meetings reviewed progress, built consensus by discussion, and developed evidence-based recommendations to the extent possible. Recommendations: Stimulators used for ESM should have sufficient dynamic range, ability to interrupt a stimulus train, and ictal disrupt mechanism(s). Charge density should be calculated for the specific electrodes and ESM settings, the maximum safe limits being 52 to 57 μC/cm 2 /phase for subdural electrodes and not established for stereotactic depth electrodes. Subdural ESM for functional mapping is typically performed at 50-Hz pulse frequency, 200- to 300-µs pulse width, 2- to 8-s train duration, and 1- to 20-mA current strength. Stereo ESM is commonly performed using 2 different pulse frequencies: 1 Hz (300–500 µs pulse width, train duration up to 30 s, and often a constant current of 3–5 mA), and 50 Hz (100–500 µs pulse width, train duration 2-8 s, and 0.5–10 mA current intensity). Conclusions: This guideline provides technical standards for the performance of ESM, which will likely evolve over time with advances in technology and additional evidence (also see Graphical Abstract).

With more than 6000 attendees between in-person and virtual offerings, the American Epilepsy Society Meeting 2022 in Nashville, felt as busy as in prepandemic times. An ever-growing number of physicians, scientists, and allied health professionals gathered to learn a variety of topics about epilepsy. The program was carefully tailored to meet the needs of professionals with different interests and career stages. This article summarizes the different symposia presented at the meeting. Basic science lectures addressed the primary elements of seizure generation and pathophysiology of epilepsy in different disease states. Scientists congregated to learn about anti-seizure medications, mechanisms of action, and new tools to treat epilepsy including surgery and neurostimulation. Some symposia were also dedicated to discuss epilepsy comorbidities and practical issues regarding epilepsy care. An increasing number of patient advocates discussing their stories were intertwined within scientific activities. Many smaller group sessions targeted more specific topics to encourage member participation, including Special Interest Groups, Investigator, and Skills Workshops. Special lectures included the renown Hoyer and Lombroso, an ILAE/IBE joint session, a spotlight on the impact of Dobbs v. Jackson on reproductive health in epilepsy, and a joint session with the NAEC on coding and reimbursement policies. The hot topics symposium was focused on traumatic brain injury and post-traumatic epilepsy. A balanced collaboration with the industry allowed presentations of the latest pharmaceutical and engineering advances in satellite symposia.

Summary: Ambulatory EEG (AEEG) devices offer portable, multichannel, digital EEG recording with or without video in the patient's natural environment. The technology applied for AEEG recording is like the technology for routine EEG and inpatient long-term video-EEG monitoring but designed to be compact and wearable. Computer-based AEEG technology is well-suited to digital recording, signal processing, and visual display. However, acquiring interpretable EEG outside of the hospital setting presents its own technical challenges. Published guidelines have established technical standards for performing routine EEG and inpatient video-EEG monitoring, but technical standards for AEEG are lacking. Therefore, this guideline provides minimal technical standards for the performance of AEEG which are essential to ensure the quality of studies for clinical and research practice. We expect these minimum standards to evolve over time with improved performance and advances in the technology.

AbstractAims Abdominal epilepsy (AE) has long been reported as a rare phenomenon in children with various episodic gastrointestinal sensory and painful symptoms suspected to be due to epileptic seizures. Originally, AE was diagnosed when abdominal sensory or painful symptoms were associated with pain, temporal lobe origin, an epileptiform or paroxysmal EEG pattern, and a clinical response to antiseizure medication. AE has also been associated with non‐epileptic etiologies such as migraine. Reports of abdominal epilepsy based on an abnormal EEG or clinical response to antiseizure medication without diagnosis confirmation by video‐EEG are at best speculative, and at worst, misdiagnoses.Methods We describe three adult patients with focal aware motor seizures manifesting as recurrent, isolated prolonged painless rhythmic clonic jerking of the abdominal musculature including epilepsia partialis continua.Results All patients had a contralateral structural lesion on high‐resolution brain MRI in the abdominal region of the motor homunculus. Standard EEG was unrevealing and only after extra EEG electrodes and video‐EEG monitoring was the ictal origin confirmed.Conclusions Historically, AE has been described as a disorder involving subjective sensory symptoms including vague abdominal pain, instead of epileptic motor signs of abdominal clonic jerking. We recommend replacing the use of vague terms such as AE with International League Against Epilepsy terminology along with diagnostic confirmation validated by video‐EEG monitoring. [Published with video sequence].